Ablative fractional laser-assisted photodynamic therapy for lentigo maligna: a prospective pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Lentigo maligna (LM) is an in situ form of melanoma carrying a risk of progression to invasive lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM). LM poses a clinical challenge, with subclinical extension and high recurrence rates after incomplete surgery. Alternative treatment methods have been investigated with varying results. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with methylaminolaevulinate (MAL) has already proved promising in this respect. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of ablative fractional laser (AFL)-assisted PDT with 5-aminolaevulinic acid nanoemulsion (BF-200 ALA) for treating LM. METHODS: In this non-sponsored prospective pilot study, ten histologically verified LMs were treated with AFL-assisted PDT three times at 2-week intervals using a light dose of 90 J/cm2 per treatment session. Local anaesthesia with ropivacaine was used. Four weeks after the last PDT treatment the lesions were treated surgically with a wide excision and sent for histopathological examination. The primary outcome was complete histopathological clearance of the LM from the surgical specimen. Patient-reported pain during illumination and the severity of the skin reaction after the PDT treatments were monitored as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The complete histopathological clearance rate was 7 out of 10 LMs (70%). The pain during illumination was tolerable, with the mean pain scores for the PDT sessions on a visual assessment scale ranging from 2.9 to 3.8. Some severe skin reactions occurred during the treatment period, however. CONCLUSIONS: Ablative fractional laser-assisted PDT showed moderate efficacy in terms of histological clearance. It could constitute an alternative treatment for LM but due to the side effects it should only be considered in inoperable cases.

5-aminolaevulinic acid nanoemulsion is more effective than methyl-5-aminolaevulinate in daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: a nonsponsored randomized double-blind multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT) with methyl-5-aminolaevulinate (MAL) is an effective treatment for mild and moderate actinic keratosis (AK). OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical efficacy, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of 5-aminolaevulinic acid nanoemulsion (BF-200 ALA) compared with MAL in DL-PDT for grade I-II AKs. METHODS: This nonsponsored, prospective randomized double-blind multicentre trial included 69 patients with 767 grade I-II AKs located symmetrically on the face or scalp. A single DL-PDT was given in a randomized split-face design. The primary outcome was clearance of the AKs at 12 months as assessed by a blinded observer. The secondary outcomes were pain, treatment reactions, cosmetic outcome and the cost-effectiveness of the therapy. RESULTS: In the per-patient (half-face) analysis, clearance was better for the BF-200 ALA sides than for those treated with MAL (P = 0·008). In total, BF-200 ALA cleared 299/375 AKs (79·7%) and MAL 288/392 (73·5%) (P = 0·041). The treatment was practically painless with both photosensitizers, the mean pain visual analogue scale being 1·51 for BF-200 ALA and 1·35 for MAL (P = 0·061). Twenty-six patients had a stronger skin reaction on the BF-200 ALA side, seven on the MAL side and 23 displayed no difference (P = 0·001). The cosmetic outcome was excellent or good in > 90% of cases with both photosensitizers (P = 1·000). The cost-effectiveness plane showed that the costs of DL-PDT were similar for both photosensitizers, but the effectiveness was slightly higher for BF-200 ALA. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that BF-200 ALA is more effective than MAL in DL-PDT for grade I-II AKs. BF-200 ALA provides slightly better value for money than MAL.