Gamma knife radiosurgery for orbital cavernous hemangioma: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for orbital cavernous hemangioma (OCH) has emerged as a promising method due to its significant clinical improvement and low incidence of complications. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GKRS for the treatment of OCH. METHODS: In accordance with the PRISMA framework, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase for studies reporting outcomes of GKRS for OCH. Studies reporting complications, visual improvement, proptosis, tumor reduction rate, and tumor progression rate for OCH following GKRS were included. RESULTS: Six studies, out of 1856 search results, with 100 patients were included. Among them, only 5 minor complications were related to GKRS, including 3 with orbital pain and 2 with periorbital chemosis. Thus, the complication rate was 13% (95% CI, 7-25%). Visual acuity and visual field improvement rates after GKRS were 80% (95% CI, 63-96%) and 71% (95% CI, 47-95%) respectively. Proptosis improved in 94% of cases (95% CI, 83-100%). The tumor reduction rate was 77% after GKRS (95% CI, 69-85%). CONCLUSION: GKRS for OCH appears to be a safe technique, as evidenced by the rate of clinical improvement and radiological improvement. However, studies are limited by an absence of a control group. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the relative efficacy of GKRS as compared with alternative surgical modalities for OCH.

Efficacy and safety of sagittal synostosis surgery in older (> 12 months) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Sagittal synostosis is the most common isolated craniosynostosis. Surgical treatment of this synostosis has been extensively described in the global literature, with promising outcomes when it is performed in the first 12 months of life. However, in some cases, patients older than 12 months arrive at the craniofacial center with this synostosis. A comprehensive study on efficacy and perioperative outcomes has yet to be fully explored in this population. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the available evidence of surgical outcomes for the treatment of sagittal synostosis among older patients to analyze the efficacy and safety of synostosis surgery in this unique population. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies published from inception to March 2024 reporting surgical outcomes of synostosis surgery in older patients (> 12 months) with isolated sagittal synostosis. The main outcome was the reoperation rate, with secondary endpoints including transfusion rates, aesthetic outcomes, and surgical complications. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled proportion of the reoperation rate was 1%. The rate of excellent aesthetic results was 95%. The need for transfusion associated with the procedures was 86%, and finally, surgical complications attained a pooled ratio of 2%, indicating minimal morbidity associated with the surgical repair. CONCLUSION: Sagittal synostosis surgery is a safe and effective procedure to perform in older patients; this meta-analysis suggests that open surgery confers a significant rate of excellent aesthetic results with a low reoperation rate and minimal complications associated with the intervention. Future research with direct comparisons among different techniques will validate the findings of this study, which will all contribute to the rigor of synostosis management.

Hearing preservation and quality of life in small to medium sized vestibular schwannomas after a wait and scan approach or stereotactic radiosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The management of vestibular schwannomas (VS) encompasses a choice between conservative "wait-and-scan" (WAS) approach, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or open microsurgical resection. Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal management approach for small to medium sized VS. This study aims to compared outcomes related to hearing in patients with small and medium sized VS who underwent initial treatment with WAS versus SRS. METHODS: A systematic review of the available literature was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane up December 08, 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effect model to calculate mean difference (MD) and relative risk (RR). A leave-one-out analysis was conducted. The risk of bias was assessed via the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-Interventions (ROBINS-I) and Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool (RoB-2). Ultimately, the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE assessment. The primary outcomes were serviceable hearing, and pure-tone average (PTA). The secondary outcome was the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life Scale (PANQOL) total score. RESULTS: Nine studies were eligible for inclusion, comprising a total of 1,275 patients. Among these, 674 (52.86%) underwent WAS, while 601 patients (47.14%) received SRS. Follow-up duration ranged from two to eight years. The meta-analysis indicated that WAS had a better outcome for serviceable hearing (0.47; 95% CI: 0.32 - 0.68; p < 0.001), as well as for postoperative functional measures including PTA score (MD 13.48; 95% CI 3.83 - 23.13; p < 0.01), and PANQOL total score (MD 3.83; 95% CI 0.42 - 7.25; p = 0.03). The overall certainty of evidence ranged from "very low" to "moderate". CONCLUSIONS: Treating small to medium sized VS with WAS increases the likelihood of preserving serviceable hearing and optimized PANQOL overall postoperative score compared to SRS. Nevertheless, the limited availability of literature and the methodological weakness observed in existing studies outline the need for higher-quality studies.

Awake microsurgical management of brain aneurysms: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis on rationale, safety and clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Awake microsurgery for brain aneurysm treatment has emerged as a tool for real-time intraoperative monitoring, opportune detection of ischemic complications, and reduction of surgical morbidity. Herein, we aimed to explore the current state of the procedure's rationale, safety and clinical outcomes. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, five databases were queried for articles reporting awake microsurgical management of brain aneurysms. Aggregate study results were combined using random-effects meta-analyses. Publication bias was evaluated through funnel plot analysis and Egger's regression test. RESULTS: Out of 847 articles, 11 records satisfied the inclusion criteria. Seventy-five patients (68% female) with 75 brain aneurysms (68% unruptured) were analyzed. Clipping was the predominant technique (58%), followed by bypass (17%). Monitored anesthesia care was the principal anesthesia protocol (60%). The incidence of anesthesia-related complications was 1% [95%CI, 0.00-0.05, I2 = 19%], and the conversion rate from an awake-induced anesthesia protocol to general anesthesia was 1% [95%CI, 0.00-0.05, I2 = 0%]. No permanent anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality was reported. Complete aneurysm repair, occlusion and bypass patency rate was 100% [95%CI, 0.96-1.00, I2 = 0%]. The transient postoperative symptomatic event rate was 34% [95%CI, 0.06-0.81, I2 = 77%]. The overall morbidity rate was 4% [95%CI, 0.00-0.09, I2 = 0%], and the overall mortality rate was 0% [95%CI, 0.00-0.03, I2 = 0%]. CONCLUSION: Awake microsurgery of brain aneurysms is feasible, yet current evidence stems from observational studies. This procedure can reduce surgical morbidity by providing accurate and real-time neurological monitoring during aneurysm repair. While this technique appears to be tolerated, higher level evidence is needed to evaluate judiciously its safety and preference over existing practices for intraoperative neurological monitoring.

Adenosine-assisted embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex lesions that can cause hemorrhagic stroke and significant neurological disability. Adenosine induces cardiac standstill and hypotension, which are thought to be useful during cerebral AVM embolization. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the technique's safety. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, four databases were queried for studies describing the use of adenosine-assisted embolization of cerebral AVMs. Adenosine-related intraoperative complications, permanent neurological outcomes, morbidity, and mortality assessed the technique's safety. Single proportion analysis under a random-effects model was performed. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics, and publication bias was evaluated through funnel plot analysis and Egger's regression test. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, involving 79 patients (55.7% male) with 79 AVMs (54.4% unruptured and 70.9% Spetzler-Martin grade III-V) who underwent 123 embolizations (80.4% and 5.9% under transarterial and transvenous approaches, respectively) with n-butyl cyanoacrylate (80.4%), ethylene vinyl alcohol (14.4%), or both (5.2%). The incidence of transient adenosine-related intraoperative complications was 0% (95% CI 0% to 3%, I2=24%). Besides, the incidence of adenosine-related morbidity, mortality, and permanent outcomes was 0% (95% CI 0% to 3%, I2=0%). During follow-up, good functional outcomes were reported for 64 patients (81%). CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine's effects on blood flow control can facilitate embolization and mitigate the risk of AVM rupture and embolic agent migration. Although current evidence stems from observational studies, the results of this meta-analysis suggest a safe drug profile due to minimal associated morbidity and mortality. Further research from larger randomized and controlled studies is warranted to attain a higher level of evidence. PROSPERO REGISTRY NUMBER: CRD42023494116.