Single-session ERCP in patients with previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using percutaneous-assisted transprosthetic endoscopic therapy: a case series.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains technically challenging following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Various techniques have been described to access the excluded stomach. We describe our experience using percutaneous-assisted transprosthetic endoscopic therapy (PATENT) to perform antegrade ERCP. Balloon enteroscopy was used to access the excluded stomach. Direct retrograde percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (RPEG) was performed and an esophageal self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) was deployed within the gastrostomy tract. A duodenoscope was advanced through the SEMS and antegrade ERCP was performed. Following ERCP, a gastrostomy tube was placed through the SEMS to maintain patency. Five patients underwent successful antegrade ERCP using PATENT. All patients had a diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Biliary sphincterotomy was performed in all patients and liver enzymes normalized in four patients with preprocedural elevations. In conclusion, antegrade ERCP employing PATENT is feasible and can be performed during a single endoscopic session in patients with previous RYGB.

Outcome of emergency ERCP in the intensive care unit.

There are limited data on the outcome of emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). We sought to assess the frequency, indications, and clinical outcomes of ERCPs performed in ICU patients who were too unstable to be transported to the endoscopy unit. An electronic endoscopy database was used to identify the patients (n = 22) and to assess procedural success, complications, and mortality. The indications for ERCP included suspected biliary sepsis, suspected gallstone pancreatitis, and known choledocholithiasis with cholangitis. Biliary cannulation, which was attempted in all patients, was successful in 19 patients (86 %), and of these 18 (95 %) underwent a technically successful endoscopic therapy. There were no apparent endoscopic complications. Therefore, emergency bedside ERCP in ICU patients, which is primarily performed for the management of suspected biliary sepsis and gallstone pancreatitis, can achieve high technical success rates when performed by experienced endoscopists, although the 30-day mortality rate remains high due to multiorgan dysfunction.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a single-balloon enteroscope in patients with altered Roux-en-Y anatomy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is challenging to perform in patients with postsurgical gastrointestinal anatomy. We assessed the diagnostic and therapeutic success rates using single-balloon enteroscopy in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent single-balloon ERCP between April 2008 and February 2010 were retrospectively identified using a computerized endoscopy database. Diagnostic success was defined as successful duct cannulation or securing the diagnosis, and therapeutic success was defined as the ability to successfully carry out endoscopic therapy. Complications of ERCP were defined according to standard criteria. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (34-male, mean age 57 years, range 19 - 85 years) with Roux-en-Y anastomosis underwent ERCP using a single-balloon enteroscope on 56 occasions. Indications for ERCP were cholestasis, acute cholangitis, recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis with strictures, and choledocholithiasis. Overall diagnostic success was achieved in 39 / 56 cases (70 %). Therapeutic success was achieved in 21/23 cases (91 %). In 16 cases therapeutic intervention was not required. Therapeutic interventions included balloon dilation of strictures (n = 14), retrieval of retained biliopancreatic stents (n = 5), biliary stone extraction (n = 2), insertion of biliopancreatic stents (n = 4), and biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy (n = 5). No major complications occurred. Importantly, in 22 / 56 procedures (39 %) a prior attempt at ERCP failed using conventional colonoscopes; single-balloon ERCP was successful in 15 / 22 (68 %) of these cases. CONCLUSIONS: Single-balloon ERCP is feasible in patients with complex postsurgical Roux-en-Y anastomosis, allows diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic intervention in patients with pancreaticobiliary disease, and is a useful salvage technique in the majority of patients in whom ERCP using colonoscopies has failed.

Risk of pancreatitis following endoscopically placed large-bore plastic biliary stents with and without biliary sphincterotomy for management of postoperative bile leaks.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transpapillary biliary stent placement is effective for closure of postoperative bile leaks. Large-bore stents (10 French) may transiently obstruct the adjacent pancreatic duct orifice causing acute pancreatitis. Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy may reduce this risk, but it introduces separate risks of bleeding and perforation. The objective of this study was to compare complications after large-bore biliary stent placement (10 Fr) with and without sphincterotomy in patients with bile leaks. METHODS: The institutional endoscopy database was queried to identify patients who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogrpahy (ERCP) for bile leak between March 1996 and August 2006. Procedural reports were reviewed for evidence of biliary sphincterotomy, cholangiographic and pancreatographic findings, transpapillary stent placement, and procedural complications. Patients with prior biliary sphincterotomy, choledochoenteric anastomosis, placement of multiple biliary stents and expandable metal biliary stents, biliary stents smaller than 10 Fr, and patients in whom a stent was not placed were excluded. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Probability

Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage: 10-year single center experience.

AIM: A subset of patients with acute cholecystitis is severely ill and extremely high-risk to undergo cholecystectomy. Data on the use of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) in the treatment of acute cholecystitis are limited. This article reviews the 10-year experience of ETGBD at Mayo Clinic and evaluated patient and procedure characteristics. METHODS: A retrospective review of the endoscopy database from 1998-2007 was performed to identify patients who had undergone ETGBD. Clinical information and procedure details were abstracted from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: Fifty one patients underwent ETGBD for acute cholecystitis between 1998 to July 2007. The mean age was 62+/-19 years and 67% of patients were males. The median number of comorbid medical conditions was two (range 0-5) and 27% had underlying diabetes mellitus. Acute calculous cholecystitis was the predominant indication for ETGBD (78%). A gallbladder stent was used in 33 (65%) patients, nasocholecystic drain in 14 (27%) patients, and both in four patients (8%). Bleeding (4%) and sedation-related complications (4%) were the most common complications noted. Among patients who underwent cholecystectomy, the majority (76%) needed an open procedure. The median time to cholecystectomy was 15 days (range 1-352 days). Four patients (8%) succumbed to septic shock during their hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: ETGBD is a valuable alternative therapeutic modality for the treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis who are at high-risk for early cholecystectomy, and/or those who have contraindications to percutaneous gallbladder drainage.

Pancreatic stent prophylaxis of post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: spontaneous migration rates and clinical outcomes.

AIM: Pancreatic duct (PD) stents diminish the risk of post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) in high-risk patients; 3 Fr stents are reported to spontaneously migrate at a significantly higher rate than 5 Fr stents in a cohort of mostly sphincter of Oddi (SOD) patients. We sought to assess spontaneous migration rates of 5 Fr and 7 Fr stents and effectiveness in preventing PEP in a diverse group of high risk patients. METHODS: A total of 4,332 ERCP exams performed between January 2002 and August 2005 were reviewed to identify patients undergoing PD stent placement. Follow-up was obtained from electronic medical records and contact with referring MDs. Plain abdominal radiographs were used to document stent passage. RESULTS: PD stents for PEP prophylaxis were placed in 246 exams (232 patients) undergoing: PD (major or minor) sphincterotomy (84), ampullectomy (50), SOD (46), bile duct precut (35), papillary stenosis balloon dilation (9) and difficult cannulation (8). Stents placed: 218 5-Fr (140 were 3 cm long and 78 =or> 5 cm long) and 28 7-Fr (12 were 3 cm long, 16=or> 5cm long). Follow-up was available in 197 (171 5-Fr, 26 7-Fr) of 246 placements (80%). Twenty of 171 5-Fr stents were electively removed via EGD within=or< 24 h per endoscopist preference and were not included in analysis; 128 of the remaining 151 5-Fr stents (85%) spontaneously migrated by (or within) median of 8 days and 23 failed to pass and required EGD removal. Of 26 7-Fr stents one was electively removed =or< 24 h later; of the remaining 25, 15 (60%) spontaneously migrated by median of 16 days, 10 required EGD removal. The spontaneous migration rate of 5 Fr stents was: 1) significantly higher than 7 Fr stents; 2) significantly higher than the previously reported 67% passage rate of 5 Fr stents; and 3) similar to the previously reported 86% passage rate of 3 Fr stents. PEP occurred in 15% (n=36: 24 mild, 11 moderate, 1 severe). CONCLUSION: The spontaneous dislodgement rate of 5 Fr stents in patients where the indication is primarily non-SOD is approximately 85% - significantly higher than previously reported and similar to the reported rate of spontaneous dislodgement of 3 Fr stents in SOD patients; 5 Fr stents migrate spontaneously earlier and more frequently than 7 Fr stents.

Prospective assessment of the impact of feedback on colonoscopy performance.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is an operator-dependent procedure. The medical literature describes disparity in colonoscopy performance with respect to polyp detection, caecal intubation rates and procedural times. AIM: To assess prospectively the impact of feedback among a large cohort of colonoscopists on three performance parameters: caecal intubation rate, insertion time and withdrawal time. METHOD: In a prospective clinical study, procedural data from all out-patient colonoscopies performed by attending gastroenterologists at our institution were recorded routinely in a computerized database. Enhanced serial feedback was provided on a quarterly basis for three procedure parameters: intubation to caecum, insertion time and withdrawal time. Feedback (absolute value, % rank and group distribution) was sent by email every 3 months beginning with January 2005 feedback for all of 2004, and subsequently quarterly in April 2005 (for January-March 2005), July 2005 (for April-June 2005) and October 2005 (for July-September 2005). RESULTS: Feedback was provided to 58 endoscopists with a median experience level of 8 years. There was a relative decline of 19% in incomplete procedures, with median caecal non-intubation rates decreasing from 4.7% to 3.8% following the introduction of feedback while median insertion times declined from 10.6 to 9.5 mins, P = 0.02. Median withdrawal times did not change significantly, 9.1-8.9 mins, P = 0.6. CONCLUSIONS: Feedback by email appears to improve colonoscopy performance, enhancing completion rates and shortening insertion times without compromising withdrawal times.

Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.

BACKGROUND: In 2002, a U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer recommended that the withdrawal phase for colonoscopy should average at least 6-10 min. This was based on 10 consecutive colonoscopies by two endoscopists with different adenoma miss rates. AIMS: To characterize the relationship between endoscopist withdrawal time and polyp detection at colonoscopy, and to determine the withdrawal time that corresponds to the median polyp detection rate. DESIGN: Procedural data from out-patient colonoscopies performed at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester during 2003 were reviewed. Endoscopists were characterized by their mean withdrawal time for a negative procedure and individual polyp detection rate. RESULTS: A total of 10 955 colonoscopies performed by 43 endoscopists were analysed. Median withdrawal time was 6.3 min (range: 4.2-11.9); polyp detection rate was 44.0% (all polyps), 29.8% (< or = 5 mm), 5.9% (6-9 mm), 6.7% (10-19 mm), 2.1% (> or = 20 mm). Longer withdrawal time was associated with higher polyp detection rate (r = 0.76; P < 0.0001); this relationship weakened for larger polyps (r = 0.19 for polyps 6-9 mm, r = 0.28 for polyps 10-19 mm, r = 0.02 for polyps > or = 20 mm). Overall median polyp detection rate corresponded to a withdrawal time of 6.7 min. CONCLUSION: Our findings support a colonoscopy withdrawal time of at least 7 min, which correlates with higher colon polyp detection rates.

Utility of endoscopic ultrasonography in endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in selected patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) on endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts and to determine patency with fistula dilation and placement of multiple stents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1995 and January 1999, 19 patients underwent endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts, 17 of whom were assessed by EUS before drainage. Radial EUS scanning was used to detect an optimal site of apposition of pseudocyst and gut wall, free of intervening vessels. A fistula was created with a fistulatome, followed by balloon dilation of the fistula tract. Patency was maintained with multiple double pigtail stents. The primary goal of this retrospective study was to determine whether EUS affected the practice of endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. RESULTS: In 3 patients, drainage was not attempted based on EUS findings. In the other 13 patients (14 pseudocysts), creation of a fistula was successful on 13 occasions, and no immediate complications occurred. However, 1 patient subsequently developed sepsis that required surgery. All other patients were treated with balloon dilation, multiple stents, and antibiotics, with no septic complications. Of 14 pseudocysts (in 13 patients), 13 (93%) resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Results of EUS may alter management of patients considered for endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Endoscopic ultrasonography was useful for selecting an optimal and safe drainage site. The combination of balloon dilation, multiple stents, and antibiotics appears to resolve pancreatic pseudocysts without septic complications.

Advantages of disposable endoscopic accessories.

Despite the prevailing emphasis on falling reimbursements and cost containment, the use of disposable endoscopic accessories has grown tremendously. They offer simplicity of use, certain sterility, and reduced labor costs in exchange for higher purchase costs per procedure and the burden of waste disposal. Disposable accessories provide greater variety, complexity, and utility. They carry a cost burden that may be acceptable when the devices are difficult to reprocess, when they incorporate features that justify the added cost, or when their unit cost approaches purchase plus reprocessing costs for reusable alternatives, such as for biopsy forceps. Units with small volumes may prefer the ease of disposable accessories independent of relative cost issues, while large high-volume units may need to evaluate cost data more carefully to maintain sustainable practices.

Interventional treatment of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopic procedures.

The role of therapeutic endoscopy in the treatment of acute and chronic pancreatitis has expanded dramatically over the past 10 years. Drainage of pseudocysts and even organized pancreatic necrosis when localized are becoming commonplace. Other areas in which therapeutic endoscopy has been shown to be efficacious include severe biliary pancreatitis, pancreatic duct disruptions, strictures, and obstructive calculi. Its role in the management of acute recurrent pancreatitis with presumed Oddi's sphincter dysfunction or pancreas divisum continues to be defined. The cost-effectiveness and minimally invasive nature of endoscopic therapy compared with surgery should ensure the continued development of these techniques. More controlled, prospective data are required.

The evolving role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography before and after cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopy is the preferred approach for cholecystectomy; however the indications for pre- versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) are still evolving. The records of patients who had ERC performed one month before (n = 119) or after (n = 35) laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy from January 1990 to August 1992 (period 1), and 66 patients who had preoperative ERC from November 1995 to October 1996 (period 2) are reviewed, ERC indications, findings and outcomes were reviewed, and trends in the use of preoperative ERC from 1990 to 1996 were sought. Between periods 1 and 2 the yield of preoperative ERC increased from 36% to 58% (P < 0.01). The use of preoperative ERC for the indication of abnormal liver enzymes declined (P < 0.05), while the yield increased (25% versus 61%, P < 0.01). Both the use of ERC and the yield remained stable for other indications. ERC was felt to have changed the surgical approach in 5% of patients. Primary indications for postoperative ERC (n = 35) included abnormal intraoperative cholangiography (43%), liver function test abnormalities (23%) and recurrence of preoperative symptoms (14%); stones were found in 60%, 50% and 20% of patients with these indications, respectively. Overall, 46% of postoperative studies revealed duct stones. The roles for pre- and postoperative ERC are changing and depend greatly on the relative laparoscopic and endoscopic expertise at a given institution.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in post-Whipple patients.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an established modality for evaluation and treatment of pancreaticobiliary disorders. However, it is technically more challenging in patients with post-surgical anatomy. The success rate of ERCP in patients with prior pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple resection) is unknown. We assessed the technical success and safety of ERCP in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post pancreaticoduodenectomy patients who had undergone ERCP between January 2002 and May 2005 were identified through a computerized medical index system. ERCP was considered successful if the duct of clinical interest had been cannulated and endoscopic therapy had been performed when indicated. RESULTS: ERCP was attempted 88 times in 51 patients with prior pancreaticoduodenectomy, including 37 procedures for pancreatic indications, 44 for biliary obstruction, and 7 for both biliary and pancreatic indications. The overall technical success rate of ERCP based on the intention behind the procedure was 51 % (45 of the 88 procedures). Success was significantly more likely for biliary indications (37/44, 84 %) than for pancreatic indications (3/37, 8 %) ( P < or = .001). Complications occurred in 2 % of the procedures and included one self- contained perforation treated medically and one Mallory-Weiss tear. CONCLUSIONS: When performed by experienced endoscopists, ERCP in patients with prior pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe, with a high success rate for biliary indications and a low success rate for pancreatic duct indications. Better methods of achieving pancreatic duct cannulation after pancreaticoduodenectomy are needed.

Diagnosis and therapy of biliary tract malignancy.

Bile duct and gallbladder cancer are relatively uncommon. Predisposing factors include primary sclerosing cholangitis and gallstones larger than 3 centimeters. Patients present with signs of biliary obstruction and cholestasis. A serum CA 19-9 elevated above 100 U/mL is a useful marker. The diagnosis is implied on imaging studies and confirmed by tissue obtained at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or surgery, or by the clinical course. Surgery is the only curative therapy and survival is improved with resection of early stage disease. Endoscopic or percutaneous transhepatic stenting provides effective palliation. Generally, survival is less than 1 year.

Endoscopic decompression for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction is often treated by colonoscopic decompression. Efficacy, safety, and outcome of endoscopic decompression was assessed. METHODS: Colonoscopic decompressions from 1988 to 1994 were reviewed. Resolution without further endoscopic intervention was defined as clinical success. RESULTS: Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction was diagnosed in 50 patients. Thirty-three cases followed surgery or trauma and 17 developed during severe medical illness. Orthopedic joint surgery was most common. Nineteen of 50 patients (38%) had severe underlying medical disease. Forty-one patients (82%) had one colonoscopic decompression with clinical success in 39 (95%). Nine patients (18%) required multiple (2 to 4) colonoscopic decompressions with clinical success in 5 (56%). A decompression tube positioned in the right colon (57%) and in the transverse colon (33%) had similar clinical success. In 8 procedures a decompression tube was not placed, with poor clinical success (25%). The overall clinical success of colonoscopic decompression was 88% (44 of 50). An endoscopic perforation occurred in 1 patient (2%). Overall hospital mortality was 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopic decompression is effective and safe for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction that does not respond to conservative therapy. Most patients will respond to one colonoscopic decompression with decompression tube placement. Complete colonoscopy and cecal tube placement is unnecessary.

Pancreatitis secondary to percutaneous liver biopsy-associated hemobilia.

Hemobilia refers to hemorrhage in the biliary tree and is most commonly associated with accidental and iatrogenic trauma. Rarely has pancreatitis been reported in association with hemobilia and never as a consequence of percutaneous liver biopsy-induced hemobilia. We report the case of a 64-yr-old man who presented with pancreatitis 6 days after a percutaneous liver biopsy. Within 24 h of admission, he developed hematochezia. Emergency endoscopy was performed, and with a side-viewing duodenoscope, blood and clot were clearly seen oozing from the papilla. The origin of bleeding was identified angiographically as a pseudoaneurysm of the right hepatic artery. Bleeding stopped and pancreatitis resolved after angiographic embolization of the hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm. A review of the English language literature reveals eight well-documented cases of pancreatitis associated with hemobilia, including the current report. Seven cases were associated with ruptured hepatic artery aneurysms and one case with hemorrhagic acalculous cholecystitis. Six of the patients received appropriate therapy to stop bleeding and recovered uneventfully. Pancreatitis should be recognized as a potential important complication of hemobilia. In addition, hemobilia should be considered in the differential diagnosis for those patients with apparent biliary or idiopathic acute pancreatitis and no stones seen on ultrasonography. When bleeding is stopped via surgical or radiological methods, the clinical course of hemobilia-associated pancreatitis appears to be benign.