Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Physiol ; 598(4): 839-851, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31876950

RESUMEN

KEY POINTS: Previous studies investigating the effects of somatosensory afferent inputs on cortical excitability and neural plasticity often used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of hand motor cortex (M1) as a model, but in this model it is difficult to separate out the relative contribution of cutaneous and muscle afferent input to each effect. In the face, cutaneous and muscle afferents are segregated in the trigeminal and facial nerves, respectively. We studied their relative contribution to corticobulbar excitability and neural plasticity in the depressor anguli oris M1. Stimulation of trigeminal afferents induced short-latency (SAI) but not long-latency (LAI) afferent inhibition of face M1, while facial nerve stimulation evoked LAI but not SAI. Plasticity induction was observed only after a paired associative stimulation protocol using the facial nerve. Physiological differences in effects of cutaneous and muscle afferent inputs on face M1 excitability suggest they play separate functional roles in behaviour. ABSTRACT: The lack of conventional muscle spindles in face muscles raises the question of how sensory input from the face is used to control muscle activation. In 16 healthy volunteers, we probed sensorimotor interactions in face motor cortex (fM1) using short-afferent inhibition (SAI), long-afferent inhibition (LAI) and LTP-like plasticity following paired associative stimulation (PAS) in the depressor anguli oris muscle (DAO). Stimulation of low threshold afferents in the trigeminal nerve produced a clear SAI (P < 0.05) when the interval between trigeminal stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of fM1 was 15-30 ms. However, there was no evidence for LAI at longer intervals of 100-200 ms, nor was there any effect of PAS. In contrast, facial nerve stimulation produced significant LAI (P < 0.05) as well as significant facilitation 10-30 minutes after PAS (P < 0.05). Given that the facial nerve is a pure motor nerve, we presume that the afferent fibres responsible were those activated by the evoked muscle twitch. The F-wave in DAO was unaffected during both LAI and SAI, consistent with their presumed cortical origin. We hypothesize that, in fM1, SAI is evoked by activity in low threshold, presumably cutaneous afferents, whereas LAI and PAS require activity in (higher threshold) afferents activated by the muscle twitch evoked by electrical stimulation of the facial nerve. Cutaneous inputs may exert a paucisynaptic inhibitory effect on fM1, while proprioceptive information is likely to target inhibitory and excitatory polysynaptic circuits involved in LAI and PAS. Such information may be relevant to the physiopathology of several disorders involving the cranio-facial system.


Asunto(s)
Potenciales Evocados Motores , Cara/inervación , Corteza Motora/fisiología , Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Propiocepción , Estimulación Eléctrica , Electromiografía , Humanos , Inhibición Neural , Plasticidad Neuronal , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal
2.
Exp Brain Res ; 234(2): 453-61, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26514812

RESUMEN

The beneficial effects of trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) on several neurological disorders are increasingly acknowledged. Hypothesized mechanisms include the modulation of excitability in networks involved by the disease, and its main site of action has been recently reported at brain stem level. Aim of this work was to test whether acute TNS modulates brain stem plasticity using the blink reflex (BR) as a model. The BR was recorded from 20 healthy volunteers before and after 20 min of cyclic transcutaneous TNS delivered bilaterally to the infraorbital nerve. Eleven subjects underwent sham-TNS administration and were compared to the real-TNS group. In 12 subjects, effects of unilateral TNS were tested. The areas of the R1 and R2 components of the BR were recorded before and after 0 (T0), 15 (T15), 30 (T30), and 45 (T45) min from TNS. In three subjects, T60 and T90 time points were also evaluated. Ipsi- and contralateral R2 areas were significantly suppressed after bilateral real-TNS at T15 (p = 0.013), T30 (p = 0.002), and T45 (p = 0.001), while R1 response appeared unaffected. The TNS-induced inhibitory effect on R2 responses lasted up to 60 min. Real- and sham-TNS protocols produced significantly different effects (p = 0.005), with sham-TNS being ineffective at any time point tested. Bilateral TNS was more effective (p = 0.009) than unilateral TNS. Acute TNS induced a bilateral long-lasting inhibition of the R2 component of the BR, which resembles a long-term depression-like effect, providing evidence of brain stem plasticity produced by transcutaneous TNS. These findings add new insight into mechanisms of TNS neuromodulation and into physiopathology of those neurological disorders where clinical benefits of TNS are recognized.


Asunto(s)
Parpadeo/fisiología , Depresión Sináptica a Largo Plazo/fisiología , Plasticidad Neuronal/fisiología , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/métodos , Nervio Trigémino/fisiología , Adulto , Electromiografía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven
3.
Mov Disord Clin Pract ; 2(1): 49-52, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30363942

RESUMEN

We studied two unrelated families with several members suffering from geniospasm. Here, we aim to clarify the pathophysiology underlying the hereditary geniospasm through testing of brainstem excitability by the recovery cycles of the blink reflex (BR) and the masseteric inhibitory reflex (MIR). The R2 component of the BR and the SP2 component of the MIR and their recovery cycle were analyzed in 3 patients and 8 healthy, age-matched subjects as the control group. Patients with geniospasm exhibited a different excitability of the BR, compared to the control, group, as shown by the larger R2 component area of BR in controls than patients. Notably, the mean recovery index was 0.61 ± 0.19 in geniospasm patients and 0.40 ± 0.15 in controls (P ≤ 0.05). Interestingly, the recovery cycle of the MIR showed a loss of inhibition in both patients studied, as indicated by the behavior of the SP2 component. Our cases showed a partial impairment of the activity of brainstem inhibitory interneurons, indicated by the abnormal recovery cycle of MIR. These results would implicate a mechanism akin to brainstem myoclonus for the generation of geniospasm.

4.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 125(11): 2286-2296, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24745338

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate vestibulo-masseteric (VMR), acoustic-masseteric (AMR), vestibulo-collic (VCR) and trigemino-collic (TCR) reflexes in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS); to relate abnormalities of brainstem reflexes (BSRs) to multimodal evoked potentials (EPs), clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings. METHODS: Click-evoked VMR, AMR and VCR were recorded from active masseter and sternocleidomastoid muscles, respectively; TCR was recorded from active sternocleidomastoid muscles, following electrical stimulation of the infraorbital nerve. EPs and MRI were performed with standard techniques. RESULTS: Frequencies of abnormal BSRs were: VMR 62.1%, AMR 55.1%, VCR 25.9%, TCR 58.6%. Brainstem dysfunction was identified by these tests, combined into a four-reflex battery, in 86.9% of cases, by EPs in 82.7%, MRI in 71.7% and clinical examination in 37.7% of cases. The sensitivity of paired BSRs/EPs (93.3%) was significantly higher than combined MRI/clinical testing (70%) in patients with disease duration ⩽6.4years. BSR alterations significantly correlated with clinical, EP and MRI findings. CONCLUSIONS: The four-BSR battery effectively increases the performance of standard EPs in early detection of brainstem impairment, otherwise undetected by clinical examination and neuroimaging. SIGNIFICANCE: Multiple BSR assessment usefully supplements conventional testing and monitoring of brainstem function in MS, especially in newly diagnosed patients.


Asunto(s)
Tronco Encefálico/fisiopatología , Potenciales Evocados/fisiología , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/fisiopatología , Músculos del Cuello/inervación , Reflejo/fisiología , Estimulación Acústica , Adulto , Estimulación Eléctrica , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda