Awareness of gestational diabetes mellitus foetal-maternal risks: an Italian cohort study on pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) incidence is increasing worldwide. It represents a major risk factor for adverse foetal-maternal outcomes. Awareness among women in regard to GDM-related risks (in particular foetus ones) has been proven to have an impact on compliance with recommendations. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of our post-diagnosis counselling, that informs affected women of the GDM related risks for complications, in determining an adequate level of understanding. METHOD: This is a cohort study involving 400 women undergoing the 24-28 weeks 75 g oral glucose tolerance test. Two hundred women diagnosed with GDM received the post-diagnosis counselling (treatment group) and two hundred women diagnosed without did not receive any counselling (control group). Both populations were surveyed with a 5 question questionnaire regarding their awareness about GDM foetal-maternal related risks. Their level of education about GDM foetal-maternal related risks, estimated according to the number of correct answers, was scored as: primary (score 0-1), secondary (score 2-3) or tertiary (score 4-5). RESULTS: Most of the women in the treatment group after receiving the post-diagnosis counselling have demonstrated a secondary level of education 132/200 (66%). Their mean level of awareness was higher in comparison to the control group 2.6 ± 1.8 (SD) versus 2.14 ± 1.8 (SD) p value = 0.012. In particular, they've demonstrated to be more aware of the risks for the foetus to become macrosomic (p = 0.004) or to die in utero (p = 0.0001). A high level of education and to have had previous pregnancies positively affected correct answers. CONCLUSIONS: Our post-diagnosis counselling has played a role in improving women awareness about GDM foetal-maternal related risks. Future study will explore the impact of women's level of awareness on glycaemic control.

Prenatal tests for chromosomal abnormalities detection (PTCAD): pregnant women's knowledge in an Italian Population.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays several Prenatal Tests for Chromosomal Abnormalities Detection (PTCAD) are available. In those cases in which there is not an Institutional protocol to advise women about the available PTCAD, the choice of which one to undergo is up to the woman and largely depends on her knowledge about them. Therefore, we decided to evaluate, as a primary outcome, knowledge about PTCAD among pregnant women attending our Term Clinic. As a secondary outcome we evaluated the relationship between the patient's knowledge and the subsequently chosen PTCAD. METHODS: From August 2017 to August 2018 an anonymous questionnaire with multiple-choice answers was administered to all pregnant women attending our Term antenatal Clinic, a tertiary obstetric unit in Catanzaro (Italy). RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-five pregnant women were enrolled in the study. We observed that 28.8% of the pregnant women that chose one of the PTCAD, avoided the first trimester combined screening test; among these, 11.4% were in favour of the cell-free foetal DNA test. The latter was erroneously considered diagnostic by 34.3% of the women that had chosen it. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that women's knowledge about PTCAD is poor and that there is a potentially dangerous confusion between the words 'screening' and 'diagnostic'. Informative campaigns about PTCAD and the application of dedicated antenatal counselling appointments should be a health-care priority to avoid unnecessary risks and costs for pregnant women and possible legal issues.

Obstetric complications in pregnancies with life-limiting malformations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The implementation of palliative care at birth has led to a significant rise in the number of couples who choose to continue with pregnancies complicated by life-limiting malformations (LLMs). Prenatal counselling and appropriate antenatal/perinatal management in these cases are poorly studied and may pose significant challenges. The purpose of this review is to outline specific obstetric risks and to suggest management for mothers who choose to continue with pregnancies with the most common LLMs. RECENT FINDINGS: In pregnancies complicated by LLMs where parents opt for expectant management, clinicians should respect parental wishes, whilst openly sharing potential serious maternal medical risks specific for the identified abnormalities. The focus of both antenatal and perinatal care should be maternal wellbeing rather than foetal survival. Follow-up ultrasound examinations and maternal surveillance should be aimed at achieving timely diagnosis and effective management of obstetric complications. A clear perinatal plan, agreed with the couples by a multi-disciplinary team including a foetal medicine specialist, a neonatologist and a geneticist, is crucial to reduce maternal morbidity. SUMMARY: This review provides a useful framework for clinicians who face the challenges of counselling and managing cases complicated by LLMs where parents opt for pregnancy continuation.

Non-obstetrical indications for cesarean section: a state-of-the-art review.

PURPOSE: To propose an evidence-based review on the most frequent indications for Cesarean section (CS) given by specialists in disciplines other than Obstetrics and Gynecology, with the aim of increasing consciousness about the available data in the literature and the guidelines recommendations about topics that are not frequently managed by obstetricians and gynecologists. METHODS: We analyzed hospital discharge data regarding deliveries occurred in a 10-year study period in our department to obtain the prevalence and the list of the most recurrent non-obstetrical indications for CS. A search was performed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Ovid MEDLINE and only studies published in English from 1950 to 2017 were included. For indications for which no systematic reviews existed, we included the best available evidence, including guidelines of non-obstetrics scientific societies or organizations, RCTs, non-randomized controlled clinical trials, case-control studies, cohort studies, and case series. RESULTS: The rising rate of CS registered in the recent years is not justified by reduction in maternal--fetal risk or perinatal outcomes and often reflects inappropriate clinical behaviour and a wrong tendency that assimilates CS as a defensive practice. In a relevant percentage of cases, the indication to CS is given by specialists in other disciplines, even when specific guidelines do not give clear recommendation about the route of delivery. CONCLUSIONS: To refuse non-obstetrical indications for CS, when scientific support is lacking, could be a useful and safe strategy to further reduce the rate of unnecessary CS.

Knowledge of Human Cytomegalovirus Infection and Prevention in Pregnant Women: A Baseline, Operational Survey.

Currently, the only efficient way to prevent human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection in pregnancy is primary prophylaxis through hygienic measures. So, we evaluated knowledge of HCMV and its prevention in a group of pregnant women. An anonymous questionnaire with multiple-choice answers was administered to all pregnant women who were followed up at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit of "Pugliese-Ciaccio Hospital," a third-level hospital in Catanzaro (Southern Italy), from November 2015 to March 2016. Previously prescribed serology results for HCMV were also evaluated. Three hundred and fifty women participated in the study and the results clearly demonstrated that knowledge of pregnant women about HCMV is poor. Moreover, prescribed screening procedures need to be optimized, since one out of three pregnant women has not been tested for HCMV or the screening was not performed adequately. For this reason, it is important to implement informative campaign in both pregnant women and providing physicians.

Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound in women with placenta previa and prior cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of ultrasound for antenatal identification of invasive placentation in women with placenta previa in the setting of prior cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study. Singleton pregnancies at risk of placenta accreta because of persistent placenta previa in the setting of prior cesarean delivery who delivered at four centers, from January 2010 to May 2020, were included in the study. For this study, pregnancies with diagnosis of accreta, increta, or percreta were considered under the umbrella term of placenta accreta. All women with placenta previa identified in the second trimester had a follow-up ultrasound at 32-34 weeks. Only those with prior cesarean delivery were considered at risk of placenta accreta. Women were considered with suspected accreta in case of suspected prenatal ultrasound. Women with suspected placenta accreta had delivery planned via cesarean hysterectomy at 34+0 - 35+6 weeks, without any attempt to remove the placenta. The primary endpoint of the study was the performance of ultrasound for antenatal identification of invasive placentation. The following ultrasound signs were evaluated: placenta lacunae; loss of clear space; increased vascularity between myometrium and placenta; intracervical lake; rail sign; uterovesical hypervascularity; increased vascularity in the inferior part of the lower uterine segment potentially extending into the parametrial region; and disruption of bladder-myometrial interface. RESULTS: 180 singleton pregnancies with placenta previa in the setting of prior cesarean delivery were identified. Of them, 155 (86.1%) had antenatal suspected placenta accreta based on ultrasound, having at least one sign of invasive placentation. Of the 155 suspected cases, 99 had confirmed placenta accreta at the time of delivery. Among the 99 cases of confirmed placenta accreta, all of them had at least one sign of invasive placentation at ultrasound. Among the 81 cases with placenta previa, prior cesarean delivery, without placenta accreta, 25/81 (30.9%) had ultrasound scan negative for sign of invasive placentation, and 56/81 (69.1%) had at least one sign of invasive placentation). In particular, 12/81 (14.8%) had placenta lacunae, 16/81 (19.8%) had loss of clear space, 20/81 (24.7%) had increased vascularity between myometrium and placenta, 9/81 (11.1%) had intracervical lake, 14/81 (17.3%) had rail sign, 14 (17.3%) had uterovesical hypervascularity, 5/81 (6.2%) had increased vascularity in the inferior part of the lower uterine segment potentially extending into the parametrial region, 8/81 (9.9%) had disruption of bladder-myometrial interface. In the group of women with confirmed placenta accreta, the most common sign recorded was the disruption of bladder-myometrial interface, being recorded in 88/99 women. Disruption of bladder-myometrial interface had the highest sensitivity in detection placenta accreta. Women with disruption of bladder-myometrial interface at ultrasound had 73-fold increase in the risk of placenta accreta compared to those who did not. CONCLUSION: Prenatal ultrasound has an excellent diagnostic accuracy in identifying invasive placentation in women with placenta previa and prior cesarean delivery.

Surgical Conservative Management of a Retained Placenta after Angular Pregnancy, a Case Report and Literature Review.

Angular pregnancies are rare and difficult to diagnose. Evidence suggests they are associated with a higher risk of intrauterine growth restriction and abnormal third stage of labor due to a retained placenta. The lack of standardized AP diagnostic criteria impacts on their correct identification and makes the treatment of potential complications challenging. We present a case of the successful conservative surgical management of a retained placenta after a term AP also complicated by intrauterine growth restriction. Moreover, to identify the best evidence regarding AP diagnostic criteria and retained placenta therapeutic approaches, we have realized an expert literature review.

Successful Vaginal Delivery after Induction of Labour in a Patient Treated for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the Cervix: A Case Report and Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: Primary non-Hodgkin's lymphomas of the cervix are rare; they represent about 1% of all cases. There are no available guidelines regarding the safest mode of delivery after treatment and resolution of a cervical lymphoma. Case Report. We report the first case of a successful vaginal delivery after induction of labour in a woman recovered from a primary large B-cell lymphoma of the cervix and a literature review. CONCLUSION: In carefully selected patients with fully treated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the cervix with no residual disease, induction of labour via prostaglandins pessary may be a safe option if indicated.

Status epilepticus in pregnancy: a literature review and a protocol proposal.

INTRODUCTION: Status epilepticus (SE) in pregnancy represents a life-threatening medical emergency for both mother and fetus. Pregnancy-related pharmacokinetic modifications and the risks for fetus associated with the use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) and anesthetic drugs complicate SE management. No standardized treatment protocol for SE in pregnancy is available to date. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we provide an overview of the current literature on the management of SE in pregnancy and we propose a multidisciplinary-based protocol approach. EXPERT OPINION: Literature data are scarce (mainly anecdotal case reports or small case series). Prompt treatment of SE during pregnancy is paramount and a multidisciplinary team is needed. Benzodiazepines are the drugs of choice for SE in pregnancy. Levetiracetam and phenytoin represent the most suitable second-line agents. Valproic acid should be administered only if other ASMs failed and preferably avoided in the first trimester of pregnancy. For refractory SE, anesthetic drugs are needed, with propofol and midazolam as preferred drugs. Magnesium sulfate is the first-line treatment for SE in eclampsia. Termination of pregnancy, via delivery or abortion, is recommended in case of failure of general anesthetics. Further studies are needed to identify the safest and most effective treatment protocol.

Pregnancy associated transient osteoporosis of the hip (PR-TOH): A non-obstetric indication to caesarean section. A case report with literature review.

Pregnancy related transient osteoporosis of the hip (PR-TOH) is a rare condition that manifests with sudden pain located in the groin region, anterior thigh and buttocks. It is a benign and in the majority of cases self-limiting disease, related to bone marrow oedema. It occurs during the third trimester of pregnancy or less frequently during the post-partum period. Hip movements are usually restricted by pain and it often becomes a non-obstetric indication for Caesarean delivery. Here, we report a case of unilateral PR-TOH diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a literature review.

Incidental diagnosis of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a woman affected by gestational diabetes mellitus: case report and literature review.

Pancreatic cancer is rarely diagnosed during pregnancy; it usually manifests with symptoms such as epigastric pain, vomiting, weight loss, and jaundice, rarely mimicking the hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome. It has been postulated that there exists a correlation between the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus and the occurrence of pancreatic cancer later in life. We conducted an expert literature review of the 31 available documented pancreatic cancer cases that were diagnosed during pregnancy. We also report pancreatic adenocarcinoma incidentally suspected in an asymptomatic woman affected by gestational diabetes mellitus; the woman was undergoing a fetal growth scan.

Difficult caesarean section: A literature review.

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) is usually perceived as a simple and safe alternative to natural birth, but in some instances can be technically difficult with consequent health hazards for both the mother and the fetus. We have proposed an evidence-based literature review of the most common difficult CS scenarios, with the aim to provide useful information about their management, possible prevention and resolution of complications. METHODS: We identified articles through a reserch in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Ovid MEDLINE for studies published between 1979 and 2019. We included the best available evidence, such as RCTs, non-randomised controlled clinical trials, case-control studies, cohort studies, and case series. About sixty articles were included in this review, four hundred and thirty-six were excluded after reviewing the title or abstract or because they weren't in English. FINDINGS: The possible causes of "difficult" caesarean sections were divided into four categories: difficult access to the lower uterine segment; complicated fetal extraction, laceration or organ damage and abnormal placentation. CONCLUSIONS: Knowing in advance the potential technical difficulties and resulting risks allows the surgeon to plan appropriate strategies.

Appropriate Timing of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis in Medium- and Low-Risk Women: Effectiveness of the Italian NHS Recommendations in Preventing Fetal Macrosomia.

BACKGROUND: Screening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) earlier than 24-28 weeks of gestation should be considered to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes. Nonetheless, there is uncertainty about which women would benefit most from early screening and which screening strategies should be offered to women with GDM. The Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS) recommendations on selective screening for GDM at 16-18 weeks of gestation are effective in preventing fetal macrosomia in high-risk (HR) women, but the appropriateness of timing and effectiveness of these recommendations in medium- (MR) and low-risk (LR) women are still controversial. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively enrolled 769 consecutive singleton pregnant women who underwent both anomaly scan at 19-21 weeks of gestation and screening for GDM at 16-18 and/or 24-28 weeks of gestation, in agreement with the NHS recommendations and risk stratification criteria. Comparison of maternal characteristics, fetal biometric parameters at anomaly scan (head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL), estimated fetal weight (EFW)), and neonatal birth weight (BW) percentile among risk groups was examined. RESULTS: 219 (28.5%) women were diagnosed with GDM, while 550 (71.5%) were normal glucose-tolerant women. Out of 164 HR women, only 62 (37.8%) underwent the recommended early screening for GDM at 16-18 weeks of gestation. AC and EFW percentiles, as well as neonates' BW percentiles, were significantly higher in HR women diagnosed with GDM at 24-28 weeks of gestation with respect to normal glucose-tolerant women, as well as MR and LR women who tested positive for GDM. Comparative analysis between MR and LR women with GDM and women with normal glucose tolerance revealed significant differences in both AC and EFW percentiles (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in neonatal BW percentiles. CONCLUSION: In MR and LR women with GDM, a mild acceleration of fetal growth can be detected at the time of anomaly scan. However, in these at-risk categories, the NHS recommendations for screening and treatment of GDM at 24-28 weeks of gestation are still effective in normalizing BW and preventing fetal macrosomia, thus supporting a risk factor-based selective screening program for GDM.

First Trimester Combined Test (FTCT) as a Predictor of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Background-The first trimester combined test (FTCT) is an effective screening tool to estimate the risk of fetal aneuploidy. It is obtained by the combination of maternal age, ultrasound fetal nuchal translucency (NT) measurement, and the maternal serum markers free ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A). However, conflicting data have been reported about the association of FTCT, ß-hCG, or PAPP-A with the subsequent diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Research design and methods-2410 consecutive singleton pregnant women were retrospectively enrolled in Calabria, Southern Italy. All participants underwent examinations for FTCT at 11-13 weeks (plus 6 days) of gestation, and screening for GDM at 16-18 and/or 24-28 weeks of gestation, in accordance with current Italian guidelines and the International Association Diabetes Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) glycemic cut-offs. Data were examined by univariate and logistic regression analyses. Results-1814 (75.3%) pregnant women were normal glucose tolerant, while 596 (24.7%) were diagnosed with GDM. Spearman univariate analysis demonstrated a correlation between FTCT values and subsequent GDM diagnosis (ρ = 0.048, p = 0.018). The logistic regression analysis showed that women with a FTCT <1:10000 had a major GDM risk (p = 0.016), similar to women with a PAPP-A <1 multiple of the expected normal median (MoM, p = 0.014). Conversely, women with ß-hCG ≥2.0 MoM had a reduced risk of GDM (p = 0.014). Conclusions-Our findings indicate that GDM susceptibility increases with fetal aneuploidy risk, and that FTCT and its related maternal serum parameters can be used as early predictors of GDM.

Barriers to Postpartum Glucose Intolerance Screening in an Italian Population.

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a strong risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and the postpartum period is crucial for early treatment in at-risk women. However, despite recommendations, only a fraction of women undergo a postpartum screening for glucose intolerance (ppOGTT). The present study aims to verify the reason(s) for poor adherence in our population. Research design and methods: This retrospective study includes 451 women in which GDM was diagnosed between 2015⁻2016. During 2017, we verified by phone interview how many women underwent ppOGTT at 6⁻12 weeks postpartum, as recommended by the Italian guidelines. The non-compliant women were asked about the reason(s) for failing to screen. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test and the 2-tailed Fisher exact test were used to compare continuous and categorical features, respectively, among women performing or non-performing ppOGTT. Results: Out of 451 women with GDM diagnosis, we recorded information from 327. Only 97 (29.7%) performed ppOGTT. The remaining 230 women (70.3%) provided the following explanation for non-compliance: (1) newborn care (30.4%); (2) misunderstood importance (28.3%); (3) oversight (13.0%); (4) unavailability of test reservation in the nearest centers (10.4%); (5) normal glycemic values at delivery (8.3%); (6) discouragement by primary care physician (5.6%). Conclusions: In our population, most women with recent GDM failed to perform ppOGTT. Our results indicated that the prominent barriers could potentially be overcome.