Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Br J Neurosurg ; 35(4): 408-417, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32909855

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The endonasal transsphenoidal approach (TSA) has emerged as the preferred approach in order to treat pituitary adenoma and related sellar pathologies. The recently adopted expanded endonasal approach (EEA) has improved access to the ventral skull base whilst retaining the principles of minimally invasive surgery. Despite the advantages these approaches offer, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhoea remains a common complication. There is currently a lack of comparative evidence to guide the best choice of skull base reconstruction, resulting in considerable heterogeneity of current practice. This study aims to determine: (1) the scope of the methods of skull base repair; and (2) the corresponding rates of postoperative CSF rhinorrhoea in contemporary neurosurgical practice in the UK and Ireland. METHODS: We will adopt a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort design. All neurosurgical units in the UK and Ireland performing the relevant surgeries (TSA and EEA) will be eligible to participate. Eligible cases will be prospectively recruited over 6 months with 6 months of postoperative follow-up. Data points collected will include: demographics, tumour characteristics, operative data), and postoperative outcomes. Primary outcomes include skull base repair technique and CSF rhinorrhoea (biochemically confirmed and/or requiring intervention) rates. Pooled data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. All skull base repair methods used and CSF leak rates for TSA and EEA will be compared against rates listed in the literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal institutional ethical board review was not required owing to the nature of the study - this was confirmed with the Health Research Authority, UK. CONCLUSIONS: The need for this multicentre, prospective, observational study is highlighted by the relative paucity of literature and the resultant lack of consensus on the topic. It is hoped that the results will give insight into contemporary practice in the UK and Ireland and will inform future studies.


Asunto(s)
Rinorrea de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo , Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo , Rinorrea de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/epidemiología , Rinorrea de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/etiología , Rinorrea de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Base del Cráneo/cirugía
2.
Clin Nutr ; 40(7): 4772-4782, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34242917

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several treatment strategies for avoiding post-operative ileus have been evaluated in randomised controlled trials. This network meta-analysis aimed to explore the relative effectiveness of these different therapeutic interventions on ileus outcome measures. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatments for post-operative ileus following colorectal surgery. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Direct and indirect comparisons of all regimens were simultaneously compared using random-effects network meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 48 randomised controlled trials were included in this network meta-analysis reporting on 3614 participants. Early feeding was found to be the best treatment for time to solid diet tolerance and length of hospital stay with a probability of P = 0.96 and P = 0.47, respectively. Early feeding resulted in significantly shorter time to solid diet tolerance (Mean Difference (MD) 58.85 h; 95% Credible Interval (CrI) -73.41, -43.15) and shorter length of hospital stay (MD 2.33 days; CrI -3.51, -1.18) compared to no treatment. Epidural analgesia was ranked best treatment for time to flatus (P = 0.29) and time to stool (P = 0.268). Epidural analgesia resulted in significantly shorter time to flatus (MD -18.88 h; CrI -33.67, -3.44) and shorter time to stool (MD -26.05 h; 95% CrI -66.42, 15.65) compared to no intervention. Gastrograffin was ranked best treatment to avoid the requirement for post-operative nasogastric tube insertion (P = 0.61) however demonstrated limited efficacy (OR 0.50; CrI 0.143, 1.621) compared to no intervention. Nasogastric and nasointestinal tube insertion, probiotics, and acupuncture were found to be least efficacious as interventions to reduce ileus. CONCLUSION: This network meta-analysis identified early feeding as the most efficacious therapeutic intervention to reduce post-operative ileus in patients undergoing colorectal surgery, in addition to highlighting other therapies that require further investigation by high quality study. In patients undergoing colorectal surgery, emphasis should be placed on early feeding as soon as can be appropriately initiated to support the return of gastrointestinal motility.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Ileus/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Factores de Tiempo , Teorema de Bayes , Femenino , Motilidad Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Ileus/etiología , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método de Montecarlo , Metaanálisis en Red , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Prevención Secundaria , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
BMJ Case Rep ; 12(7)2019 Jul 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31352395

RESUMEN

When a pregnant woman presents with headaches, visual disturbances, epigastric pain and nausea, preeclampsia quickly springs to mind. This case describes a primigravid 22-year-old female of 32 weeks gestation who presented with the symptoms described but was found to be apparently normotensive. Due to ongoing symptoms and diagnostic uncertainty in the absence of definitive evidence of preeclampsia, the patient was further investigated with an MRI brain scan, which was reported as either an acute stroke or an atypical presentation of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Together with blood results that showed heterozygosity for Factor V Leiden, we concluded that while the patient's clinical diagnosis was certainly preeclampsia, her investigations also supported an unexpected diagnosis of silent brain infarction. This report outlines a diagnostic dilemma that required multidisciplinary working between obstetricians, neurologists, radiologists and stroke physicians to manage the patient who went on to make a full recovery and deliver a healthy baby.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Síndrome de Leucoencefalopatía Posterior/diagnóstico , Preeclampsia/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Factor V , Femenino , Cefalea , Humanos , Labetalol/uso terapéutico , Náusea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Preeclampsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Preeclampsia/fisiopatología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/fisiopatología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda