RESUMEN
The recurrent genetic anomalies used to classify prostate cancer (PC) into distinct molecular subtypes have limited relevance for clinical practice. In consideration of WHO 2016 histological classification, which includes the introduction of Gleason Score 4 for patients with cribriform component and the definition of intraductal carcinoma as a new entity, a retrospective pilot study was conducted to investigate, by histological review, if there were any variations of Gleason Score and the incidence of intraductal carcinoma and cribriform pattern, intended as "phenotypic" markers of potentially lethal PC, among metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC) and metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) samples. Potentially predictive factors were also assessed. Among 125 cases, a variation in the Gleason Score was reported in 26% of cases. A cribriform (36%) or intraductal (2%) pattern was reported in a higher percentage. Of them, a primary Gleason pattern 4 was reported in 80% of cases. All patients with intraductal carcinoma present a BRCA2 mutation, also found in 80% of cases with a cribriform pattern. This pilot study documented some hypothesis-generating data, as the evaluation of de novo mCSPC and mCRPC as phenotypic/biologic model to be translated in clinical practice. A cribriform pattern/intraductal carcinoma might be a marker of potentially lethal PC. The high incidence of TP53 and BRCA2 mutations in de novo mCSPC may also have a therapeutic implication.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical accuracy of Hepika test to identify cancer/precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicentre retrospective study was carried out in 2018 and included 330 liquid-based cytology samples from three Italian centres of women aged 25-64 who had been tested for the human papillomavirus (HPV) and whose histology or follow-up outcome was known. Hepika is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) targeting the protein complexes E6#p53 and E7#pRb. After excluding samples without sufficient residual material, the clinical accuracy of Hepika test was evaluated in 274 samples: adenocarcinoma (ADC) (4), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (7), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) (1), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 (60), CIN2 (51), CIN1 (34), and negative histology (117). Association, sensitivity, and specificity for carcinoma, CIN3+ and CIN2+ are reported. RESULTS: Positive Hepika test was associated with a high probability of carcinoma (odds ratio (DOR) = 33.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.0-163.1); sensitivity was 81.8%, specificity, 88.2%. A positive Hepika test showed a weaker association with CIN3+ lesions (DOR = 3.5; 95% CI 1.75-6.99) and lower sensitivity (27.8%). CONCLUSION: The Hepika test was found to be an accurate biomarker for HPV-induced cervical carcinoma. Population-based prospective studies are needed to confirm the clinical usefulness of the Hepika test in the differential diagnosis of HPV-induced invasive lesions.
RESUMEN
G2 ductal infiltrating carcinomas are a heterogeneous group of tumours with ambiguous clinical significance. This is because G2 carcinomas are almost always the largest category and poorly reproducible. Mitotic count (MC) is one of the causes of poor histological grading reproducibility. The phosphoistone H3 (PPH3) antibody improves identification of mitotic figures. The aim of our study is to demonstrate whether using a new histological grading system based on PPH3 immunostaining to assess MC can re-stratify G2 category. We selected 100 cases of G2 invasive carcinoma. The mitotic score was accurately re-evaluated performing MC on PPH3 immunostained sections. 21/100 G2 cases (21%) showed the same mitotic score both with hematoxilin and eosin (H&E) and PPH3 while 79 cases (79%) with PPH3 shifted to a higher mitotic score. After re-grading the 100 G2 cases based on the assessment of mitotic score with PPH3 only 53 cases (53%) were confirmed as G2, while 47 cases (47%) had shifted to G3. Finally we reclassified early tumours in the surrogate molecular subtype according to the 2013 St. Gallen Conference criteria and found that 13/40 cases (33%) classified as luminal A were G3 with the PPH3 mitotic score and could benefit from chemotherapy. In conclusion, PPH3 improving MC gives a better categorization by halving the G2 group. In particular, applied to the surrogate subtype luminal A breast cancer it identified cases that could benefit from adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Mitosis , Índice Mitótico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/química , Neoplasias de la Mama/clasificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/química , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/clasificación , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/genética , Femenino , Histonas/análisis , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Fosforilación , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Receptor ErbB-2/análisis , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Receptores de Estrógenos/análisis , Receptores de Progesterona/análisisRESUMEN
Malignant mesothelioma is a primary neoplasm of the serosal membranes that usually presents with a diffuse pattern of growth. However, cases of localized mesotheliomas have been described. The predominant localization is the pleura; peritoneum and pericardium being rarer localizations. Only few cases of true intraparenchymal mesothelioma arising in organs such as liver, gonads, lung, and pancreas have been described. We report a case of an otherwise healthy 48-year-old man without asbestos exposure with a nodule of 3 cm in diameter, localized in the spleen, discovered incidentally at the ultrasonographic examination, for which histopathological and immunohistochemical findings were consistent with epithelioid mesothelioma: large round cells with eosinophil dense cytoplasm and macronucleoli and with immunohistochemical positivity for pancytokeratins, calretinin, Wilms tumor-1, and others markers of mesothelial differentiation. The diagnosis of localized intrasplenic epithelioid malignant mesothelioma was carried out. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of a localized intrasplenic mesothelioma published in the indexed literature.