RESUMEN
RATIONALE: Buspirone, a partial 5HT(1A) agonist and D2 and D3 antagonist, has shown promising antiemetic efficacy when given parenterally in animal models, but its efficacy for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and dose-responsiveness of intravenous buspirone for the prevention of PONV. METHODS: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in adults at moderate to high PONV risk undergoing surgery with a general anaesthetic. Patients were randomised to receive an intravenous dose of buspirone (0.3, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 mg) or placebo at the end of surgery. The primary endpoint was the cumulative 24-h PONV incidence (i.e. any nausea and/or vomiting). Vomiting included retching. Nausea was defined as a score of ≥ 4 on an 11-point verbal rating scale running from zero (no nausea) to ten (the worst nausea imaginable). RESULTS: A total of 257 patients received the study drug and fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the primary efficacy and safety analyses. With placebo, the mean 24-h PONV incidence was 49.0 % (90 % confidence interval [CI] 37.5-60.5 %). With buspirone, that incidence ranged from a mean of 40.8 % (29.3-52.4 %) in the 1 mg arm to 58.0 % (46.5-69.5 %) in the 0.3 mg arm (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). There was no difference between placebo and buspirone at any dose for any other efficacy endpoint, nor in the number or severity of adverse events or any other safety measures. CONCLUSION: We were unable to show that intravenous single-dose buspirone, at the tested dose-range, was effective at preventing PONV in surgical adult patients. The present study emphasises the difficulty in extrapolating from animal models of emesis to clinical efficacy in PONV.
Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Antieméticos/uso terapéutico , Buspirona/uso terapéutico , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/prevención & control , Agonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT1/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiolíticos/administración & dosificación , Ansiolíticos/efectos adversos , Ansiolíticos/farmacocinética , Antieméticos/administración & dosificación , Antieméticos/efectos adversos , Antieméticos/farmacocinética , Buspirona/administración & dosificación , Buspirona/efectos adversos , Buspirona/análogos & derivados , Buspirona/sangre , Buspirona/farmacocinética , Antagonistas de Dopamina/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Dopamina/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Dopamina/farmacocinética , Antagonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores de Dopamina D2 , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/sangre , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/epidemiología , Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT1A/química , Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT1A/metabolismo , Receptores de Dopamina D2/metabolismo , Receptores de Dopamina D3/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Dopamina D3/metabolismo , Agonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT1/administración & dosificación , Agonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT1/efectos adversos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Antiplatelet therapy commonly is used for the prevention of cardiovascular complications but increases the risk of perioperative bleeding. Multiple-electrode aggregometry (MEA) was investigated for monitoring platelet inhibition by acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with regard to clinical outcome as measured by postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: A teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery were included: without antiplatelet therapy (group A, n = 50), single ASA exposure (group B, n = 50), and combined therapy with ASA and clopidogrel (group C, n = 50). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: MEA was assessed preoperatively using either collagen (COL-MEA) or ADP (ADP-MEA). Postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements were recorded for 24 hours after surgery. Postoperative blood loss significantly increased only from combined antiplatelet therapy (group A: 572 ± 297 mL, group B: 721 ± 356 mL, group C: 865 ± 346, p < 0.01) and correlated with ADP (r(p) = -0.35, p < 0.01) and COL-MEA (r(p) = -0.23, p > 0.01). COL-MEA and ADP-MEA discriminated between preoperative ASA and clopidogrel intake (ASA: sensitivity = 86.3%, and specificity = 89.3%; clopidogrel: sensitivity = 87.5%, and specificity = 95.1%). The postoperative transfusion risk was increased in patients diagnosed for clopidogrel treatment by ADP-MEA (odds ratio = 2.92; confidence interval: 1.44-5.92; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: MEA is a suitable method for the detection of platelet inhibition by ASA and clopidogrel in patients undergoing CABG surgery. In these patients, preoperative ADP MEA seems to indicate patients at risk for postoperative transfusion requirements.
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Agregación Plaquetaria/fisiología , Pruebas de Función Plaquetaria/instrumentación , Anciano , Anestesia General , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Volumen Sanguíneo , Clopidogrel , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Derivados de Hidroxietil Almidón/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sustitutos del Plasma/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Medicación Preanestésica , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Ticlopidina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Several studies have shown that goal-directed hemodynamic and fluid optimization may result in improved outcome. However, the methods used were either invasive or had other limitations. The aim of this study was to perform intraoperative goal-directed therapy with a minimally invasive, easy to use device (FloTrac/Vigileo), and to evaluate possible improvements in patient outcome determined by the duration of hospital stay and the incidence of complications compared to a standard management protocol. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled trial 60 high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were included. Patients were allocated into either an enhanced hemodynamic monitoring group using a cardiac index based intraoperative optimization protocol (FloTrac/Vigileo device, GDT-group, n = 30) or a standard management group (Control-group, n = 30), based on standard monitoring data. RESULTS: The median duration of hospital stay was significantly reduced in the GDT-group with 15 (12 - 17.75) days versus 19 (14 - 23.5) days (P = 0.006) and fewer patients developed complications than in the Control-group [6 patients (20%) versus 15 patients (50%), P = 0.03]. The total number of complications was reduced in the GDT-group (17 versus 49 complications, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, implementation of an intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic optimization protocol using the FloTrac/Vigileo device was associated with a reduced length of hospital stay and a lower incidence of complications compared to a standard management protocol. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Unique identifier: NCT00549419.
Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Tiempo de Internación , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Anciano , Calibración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos OperativosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: it has been shown that supplemental oxygen reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing colon surgery. Serotonin is a potent trigger of PONV. Theoretically, supplemental oxygen decreases gut ischaemia during surgery and in this way minimizes the release of serotonin. We investigated the release of serotonin during and after colorectal surgery with normal and supplemental oxygen administration. METHODS: patients (n = 53) undergoing colon surgery were randomly assigned to one of two intraoperative ventilation regimens: group A (n = 30) received 80% oxygen and 20% nitrogen mixed with desflurane and group B (n = 23) received 30% oxygen and 70% nitrogen mixed with desflurane. To verify oxygenation status, we measured the arterial oxygen partial pressure (pO2) by blood gas analysis and the intramuscular tissue oxygenation using a polarographic microoxygen sensor (Licox, GMS, Mielkendorf, Germany). Serotonin levels in plasma and in platelets were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) before the beginning of surgery (T0), at the end of surgery (T1), and 2 h (T2), 8 h (T3) and 24 h (T4) postoperatively. PONV was assessed in the early (0-4 h) and overall (0-24 h) postoperative period by an anaesthesiologist unaware of patients' treatment regime. RESULTS: at T1, T2 and T3, serotonin levels were significantly (T1 '80% group' 80 ± 68.2 vs. '30% group' 147 ± 130.5; T2 '80% group' 78.4 ± 61 vs. '30% group' 139 ± 103; T3 '80% group' 76.2 ± 49.5 vs. '30% group' 124 ± 73.7; P < 0.05) reduced in the '80% oxygen group'. Patients in the '80% group' showed a significantly higher pO2 and subcutaneous tissue oxygenation (ptO2). The overall incidence of PONV was significantly reduced in the '80% oxygen group' ('80% group' 7% vs. '30% group' 35%). CONCLUSION: an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 reduces serotonin levels significantly and decreases PONV significantly in patients undergoing colon surgery.
Asunto(s)
Colon/cirugía , Oxígeno/administración & dosificación , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/prevención & control , Serotonina/metabolismo , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestésicos por Inhalación/administración & dosificación , Análisis de los Gases de la Sangre , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Desflurano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Isquemia/etiología , Isoflurano/administración & dosificación , Isoflurano/análogos & derivados , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nitrógeno/administración & dosificación , Oxígeno/metabolismo , Método Simple Ciego , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Motility disturbances often occur in critically ill patients resulting in an increased rate of morbidity and mortality. Only limited options for treatment of gastrointestinal dysfunction have been introduced. Factors contributing to motility disorders in the ICU patient, and recent therapeutic approaches are reviewed in the following. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite the growing use of early enteral nutrition in the ICU and improvements in patients' outcome, feed intolerance and motility disorders in critical illness remain unsolved. Evaluation of pathophysiological patterns such as antro-pyloric dysfunction has led to a better knowledge of gut function, whereas development of new prokinetic agents is scarce, and enthusiasm has been cut by the withdrawal of some propulsive agents from the market. SUMMARY: The complexity of gastrointestinal motor function poses a challenge to the pharmacological modulation of gut motility. There has been progress in the understanding of pathophysiologic patterns, whereas therapeutic options are still rare. Metoclopramide and erythromycin are the best evaluated and still the most promising prokinetic agents. Only a few studies in critical illness are available, and the definite value of novel propulsive agents such as motilin agonists and mu-receptor antagonists is unclear due to small patient populations. The most reasonable approach of motility disorders in critical illness seems to be an individual assessment of all associated risk factors combined with early enteral nutrition and use of prokinetic agents.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Motilidad Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos , Nutrición Enteral , Eritromicina/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/farmacología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/fisiopatología , Motilidad Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Metoclopramida/uso terapéutico , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Increased inorganic fluoride levels after methoxyflurane exposure in the 1970s and prolonged intraoperative sevoflurane use have been suggested to be potentially nephrotoxic. In the intensive care unit we evaluated the effect on renal integrity of short-term inhaled postoperative sedation with sevoflurane using the Anesthetic Conserving Device (ACD) compared with propofol. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study, after major abdominal, vascular or thoracic surgery 125 patients were allocated to receive either sevoflurane (n = 64) via the ACD (end-tidal 0.5-1 vol%) or i.v. propofol (n = 61) for postoperative sedation up to 24 h. Urinary alpha-glutathione-s-transferase as primary outcome variable, urinary N-acetyl-glucosaminidase, serum creatinine, and inorganic fluoride concentrations, urine output and fluid management were measured preoperatively, at the end of surgery, and at 24 and 48 h postoperatively. RESULTS: The sedation time in the intensive care unit was comparable between the sevoflurane (9.2 +/- 4.3 h) and the propofol (9.3 +/- 4.7 h) group. Alpha-glutathione-s-transferase levels were significantly increased at 24 and 48 h postoperatively compared with preoperative values in both groups, without significant differences between the groups. N-acetyl-glucosaminidase and serum creatinine remained unchanged in both study groups, and urine output and creatinine clearance were comparable between the groups throughout the study period. Inorganic fluoride levels increased significantly (P < 0.001) at 24 h after sevoflurane exposure (39 +/- 25 micromol/L) compared with propofol (3 +/- 6 micromol/L) and remained elevated 48 h later (33 +/- 26 vs 3 +/- 5 micromol/L). One patient in each group suffered from renal insufficiency, requiring intensive diuretic therapy, but not dialysis, during hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term sedation with either sevoflurane using ACD or propofol did not negatively affect renal function postoperatively. Although inorganic fluoride levels were elevated after sevoflurane exposure, glomerular and tubular renal integrity were preserved throughout the hospital stay.
Asunto(s)
Anestésicos por Inhalación , Sedación Consciente , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Enfermedades Renales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Éteres Metílicos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/inducido químicamente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Propofol , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Cuidados Críticos , Femenino , Fluidoterapia , Fluoruros/sangre , Glutatión Transferasa/sangre , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Sevoflurano , Método Simple CiegoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Parenteral nutrition including lipids might be associated with liver disease. The cause leading to parenteral nutrition-related liver dysfunction remains largely unknown but is likely to be multifactorial. The study was performed to assess the effects of a lipid emulsion based on soybean oil, medium-chain triglycerides, olive and fish oil (SMOFlipid20%) compared with a lipid emulsion based on olive and soybean oil on hepatic integrity. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial, 44 postoperative patients with an indication for parenteral nutrition were allocated to one of two regimens: group A (n = 22) received SMOFlipid, group B (n = 22) a lipid emulsion based on olive and soybean oil for 5 days. Aspartate aminotransferase, alanin-aminotransferase, and serum alpha-glutathion S-transferase were measured before the start of parenteral nutrition (d0), at day 2 (d2), and day 5 (d5) after the start of parenteral nutrition. The significance level was defined at a P value of less than 0.05. RESULTS: There was no significant difference at d0, but at d2 and d5, significantly lower aspartate aminotransferase (d2: group A: 27 +/- 13 vs. group B: 47 +/- 36 U l(-1); d5: A: 31 +/- 14 vs. B: 56 +/- 45 U l(-1)), alanin-aminotransferase (d2: A: 20 +/- 12 vs. B: 42 +/- 39 U l(-1); d5: A: 26 +/- 15 vs. B: 49 +/- 44 U l(-1)), and alpha-glutathion S-transferase levels (d2: A: 5 +/- 6 vs. B: 17 +/- 21 U l(-1); d5: A: 6 +/- 7 vs. B: 24 +/- 27 microg l(-1)) were found in soybean oil, medium-chain triglycerides, olive and fish oil group compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: Hepatic integrity was well retained with the administration of SMOFlipid whereas in patients receiving a lipid emulsion based on olive and soybean oil liver enzymes were elevated indicating a lower liver tolerability.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/prevención & control , Emulsiones Grasas Intravenosas/efectos adversos , Aceites de Pescado/efectos adversos , Nutrición Parenteral/efectos adversos , Aceites de Plantas/efectos adversos , Aceite de Soja/efectos adversos , Triglicéridos/efectos adversos , Anciano , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Aspartato Aminotransferasas/sangre , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Emulsiones , Femenino , Glutatión Transferasa/sangre , Humanos , Masculino , Aceite de Oliva , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Triglicéridos/sangreRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the procedure of postoperative inhalational sedation with sevoflurane using the Anaesthetic Conserving Device (ACD) with regard to recovery times, feasibility and consumption of anaesthetics in comparison to propofol. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, randomised, single-blinded, controlled study in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a 1,000-bed academic hospital. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: A total of 70 patients after elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery either received sevoflurane via ACD (n = 35) or propofol (n = 35) for short-term postoperative sedation in the ICU. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint was extubation time from termination of sedation. Recovery times, consumption of anaesthetics, endtidal sevoflurane concentrations, length of ICU and hospital stay, and side effects were documented. Mean recovery times were significantly shorter with sevoflurane than with propofol (extubation time: 22 vs. 151 min; following commands: 7 vs. 42 min). The mean (SD) sevoflurane consumption was 3.2 +/- 1.4 mL/h to obtain mean endtidal concentrations of 0.76 vol%. No serious complications occurred during sedation with either sedative drug. The length of ICU stay was comparable in both groups, but hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the sevoflurane group. Drug costs (in Euro) for sedation per patient were similar in both groups (sevoflurane: 15.1 +/- 9.5
Asunto(s)
Anestesiología/instrumentación , Anestésicos por Inhalación , Anestésicos Intravenosos , Sedación Profunda/métodos , Éteres Metílicos , Propofol , Anciano , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Sevoflurano , Método Simple CiegoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antifibrinolytic drugs including aprotinin and tranexamic acid are currently used in cardiac surgery to reduce postoperative bleeding and transfusion requirements, and may have different effects on platelets. We therefore evaluated platelet function after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardiac surgery to determine the effect of either aprotinin or tranexamic acid. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized study, 50 patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery with CPB were evaluated. Patients received high-dose aprotinin (n = 25) or tranexamic acid (n = 25) as antifibrinolytic drugs. Coagulation and platelet function were assessed preoperatively, after CPB, 3 and 24 h after surgery using modified thrombelastography and whole blood aggregometry. RESULTS: Impaired coagulation after CPB occurred in both groups compared with preoperative data (P < 0.01). In contrast to modified thrombelastography, thrombin receptor-mediated aggregometry after CPB was significantly decreased only in those patients receiving tranexamic acid until the end of the study period in comparison to the aprotinin group (P < 0.05). Aprotinin-treated patients showed significantly less chest tube drainage (575 mL +/- 228 vs 1033 mL +/- 647, P < 0.05) and need for postoperative transfusion requirements (P < 0.01) compared with the tranexamic acid group. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet function measured by whole blood aggregometry is better preserved by aprotinin than tranexamic acid and may be responsible for producing less bleeding within the first 24 h after CPB.
Asunto(s)
Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Aprotinina/uso terapéutico , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Hemostáticos/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Inhibidores de Serina Proteinasa/uso terapéutico , Ácido Tranexámico/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Transfusión Sanguínea , Puente Cardiopulmonar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Sustitutos del Plasma/uso terapéutico , Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Función Plaquetaria , TromboelastografíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Along with postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postanesthetic shivering (PAS) is one of the leading causes of distress postoperatively. Previous studies report on a decrease in incidence of PAS due to ketamine administration; however, the S(+) isomer of ketamine has not been evaluated before. Additionally the administration of ketamine minimizes the use of opioids, one of the most important risk factor of PONV. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of S(+)-ketamine in the prophylaxis of both PAS and PONV in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. MATERIAL/METHODS: After ethics committee approval and written informed consent from the patients, 54 patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) were studied for both postanesthetic shivering and PONV. The sedation on the ICU was maintained using continuous infusion of propofol (1-3 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) and if necessary boli of 3.75 mg piritramide. At arrival in the ICU patients supplementary received either S(+)-ketamine (2 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1); group A; n=27) or 0.9% saline as placebo (group B; n=27) in a double-blind fashion. The severity of PAS was assessed by using a five-point rating scale. Fifteen minutes after extubation and 24 hours postoperatively, patients were asked about occurrence of PONV. RESULTS: In group A 4 (14.8%) patients suffered from PAS compared to 12 (44.4%) in the control group (p<0.05). The severity of shivering was significantly lower in group A than in group B (p<0.05). In group A, patients showed a significant lower incidence of PONV (3.7% vs. 33.3%) and vomiting (3.7% vs. 22.2%) compared to patients of group B (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: S(+)-ketamine reduced both postanesthetic shivering and postoperative nausea and vomiting, when administered for postoperative analgosedation.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Náusea/prevención & control , Enfermería Posanestésica , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Vómitos/prevención & control , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Vómitos/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Impaired hemostasis of multiple etiologies are often present in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery. Platelet dysfunction is considered to be important in the early postoperative period. Therefore, a new whole-blood platelet function analyzer was compared with thromboelastography in predicting postoperative hemostatic outcomes as measured by blood loss and blood product use. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study enrolled 54 patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass surgery with CPB. INTERVENTIONS: Coagulation and platelet function were assessed preoperatively, after CPB, at 3 hours, and at 24 hours after surgery by using thromboelastography and impedance aggregometry. Patients were divided into a transfused and nontransfused group on the basis of postoperative transfusion requirements. Postoperative blood loss and requirements of blood transfusions were documented until 24 hours postoperatively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (46%) received postoperative blood transfusions. Impaired hemostasis occurred after CPB detected by thromboelastography (p < 0.01) and impedance aggregometry (p < 0.01). In contrast to thromboelastography, preoperative adenosine diphosphate-mediated aggregometry correlated with postoperative requirements for blood transfusion (Spearman r = -0.302, p < 0.05) and was significantly lower in patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusion compared with nontransfused patients (p < 0.05). Neither aggregometry nor thromboelastography was correlated with postoperative blood loss. CONCLUSION: Impedance aggregometry as well as thromboelastography are able to detect impaired hemostasis after CPB. In contrast to thromboelastography, aggregometry using a new whole-blood aggregometer identified patients with a reduced risk for postoperative transfusion requirements.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/diagnóstico , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Agregación Plaquetaria/fisiología , Pruebas de Función Plaquetaria/instrumentación , Anciano , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/etiología , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Transfusión Sanguínea , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , TromboelastografíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare noninvasive cardiac output (CO)measurement obtained with a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) device, using a proprietary modification of the impedance equation, with invasive measurement obtained via pulmonary artery thermodilution. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a university-affiliated community hospital. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-four adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with routine pulmonary artery catheter placement. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Simultaneous paired CO and cardiac index (CI) measurements by TEB and thermodilution were obtained in mechanically ventilated patients upon admission to the ICU. For analysis of CI data the patients were subdivided into a hemodynamically stable group and a hemodynamically unstable group. The groups were analyzed using linear regression and tests of bias and precision. We found a significant correlation between thermodilution and TEB (r = 0.83; n < 0.001), accompanied by a bias of -0.01 l/min/m(2) and a precision of +/-0.57 l/min/m(2) for all CI data pairs. Correlation, bias, and precision were not influenced by stratification of the data. The correlation coefficient, bias, and precision for CI were 0.86 (n< 0.001), 0.03 l/min/m(2), and +/-0.47 l/min/m(2) in hemodynamically stable patients and 0.79 (n< 0.001), 0.06 l/min/m(2), and +/-0.68 l/min/m(2) in hemodynamically unstable patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate a close correlation and clinically acceptable agreement and precision between CO measurements obtained with impedance cardiography using a new algorithm to calculate CO from variations in TEB, and those obtained with the clinical standard of care, pulmonary artery thermodilution, in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery.
Asunto(s)
Gasto Cardíaco , Impedancia Eléctrica , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Termodilución/métodos , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Periodo PosoperatorioRESUMEN
Emergence agitation may occur after general anesthesia with volatile anesthetics in children. We designed this study to examine the emergence behavior of children undergoing ear-nose-throat surgery after sevoflurane induction and desflurane maintenance versus both sevoflurane induction and maintenance using a recently published Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale. In 38 premedicated children aged 12 mo to 7 yr mask induction with sevoflurane was performed and they were randomly assigned to receive either sevoflurane (n = 19) or desflurane (n = 19) for maintenance of general anesthesia. Time to tracheal extubation, modified Aldrete score, emergence behavior, recovery complications, and pain scores were assessed. The PAED scale showed a significant advantage for desflurane (6 [0-15] versus 12 [2-20], maximum total score of 20 for severe agitation). Time to extubation was significantly shorter with desflurane than with sevoflurane (5.4 +/- 1.4 versus 13.4 +/- 1.8 min). The modified Aldrete score on arrival in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was significantly lower in children receiving sevoflurane for maintenance. Time to discharge from PACU to normal ward and the incidence of adverse effects were not significantly different between the groups. In conclusion, the use of desflurane for maintenance of anesthesia after sevoflurane induction in children is associated with less severe emergence agitation and faster emergence times.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Anestésicos por Inhalación , Isoflurano/análogos & derivados , Éteres Metílicos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Agitación Psicomotora/prevención & control , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Desflurano , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Isoflurano/efectos adversos , Masculino , Éteres Metílicos/efectos adversos , Agitación Psicomotora/etiología , SevofluranoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postanesthetic shivering (PAS) is a frequent side effect of general anesthesia. Previous reports on the incidence of PAS of propofol for the induction or maintenance of anesthesia have been controversial, but have not been studied in detail. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the incidence and severity of PAS in total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanil compared with an inhalative anesthesia. MATERIAL/METHODS: After ethics committee approval and written informed consent from the patients, 53 patients scheduled for urologic, gynecologic, or surgical operations were studied for shivering postoperatively using a five-point rating scale. They received desflurane-fentanyl based anesthesia (n=27) or TIVA with propofol and remifentanil (n=26). Hemodynamics and temperature were measured after induction of anesthesia (T0), and 5 min (T1), 15 min (T2), 30 min (T3), and 60 min (T4) after reaching the postanesthetic care unit (PACU). RESULTS: In the TIVA group, 18/26 (69.2%) patients suffered from PAS compared with 10/27 (37%) in the desflurane-fentanyl group (P<0.02). The severity of shivering was significantly higher with TIVA than with desflurane (P<0.02), whereas temperature showed no significant difference between the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Postanesthetic shivering appears significantly more frequently and intensively after TIVA with propofol and remifentanil compared with an inhalative anesthesia with fentanyl and desflurane.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Intravenosa , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Isoflurano/análogos & derivados , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Tiritona , Anciano , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Desflurano , Femenino , Humanos , Isoflurano/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Remifentanilo , Temperatura , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
We investigated whether blocking afferent nociceptive inputs by continuous intra- and postoperative thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) would decrease plasma concentrations of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients who were at risk for, or had, coronary artery disease. Twenty-eight patients undergoing major abdominal surgery received either general anesthesia supplemented with a continuous thoracic epidural infusion of 1.25 mg/mL bupivacaine and 1 microg/mL sufentanil (n = 14; TEA) or general anesthesia followed by IV patient-controlled analgesia (n = 14; IV PCA). Visual analog scale pain scores, hemodynamics, plasma catecholamines, cardiac troponin T, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), and BNP were serially measured preoperatively, 90 min after skin incision, at arrival in the intensive care unit, and in the morning of the first, second, and third postoperative day. Dynamic visual analog scale scores were significantly less in the TEA group. TEA reduced the postoperative heart rate without affecting other hemodynamic variables. Plasma epinephrine increased perioperatively in both groups but was significantly lower in the TEA group. Baseline ANP and BNP concentrations were similar between groups (TEA 3.4 +/- 1.8 and 27.0 +/- 12.3 pg/mL; IV PCA 3.1 +/- 2.0 and 25.9 +/- 13.0 pg/mL, respectively). ANP and BNP increased perioperatively in both groups, with significantly lower postoperative BNP levels in TEA patients (TEA 92.1 +/- 31.9 pg/mL; IV PCA 161.2 +/- 44.7 pg/mL). No such difference was observed in plasma ANP concentrations. Plasma cardiac troponin T concentrations were within normal limits in both groups at all times. We conclude that continuous perioperative TEA using local anesthetics and opioids attenuated the release of BNP in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery who were at risk for, or had, coronary artery disease.
Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Analgesia Epidural/efectos adversos , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico/sangre , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Anciano , Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Factor Natriurético Atrial/sangre , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/metabolismo , Epinefrina/sangre , Femenino , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Norepinefrina/sangre , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirinitramida/uso terapéutico , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiologíaRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: We designed this study to assess the efficacy of dolasetron compared with clonidine and placebo in prophylaxis of postanesthetic shivering. We included 90 patients undergoing elective abdominal or urologic surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to one three groups (each group n = 30) using a double-blinded study protocol: Group A received 12.5 mg dolasetron, Group B 3 microg/kg clonidine, and Group C saline 0.9% as placebo. The medication was given after the induction of anesthesia. Postanesthetic shivering was judged by using a five-point scale. In the Clonidine group, 86.6% showed no shivering, whereas in the Dolasetron and Placebo groups, only 63.3% and 66.6%, respectively, were symptom free. Only clonidine, but not dolasetron, significantly reduced the incidence and the severity of shivering. We conclude that clonidine is effective in preventing shivering when given before surgery, whereas dolasetron, at the dose used, is not effective. IMPLICATIONS: Shivering, an irregular muscular fasciculation lasting longer than 15 s, is a common complication secondary to general anesthesia. We compared dolasetron with clonidine (an established antishivering drug) in the prevention of postanesthetic shivering. Dolasetron 12.5 mg was not effective.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia/efectos adversos , Clonidina/uso terapéutico , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Quinolizinas/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de la Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Tiritona/efectos de los fármacos , Abdomen/cirugía , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Temperatura Corporal , Clonidina/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Quinolizinas/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de la Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos UrológicosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most frequent complications of general anesthesia. The aim of the study was to compare the antiemetic efficacy of dolasetron and metoclopramide after inhalational or i.v. anesthesia (IVA). METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial we evaluated the efficacy of 12.5 mg dolasetron i.v. and 20 mg metoclopramide (MCP) i.v. in preventing PONV in 387 patients (ASA I-III) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were allocated randomly to one of three main groups: Group D (n = 129) received 12.5 mg dolasetron i.v., Group MCP (n = 129) 20 mg MCP i.v., and Group C (n = 129) saline as placebo i.v. Using a multifactorial study design, one third of each main group (n = 43) was further randomized to receive either general anesthesia with desflurane, isoflurane or IVA with propofol and remifentanil. PONV, postoperative piritramide and droperidol consumption were documented. RESULTS: Independent from the anesthesia regimen chosen, dolasetron reduced PONV (19%) significantly compared to MCP (45%) and placebo (46%). Furthermore we could show a significant difference in the incidence of PONV between IVA (28%) and isoflurane (46%), but not in comparison to desflurane (36%). Patients receiving IVA had a higher postoperative piritramide consumption compared to the two other groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that dolasetron was more effective than MCP and placebo in preventing PONV. This action is independent of the anesthetic technique used.
Asunto(s)
Antieméticos/uso terapéutico , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Metoclopramida/uso terapéutico , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/prevención & control , Quinolizinas/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de la Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anestesia por Inhalación , Anestesia Intravenosa , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
In this study we investigated the effects of allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on tissue oxygenation compared with those of 100% oxygen ventilation by using systemic oxygen transport variables and skeletal muscle oxygen tension (PtiO2). Fifty-one volume-resuscitated, mechanically ventilated patients with a nadir hemoglobin concentration in the range from 7.5 to 8.5 g/dL after elective coronary artery bypass grafting were allocated randomly to receive 1 unit (transfusion 1; n = 17) or 2 units (transfusion 2; n = 17) of allogeneic RBCs and ventilation with 40% oxygen or pure oxygen ventilation (100% oxygen; n = 17) and no allogeneic blood for 3 hours. Invasive arterial and pulmonary artery pressures and calculations of oxygen delivery (oxygen delivery index) and consumption indices (oxygen consumption index) were documented at 30-min intervals. PtiO2 was measured continuously by using implantable polarographic microprobes. Systemic oxygen transport variables and PtiO2 were similar between groups at baseline. The oxygen delivery index increased significantly with transfusion of allogeneic RBCs and 100% oxygen ventilation, whereas the oxygen consumption index remained unchanged. Oxygen 100% ventilation increased PtiO2 significantly (from 24.0 +/- 5.1 mm Hg to 34.2 +/- 6.2 mm Hg), whereas no change was found after transfusion of allogeneic RBCs. Peak PtiO2 values were 25.2 +/- 5.2 mm Hg and 26.3 +/- 6.5 mm Hg in the transfusion 1 and 2 groups, respectively. Transfusion of stored allogeneic RBCs was effective only in improving systemic oxygen delivery index, whereas 100% oxygen ventilation improved systemic oxygen transport and PtiO2. This improved oxygenation status was most likely due to an increase in convective oxygen transport with a large driving gradient for diffusion of plasma-dissolved oxygen into the tissue.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Sangre Autóloga , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Músculo Esquelético/metabolismo , Consumo de Oxígeno/fisiología , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/sangre , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Puente Cardiopulmonar , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Femenino , Fluidoterapia , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oximetría , Oxígeno/sangre , Respiración Artificial , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of dopamine and diltiazem on renal function and markers for acute renal failure, including urinary alpha-glutathion s-transferase (alpha-GST), alpha-1-microglobulin (alpha(1)-MG) and N-acetyl-ss-glucosaminidase (ss-NAG) after extracorporeal circulation. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial we evaluated the efficacy of dopamine (2.5 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1)), diltiazem (2 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or placebo administered over 48 hr postoperatively to maintain renal tubular integrity in 60 elective cardiac surgery patients. alpha-GST, alpha(1)-MG, ss-NAG, and creatinine clearance were measured from urine collected during surgery (T0), the first four hours (T1), 24 hr (T2) and 48 hr (T3) postoperatively. RESULTS: Cumulative urine output in the diltiazem group (9.0 +/- 2.8 L) increased significantly compared with placebo (7.0 +/- 1.6 L), but not compared with dopamine (7.8 +/- 1.8 L). Creatinine clearance showed no significant intergroup differences. In all groups alpha(1)-MG increased from T0 to T3, but we found no significant intergroup differences. alpha-GST increased significantly from T0 to T3 in the placebo (2.1 +/- 1.8 to 11.4 +/- 8.6 micro g x L(-1)) and in the dopamine groups (2.7 +/- 1.8 to 13.6 +/- 14.9 micro g x L(-1)), but not in the diltiazem group (1.8 +/- 1.4 to 3.2 +/- 3.2 micro g x L(-1)). Forty-eight hours postoperatively alpha-GST was significantly lower in the diltiazem group than in both other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Diltiazem stimulates urine output, reduces excretion of alpha-GST and ss-NAG and may be useful to maintain tubular integrity after cardiac surgery.