Overt visual attention and between-limb asynchrony for bimanual reaching movements.

Although synchrony between the limbs is an often-cited feature of bimanual coordination, recent studies have also highlighted the small asynchronies that can occur. The visuo-motor demands of any bimanual task are considered central to the emergence of asynchrony, but the relationship between the two remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to address this issue. Hand and eye movements were measured in 19 participants, while they made either unimanual or bimanual reach-to-point (aiming) movements to targets presented on a touchscreen. Bimanual movements were either congruent (same-sized targets) or incongruent (different-sized targets). Resulting hand data showed many of the typical patterns of movement previously reported. While temporal coupling between the limbs remained largely evident for bimanual movements, small between-limb asynchronies were apparent and demonstrated clear associations with the competing precision requirements of the targets and related visual attention. Participants mainly directed their gaze towards the more difficult target with corresponding reaching movements demonstrating greater precision than for the easier target. Additionally, there was a reliable tendency for the hand reaching towards the more difficult target to lead. Importantly, it was the competing visuo-motor demands of individual movements rather than overall difficulty that resulted in greater between-limb asynchrony; accordingly, where both targets were small (i.e., the most difficult condition), asynchrony was significantly less pronounced than for incongruent bimanual conditions. The results show how the visuo-motor system balances its apparent drive for synchrony in coordinating bimanual movements with the competing demands that characterise the constituent unimanual movements.

Through the looking-glass: Mirror feedback modulates temporal and spatial aspects of bimanual coordination.

Mirror therapy has become an effective and recommended intervention for a range of conditions affecting the upper limb (e.g. hemiparesis following stroke). However, little is known about how mirror feedback affects the control of bimanual movements (as performed during mirror therapy). In this study, in preparation for future clinical investigations, we examined the kinematics of bimanual circle drawing in unimpaired participants both with (Experiment 1) and without (Experiment 2) a visual template to guide movement. In both experiments, 15 unimpaired right-handed participants performed self-paced continuous bimanual circle-drawing movements with a mirror/symmetrical coordination pattern. For the mirror condition, vision was directed towards the mirror in order to monitor the reflected limb. In the no mirror condition, the direction of vision was unchanged, but the mirror was replaced with an opaque screen. Movements of both hands were recorded using motion capture apparatus. In both experiments, the most striking feature of movements was that the hand behind the mirror drifted spatially during the course of individual trials. Participants appeared to be largely unaware of this marked positional change of their unseen hand, which was most pronounced when a template to guide movement was visible (Experiment 1). Temporal asynchrony between the limbs was also affected by mirror feedback in both experiments; in the mirror condition, illusory vision of the unseen hand led to a relative phase lead for that limb. Our data highlight the remarkable impact that the introduction of a simple mirror can have on bimanual coordination. Modulation of spatial and temporal features is consistent with the mirror inducing a rapid and powerful visual illusion, the latter appearing to override proprioceptive signals.

From both sides now: crossover effects influence navigation in patients with unilateral neglect.

Unilateral neglect is a challenging disorder that pervades a range of behaviours following stroke and hampers recovery. Although a preponderance of clinical studies measure performance on a range of bedside assessments, including line bisection and cancellation tasks, there have been calls for studies to embrace more relevant functional measures. Here, for the first time, we present data from two separate tasks that characterise the performance of seven patients with unilateral neglect when navigating a power wheelchair. The tasks involved negotiating an obstacle course and steering a central path between gaps of different sizes. Results from the obstacle course confirmed the clinical observation and predicted bias of contralesional errors. However, the second task revealed a robust "crossover" effect. Patients deviated to the ipsilesional side for large gaps but deviated increasingly contralesionally when steering through small gaps in behaviour that was analogous to that previously shown on line bisection tasks. Contrary to being seen as an unintuitive finding, further analysis of these errors suggests that patients are giving disproportionate weight to the location of the ipsilesional object when plotting a midline course between two objects. Our results provide a platform for further studies to investigate the modulation and rehabilitation of this important skill.

Don't think twice, it's all right--contralesional dependency for bimanual prehension movements.

In bimanual coordination when moving the hands to two separate objects, subjects tend to initiate and terminate the movements together, even when the targets are at different distances or are of a different size. Additionally, each hand tends to scale its grasp independently to the object to be grasped. Here, we report the performance of a patient, who had previously shown signs of motor neglect, on two experiments investigating coupling and independence in bimanual coordination. The patient showed relatively normal bimanual behaviour for the transport phase of prehension when objects were placed at different distances (Experiment 1), but abnormal behaviour for the grasp component when objects were of different sizes (Experiment 2). Moreover, the contralesional limb demonstrated a dependency of grasp that was related to the object grasped by the ipsilesional limb. We discuss the possible underlying mechanisms of this dependency in relation to competitive motor programming and attentional bias. The results also reinforce the view that the transport and grasp components of prehension are distinct processes.

Bimanual coordination and perceptual grouping in a patient with motor neglect.

Motor neglect refers to the underutilisation of a limb contralateral to a brain lesion in the absence of primary motor and sensory deficits. The related problem of motor extinction refers to a contralesional motor deficit that worsens or only becomes apparent when bilateral actions are required. We present a single case (MM) of a patient with motor neglect who also demonstrates a form of motor extinction that is influenced by visual grouping between stimuli. The comparisons of unimanual and bimanual reach to grasp movements towards one or two objects in Experiment 1 showed that MM made relatively normal unimanual contralesional movements but impaired contralesional movements under bimanual action conditions. Experiment 2 demonstrated that motor extinction was improved by asking MM to make bimanual movements towards a single object. In Experiment 3, the effects of object coding on bimanual movement were replicated across conditions that varied the distance between end points for the movements. MM did not show overt visual extinction. We suggest that MM demonstrates a late-acting attentional bias that is expressed in terms of competitive motor activity. Normally, the contralesional limb "loses" the competition for action, but this can be modulated by visual grouping between targets.