Delayed pericardial effusion or tamponade following left atrial appendage closure: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Pericardial effusion or pericardial tamponade (PE/PT) is a relatively common complication of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). However, delayed PE/PT is rare with limited data. The aim of the study was to analyze the incidence and clinical consequences of delayed PE/PT following LAAC. METHODS: Patients with nonvalvular AF who were successfully implanted with LAAC devices from October 2014 to April 2021 were consecutively screened. Subjects experiencing delayed PE/PT after LAAC were included. All treatment sessions of the subjects were recorded in detail. After discharge, the patients were followed up for clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 748 patients with successful LAAC [nitinol cage device (475 Watchman 2.5), nitinol plug device (131 ACP and 142 LAmbre)] were screened. Six patients experienced delayed PE/PT (1 Watchman, 2 ACP, 3 LAmbre). The incidence of delayed PE/PT was higher in patients with a nitinol plug device (1.8% vs. 0.2%, P = 0.027). Bloody PE only occurred in patients with a nitinol plug device (5/273, 1.8%). All the patients accepted pericardiocentesis and discontinuing antithrombotic medication, and none of the patients died or needed cardiac surgery. All patients were followed up for 810 (598, 1174) days after discharge. None of them developed constrictive pericarditis or thromboembolic or major bleeding events. CONCLUSION: Delayed PE/PT is rare but can occur, and the incidence of delayed bloody PE/PT for the nitinol plug device was higher than that for the nitinol cage device. The strategy of emergency pericardiocentesis combined with discontinuing antithrombotic medication may be effective for delayed bloody PE/PT.

Progress in the study and treatment of peri-device leak after left atrial appendage closure.

For patients with atrial fibrillation with an increased risk of stroke and contraindications to long-term anticoagulation, percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has become an important alternative to long-term oral anticoagulation. Incomplete closure of the LAAC during the procedure leads to faster blood flow in the interstitial space around the device, resulting in peri-device leak (PDL), which is not uncommon. Studies are still inconclusive in determining the incidence, long-term safety, and management of PDL. Therefore, this article reviewed the progress made in the research and treatment of PDL after LAAC.

Unipolar Electrogram-Guided versus Lesion Size Index-Guided Catheter Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Background: This research explores the relationship between the unipolar electrogram (UP-EGM) and lesion size index (LSI) in different regions of continuous circular lesions (CCLs) and to assess the safety and efficacy of UP-EGM-guided versus LSI-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods: A total of 120 patients with drug-refractory PAF who underwent index RFCA were scheduled to be consecutively included from March 2020 to April 2021. All the patients were randomly divided 1:1 into two groups: the UP-EGM group and the LSI group. The first-pass PVI rate, acute PVI rate, and the sinus rhythm maintenance rate were compared. Results: A total of 120 patients with PAF were included in the study: the UP-EGM group (n = 60) and the LSI group (n = 60). All the LSI values in the UP-EGM group were less than those in the corresponding regions in the LSI group (all p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the first-pass PVI rate and acute PVI rate between the two groups. After a mean follow-up period of 11.31 ± 1.70 months, the sinus rhythm maintenance rate in the UP-EGM group was comparable to that in the LSI group (90% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.752). Conclusion: UP-EGM-guided and LSI-guided RFCA are both effective and safe in patients with PAF. However, UP-EGM may be more suitable than LSI for guiding individual RFCA.