Artificial Intelligence in Operating Room Management.

This systematic review examines the recent use of artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning, in the management of operating rooms. A total of 22 selected studies from February 2019 to September 2023 are analyzed. The review emphasizes the significant impact of AI on predicting surgical case durations, optimizing post-anesthesia care unit resource allocation, and detecting surgical case cancellations. Machine learning algorithms such as XGBoost, random forest, and neural networks have demonstrated their effectiveness in improving prediction accuracy and resource utilization. However, challenges such as data access and privacy concerns are acknowledged. The review highlights the evolving nature of artificial intelligence in perioperative medicine research and the need for continued innovation to harness artificial intelligence's transformative potential for healthcare administrators, practitioners, and patients. Ultimately, artificial intelligence integration in operative room management promises to enhance healthcare efficiency and patient outcomes.

Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Perioperative Medicine.

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) is disruptive and unstoppable, also in medicine. Because of the enormous quantity of data recorded during continuous monitoring and the peculiarity of our specialty where stratification and mitigation risk are some of the core aspects, anesthesiology and postoperative intensive care are fertile fields where new technologies find ample room for expansion. Recently, research efforts have focused on the development of a holistic technology that globally embraces the entire perioperative period rather than a fragmented approach where AI is developed to carry out specific tasks. This could potentially revolutionize the perioperative medicine we know today. In fact, AI will be able to expand clinician's ability to interpret, adapt, and ultimately act in a complex reality with facets that are too complex to be managed all at the same time and in a holistic manner. With the support of new tools, as healthcare professionals we have the moral obligation to govern this transition, allowing an ethical and sustainable development of these technologies and avoiding being overwhelmed by them. We should welcome this transhumanist tension which does not aim at the replacement of human capabilities or even at the integration of these but rather at the expansion of a "single intelligence".

Application of AI in urolithiasis risk of infection: a scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence and machine learning are the new frontier in urology; they can assist the diagnostic work-up and in prognostication bring superior to the existing nomograms. Infectious events and in particular the septic risk, are one of the most common and in some cases life threatening complication in patients with urolithiasis. We performed a scoping review to provide an overview of the current application of AI in prediction the infectious complications in patients affected by urolithiasis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic scoping review of the literature was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines by screening Medline, PubMed, and Embase to detect pertinent studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 467 articles were found, of which nine met the inclusion criteria and were considered. All studies are retrospective and published between 2021 and 2023. Only two studies performed an external validation of the described models. The main event considered is urosepsis in four articles, urinary tract infection in two articles and diagnosis of infection stones in three articles. Different AI models were trained, each of which exploited several types and numbers of variables. All studies reveal good performance. Random forest and artificial neural networks seem to have higher AUC, specificity and sensibility and perform better than the traditional statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Further prospective and multi-institutional studies with external validation are needed to better clarify which variables and AI models should be integrated in our clinical practice to predict infectious events.