Patient satisfaction and cost savings analysis of the telemedicine program within a neuro-oncology department.

PURPOSE: Unique challenges exist in the utilization of telemedicine for neurological and surgical specialties. We examined the differences in patient satisfaction for telemedicine versus in-person visits within a Neuro-Oncology Program to assess whether there was a difference between surgical and medical specialties. We also examined the potential cost savings benefits of utilizing telemedicine. METHODS: 1189 Press Ganey surveys in the Department of Neuro-Oncology (982 in-person and 207 telemedicine) by surgical and medical neuro-oncology patients between 04/01/2020 and 06/30/2021 were reviewed. Survey results were divided into 4 categories (Access, Provider, Technology (telemedicine only), and Overall Satisfaction). Results were analyzed for the impact of telemedicine versus in-person visits, and gender, age, insurance, and specialty. Cost savings were calculated based on potential travel distance and lost productivity. RESULTS: Survey results from telemedicine visits demonstrated that patients with private insurance returned higher scores in the Provider (p = 0.0089), Technology (p = 0.00187), and Overall (p = 0.00382) categories. Surgical patients returned higher scores for Access (p = 0.0015), Technology (p = 0.0002), and Overall (p = 0.0019). When comparing telemedicine to in-person scores, in-person scored higher in Provider (p = 0.0092) for all patients, while in-person scored higher in Access (p = 0.0252) amongst surgical patients. Cost analysis revealed that telemedicine allowed patients to save an average of 4.1 to 5.6 h per visit time and a potential cost savings of up to $223.3 ± 171.4. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine yields equivalent patient satisfaction when employed in surgical as compared to medical Neuro-Oncology patients with the potential to lessen the financial and time burden on neuro-oncology patients.

BRAF Inhibitor Therapy-Related Encephalitis in a Patient with Metastatic Melanoma.

INTRODUCTION: BRAF inhibitors such as encorafenib and vemurafenib in combination with MEK inhibitors are commonly used for the treatment of patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. CASE PRESENTATION: A patient with relapsed metastatic melanoma with a BRAF V600 mutation was started on treatment with vemurafenib and cobimetinib. Within 2 weeks of treatment start, he was hospitalized and diagnosed with encephalitis through a lumbar puncture and treated with corticosteroids, with subsequent normalization of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings. When he recovered and was switched to encorafenib treatment, the same symptoms recurred, and the patient was treated with high-dose steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin, again with improvement in his CSF. He has not had a relapse of his symptoms since BRAF inhibitor treatment was permanently discontinued. CONCLUSION: This is the first known report of a patient who has developed encephalitis because of treatment with BRAF inhibitors.

Durable Progression-Free Survival With the Use of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Four Cases With BRAF V600E-Mutated Gliomas.

INTRODUCTION: BRAF V600 E mutations have been identified in a subset of patients with primary brain tumors. Combination therapy with BRAF and Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) targeting sequential steps in the MAPK pathway has replaced BRAFi monotherapy as the standard of care in multiple tumors with BRAF V600 E mutations, and clinical evidence for this strategy continues to grow in primary brain tumors. CASE SERIES: We describe four patients with BRAF V600 E mutated gliomas, including a 21-year-old woman with a ganglioglioma WHO grade I, a 19-year-old man with a pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma WHO grade III, and 21-year-old and 33-year-old women with epithelioid GBM WHO grade IV, who achieved durable progression-free survival with combination BRAF/MEKi. CONCLUSION: Combination of BRAF/MEK inhibition can be a novel, promising approach as targeted therapy in gliomas with BRAF V600 E mutations, especially those that are resistant to standard therapy. Our cases, along with other early reports utilizing dabrafenib/trametinib, highlight the importance of somatic next-generation sequencing, particularly in younger patients. Interim results from clinical trials utilizing dabrafenib/trametinib have been promising thus far, and our case series suggests that durable clinical benefit is possible, even in the setting of glioblastoma, WHO grade IV.

Spontaneous Spinal Subdural Hematoma Secondary to Hemophilia A and Zanubrutinib.

Spontaneous spinal subdural hematomas (SSH) are rare occurrences that can occur most commonly secondary to vascular malformations or coagulopathies. Only a small fraction of spontaneous SSHs are caused by acquired coagulation disorders such as leukemia, hemophilia, and thrombocytopenia. This case report describes a patient with a history of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), hemophilia A, and mantle cell lymphoma, on zanubrutinib therapy, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor associated with a risk of spontaneous hemorrhage. This patient developed a spontaneous spinal subdural hematoma, most likely due to the zanubrutinib therapy and exacerbated due to hemophilia. Treatment was delayed due to the patient's history of GBS that confounded the clinical diagnosis. This case is the first report of a spontaneous SSH in a patient on zanubrutinib, highlighting the need for a high index of suspicion for CNS hemorrhage in patients on Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor therapy.

Rituximab for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Myasthenia Gravis.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (iCPI) in the treatment of multiple cancers has gained prominence due to their high efficacy. However, neurological immune-related adverse events (irAEs) such as myasthenia gravis (MG) have been associated with iCPI therapy. Most of these neurological irAEs are rare, and in many cases, their diagnoses and management can be challenging.  We present a case of a 70-year-old woman with stage IIIC melanoma who developed a new onset of gradually progressive dyspnea, diplopia, and bilateral ptosis following treatment with one cycle of nivolumab and ipilimumab (Nivo+Ipi). She was diagnosed with MG via positive serum acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies. She had developed a severe dyspnea at rest, which was refractory to multiple immune-suppressive therapies including prednisone, pyridostigmine, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Subsequently, she was treated with rituximab 375 mg/m2 monthly every four weeks with significant improvement of her symptoms within 48 hours each time. As the implementation of immunotherapy increases in medical practice, irAEs may become more apparent. When first-line therapies are not adequate, other alternative therapies should be explored. This case of MG as an irAE shows that rituximab can provide a potential benefit to treating patients with immunotherapy-induced MG who are refractory to other standard treatments. Prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of rituximab in the management of irAEs.

Acute motor axonal neuropathy after ipilimumab and nivolumab treatment in melanoma brain metastases: A case report and review of the literature.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors including ipilimumab and nivolumab has expanded for several tumors including melanoma brain metastasis. These have resulted in a growing spectrum of neurologic immune-related adverse events, including ones that are rare and difficult to diagnose and treat. Here, we present a patient with melanoma brain metastasis who was treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and developed an Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy. To our knowledge, this is the first case of Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy as an immune-related adverse event associated with combination treatment of ipilimumab and nivolumab, who was successfully treated. A 28-year-old woman with metastatic BRAF V600E melanoma developed melanoma brain metastasis and was enrolled on Checkmate 204, a Phase 2 clinical trial using ipilimumab (3 mg/kg intravenous) and nivolumab (1 mg/kg intravenous) every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by monotherapy with nivolumab (240 mg intravenous) every 2 weeks. A few days after Cycle 2 of ipilimumab and nivolumab, she developed a pure motor axonal neuropathy consistent with Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy. She was treated with several immunosuppressive treatments including high dose methylprednisolone, immune globulin, and infliximab, and her motor neuropathy eventually improved several months after onset of symptoms. Unfortunately, she had progression of her systemic disease and died several months later. This is the first case reported of Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy associated with ipilimumab and nivolumab, successfully treated with immune-suppressive therapy. As the field of immunotherapy expands with the increasing use of the immune checkpoint inhibitors, it is critical to increase our knowledge and understanding of the neurologic immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. This includes the spectrum of rare neurologic immune-related adverse events, which can be quite difficult to recognize and treat. Early consultations with neurology may expedite a diagnosis and treatment plan in patients with unexplained weakness receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

A Prospective Validation Study of the First 3D Digital Exoscope for Visualization of 5-ALA-Induced Fluorescence in High-Grade Gliomas.

BACKGROUND: We report on the first use of a digital 3-dimensional (3D) exoscope equipped with a 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence visual system. METHODS: We conducted a prospective clinical trial to evaluate the utility and sensitivity/specificity of the Olympus Orbeye 3D digital exoscope when used to visualize 5-ALA-induced fluorescence in patients with high-grade glioma undergoing a clinically indicated craniotomy. At least 2 tissue samples were each obtained from regions of strong, weak. and no fluorescence and evaluated in a blinded manner by a neuropathologist. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled. Intraoperative fluorescence was observed in 100% of subjects. One hundred twenty-one surgical specimens were collected for histopathological analysis; 40 with strong, 40 weak, and 41 with no visible fluorescence. Histopathology demonstrated 62.8% of samples (n = 76) contained abundant, 20.7% (n = 25) scarce, and 16.5% (n = 20) no tumor cells. Thirty-three of the 40 specimens (82.5%) in the strong fluorescence group correlated with abundant tumor cells and 7 (17.5%) with scarce. Twenty-nine of the 40 specimens (72.5%) in the weak fluorescence group correlated with abundant tumor cells, 7 (17.5%) with scarce, and 4 (10%) with none. Fourteen of the 41 (34.2%) specimens in the no fluorescence group had abundant tumor cells, 11 (26.8%) had scarce, and 16 (39%) had none. The sensitivity was 75% and specificity was 80%. The positive predictive value was 95% and negative predictive value was 39%. CONCLUSIONS: Visualization of 5-ALA-induced tumor fluorescence with use of the Orbeye 3D digital exoscope was feasible and associated with a high positive predictive value.

Hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas: results from a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy may synergize with programmed cell death 1 (PD1)/PD1 ligand (PD-L1) blockade. The purpose of this study was to determine the recommended phase II dose, safety/tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of combining pembrolizumab, an anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody, with hypofractionated stereotactic irradiation (HFSRT) and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGGs). METHODS: Eligible subjects with recurrent glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma were treated with pembrolizumab (100 or 200 mg based on dose level Q3W) concurrently with HFSRT (30 Gy in 5 fractions) and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg Q2W. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled (bevacizumab-naïve, n = 24; bevacizumab-resistant, n = 8). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were proteinuria (40.6%), fatigue (25%), increased alanine aminotransferase (25%), and hypertension (25%). TRAEs leading to discontinuation occurred in 1 patient who experienced a grade 3 elevation of aspartate aminotransferase. In the bevacizumab-naïve cohort, 20 patients (83%) had a complete response or partial response. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 13.45 months (95% CI: 9.46-18.46) and 7.92 months (95% CI: 6.31-12.45), respectively. In the bevacizumab-resistant cohort, PR was achieved in 5 patients (62%). Median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 8.97-18.86) with a median PFS of 6.54 months (95% CI: 5.95-18.86). The majority of patients (n = 20/26; 77%) had tumor-cell/tumor-microenvironment PD-L1 expression <1%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of HFSRT with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent HGG is generally safe and well tolerated. These findings merit further investigation of HFSRT with immunotherapy in HGGs.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor induced anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (Anti-GAD 65) limbic encephalitis responsive to intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have made significant advances in available cancer treatment options towards progression-free and overall survival in cancer patients by potentiating own anti-tumor immune response. Anti-programmed death (PD-1) and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have been increasingly associated with neurologic complications. LE is a rare complication and like many complications secondary to immunotherapy, there is no standard for evaluation and treatment. Anti-GAD65-associated LE has been associated with thymic carcinoma. We describe a patient who presented with progressive memory loss 2 weeks after her third cycle of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab with associated elevated Anti-GAD65 levels. Treatment with IVIG and PLEX led to complete resolution of her symptoms and improvement in her brain imaging and CSF findings.

Immunotherapy Induced Myasthenic-Like Syndrome in a Metastatic Melanoma Patient With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Immunotherapy agents such as ipilimumab and nivolumab are immensely effective in the treatment of various malignancies. Despite this, neurologic immune-related sequelae (NIRS) have been observed. Prompt diagnosis and treatment is critical to improve patient outcomes. We present a case of a 63-year-old man with stage IV metastatic melanoma beginning treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab. Gathered history from the patient showed that he had a 3-year presentation of bradykinesia, shuffling gait, and muscle cramping. After one dose, the patient began to have progressively worsening generalized weakness; after receiving the immunotherapy, there was a rapid decline in his health. In addition to weakness, the patient developed diplopia, impaired single breath count, lingual and upper/lower extremity fasciculations, and brisk reflexes. While the lumbar puncture and myasthenia panel were non-diagnostic, the electromyography (EMG) revealed axonal neuropathy and diffuse denervation/reinnervation changes. Furthermore, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) displayed fatty replacement of the tongue with a bright tongue sign. These results pointed to the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) superimposed onto myasthenic-like syndrome. The patient was started on various treatments; however, unfortunately he died due to acute hypoxic respiratory failure. This case highlights important considerations that must be taken when using immunotherapy, especially in patients with pre-existing neurological deficits. Furthermore, it shows the importance of early diagnosis as treatment can potentially cure adverse sequelae.

Using personalized medicine in gliomas: a genomic approach to diagnosis and overcoming treatment resistance in a case with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma.

INTRODUCTION: A patient who was initially considered to have a glioblastoma (GBM) had molecular analysis, showing that it was a pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA). Up to 78% of PXA tumors have BRAF V600E mutations. Primary brain tumors with BRAF mutations can have a good response to BRAF MEK inhibitors (BRAF MEKi), and there may be a synergistic response when combined with autophagy inhibitors. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: A 20-year-old man found to have a large brain mass with midline shift underwent resection. He was diagnosed with "GBM" and treated with radiation and temozolomide with subsequent disease recurrence. Review of histology showed malignant PXA with BRAF V600E mutation. Treatment with Dabrafenib and Trametinib was started, and tumor size increased in size after 14 months of treatment. Given studies showing that resistance to BRAF inhibition can be overcome by autophagy inhibition, chloroquine was added. Patient has been on "triple" therapy for 15 months and has radiographically Stable Disease. At MCC, 3% of patients with gliomas have BRAF mutations who could potentially benefit from this combination therapy. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of a PXA patient receiving therapy with BRAF MEKi and an autophagy inhibitor with prolonged stable disease. This patient highlights the importance of a molecular interrogation in gliomas to provide an integrated diagnosis and effective treatment. This may be useful in up to 3% of glioma patients with BRAF mutations. Molecular testing in neuro-oncology is providing new avenues of diagnosis and treatment, and detailed molecular interrogation should be considered routine.

Immediate Transfer for Clot Extraction in a Young Woman With Leukemia and Asparaginase-Associated Acute Cerebral Vein Thrombosis.

We present the case of an 18-year-old woman with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who developed hemorrhagic stroke and epilepsia partialis continua due to acute cerebral vein thrombosis (CVT). The patient had 10 risk factors for CVT (including use of asparaginase chemotherapy for the ALL) and also unfortunately had 4 biomarkers for poor prognosis for outcome post-CVT diagnosis. Immediate transfer to a Comprehensive Stroke Center allowed for hyperacute neurointerventional clot extraction with rapid restoration of the patency of the superior sagittal sinus. This resulted in an unexpectedly favorable neurological outcome and simultaneously allowed for early resumption of chemotherapy for ALL after only a 5-day hiatus. Our case highlights the importance of immediate transfer of highest risk patients with multiple biomarkers for poor prognosis to a Comprehensive Stroke Center with endovascular and neurosurgical capabilities and the possibility of overcoming the odds of a poor outcome with venous clot extraction if medical management fails. Neurological deterioration due to escalating intracranial pressure with impending herniation may occur rapidly, and treatment at such facilities can be life-saving.

Ipilimumab/Nivolumab-related Opsoclonus-Myoclonus-Ataxia Syndrome Variant in a Patient with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

INTRODUCTION: Ipilimumab and nivolumab are immune-checkpoint inhibitors commonly used for melanoma. The combination is being investigated for its efficacy against several types of cancer, including malignant pleural mesothelioma. Although immune-related adverse events have been reported in patients receiving immune-checkpoint inhibitors, opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome has never been previously described. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a 74-year-old male with malignant pleural mesothelioma who presented with opsoclonus and marked truncal ataxia ∼10 weeks following immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab. No myoclonus was present. Oligoclonal bands were detected in cerebrospinal fluid. Treatment with methylprednisolone and intravenous immunoglobulin along with clonazepam and valproic acid resulted in a rapid clinical improvement. A follow-up visit 2 months afterward showed a resolution of opsoclonus and he was able to walk with cane. CONCLUSIONS: A variant of opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome may occur following treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab.