Externalization of an infected vagus nerve stimulator generator without a break in anti-seizure therapy: a technical note.

INTRODUCTION: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a widely used treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. An infection of the VNS generator pocket occurs in 3-8% of cases. Current standard of care requires the removal of the device, antibiotic therapy, and then replacement of the device. The consequential break in VNS therapy leaves patients highly susceptible to seizures. METHODS: Retrospective case report. RESULTS: The externalized generator continued to provide electroceutical coverage of the patient's seizures while the pocket was sterilized with IV antibiotics as well as betadine and local antibiotics. The externalized generator was kept safe against the patient's chest with ioban and an entriely new system was implanted on post-externalization day 5. The patient is now 7 months post-operative and without any evidence of infection. CONCLUSIONS: We report successful management of an infected VNS generator with externalization and short interval replacement of the entire system without any break in anti-seizure therapy.

Predictive value of video alone in diagnosis of epileptic vs paroxysmal nonepileptic events in children.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies examined the use of video-based diagnosis and the predictive value of videos for differentiation of epileptic seizures (ES) from paroxysmal nonepileptic events (PNEE) in the adult population. However, there are no such published studies strictly on the pediatric population. Using video-EEG diagnosis as a gold standard, we aimed to determine the diagnostic predictive value of videos of habitual events with or without additional clinical data in differentiating the PNEE from ES in children. METHODS: Consecutive admissions to our epilepsy monitoring unit between June 2020 and December 2020 were analyzed for events of interest. Four child neurologists blinded to the patient's diagnosis formulated a diagnostic impression based upon the review of the video alone and again after having access to basic clinical information, in addition to the video. Features of the video which helped to make a diagnosis were identified by the reviewers as a part of a survey. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included (ES n = 24, PNEE n = 30). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated for each reviewer and combined across all the ratings. Diagnostic accuracy by video alone was 74.5% (sensitivity 80.8%, specificity 66.7%). Providing reviewers with basic clinical information in addition to the videos significantly improved diagnostic accuracy compared to viewing the videos alone. Inter-rater reliability between four reviewers based on the video alone showed moderate agreement (κ = 0.51) and unchanged when additional clinical data were presented (κ = 0.51). The ES group was significantly more likely to demonstrate changes in facial expression, generalized stiffening, repetitive eye blinks, and eye deviation when compared with the PNEE group, which was more likely to display bilateral myoclonic jerking. CONCLUSIONS: Video review of habitual events by Child Neurologists may be helpful in reliably distinguishing ES from PNEE in children, even without included clinical information.