Advances in the treatment of malignant ascites in China.

PURPOSE: Malignant ascites (MA) often occurs in recurrent abdominal malignant tumors, and the large amount of ascites associated with cancerous peritonitis not only leads to severe abdominal distension and breathing difficulties, but also reduces the patient's quality of life and ability to resist diseases, which usually makes it difficult to carry out anti-cancer treatment. The exploration of MA treatment methods is also a key link in MA treatment. This article is going to review the treatment of MA, to provide details for further research on the treatment of MA, and to provide some guidance for the clinical treatment of MA. METHOD: This review analyzes various expert papers and summarizes them to obtain the paper. RESULT: There are various treatment methods for MA, including systemic therapy and local therapy. Among them, systemic therapy includes diuretic therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, anti angiogenic therapy, CAR-T, and vaccine. Local therapy includes puncture surgery, peritoneal vein shunt surgery, acellular ascites infusion therapy, radioactive nuclide intraperitoneal injection therapy, tunnel catheter, and intraperitoneal hyperthermia chemotherapy. And traditional Chinese medicine treatment has also played a role in enhancing efficacy and reducing toxicity to a certain extent. CONCLUSION: Although there has been significant progress in the treatment of MA, it is still one of the clinical difficulties. Exploring the combination or method of drugs with the best therapeutic effect and the least adverse reactions to control MA is still an urgent problem to be solved.

Elucidating the role of TWIST1 in ulcerative colitis: a comprehensive bioinformatics and machine learning approach.

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a common and progressive inflammatory bowel disease primarily affecting the colon and rectum. Prolonged inflammation can lead to colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CAC). While the exact cause of UC remains unknown, this study aims to investigate the role of the TWIST1 gene in UC. Methods: Second-generation sequencing data from adult UC patients were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, and characteristic genes were selected using machine learning and Lasso regression. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve assessed TWIST1's potential as a diagnostic factor (AUC score). Enriched pathways were analyzed, including Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA). Functional mechanisms of marker genes were predicted, considering immune cell infiltration and the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network. Results: We found 530 DEGs, with 341 upregulated and 189 downregulated genes. TWIST1 emerged as one of four potential UC biomarkers via machine learning. TWIST1 expression significantly differed in two datasets, GSE193677 and GSE83687, suggesting its diagnostic potential (AUC = 0.717 in GSE193677, AUC = 0.897 in GSE83687). Enrichment analysis indicated DEGs associated with TWIST1 were involved in processes like leukocyte migration, humoral immune response, and cell chemotaxis. Immune cell infiltration analysis revealed higher rates of M0 macrophages and resting NK cells in the high TWIST1 expression group, while TWIST1 expression correlated positively with M2 macrophages and resting NK cell infiltration. We constructed a ceRNA regulatory network involving 1 mRNA, 7 miRNAs, and 32 long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) to explore TWIST1's regulatory mechanism. Conclusion: TWIST1 plays a significant role in UC and has potential as a diagnostic marker. This study sheds light on UC's molecular mechanisms and underscores TWIST1's importance in its progression. Further research is needed to validate these findings in diverse populations and investigate TWIST1 as a therapeutic target in UC.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of pancreatitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown remarkable efficacy against various cancers in clinical practice. However, ICIs can cause immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated pancreatic injury, often leading to drug withdrawal, and then patients must go to specialized treatment. The patients, their primary tumors are sensitive to ICIs therapy, may experience treatment delays due to such adverse reactions. Therefore, there is a need for systematic clinical researches on immune-related pancreatic toxicity to provide a clinical basis for its prevention and treatment. METHODS: This study involved the collection of data from patients treated with ICIs and addressed pancreatic injury with preemptive treatment before continuing ICIs therapy. Then, we also statistically analyzed the incidence of pancreatic injury in patients with different courses and combined treatment, and the success rate of rechallenge treatment. RESULTS: The study included 62 patients, with 33.9% (21/62) experiencing varying degrees of pancreatic injury. Patients with pancreatic injury, 10 cases evolved into pancreatitis, representing 47.6% (10/21) in the pancreatic injury subgroup and 16.1% (10/62) of the total patient cohort. Preemptive treatment was administered to 47.6% (10/21) of patients with pancreatitis, the effective rate was 100%. Among these patients, 70% (7/10) underwent successful rechallenge with ICIs. The occurrence of pancreatic injury was positively correlated with the treatment duration (P < 0.05) but showed no significant correlation with combination therapies (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The likelihood of pancreatic injury increased with longer treatment durations with ICIs; no significant association was found between the incidence of ICIs-related pancreatic damage and combination therapies. Preemptive treatment for immune-related pancreatitis is feasible, allowing some patients to successfully undergo rechallenge with ICIs therapy.

Albumin Paclitaxel Combined with Intrapleural Infusion of Bevacizumab + Lobaplatin for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of albumin paclitaxel combined with intrapleural bevacizumab + lobaplatin for patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) with malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and analyze prognostic factors. Methods: A total of 126 NS-NSCLC patients were included in the study. Control group with 64 cases received intrapleural infusion of lobaplatin + intravenous albumin paclitaxel, and treatment group with 62 cases received additional intrapleural bevacizumab perfusion. Analysis was performed by collecting data about MPE, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and scores of quality of life. Results: In the treatment and control groups, objective response rate (ORR) was 51.6% and 31.3% (χ 2 = 5.39, P=0.02), and disease control rate (DCR) was 91.9% and 71.9% (χ 2 = 8.49, P=0.004), respectively. The main adverse reactions (≥grade 3) in the treatment group were thrombocytopenia, peripheral neurotoxicity, proteinuria, neutropenia, and nausea/vomiting, and in the control group, they were weakness, nausea/vomiting, anemia, and peripheral neurotoxicity. In the control and treatment groups, the median PFS was 6.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.86-6.56) and 5.1 (95% CI: 4.956-5.191), and the median OS was 14.4 (95% CI: 12.681-16.113) and 10.6 months (95% CI: 8.759-12.391). The score of quality of life for treated patients was significantly higher than those before treatment and the control group, and the parameters included general health status (GH), role physical (RP), body pain (BP), social function (SF), and vitality (VT); pH, CD4+/CD8+ values, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the pleural effusion significantly affected the PFS and OS (P < 0.05). Bevacizumab administration in patients with bloody pleural effusion did not increase the risk of pleural hemorrhage. Conclusion: The combination of albumin paclitaxel and intrapleural bevacizumab + lobaplatin is effective and may reverse the adverse events in patients with NS-NSCLC and MPE. The change of CD4+/CD8+ ratio before and after treatment is an independent and prognostic factor for patients with NS-NSCLC and MPE.