Educational level and use of osteoporosis drugs in elderly men and women: a Swedish nationwide register-based study.

SUMMARY: We examined educational disparities in use of osteoporosis drugs in a nationwide population of Swedes aged 75-89 years old. Individuals with high education were more likely to receive osteoporosis drug treatment than lower educated individuals, particularly among women. INTRODUCTION: This study aims to investigate whether educational level is associated with use of osteoporosis drugs in the general population of older men and women in Sweden, also after adjustment for fractures. METHODS: By record linkage of The Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, The Swedish Patient Register, and The Swedish Education Register, we obtained information on filling of prescriptions for osteoporosis drugs (bisphosphonates, calcium/vitamin D combinations, and selective estrogen receptor modulators) from July to October 2005, osteoporotic fractures from 1998 to 2004, and educational level for 645,429 people aged 75-89 years. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate whether education was associated with use of osteoporosis drug therapy. RESULTS: Higher education was associated with use of osteoporosis drugs for both men [odds ratio (OR)(high education vs low), 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-1.35] and women (OR(high education vs low), 1.57; 95% CI, 1.52-1.61), after adjustment for age, osteoporotic fractures, and comorbidity (i.e., number of other drugs). Among those who had sustained a fracture (n = 57,613), the educational differences in osteoporosis drug treatment were more pronounced in women than men. Further, women were more likely to receive osteoporosis drug treatment after osteoporotic fracture. CONCLUSION: Uptake of osteoporosis drug therapy seems to be unequally distributed in the elderly population, even in a country with presumably equal access to health care.

Steroid and related receptors.

Steroid hormone receptors stimulate gene transcription by binding to DNA as homodimers, whereas many other members of the nuclear receptor family appear to function as heterodimers or as monomers. This is important for target gene recognition and, given that many of the receptors are expressed in multiple forms, generates many combinations of ligand-dependent transcription factors that regulate the expression of different genes in diverse pathways.

Kidney allograft biopsy: timing to complications.

BACKGROUND: Clinical Practice guidelines recommend that patients be observed overnight after kidney biopsy based upon data that 1/3 of bleeding complications occur 12 hours post-procedure. Retrospective studies of same day discharge after kidney allograft biopsy suggest this practice may be safe, but no prospective studies to date have examined time to bleeding complications. METHODS: We conducted a single center, prospective, observational study of adult outpatient kidney allograft recipients undergoing elective percutaneous allograft biopsy who were observed for 8 hours post-procedure before discharge home. Bleeding complications were characterized as minor or major and tracked by time post-biopsy. Baseline demographics were assessed for correlation with complications. RESULTS: 8/124 (6.4%) of patients had a bleeding complication and 7/8 (87.5%) of complications occurred within the observation window. 3.2 % were minor and 3.2% were major complications with one major complication occurring after the 8-hour period. Neither the baseline demographics nor drop in serum hemoglobin of > 1 g/dl 6 hours after biopsy predicted a bleeding complication. However, a drop of > 1.5 g/dl correlated with a significant bleeding event (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: An 8-hour observation window captures the majority of bleeding complications after adult kidney transplant biopsy.

Use of suppressor mutants to probe the function of estrogen receptor-p160 coactivator interactions.

Estrogen-dependent recruitment of coactivators by estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) represents a crucial step in the transcriptional activation of target genes. However, studies of the function of individual coactivators has been hindered by the presence of endogenous coactivators, many of which are potentially recruited in the presence of agonist via a common mechanism. To circumvent this problem, we have generated second-site suppressor mutations in the nuclear receptor interaction domain of p160 coactivators which rescue their binding to a transcriptionally defective ERalpha that is refractory to wild-type coactivators. Analysis of these altered-specificity receptor-coactivator combinations, in the absence of interference from endogenous coregulators, indicated that estrogen-dependent transcription from reporter genes is critically dependent on direct recruitment of a p160 coactivator in mammalian cells and that the three p160 family members serve functionally redundant roles. Furthermore, our results suggest that such a change-of-specificity mutation may act as a transposable protein-protein interaction module which provides a novel tool with which to dissect the functional roles of other nuclear receptor coregulators at the cellular level.

Tissue-specific and hormonal regulation of the gene for rat prostatic steroid-binding protein in transgenic mice.

We investigated the tissue-specific and hormonal regulation of the gene for rat prostatic steroid-binding protein by introducing the C3(1) gene with 4-kilobase (kb) upstream and 2-kb downstream flanking sequences into transgenic mice. There was selective expression in the ventral prostate that was stimulated by testosterone, which indicated that the gene together with 6-kb flanking DNA contains the information required for prostate-specific and testosterone-regulated expression.

AF-2 activity and recruitment of steroid receptor coactivator 1 to the estrogen receptor depend on a lysine residue conserved in nuclear receptors.

Hormone-dependent transcriptional activation by nuclear receptors depends on the presence of a conserved C-terminal amphipathic alpha-helix (helix 12) in the ligand-binding domain. Here we show that a lysine residue, which is conserved in most nuclear receptors in the predicted helix 3, is also required for estrogen-dependent transactivation. The replacement of lysine 366 with alanine appreciably reduced activation function 2 (AF-2) activity without affecting steroid- or DNA-binding activity in the mouse estrogen receptor. The mutation dramatically reduced the ability of the receptor to bind steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1) but had no effect on receptor-interacting protein 140 (RIP-140) binding, indicating that while their sites of interaction overlap, they are not entirely consistent and in keeping with the proposal that the recruitment of coactivators, such as SRC-1, is required for AF-2 activity. Although the function of RIP-140 remains to be established, RIP-140 appears to be capable of recruiting the basal transcription machinery, since overexpression of the protein markedly increased the transcriptional activity of the mutant receptor. Since the lysine residue is conserved, we propose that it is required, together with residues in helix 12, to form the surface by which members of the nuclear receptor family interact with coactivators.

A 22-amino-acid peptide restores DNA-binding activity to dimerization-defective mutants of the estrogen receptor.

We have identified residues within the estrogen receptor that are required for dimerization and high-affinity DNA binding. A 22-amino-acid peptide encompassing these residues was sufficient to restore DNA-binding activity to a mutant receptor lacking most of the hormone-binding domain. Point mutagenesis of the fusion protein confirmed that this sequence continued to mediate dimerization in a manner similar to that within the native receptor, although its position relative to the DNA-binding domain was appreciably altered.

RIP-140 interacts with multiple nuclear receptors by means of two distinct sites.

We have characterized two distinct binding sites, called site 1 and site 2, in the nuclear protein RIP-140 which interact with the ligand binding domain of the estrogen receptor both in solution and when the receptor is bound to DNA. Both sites are capable of independently interacting with other nuclear receptors, including the thyroid hormone and retinoic acid receptors, but they are not identical since the interaction with retinoid X receptor is mediated primarily by site 1. The interaction is enhanced by agonists but not by antagonists, and the in vitro binding activities to a number of mutant receptors correlate with their abilities to stimulate transcription in vivo. When RIP-140 is fused to heterologous DNA binding domains, it is able to stimulate the transcription of reporter genes in both yeast and mammalian cells. Thus, RIP-140 is likely to function as a bridging protein between receptors and the basal transcription machinery and thereby stimulate the transcription of target genes.

Molecular determinants of the estrogen receptor-coactivator interface.

Transcriptional activation by the estrogen receptor is mediated through its interaction with coactivator proteins upon ligand binding. By systematic mutagenesis, we have identified a group of conserved hydrophobic residues in the ligand binding domain that are required for binding the p160 family of coactivators. Together with helix 12 and lysine 366 at the C-terminal end of helix 3, they form a hydrophobic groove that accommodates an LXXLL motif, which is essential for mediating coactivator binding to the receptor. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the high-affinity binding of motif 2, conserved in the p160 family, is due to the presence of three basic residues N terminal to the core LXXLL motif. The recruitment of p160 coactivators to the estrogen receptor is therefore likely to depend not only on the LXXLL motif making hydrophobic interactions with the docking surface on the receptor, but also on adjacent basic residues, which may be involved in the recognition of charged residues on the receptor to allow the initial docking of the motif.

The AF1 and AF2 domains of the androgen receptor interact with distinct regions of SRC1.

The androgen receptor is unusual among nuclear receptors in that most, if not all, of its activity is mediated via the constitutive activation function in the N terminus. Here we demonstrate that p160 coactivators such as SRC1 (steroid receptor coactivator 1) interact directly with the N terminus in a ligand-independent manner via a conserved glutamine-rich region between residues 1053 and 1123. Although SRC1 is capable of interacting with the ligand-binding domain by means of LXXLL motifs, this interaction is not essential since an SRC1 mutant with no functional LXXLL motifs retains its ability to potentiate androgen receptor activity. In contrast, mutants lacking the glutamine-rich region are inactive, indicating that this region is both necessary and sufficient for recruitment of SRC1 to the androgen receptor. This recruitment is in direct contrast to the recruitment of SRC1 to the estrogen receptor, which requires interaction with the ligand-binding domain.

Mechanism of estrogen receptor-dependent transcription in a cell-free system.

RNA synthesis was stimulated directly in a cell-free expression system by crude preparations of recombinant mouse estrogen receptor (ER). Receptor-stimulated transcription required the presence of estrogen response elements (EREs) in the test template and could be specifically inhibited by addition of competitor oligonucleotides containing EREs. Moreover, polyclonal antibodies directed against the DNA-binding region of ER inhibited ER-dependent transcription. In our cell-free expression system, hormone-free ER induced transcription in a hormone-independent manner. Evidence is presented suggesting that ER acts by facilitating the formation of a stable preinitiation complex at the target gene promoter and thus augments the initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. These observations lend support to our current understanding of the mechanism of steroid receptor-regulated gene expression and suggest strong conservation of function among members of the steroid receptor superfamily.

Transcriptional activators differ in their responses to overexpression of TATA-box-binding protein.

We investigated how overexpression of human TATA-box-binding protein (TBP) affects the action of estrogen receptor (ER) and compared the response with that of other activators. When ER activates a simple promoter, consisting of a response element and either the collagenase or tk TATA box, TBP overexpression potentiates transcription. TBP potentiates only estrogen-induced and not basal transcription and does so independent of spacing between response element and TATA box. TBP overexpression also reduces autoinhibition by overexpressed ER, suggesting that one target of the autoinhibition may be TBP itself. Both AF-1 and AF-2 domains of ER are potentiated by TBP, and each domain binds TBP in vitro. Like ER, chimeric GAL4/VP16 and GAL4/Tat activators are also potentiated by TBP, as is the synergistic activation by ER and GAL4/VP16 on a complex promoter. Unlike ER, GAL4/Sp1 and GAL4/NF-I become less potent when TBP is overexpressed. Furthermore, synergy between ER and Sp1 or between ER and NF-I, whether these are supplied by transfected GAL4 fusions or by the endogenous genes, is inhibited by TBP overexpression. Thus, ER resembles VP16 in response to TBP overexpression and is different from Sp1 and NF-I, which predominate over ER in setting the response on complex promoters.

Effects of an exon 5 variant of the estrogen receptor in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

The estrogen receptor gene gives rise to variant mRNAs, generated by alternative mRNA splicing, as well as the full-length mRNA containing eight coding exons. It has been postulated that one of these, the exon 5 variant, may be important in the development of hormone-independent and anti-estrogen-resistant breast cancer since it has the potential to encode a truncated receptor that retains the N-terminal activation domain AF-1, but lacks the hormone-binding domain. We have expressed the variant using an inducible promoter in estrogen receptor-positive MCF-7 cells and analyzed the effect of the variant protein on gene expression and cell growth. Inducible expression was validated using a specific antiserum that recognized a novel epitope on the exon 5 variant. The variant was able to stimulate transcription of a reporter gene in transiently transfected chicken embryo fibroblasts in the absence of hormone but showed weak constitutive activity when it was stably expressed in MCF-7 cells. The variant had no effect on the expression of the estrogen target genes, pS2, and the progesterone receptor. Finally, we analyzed whether the proliferation of MCF-7 cells was altered by the expression of the exon 5 variant and found that the stimulatory effects of estrogen and growth inhibitory effects of tamoxifen and ICI 182780 were unchanged. We therefore conclude that expression of the variant alone is not sufficient to give rise to hormone independence or tamoxifen resistance of breast cancers.

Cofactor competition between the ligand-bound oestrogen receptor and an intron 1 enhancer leads to oestrogen repression of ERBB2 expression in breast cancer.

Overexpression of the ERBB2 proto-oncogene in breast tumours, which occurs in 25-30% of patients, correlates with poor prognosis. In oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast epithelial cells oestrogens reduce ERBB2 mRNA and protein levels, an effect that is reversed in the presence of anti-oestrogens such as tamoxifen and ICI 182780. Our previous studies have shown that the major effect of oestrogen on ERBB2 expression is at the level of transcription and that this is mediated through a region within the ERBB2 first intron which can act as an oestrogen-suppressible enhancer in ER positive breast cells. In vitro footprinting of the smallest DNA fragment that retained full activity revealed four transcription factor binding sites. We report here that two of these sites are recognized by AP-2 proteins and the other two are bound by a variety of bZIP factors, including CREB and ATFI, with a major complex containing ATFa/ JunD. However, by using ER mutants it is clear that repression occurs essentially off the DNA. Indeed, the essential domain of the ER responsible for repression of the ERBB2 enhancer is a region termed AF2 which is required for the ligand-dependent association of non-DNA binding cofactors. We further demonstrate that one of these ER cofactors, SRC-1, can relieve oestrogen repression of the ERBB2 enhancer and conclude that these data fit with a model whereby the ER and the ERBB2 enhancer compete for this limiting, non-DNA binding cofactor. Thus, in oestrogenic conditions SRC-1 preferentially binds to the ER which effectively sequesters it thereby reducing enhancer activity, but in antioestrogenic media the cofactor is released from the ER and is therefore available to activate the ERBB2 enhancer.

17beta-Estradiol induces cyclin D1 gene transcription, p36D1-p34cdk4 complex activation and p105Rb phosphorylation during mitogenic stimulation of G(1)-arrested human breast cancer cells.

MCF-7 human breast cancer cells express functional estrogen receptor and grow in response to estrogen stimulation. G(1)-synchronized MCF-7 cells, made quiescent by exposure to the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor Simvastatin in estrogen-free medium, readily resume cell cycle progression upon stimulation with 17beta-estradiol (E(2)), even under conditions where polypeptide growth factor-triggered signal transduction pathways are inhibited by the continuous presence of Simvastatin in the culture medium. Under these conditions, cyclin D(1) gene transcription is transiently induced within the first 1-9 h of stimulation, as shown by the accumulation of cyclin D(1) mRNA and protein (p36(D(1))) in the cell and by enhanced expression of stably transfected D(1) promoter-luciferase hybrid genes. Estrogen-induced p36(D(1)) associates readily with p32(cdk2) and p34(cdk4), but not with p31(cdk5), which is however abundantly expressed in these cells. Only p36(D(1))-p34(cdk4) complexes are activated by E(2), as detected in cell extracts by immunoprecipitation with anti-D(1) antibodies followed by assessment of phosphotransferase activity toward the retinoblastoma (Rb) gene product and by analysis of p105(Rb) phosphorylation in vivo. An estrogen-responsive regulatory region has been mapped within the first 944 bp upstream of the transcriptional startsite of the human D(1) gene. Sequence analysis of this DNA region reveals that the cis-acting elements responsive to estrogen are likely to be different in this case from the canonical EREs.

HER-2 tyrosine kinase pathway targets estrogen receptor and promotes hormone-independent growth in human breast cancer cells.

Growth of human breast cells is closely regulated by steroid hormone as well as peptide hormone receptors. Members of both receptor classes are important prognostic factors in human breast cancer. Clinical data indicate that overexpression of the HER-2 gene is associated with an estrogen receptor-negative phenotype. In this study, we demonstrate that introduction of a HER-2 cDNA, converting non-overexpressing breast cancer cells to those which overexpress this receptor, results in development of estrogen-independent growth which is insensitive to both estrogen and the antiestrogen, tamoxifen. Moreover, activation of the HER-2 receptor in breast cancer cells by the peptide growth factor, heregulin, leads to direct and rapid phosphorylation of ER on tyrosine residues. This is followed by interaction between ER and the estrogen-response elements in the nucleus and production of an estrogen-induced protein, progesterone receptor. In addition, overexpression of HER-2 receptor in estrogen-dependent tumor cells promotes ligand-independent down-regulation of ER and a delayed autoregulatory suppression of ER transcripts. These data demonstrate a direct link between these two receptor pathways and suggest one mechanism for development of endocrine resistance in human breast cancers.

Effects of estrogen on gene expression in the chick oviduct. Isolation and fractionation of chromatin non-histone proteins.

Non-histones isolated from hen oviduct chromatin have been fractionated by a variety of methods. Chromatin was dissociated in 2 M NaC1, 5 M Urea, 0.1% beta-mercaptoethanol and 0.01 M Tris - HC1, pH 8.3, and the DNA removed by ultracentrifugation. After desalting by gel filtration the chromatin proteins were separated into three distinct fractions by stepwise elution with 0.10 M NaC1, 0.25 M Na C1 and 15% guanidine - HC1 from Bio-Rex 70 columns. Fractions I and II contain only non-histones and Fraction III contains histones plus a small amount of non-histones. Further fractionation of the non-histones was achieved by ammonium sulfate precipitation and DEAE-cellulose chromatography for Fraction I and phosphocellulose chromatography and gel filtration on Bio-Gel A-15 m for Fraction II. The histone and non-histones present in Fraction III were separated by gel filtration on Bio-Gel A-0.5 m. All fractionation methods have been used preparatively with reasonable recoveries of protein (greater than or equal to 60%). The fractions have been characterized by acrylamide gel electrophoresis. The integrity of the histones was maintained during the fractionation procedure indicating that proteolytic degradation was unlikely to have occurred. There was no selective loss of chromatin proteins during the ultracentrifugation and desalting steps and the non-histones were separated into distinct fractions with enrichment of some species not apparent prior to fractionation of the chromatin proteins.

Interaction of rat prostate androgen receptors with polynucleotides, RNA, DNA and cloned DNA fragments.

Androgen receptors were partially purified from prostates of mature (non-castrated) rats by chromatography on 2',5'-ADP-Sepharose and labelled by exchange with 5 alpha-[3H]dihydrotestosterone. The partially purified receptor preparation was free of DNAase activity and sedimented at approx. 3 S. The specificity of the interaction of this androgen receptor with nucleotides was investigated in a competitive binding assay using inhibition of binding of the steroid receptor complex to ADP-Sepharose. Certain polyribonucleotides were strongly bound (e.g., poly(UG), poly(AU), poly(G) and poly(U] and competed more effectively for the receptor binding sites than prostate RNA. Restriction fragments of genomic clones from the genes which code for prostatic binding protein showed only moderate affinity for the 3 S receptor form. These data suggest that the 3 S form of the androgen receptor lacks the specific domain or conformation necessary for specific interaction with DNA, but retains a high affinity for certain forms of RNA. Some potent inhibitors of proteolysis (diisopropylfluorophosphate, leupeptin) did not have any effect on the form of the receptor isolated from mature intact animals. A possible function of the 3 S form in post-transcriptional processing is discussed.

Expression of nuclear receptor interacting proteins TIF-1, SUG-1, receptor interacting protein 140, and corepressor SMRT in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer.

Regulation of gene transcription as a consequence of steroid receptor-DNA interaction is mediated via nuclear receptor interacting proteins (RIPs), including coactivator or corepressor proteins, which interact with both the receptor and components of the basic transcriptional unit and vary between cell types. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that resistance of some breast carcinomas to tamoxifen was associated with inappropriate expression of some of these RIPs. Using Northern analysis, we observed no significant difference between the amount of either TIF-1 or SUG-1 mRNA expressed in parental MCF-7 and MCF-7 tamoxifen-resistant cell lines. However, the expression of RIP140 mRNA was lower in the resistant cell line and in the presence of estradiol, the level of RIP140 mRNA was higher in the resistant cells but not in the parental cells. In a cohort of 19 tamoxifen-resistant breast tumor samples, there was no significant difference in the level of the RIP140 and TIF-1 and corepressor SMRT mRNA compared with tamoxifen-treated tumors (n = 6) or untreated tumors (n = 21). However, SUG-1 mRNA was lower in resistant breast tumors. These data provide no support for increased expression of these RIPs or decreased expression of corepressor SMRT for being a mechanism for resistance of breast tumors to tamoxifen.