Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 27
Filtrar
1.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 63(1): 127-139, 2024 Jan 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37084267

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Disease flares in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination period represent a prominent concern, though risk factors are poorly understood. We studied these flares among patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and other autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs). METHODS: The COVAD-1 and -2 global surveys were circulated in early 2021 and 2022, respectively, and we captured demographics, comorbidities, AIRDs details, COVID-19 infection history and vaccination details. Flares of IIMs were defined as (a) patient self-reported, (b) immunosuppression (IS) denoted, (c) clinical sign directed and (d) with >7.9-point minimal clinically significant improvement difference worsening of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PROMISPF10a score. Risk factors of flares were analysed using regression models. RESULTS: Of 15 165 total respondents, 1278 IIMs (age 63 years, 70.3% female, 80.8% Caucasians) and 3453 AIRDs were included. Flares of IIM were seen in 9.6%, 12.7%, 8.7% and 19.6% patients by definitions (a) to (d), respectively, with a median time to flare of 71.5 (10.7-235) days, similar to AIRDs. Patients with active IIMs pre-vaccination (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.03, 1.6, P = 0.025) were prone to flares, while those receiving rituximab (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1, 0.7, P = 0.010) and AZA (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1, 0.8, P = 0.016) were at lower risk. Female gender and comorbidities predisposed to flares requiring changes in IS. Asthma (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.05, 2.50, P = 0.028) and higher pain visual analogue score (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.11, 1.27, P < 0.001) were associated with disparity between self-reported and IS-denoted flares. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of IIMs confers an equal risk of flares in the post-COVID-19 vaccination period to AIRDs, with active disease, female gender and comorbidities conferring a higher risk. Disparity between patient- and physician-reported outcomes represents a future avenue for exploration.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Miositis , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/fisiopatología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Miositis/fisiopatología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Enfermedades Reumáticas/fisiopatología
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430474

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To explore prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of COVID-19 breakthrough infections (BIs) in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) using data from the COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) study. METHODS: A validated patient self-reporting e-survey was circulated by the COVAD study group to collect data on COVID-19 infection and vaccination in 2022. BIs were defined as COVID-19 occurring ≥14 days after 2 vaccine doses. We compared BIs characteristics and severity among IIMs, other autoimmune rheumatic and non-rheumatic diseases (AIRD, nrAID), and healthy controls (HC). Multivariable Cox regression models assessed the risk factors for BI, severe BI and hospitalisations among IIMs. RESULTS: Among 9449 included response, BIs occurred in 1447 (15.3%) respondents, median age 44 years (IQR 21), 77.4% female, and 182 BIs (12.9%) occurred among 1406 IIMs. Multivariable Cox regression among IIMs showed age as a protective factor for BIs [Hazard Ratio (HR)=0.98, 95%CI = 0.97-0.99], hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine use were risk factors (HR = 1.81, 95%CI = 1.24-2.64, and HR = 3.79, 95%CI = 1.69-8.42, respectively). Glucocorticoid use was a risk factor for severe BI (HR = 3.61, 95%CI = 1.09-11.8). Non-White ethnicity (HR = 2.61, 95%CI = 1.03-6.59) was a risk factor for hospitalisation. Compared with other groups, patients with IIMs required more supplemental oxygen therapy (IIM = 6.0% vs AIRD = 1.8%, nrAID = 2.2%, and HC = 0.9%), intensive care unit admission (IIM = 2.2% vs AIRD = 0.6%, nrAID, and HC = 0%), advanced treatment with antiviral or monoclonal antibodies (IIM = 34.1% vs AIRD = 25.8%, nrAID = 14.6%, and HC = 12.8%), and had more hospitalisation (IIM = 7.7% vs AIRD = 4.6%, nrAID = 1.1%, and HC = 1.5%). CONCLUSION: Patients with IIMs are susceptible to severe COVID-19 BI. Age and immunosuppressive treatments were related to the risk of BIs.

3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37505460

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We investigated COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnant and breastfeeding women with autoimmune diseases (AID) in the COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) study. METHODS: Delayed-onset (>7 days) vaccine-related adverse events (AE), disease flares (DF), and AID-related treatment modifications were analyzed upon diagnosis of AID versus healthy controls (HC) and the pregnancy/breastfeeding status at the time of at least one dose of vaccine. RESULTS: Among the 9201 participants to the self-administered online survey, 6787 (73.8%) were women. Forty pregnant and 52 breastfeeding patients with AID were identified, of whom the majority had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine (100% and 96.2%, respectively). AE were reported significantly more frequently in pregnant than in non-pregnant patients (overall AE 45% vs 26%, p= 0.01; minor AE 40% vs 25.9%, p= 0.03; major AE 17.5% vs 4.6%, p< 0.01), but no difference was found in comparison with pregnant HC. No difference was observed between breastfeeding patients and HC with respect to AE. Post-vaccination DF were reported by 17.5% of pregnant and 20% of breastfeeding patients, and by 18.3% of age- and disease-matched non-pregnant and non-breastfeeding patients (n = 262). All pregnant/breastfeeding patients who experienced a DF were managed with glucocorticoids; 28.6% and 20% of them required initiation or change in immunosuppressants, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study provides reassuring insights into the safety of COVID-19 vaccines administered to women with AID during the gestational and post-partum periods, helping overcome hesitant attitudes, as the benefits for the mother and the fetus by passive immunization appear to outweigh potential risks.

4.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(10): 3291-3301, 2023 10 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36734536

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 vaccines have a favorable safety profile in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) such as idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs); however, hesitancy continues to persist among these patients. Therefore, we studied the prevalence, predictors and reasons for hesitancy in patients with IIMs, other AIRDs, non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs) and healthy controls (HCs), using data from the two international COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) e-surveys. METHODS: The first and second COVAD patient self-reported e-surveys were circulated from March to December 2021, and February to June 2022 (ongoing). We collected data on demographics, comorbidities, COVID-19 infection and vaccination history, reasons for hesitancy, and patient reported outcomes. Predictors of hesitancy were analysed using regression models in different groups. RESULTS: We analysed data from 18 882 (COVAD-1) and 7666 (COVAD-2) respondents. Reassuringly, hesitancy decreased from 2021 (16.5%) to 2022 (5.1%) (OR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.30, P < 0.001). However, concerns/fear over long-term safety had increased (OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 2.9, 4.6, P < 0.01). We noted with concern greater skepticism over vaccine science among patients with IIMs than AIRDs (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.08, 3.2, P = 0.023) and HCs (OR: 4; 95% CI: 1.9, 8.1, P < 0.001), as well as more long-term safety concerns/fear (IIMs vs AIRDs - OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2, 2.9, P = 0.001; IIMs vs HCs - OR: 5.4 95% CI: 3, 9.6, P < 0.001). Caucasians [OR 4.2 (1.7-10.3)] were likely to be more hesitant, while those with better PROMIS physical health score were less hesitant [OR 0.9 (0.8-0.97)]. CONCLUSION: Vaccine hesitancy has decreased from 2021 to 2022, long-term safety concerns remain among patients with IIMs, particularly in Caucasians and those with poor physical function.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , COVID-19 , Miositis , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacilación a la Vacunación , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Miositis/epidemiología , Autoinforme , Vacunación
5.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(12): 3838-3848, 2023 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36961331

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Flares of autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) following COVID-19 vaccination are a particular concern in vaccine-hesitant individuals. Therefore, we investigated the incidence, predictors and patterns of flares following vaccination in individuals living with AIRDs, using global COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) surveys. METHODS: The COVAD surveys were used to extract data on flare demographics, comorbidities, COVID-19 history, and vaccination details for patients with AIRDs. Flares following vaccination were identified as patient-reported (a), increased immunosuppression (b), clinical exacerbations (c) and worsening of PROMIS scores (d). We studied flare characteristics and used regression models to differentiate flares among various AIRDs. RESULTS: Of 15 165 total responses, the incidence of flares in 3453 patients with AIRDs was 11.3%, 14.8%, 9.5% and 26.7% by definitions a-d, respectively. There was moderate agreement between patient-reported and immunosuppression-defined flares (K = 0.403, P = 0.022). Arthritis (61.6%) and fatigue (58.8%) were the most commonly reported symptoms. Self-reported flares were associated with higher comorbidities (P = 0.013), mental health disorders (MHDs) (P < 0.001) and autoimmune disease multimorbidity (AIDm) (P < 0.001).In regression analysis, the presence of AIDm [odds ratio (OR) = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.7; P = 0.003), or a MHD (OR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.6; P = 0.007), or being a Moderna vaccine recipient (OR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.2; P = 0.014) were predictors of flares. Use of MMF (OR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3, 0.8; P = 0.009) and glucocorticoids (OR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.5, 0.8; P = 0.003) were protective.A higher frequency of patients with AIRDs reported overall active disease post-vaccination compared with before vaccination (OR = 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.5; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Flares occur in nearly 1 in 10 individuals with AIRDs after COVID vaccination; people with comorbidities (especially AIDm), MHDs and those receiving the Moderna vaccine are particularly vulnerable. Future avenues include exploring flare profiles and optimizing vaccine strategies for this group.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , COVID-19 , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/epidemiología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/epidemiología
6.
Rheumatol Int ; 43(9): 1651-1664, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37351634

RESUMEN

Limited evidence on long-term COVID-19 vaccine safety in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) continues to contribute to vaccine hesitancy. We studied delayed-onset vaccine adverse events (AEs) in patients with IIMs, other systemic autoimmune and inflammatory disorders (SAIDs), and healthy controls (HCs), using data from the second COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) study. A validated self-reporting e-survey was circulated by the COVAD study group (157 collaborators, 106 countries) from Feb-June 2022. We collected data on demographics, comorbidities, IIM/SAID details, COVID-19 history, and vaccination details. Delayed-onset (> 7 day) AEs were analyzed using regression models. A total of 15165 respondents undertook the survey, of whom 8759 responses from vaccinated individuals [median age 46 (35-58) years, 74.4% females, 45.4% Caucasians] were analyzed. Of these, 1390 (15.9%) had IIMs, 50.6% other SAIDs, and 33.5% HCs. Among IIMs, 16.3% and 10.2% patients reported minor and major AEs, respectively, and 0.72% (n = 10) required hospitalization. Notably patients with IIMs experienced fewer minor AEs than other SAIDs, though rashes were expectedly more than HCs [OR 4.0; 95% CI 2.2-7.0, p < 0.001]. IIM patients with active disease, overlap myositis, autoimmune comorbidities, and ChadOx1 nCOV-19 (Oxford/AstraZeneca) recipients reported AEs more often, while those with inclusion body myositis, and BNT162b2 (Pfizer) recipients reported fewer AEs. Vaccination is reassuringly safe in individuals with IIMs, with AEs, hospitalizations comparable to SAIDs, and largely limited to those with autoimmune multimorbidity and active disease. These observations may inform guidelines to identify high-risk patients warranting close monitoring in the post-vaccination period.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Miositis , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida del Simio , Animales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/epidemiología , Vacuna BNT162 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Miositis/epidemiología , Vacunación/efectos adversos
9.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 16(2): 71-3, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20216127

RESUMEN

We describe a child with pigmented villonodular synovitis initially treated for a presumed hip infection. The correct diagnosis was not made until 2(1/2) years later on a second admission. This is a rare disease with vague presenting symptoms that requires a high index of suspicion. Magnetic resonance imaging and tissue biopsy are usually needed for a definitive diagnosis. Surgery is the primary treatment option; however, the patient described was unusual in that she did well to date with conservative measures.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Articulación de la Cadera/patología , Sinovitis Pigmentada Vellonodular/patología , Artralgia/etiología , Niño , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética
10.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol ; 16(12): 1185-1204, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33146561

RESUMEN

Introduction: The mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is frequently driven by an injurious immune response characterized by the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), endotheliitis, coagulopathy, and multi-organ failure. This spectrum of hyperinflammation in COVID-19 is commonly referred to as cytokine storm syndrome (CSS). Areas covered: Medline and Google Scholar were searched up until 15th of August 2020 for relevant literature. Evidence supports a role of dysregulated immune responses in the immunopathogenesis of severe COVID-19. CSS associated with SARS-CoV-2 shows similarities to the exuberant cytokine production in some patients with viral infection (e.g.SARS-CoV-1) and may be confused with other syndromes of hyperinflammation like the cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in CAR-T cell therapy. Interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha have emerged as predictors of COVID-19 severity and in-hospital mortality. Expert opinion: Despite similarities, COVID-19-CSS appears to be distinct from HLH, MAS, and CRS, and the application of HLH diagnostic scores and criteria to COVID-19 is not supported by emerging data. While immunosuppressive therapy with glucocorticoids has shown a mortality benefit, cytokine inhibitors may hold promise as 'rescue therapies' in severe COVID-19. Given the arguably limited benefit in advanced disease, strategies to prevent the development of COVID-19-CSS are needed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas , Citocinas/sangre , SARS-CoV-2/metabolismo , Terapias en Investigación , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/terapia , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/sangre , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/mortalidad , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/prevención & control , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/terapia , Humanos
14.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 14(5): 278-80, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18824926

RESUMEN

We describe a case of pediatric Wegener granulomatosis initially treated with cyclophosphamide and oral corticosteroids resulting in remission for 5 years. Of note in this case is relapse with severe pulmonary disease treated with multiple regimens, all unsuccessful. Patient achieved remission with rituximab infusion therapy. This demonstrates how rituximab may be beneficial for childhood-onset Wegener granulomatosis unresponsive to conventional therapy. The case is followed by a review of the current treatment options.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/diagnóstico , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/fisiopatología , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Prednisolona/administración & dosificación , Rituximab , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
15.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 14(5): 267-72, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18679133

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Use of cyclophosphamide in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) that has substantial morbidity and mortality. However, the frequency of PJP in these patients is unknown and there are no guidelines for prophylactic antibiotics. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to evaluate the frequency of PJP and the need for prophylactic antibiotics in these patients. METHODS: We estimated incidence of PJP and use of prophylactic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in these patients by a literature search and an e-mail survey of US rheumatologists. RESULTS: We identified 18 manuscripts dealing with infections in SLE patients treated with cyclophosphamide. In these manuscripts, 121 cases of PJP were identified in 76,156 SLE patients with a frequency of 15.88 per 10,000 patients.Of 264 rheumatologists surveyed, 133 (50.37%) were using prophylactic antibiotics in these patients. One hundred thirty-one (49.63%) respondents did not use prophylactic antibiotics. 5,174 SLE patients received cyclophosphamide in last 5 years with 19.6 +/- 30.6 (mean +/- SD) patients per rheumatologist. 32 cases of PJP were reported. The total cumulative experience of 264 rheumatologists was 4742 years [(17.96 +/- 10.35) (mean +/- SD)] with a PJP rate of 67.48 per 10,000 years of practice. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of PJP in SLE patients on cyclophosphamide remains low (0.1588%). Therefore, routine use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for PJP prophylaxis in SLE patients on cyclophosphamide does not appear to be substantiated by this study, except in those with elevated risk, ie, with severe leucopenia, lymphopenia, high dose corticosteroids, hypocomplementemia, active renal disease, and higher mean SLEDAI score. There is a need for consensus guidelines addressing prophylactic antibiotics in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/epidemiología , Pneumocystis carinii , Neumonía por Pneumocystis/epidemiología , Neumonía por Pneumocystis/prevención & control , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Comorbilidad , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico
16.
19.
Case Rep Rheumatol ; 2016: 9068061, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27642533

RESUMEN

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a group of systemic autoimmune diseases that involve inflammation of skeletal muscle. The two most common forms are dermatomyositis and polymyositis, the former of which entails a skin component. There are few approved therapeutics available for treatment of this group of diseases and the first-line therapy is usually corticosteroid treatment. Considering that a large proportion of patients do not respond to or cannot tolerate corticosteroids, additional treatments are required. There are second-line therapies available, but many patients are also refractory to those options. H.P. Acthar® Gel (repository corticotropin injection [RCI]) is a melanocortin peptide that can induce steroid-dependent effects and steroid-independent effects. Herein, we present a series of cases that involved the use of RCI in the management of dermatomyositis and polymyositis. RCI treatments resulted in improvement in three of four patients, despite failure with previous therapies. The use of RCI did not exacerbate any comorbidity and no significant changes in blood pressure, weight, or glycemic control were observed. Overall, these results are encouraging and suggest that randomized, controlled clinical trials applying RCI to dermatomyositis and polymyositis are warranted.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda