Effectiveness of a short video-based educational intervention on factors related to clinical trial participation in adolescents and young adults: a pre-test/post-test design.

BACKGROUND: Poor clinical trial enrollment continues to be pervasive and is especially problematic among young adults and youth, and among minorities. Efforts to address barriers to enrollment have been predominantly focused on adult diseased populations. Because older adults may already have established attitudes, it is imperative to identify strategies that target adolescents and young adults. The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of an educational video on factors related to clinical trial participation among a healthy adolescent and young adult population. METHODS: Participants completed a 49-item pre-test, viewed a 10-min video, and completed a 45-item post-test to assess changes in attitudes, knowledge, self-efficacy, receptivity to, and intention to participate (primary outcome) in clinical trials. Descriptive statistics, paired samples t-tests, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted. RESULTS: The final analyses included 935 participants. The mean age was 20.7 years, with almost 70% aged 18 to 20 years. The majority were female (73%), non-Hispanic (92.2%), white (70%), or African American (20%). Participants indicated a higher intention to participate in a clinical trial (p < 0.0001) and receptivity to hearing more about a clinical trial (p < 0.0001) after seeing the video. Intention to participate (definitely yes and probably yes) increased by an absolute 18% (95% confidence interval 15-22%). There were significant improvements in attitudes, knowledge, and self-efficacy scores for all participants (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed strong evidence for the effectiveness of a brief intervention on factors related to participation in clinical trials. This supports the use of a brief intervention, in a traditional educational setting, to impact the immediate attitudes, knowledge, self-efficacy, and intention to participate in clinical trial research among diverse, healthy adolescents and young adults.

The project IMPACT experience to date: increasing minority participation and awareness of clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated activities of Project IMPACT (Increase Minority Participation and Awareness of Clinical Trials), a National Medical Association (NMA) project chartered to identify ways to increase minority physician and patient involvement in clinical trials. Project IMPACT included physician education and training workshops, establishment of a physician-investigator database and other activities to facilitate minority-physician clinical trial participation. METHODS: A descriptive survey was used. The survey was distributed to 542 African-American physicians. Physicians were queried about prior involvement in clinical research, barriers and facilitators to clinical trial participation by patients and physicians, and perceptions regarding Project IMPACT. RESULTS: Two-hundred physicians responded to the survey. Common practice characteristics were self-employment (51%), solo practice (39%) and office based (58%). Prior involvement in clinical trials was generally low. Barriers to participation included lack of awareness of clinical trial opportunities and lack of resources to conduct clinical trials. However, most respondents had referred patients to clinical trials. Project IMPACT participants who responded were highly satisfied with the project. CONCLUSIONS: Minority physicians are interested in participating in clinical trials. However, multiple barriers, including lack of awareness and lack of access to clinical research coordinators, continue to exist and must be addressed. Clinical trials training programs alone are not enough.

Influence of coadministration on the pharmacokinetics of azimilide dihydrochloride and digoxin.

The influence of coadministration on digoxin and azimilide pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics was assessed in a randomized, 3-way crossover study in 18 healthy men. Serial blood and urine samples were obtained for azimilide and digoxin quantitation. Treatment effects on pharmacokinetics were assessed using analysis of variance. The relationship between azimilide blood concentrations and QT(c) prolongation was characterized by an E(max) model. Effects of coadministration on pharmacodynamics were assessed using a mechanistic-based inhibition model. Azimilide pharmacokinetics was unaffected by digoxin, except for a 36% increase in CL(r) (P = .0325), with no change in CL(o). Digoxin pharmacokinetics was unaffected by azimilide, except for a 21% increase in C(max) (P = .0176) and a 10% increase in AUC(tau) (P = .0121). Digoxin coadministration increased the apparent EC(50) with no effect on E(max), consistent with competitive inhibition (K(i) = 0.899 ng/mL). The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes observed upon coadministration were small and are not expected to be clinically important.

Effect of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on azimilide pharmacokinetics following single dose oral administration.

Azimilide dihydrochloride (75-125 mg/day) is currently being developed for use in prolonging the time to recurrence of atrial fibrillation/flutter and for reducing the frequency of shocks in patients with an implantable cardioverting defibrillator. This study investigated the influence of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on azimilide pharmacokinetics. Six subjects each with mild and moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh grades A and B, respectively) were age, weight, smoking status, and gender-matched to a healthy subject (total N = 24). Each subject was administered a single, oral dose of 100 mg azimilide dihydrochloride following an overnight fast. Blood/plasma and urine samples were collected up to 28 days and over 9 days, respectively, and analyzed using HPLC with MS/MS or UV detection. For azimilide, most parameters in subjects with mild to moderate hepatic impairment were within 25% of those observed in matched healthy subjects, with no statistically significant differences observed. For F-1292 (major metabolite in plasma), a significant decrease in AUC was observed in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, secondary to an increase in renal clearance (CL(r)). Based on these results, no a priori dosage adjustment is required in subjects with mild to moderate hepatic impairment.

Effect of severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of azimilide following single dose oral administration.

AIMS: To assess the influence of severe renal impairment on azimilide pharmacokinetics. METHODS: A single oral dose of 125 mg azimilide dihydrochloride was administered to subjects with normal and severely impaired renal function. Blood and urine samples were collected for 22-28 and 10 days, respectively. RESULTS: Azimilide renal clearance decreased in subjects with renal impairment (mean 14 vs 4.8 ml h-1 kg-1, 95% confidence interval on the ratio 0.23, 0.50). However, no change in any other pharmacokinetic parameter including oral clearance (mean 109 vs 104 ml h-1 kg-1, 95% confidence interval on the ratio 0.67, 1.36) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Since azimilide blood concentrations are essentially unaffected by renal function, an a priori dosage regimen adjustment is not required in patients with renal impairment.