Intraoperative Radiation Exposure During Midfoot Charcot Reconstruction.

While radiation exposure in foot and ankle surgery varies by procedure, attempts to minimize this hazard remain imperative to protect patients and surgeons. Hindfoot deformity correction employs significant radiation through intraoperative fluoroscopy, however, a paucity of data exists concerning Charcot reconstruction. This investigation describes and compares radiation exposure across varying Charcot pathology and fixation constructs. A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing midfoot Charcot reconstruction under large C-arm assistance from 2016-2022 was conducted. Demographics, pathology-specific, and intervention-specific variables were recorded and compared among midfoot reconstructions. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p ≤ .05. Among 40 patients, the average midfoot radiation exposure and fluoroscopy times were 9.5 ± 5.39 mGy and 256.64 ± 130.67 seconds, respectively. There existed no statistically significant difference in radiation exposure (p = .32) or fluoroscopy times (p = .71) among the different midfoot constructs. There existed a statistically significant relationship between radiation exposure with weight (p = .01) body mass index (p = .03) and number of stages (p = .04). Similarly, a relationship existed between fluoroscopy time with weight (p = .02), body mass index (p = .03), and number of beams/screws (p = .003). Due to the complexity of Charcot reconstruction coupled with multiple robust types of fixation, surgeons must remain cognizant of fluoroscopy usage. Moreover, providers who routinely perform Charcot reconstruction should wear personal protective equipment to protect against radiation.

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Hammertoe Correction: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Hammertoe deformity is a common forefoot pathology, characterized by a progressive deformity with dorsiflexion of the proximal phalanx on the metatarsal head at the metatarsal phalangeal joint (MTPJ) and plantarflexion of the intermediate phalanx on the proximal phalanx at the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ). While there is literature available discussing open techniques for hammertoe correction, there is a lack of publications discussing minimally invasive techniques, therefore the objective of this retrospective comparative study is to evaluate minimally invasive versus open hammertoe surgery in terms of time to osseous union, complications, recurrence, and return to full activity. Sixty eight feet among 41 patients met the inclusion criteria and were surveyed. Among the 68 feet, 54 feet (124 toes) underwent minimally invasive hammertoe correction and 14 feet (22 toes) underwent open hammertoe correction. Time to osseous union (weeks) in the MIS group was 8.76 ± 2.31 weeks with similar outcomes to the open group with union at 8.42 ± 2.31 (p = .65). Return to activity (weeks) was 10.47 ± 3.45 in the MIS group and 9.92 ± 3.03 in the open group with no statistical significance (p = .62). There was 4 recurrent hammertoe deformities in the MIS group (3.23%) with no recurrent hammertoes in the open group (0%). In the MIS group 5 hammertoes had unplanned hardware removal (4.03%) compared to 0 in the open group. There was no statistical significance for both recurrence and unplanned hardware removal (p = 1). Overall, we concluded that both techniques are equivocal with no detectable statistical difference.

Comparing Clinical Characteristics and Short-Term Outcomes Between Adult and Geriatric Patients Undergoing Charcot Reconstruction.

Maintaining an acceptable quality of life following a lifetime of chronic diseases and resulting physiologic effects poses a challenge when treating an aging population. In those with Charcot neuroarthropathy, wounds, and infection complicate decision making when considering limb preservation versus amputation. The purpose of this investigation is to describe the clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes of geriatric patients undergoing Charcot reconstruction. A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent Charcot reconstruction from 2016 to 2022 was conducted. Demographics, medical history, deformity type, surgical intervention, discharge planning, and short-term complications were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes were compared between the non-geriatric, adult (A) and geriatric (G) cohorts using Student's t-test or chi-squared test. Overall, 125 patients were reviewed for final analysis. Charcot deformity type, prevalence of wounds, osteomyelitis, and fixation construct did not significantly differ between groups. While the proportion of those experiencing a prolonged admission did not significantly differ between cohorts, the geriatric group showed age-related pathology including delirium and urinary tract infections. While discharge to nursing facilities did differ between groups (G 43% versus A 19%), baseline function did not. The 30-day unplanned readmission and mortality rates did differ between groups, though this difference was not statistically significant. Prior to geriatric Charcot reconstruction, consideration should be given to age-related comorbidities. Specifically, with a greater incidence of age-related complications unrelated to the surgery as well as mortality in the geriatric group, complications should be discussed at length.