RESUMEN
Cellular replacement therapy and genetic transfer in injured brains provide new pathways for treating human neurological illnesses. Current progress in the field focuses on the production of neurons and glial cells from many types of stem cells, such as embryonic, induced pluripotent, mesenchymal, and neural stem cells. This has led to a significant increase in research on brain transplantation treatments. Extended neurodegeneration results in the progressive decline of certain neuronal subtypes or whole neuronal cells. An analysis of the progress made in induced pluripotent and mesenchymal stem cells reveals their significant promise in disease modeling, regeneration, and medication screening. The requirement for stem cells in neurodegenerative disease studies has been crucial in recent years. Stem cells provide the potential for replacing impaired neurons, comprehending disease needs modeling, and creating efficient treatments, but they have many challenges in culturing and acceptability to the host immune cells. The need to use their potential in discovering novel therapies for diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis leads to promising therapy. This review examines the function of stem cells in the pathogenesis and treatment of Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and multiple sclerosis. This review further examines hurdles such as immunological reactions and delivery systems intending to overcome these problems. This article offers a detailed viewpoint on the use of stem cell-based nanotherapies as revolutionary treatments for various neurological illnesses.
RESUMEN
Vaccination, a historically effective public health intervention, has shielded millions from various diseases. Lessons from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) have improved COVID-19 vaccine development. Despite mRNA vaccines' efficacy, emerging variants pose challenges, exhibiting increased transmissibility, infectivity, and severity. Developing COVID-19 vaccines has faced hurdles due to urgency, limited virus understanding, and the need for safe solutions. Genetic variability necessitates continuous vaccine adjustments and production challenges demand scaling up manufacturing with stringent quality control. This review explores SARS-CoV-2's evolution, upcoming mutations that challenge vaccines, and strategies such as structure-based, T cell-based, respiratory mucosal-based, and nanotechnology approaches for vaccine development. This review insight provides a roadmap for navigating virus evolution and improving vaccine development.
RESUMEN
In traditional treatment modalities and standard clinical practices, FLASH radiotherapy (FL-RT) administers radiation therapy at an exceptionally high dosage rate. When compared to standard dose rate radiation therapy, numerous preclinical investigations have demonstrated that FL-RT provides similar benefits in conserving normal tissue while maintaining equal antitumor efficacy, a phenomenon possible due to the 'FLASH effect' (FE) of FL-RT. The methodologies involve proton radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation treatment, and managing high-throughput damage by radiation to solid tissues. Recent results from animal studies indicate that FL-RT can reduce radiation-induced tissue damage, significantly enhancing anticancer potency. Focusing on the potential benefits of FL proton beam treatment in the years to come, this review details the FL-RT research that has been done so far and the existing theories illuminating the FL effects. This subject remains of interest, with many issues still needing to be answered. We offer a brief review to emphasize a few of the key efforts and difficulties in moving FL radiation research forward. The existing research state of FL-RT, its affecting variables, and its different specific impacts are presented in this current review. Key topics discussed include the biochemical mechanism during FL therapy, beam sources for FL therapy, the FL effect on immunity, clinical and preclinical studies on the protective effect of FL therapy, and parameters for effective FL therapy.
RESUMEN
Cancer genetic testing is a revolutionary medical approach that involves the assessment of genetic markers in asymptomatic individuals to predict their future susceptibility to cancer. This paradigm shift in early detection and intervention has the potential to profoundly alter our strategies for cancer prevention and treatment. One pivotal area where genetic testing can have a significant impact is among families with a hereditary predisposition to cancer. Recent research has seen a surge in the exploration of how individuals perceive their cancer risk within the realm of cancer genetics. This proactive approach to genetic testing allows healthcare professionals to identify family members who may carry the same cancer-related genetic mutations, empowering them to make informed decisions regarding their healthcare and cancer risk management. Genetic testing for cancer-related disorders has significantly improved in accuracy and affordability, potentially revolutionizing monitoring and treatment methods. The expanding knowledge of genetic mutations associated with cancer susceptibility has driven significant progress in cancer therapy. Identifying numerous major cancer susceptibility genes has propelled predictive genetic testing, providing individuals with valuable insights into their genetic predisposition to cancer. While perceived risk plays a vital role in genetic counseling, it is equally essential to offer comprehensive information about the advantages and potential risks associated with genetic testing. Ensuring that individuals have a clear understanding of the benefits and potential drawbacks of genetic testing is imperative for making informed healthcare decisions. In our comprehensive review, researchers explored several critical aspects of genetic testing in the context of cancer, including awareness and knowledge, the communication of cancer genetic risk, genetic testing for inherited cancer syndromes, and the challenges and limitations linked to genetic testing. Through this examination, we aim to illuminate the transformative potential of genetic testing in cancer prevention and treatment.