RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears remains a topic of considerable debate among orthopedic surgeons. Currently, there is little consensus regarding the gold-standard treatment; however, an emerging option involves the use of a biodegradable subacromial spacer. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to systematically review and synthesize the current literature reporting on the clinical outcomes following implantation of a subacromial balloon spacer (SABS) for the treatment of patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed Central, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from inception through December 2022 was performed. Clinical outcome studies reporting on functional and clinical outcomes, as well as postoperative complications, were included. RESULTS: A total of 127 studies were initially identified, of which 28 were deemed eligible for inclusion in our review. Of these studies, 17 reported adequate preoperative and postoperative data (mean and a measure of variance) and thus were included in the meta-analysis. Among the included studies, a total of 894 shoulders (886 patients) were included; the mean age was 67.4 years (range, 61.7-76.2 years). The average follow-up period was 30.4 months (range, 12-56 months). All postoperative patient-reported outcomes improved significantly from baseline, including the Constant score (mean difference, 33.53; P < .001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (mean difference, 40.38; P < .001), Oxford Shoulder Score (mean difference, 12.05; P = .004), and visual analog scale pain score or Numeric Pain Rating Scale score (mean difference, -3.79; P < .001). Forward elevation (mean difference, 24°; P < .001), abduction (mean difference, 52°; P = .02), and external rotation (mean difference, 15°; P < .001) improved. Device-related complications occurred at a rate of 3.6%, the most common of which were balloon migration (1.0%) and synovitis (0.6%). Ultimately, 5% of patients required salvage reverse shoulder arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: Short-term outcomes suggest that SABS implantation can be a safe and effective treatment and appears to be associated with early improvements in postoperative pain and function. Clinical heterogeneity, use of concomitant procedures, and variations in patient selection limit our ability to conclusively interpret the available evidence. We do not yet know the potential therapeutic value of SABS implantation relative to other currently accepted treatment strategies, the length of symptomatic improvement that can be expected, or the long-term implications of SABS use on the outcomes of further salvage procedures.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores , Articulación del Hombro , Humanos , Anciano , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Artroplastia , Dolor Postoperatorio , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Artroscopía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: When return to sport (RTS) at a competitive level is desired, treatment of injury to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) frequently involves surgical reconstruction. Although RTS rates between 66% and 98% have been reported, there remains a paucity of comparative clinical studies, with far fewer reporting statistically significant risk factors for reconstruction failure. The goal of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to demonstrate the variety and inconsistency with which risk factors associated with reconstruction failure are reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed Central and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify clinical outcome studies reporting ≥1 statistically significant risk factor associated with failure of UCL reconstruction. Failure was defined as (1) reinjury, recurrent instability, or need for revision surgery; (2) failure show improvement in postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs); or (3) failure to RTS at the preinjury level (RSL). RESULTS: A total of 349 unique studies were initially identified, of which 12 were deemed eligible for inclusion in our study. Of these 12 studies, 4 defined outcomes based on recurrent instability, reinjury, or revision surgery; 2 defined outcomes based on PROs; and 6 defined outcomes based on RSL. In the group with instability, reinjury, or revision failure, 11 significant risk factors were identified across all studies: age, height, body mass index, professional experience, injury to the nondominant arm, history of competitive throwing, mechanism of injury, history of a psychiatric diagnosis, presence of preoperative instability or stiffness, postoperative workload, and time to RTS. In the PRO failure group, 12 risk factors were identified across all studies: age, status as a military cadet, injury to the nondominant arm, graft type, baseball position, current injury to the ipsilateral arm, current level of competition attributed to reconstruction surgery, shoulder surgery after reconstruction, no competitive throwing history, non-throwing mechanism of injury, history of a psychiatric diagnosis, and preoperative instability or stiffness. In the RSL failure group, 4 risk factors were identified across all studies: age, ulnar neuritis, level of professional play, and amount of time spent at the professional level. CONCLUSIONS: Age, level of professional play prior to surgery, postoperative workload, and time at the professional level are the most commonly reported risk factors associated with UCL reconstruction failure. There remains a paucity of data associating risk factors with patient-specific outcomes and marked levels of inconsistency and conflict among the studies that report such data.
Asunto(s)
Ligamento Colateral Cubital , Lesiones de Codo , Lesiones de Repetición , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Colateral Cubital , Humanos , Lesiones de Repetición/cirugía , Ligamento Colateral Cubital/lesiones , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To examine allograft augmentation of undersized hamstring (HS) autograft tendons at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, compared with un-augmented autograft HS ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction at our institution between 2005 and 2015 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included patients who underwent (1) primary ACL reconstruction, (2) use of a hybrid HS autograft with allograft augmentation, and (3) had a minimum 2-year postoperative follow-up. Patients with revision ACL, multiligamentous injuries, all-epiphyseal fixation techniques, or additional procedures beyond chondroplasty or meniscal repair/debridement were excluded. Data collected included demographics, graft size, concomitant procedures, revision operation, revision ACL reconstruction, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 59 patients met criteria for inclusion into the hybrid group, and 80 patients were eligible for inclusion into the control group. The average age of the cohort was 22.9 (interquartile range Q1:17, Q3: 38.3), and 51.8% of the patients were female. Seven patients (11.9%) in the hybrid ACL group underwent revision ACL surgery versus 15 (18.8%) in the control group (P = .27). There was no difference in patient-reported outcomes between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Augmenting an HS ACL autograft that is 8 mm or less with allograft tissue to increase the overall size of the ACL graft shows no difference in overall reoperation or revision of ACL failure. The hybrid autograft/allograft ACL reconstruction patients showed no clinically important difference between groups in patient-reported outcome measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control comparative analysis.
Asunto(s)
Aloinjertos , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Autoinjertos , Tendones Isquiotibiales/trasplante , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Satisfacción del Paciente , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postoperative infection after shoulder arthroplasty is a devastating complication. Multiple patient risk factors have been associated with postoperative infection, including increased body mass index and diabetes. Although the association between preoperative glucose control and infection has been established, little is known about the effect of perioperative glycemic control on outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between postoperative glycemic variability and short-term complications after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at a large, single-specialty center from January 2015 to December 2018. Patients were included if they underwent primary TSA or RTSA with a minimum of 90 days' follow-up and had a minimum of 1 serum glucose value obtained per day of the hospital stay or had ≥3 measurements obtained during the hospital admission period. The primary outcome variable was postoperative infection per accepted definitions of surgical-site infection or periprosthetic joint infection. Secondary outcome variables included stiffness, periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic dislocation, and reoperation. RESULTS: In total, 1074 TSAs or RTSAs (in 1032 patients) met the eligibility criteria. The mean patient age was 69.9 ± 8.4 years, and 40.3% of patients had a preoperative diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Of the patients, 670 (62%) had a calculable coefficient of variation. A younger patient age (median, 65 years [interquartile range (IQR), 13.5 years] vs. 71 years [IQR, 11.0 years]; P = .02) and a preoperative diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (P = .01) showed statistically significant associations with postoperative infection. The first in-hospital glucose measurement beyond the reference tertile of 70-140 mg/dL showed a statistically significant association with postoperative infection, with a median of 128.0 mg/dL (IQR, 43 mg/dL) vs. 167.5 mg/dL (IQR, 37.0 mg/dL; P = .01), whereas the second and third glucose measurements showed no association with postoperative infection. We found no associations between the coefficient of variation and reoperations or complications including surgical-site infection, periprosthetic joint infection, death, postoperative infection, periprosthetic fracture, or stiffness. CONCLUSION: We found an association between a preoperative diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and postoperative infection following shoulder arthroplasty. We also found that an elevated first glucose measurement is associated with the development of postoperative infection. In-hospital glycemic control, as well as preoperative glycemic control and optimization, may be beneficial for reducing postoperative infections following shoulder arthroplasty.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Articulación del Hombro , Adolescente , Anciano , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/efectos adversos , Glucosa , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is the gold standard for treating ulnar collateral ligament injuries in throwing athletes who have failed conservative treatment. There are several described techniques that produce successful and reproducible outcomes. In addition, there is biomechanical evidence that supports hybrid fixation of the graft with a docking technique on the humeral side and suspensory fixation on the ulnar side. However, as of this writing there are no clinical studies that have reported results. This retrospective case series is the first of its kind to report on clinical outcomes following UCLR with hybrid suspensory fixation. METHODS: Fifty throwing athletes who underwent ULCR with hybrid suspensory fixation from 2010-2017 by one of 5 surgeons at a single institution were available at a median follow-up of 7 years. Return to sport, level of sport, and postoperative complications were recorded at final follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included in final analysis. Nearly all were able to return to sport at the same level or higher (48/50, 96%). One of these 50 athletes (2%) played professionally, 27 (54%) played collegiately, and 21 (42%) played at the high school level. Seven patients (14%) underwent reoperation following the index procedure. The median (interquartile range) Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire score was 0.098 (0-4.5) at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Hybrid suspensory fixation is a safe and effective technique for UCLR in the throwing athlete. Throwers can expect to return to sport at a very high rate with low risks for postoperative complications.
Asunto(s)
Béisbol , Ligamento Colateral Cubital , Ligamentos Colaterales , Articulación del Codo , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Colateral Cubital , Ligamento Colateral Cubital/cirugía , Ligamentos Colaterales/cirugía , Articulación del Codo/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , CúbitoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the tibiofemoral contact mechanics of an all-inside posterior medial meniscal root repair technique via suture fixation to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and to compare with that of the intact knee and the knee with a root tear. METHODS: Tibiofemoral contact mechanics were recorded in 8 human cadaveric knee specimens using pressure sensors. Each knee underwent 3 testing conditions related to the posterior medial meniscal root: (1) intact knee; (2) root tear; and (3) all-inside repair via suture fixation to the PCL. Knees were loaded with a 1000-N axial compressive force at 4 knee flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°). Calculations were performed for contact area, mean contact pressure, and peak contact pressure. A generalized linear model with a Tukey adjusted least square means test was used to determine differences between testing conditions. RESULTS: Across all knee flexion angles, there was an overall mean 26.3% reduction in contact area with root tear (211.34 mm2 vs intact 286.64 mm2, P = .0002), and a 31.6% increase from root tear to repair (277.61 mm2, P = .0297). Across all knee flexion angles, there was an overall mean 24.3% increase in contact pressure with root tear (1849.12 N/mm2 vs. intact 1487.52 N/mm2, P < .0001), and a 31.1% decrease from root tear to repair (1410.7 N/mm2, P = .0037). Across all knee flexion angles, there was an overall mean 10.6% increase in peak contact pressure with root tear (4083.55 N/mm2 vs. intact 3693.68 N/mm2, P < .0001), and a 12.4% decrease from root tear to repair (3632.13 N/mm2, P = .531). CONCLUSIONS: In most testing conditions and with overall averaging across knee flexion angles, the all-inside posterior medial meniscal root repair with suture fixation to the adjacent PCL fibers restored contact area (from 26.3% reduction with root tear to 31.6% increase with repair), contact pressures (from 24.3% increase with root tear to 31.1% decrease with repair), and peak contact pressures (from 10.6% increase with root tear to 12.4% decrease with repair) to that of the intact knee This may be a future potential technique to limit complications associated with the traditional transtibial pull-out method of repair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This technique may provide a posterior medial meniscal root repair construct that restores most tibiofemoral contact mechanics and offers theoretical benefits of technical ease and potential for an acceptable, less "anatomic" repair location.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugía , Ligamento Cruzado Posterior/cirugía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Técnicas de Sutura , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugía , Adulto , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Cadáver , Femenino , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Laceraciones/cirugía , Masculino , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Presión , Rotura/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in differentiating between active infection and contaminant or baseline flora remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare NGS with culture-based methods in primary shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: A prospective series of primary shoulder arthroplasty patients with no history of infection or antibiotic use within 60 days of surgery was enrolled. All patients received standard perioperative antibiotics. After skin incision, a 10 × 3-mm sample of the medial skin edge was excised. A 2 × 2-cm synovial tissue biopsy was taken from the rotator interval after subscapularis takedown. Each sample set was halved and sent for NGS and standard cultures. RESULTS: Samples from 25 patients were analyzed. Standard aerobic/anaerobic cultures were positive in 10 skin samples (40%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 20%-60%) and 3 deep tissue samples (12%, 90% CI 1%-23%]). NGS detected ≥1 bacterial species in 17 of the skin samples (68%, 95% CI 49%-87%) and 7 deep tissue samples (28%, 95% CI 9%-47%). There was a significant difference (P < .03) in the mean number of bacterial species detected with NGS between the positive standard culture (1.6 species) and the negative standard culture groups (5.7 species). CONCLUSION: NGS identified bacteria at higher rates in skin and deep tissue samples than standard culture did in native, uninfected patients undergoing primary procedures. Further research is needed to determine which NGS results are clinically relevant and which are false positives before NGS can be reliably used in orthopedic cases.
Asunto(s)
Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Piel/microbiología , Membrana Sinovial/microbiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Artroplastia , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although ulnar neuritis can occur secondary to ulnar collateral ligament pathology, stress fractures, and traction apophysitis, isolated ulnar nerve dysfunction can lead to medial elbow pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of overhead athletes undergoing anterior ulnar nerve transposition for ulnar neuropathy. METHODS: All overhead athletes who underwent isolated ulnar nerve transposition between 2009 and 2016 for refractory ulnar neuritis were identified. The primary outcome was return to sport, and secondary outcome measures included the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score; Mayo Elbow Performance Score; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score; and visual analog scale score for pain. Complication and reoperation rates were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 26 overhead athletes (21 male and 5 female athletes) underwent ulnar nerve transposition at an average age of 18.4 years (range, 11-25 years). Of the patients, 24 (92%) returned to their sporting activity at an average of 2.7 months postoperatively, including 16 (62%) at the previous level of play. The average visual analog scale pain score improved from 4.7 (±2.5) to 0.4 (±1.5) (P = .015). The average postoperative patient-reported outcome scores were as follows: Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score, 80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.7-87.0); Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, 85 (95% CI, 75.4-94.7); Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, 5 (95% CI, 2.1-7.7); and Mayo Elbow Performance Score, 91 (95% CI, 86.8-96.0). CONCLUSION: Cubital tunnel syndrome can cause medial elbow pain in overhead athletes in the presence of a normal ulnar collateral ligament. At mid-term follow-up, 92% of overhead athletes returned to sport after ulnar nerve transposition, with 62% resuming their previous level of performance.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/cirugía , Volver al Deporte , Neuropatías Cubitales/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Síndrome del Túnel Cubital/complicaciones , Síndrome del Túnel Cubital/cirugía , Articulación del Codo/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Dolor Musculoesquelético/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Reoperación , Neuropatías Cubitales/complicaciones , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic elbow instability after trauma is a challenging problem. Clinical results of external elbow fixation in this setting are limited, with most studies focusing on hinged external fixation. A static fixator is an alternative for maintaining joint reduction. Advantages of a static frame include ease of application, decreased need for special instrumentation, and more secure maintenance of a concentrically reduced joint in the setting of bone or soft tissue instability. The primary limitation of static fixation is the potential for stiffness. METHODS: This retrospective review represents the largest reported cohort evaluating the use of static elbow external fixation for the treatment of chronic elbow instability. Twenty-seven cases treated by a single surgeon between 2004 and 2015 were identified. RESULTS: Twenty patients were available for a clinical evaluation, including radiographs and a physical examination at a mean follow-up of 5.8 years (range, 1.4-12.4 years). Of note, 19 of 20 were clinically obese or overweight. At final evaluation, range of motion averaged from 20° ± 13° of extension to 134° ± 9° of flexion. All patients had stable elbows, except 1 patient who had valgus and varus laxity on stress examination. Radiographs of this patient showed an incongruous joint. Eight patients required an additional operation after external fixator removal, 3 for infection and 5 for stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: At almost 6 years of follow-up, static elbow external fixator resulted in a congruous joint with adequate functional and clinical outcomes in 95% of patients.
Asunto(s)
Articulación del Codo/cirugía , Fijadores Externos , Predicción , Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Articulación del Codo/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/diagnóstico , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Lesiones de CodoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in cases with posterior wear can be addressed by eccentric reaming of the anterior glenoid or by augmenting the posterior glenoid with bone grafting or augmented glenoid implants. We report the results of TSA with posterior glenoid bone grafting (PGBG) with humeral head autograft in patients with shoulder osteoarthritis and severe posterior glenoid wear. METHODS: A retrospective review of cases from 2004 to 2014 revealed 34 patients. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were evaluated for glenoid version and humeral head subluxation as well as component loosening. Patient-reported outcomes were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. Complications and reoperations were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 34 patients, 28 (82.4%) were available at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. PGBG corrected glenoid retroversion from -28° ± 4° preoperatively to -4° ± 2° (P < .001). Humeral head subluxation also improved after PGBG with respect to the scapular axis and to the midglenoid face (P < .001). Radiographic analysis revealed all PGBGs had incorporated. Radiographically, 3 patients (10.7%) had a total of 5 broken or displaced screws. In addition, 3 patients (10.7%) had a broken metal marker in the center peg of the glenoid component. No patients required component revision surgery by final follow-up. Only 1 reoperation occurred for capsular release. Patients showed significant improvements in all patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing primary TSA with humeral head autograft PGBG showed significant improvements in glenoid version, humeral head subluxation, patient-reported outcomes, and range of motion at an average of 4 years' follow-up. There was a low revision rate and a high rate of graft incorporation.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Trasplante Óseo , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Escápula/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Retroversión Ósea/etiología , Retroversión Ósea/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Cabeza Humeral/cirugía , Luxaciones Articulares/etiología , Luxaciones Articulares/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis/complicaciones , Osteoartritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Reoperación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: New medical doctors enter their residency fields in July, a time in the hospital in which patient morbidity and mortality rates are perceived to be higher. It remains controversial whether a "July effect" exists in different areas of medicine and surgery, including in orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study is to test for the July effect in patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). METHODS: Patients who underwent primary TSA from 2005-2012 were identified using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Cases were categorized as involving residents or fellows and as occurring during the first academic quarter. Rates of composite and any adverse event outcomes were compared between patient groups using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1591 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these cases, 711 (44.7%) had resident or fellow involvement and 390 (24.5%) were performed in the first academic quarter. There were few demographic and comorbidity differences between cases with and without residents or fellows or between cases performed during the first quarter and during the rest of the year. Overall, the rate of serious adverse events was 1.6% and the rate of any adverse events was 6.5%. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Using one of the largest cohorts of primary TSA patients, this study could not provide evidence for a July effect. In the context of the recent growth in the volume of TSA procedures, these findings provide important reassurance to patients that it is safe to schedule their elective procedures at training institutions during the first part of the academic year.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/educación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Ortopedia/educación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty is a successful operation for treatment of arthritis. However, devastating wound complications and infections can compromise the knee joint, particularly in revision situations. METHODS: Soft tissue loss associated with poor wound healing and multiple operations can necessitate the need for reconstruction for wound closure and protection of the prosthesis. RESULTS: Coverage options range from simple closure methods to complex reconstruction, including delayed primary closure, healing by secondary intention, vacuum-assisted closure, skin grafting, local flap coverage, and distant microsurgical tissue transfer. CONCLUSION: Understanding the advantages and pitfalls of each reconstructive option helps to guide treatment and avoid repeated operations and potentially devastating consequences such as knee arthrodesis or amputation.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Rodilla/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Rodilla/irrigación sanguínea , Rodilla/fisiopatología , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Masculino , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Reoperación/métodos , Trasplante de Piel , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/irrigación sanguínea , Cicatrización de Heridas , Heridas y Lesiones/etiología , Heridas y Lesiones/fisiopatología , Heridas y Lesiones/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the fractured pelvis or acetabulum requires both standard radiographic evaluation as well as computed tomography (CT) imaging. The standard anterior-posterior (AP), Judet, and inlet and outlet views can now be simulated using data acquired during CT, decreasing patient discomfort, radiation exposure, and cost to the healthcare system. The purpose of this study is to compare the image quality of conventional radiographic views of the traumatized pelvis to virtual radiographs created from pelvic CT scans. METHODS: Five patients with acetabular fractures and ten patients with pelvic ring injuries were identified using the orthopedic trauma database at our institution. These fractures were evaluated with both conventional radiographs as well as virtual radiographs generated from a CT scan. A web-based survey was created to query overall image quality and visibility of relevant anatomic structures. This survey was then administered to members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA). RESULTS: Ninety-seven surgeons completed the acetabular fracture survey and 87 completed the pelvic fracture survey. Overall image quality was judged to be statistically superior for the virtual as compared to conventional images for acetabular fractures (3.15 vs. 2.98, p = 0.02), as well as pelvic ring injuries (2.21 vs. 1.45, p = 0.0001). Visibility ratings for each anatomic landmark were statistically superior with virtual images as well. DISCUSSION: Virtual radiographs of pelvic and acetabular fractures offer superior image quality, improved comfort, decreased radiation exposure, and a more cost-effective alternative to conventional radiographs.
Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagen , Acetábulo/lesiones , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos Pélvicos/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos Pélvicos/lesiones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Puntos Anatómicos de Referencia/diagnóstico por imagen , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Interfaz Usuario-Computador , Película para Rayos XRESUMEN
Cryptocurrency offers a decentralized alternative to traditional financial systems, facilitating peer-to-peer transactions with minimal fees and heightened security. It also transformed into a financial asset similar to gold. Despite its volatile valuation, recent developments, such as the approval of Bitcoin exchange-traded funds by the Securities and Exchange Commission, underscore its evolving role as an investment opportunity. Plastic surgery has increasingly embraced cryptocurrency as a form of payment, leveraging its speed, security, and privacy benefits. However, alongside its potential advantages, risks such as volatility, irreversibility of transactions, and regulatory uncertainties warrant careful consideration. Moving forward, the integration of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency is poised to revolutionize various aspects of plastic surgery, from patient privacy to postoperative monitoring devices, necessitating a proactive approach from surgeons to navigate this evolving landscape. This article explores the intersection of cryptocurrency and plastic surgery, delving into its current applications, risks, investment potential, and future prospects.
RESUMEN
Background: A total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) system utilizing an inlay glenoid component has been proposed as a means of reducing glenoid component loosening while still providing patients with desirable functional and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to systematically review current outcomes literature on TSA using an inlay glenoid component. Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science databases. Studies comparing pre- and postoperative functional and clinical outcomes were included. Results: Five studies with 148 shoulders (133 patients) were included. Patient-reported outcomes improved, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (mean change 34.1 to 80.6), Penn Shoulder Score (mean change 43.3 to 85.5), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (mean change 34.1 to 80.6), and visual analog scale-pain (mean change 6.9 to 1.6). Range of motion improved for forward elevation (mean change 109.6 to 156.2) and external rotation (mean change 21.5 to 50.8). Glenoid component loosening occurred in one shoulder (0.68%). Two revision surgeries (1.35%) were performed. Discussion: The use of an inlay glenoid component is associated with improvements in postoperative pain, function, and satisfaction while minimizing rates of glenoid component loosening and the need for revision surgery over short-term follow-up. Level of evidence: systematic review, level IV.
RESUMEN
Background: Multiple treatment options for locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder (LPDS) have been described, including the modified McLaughlin procedure. The purpose of this review, therefore, was to perform a systematic review of the literature to synthesize the available data reporting on the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing the modified McLaughlin procedure for the treatment of LPDS. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed Central, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception through January 2023 was performed. Outcomes studies reporting on clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing the modified McLaughlin procedure for LPDS were included. Postoperative complications and episodes of recurrent instability were noted. Results: A total of 1322 studies were initially identified, of which 9 were deemed eligible for inclusion in our review. Among included studies, a total of 97 shoulders (96 patients) with a mean age of 37.7 years (range, 26-51) were identified. The most common mechanisms of injury included trauma, seizure, and electrocution. Reverse Hill-Sachs lesions ranged in size from 20% to 50% of the humeral head articular surface. At final follow-up, the weighted mean University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score, Constant-Murley Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score, and visual analog scale for pain score were 29 (range, 27-31), 75 (range, 65-92), 92 (range, 83-98), and 1.9 (range, 1-2.4), respectively. Postoperative Constant-Murley Score and University of California at Los Angeles scores were highest in the one study reporting exclusively on treatment during the acute period. Weighted mean postoperative forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation were 154° (range, 102-176), 144° (range, 118-171), 64° (range, 44-84), and 47° (range, 42-56), respectively. Osteointegration of the lesser tuberosity was noted in all patients at the final follow-up. Postoperative complications occurred in one patient (1.0% of cohort); a screw migration successfully treated with operative removal. Recurrent instability was noted in two epileptic patients (2.1% of cohort). Conclusion: The literature surrounding the use of the modified McLaughlin procedure for LPDS remains sparse. This review demonstrates that this procedure is associated with favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes with overall low rates of complication and recurrent instability, especially when the time from injury to surgery is minimized. These findings illustrate that in patients presenting with LPDS and a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion between 20% and 50% of the humeral head articular surface, the modified McLaughlin procedure is a safe and effective treatment option.
RESUMEN
Background: The objective of this study was to retrospectively report on the outcomes of female patients undergoing the Latarjet procedure. Methods: Female patients undergoing the Latarjet procedure with minimum 1 year follow-up were identified and contacted to obtain Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and return to sport (RTS) data. Eligible females were then matched 1:1 with a male counterpart based on laterality and age (± 3 years), and outcomes compared. Results: A total of 20 female patients with a mean follow-up of 73.8 months reported postoperative NPRS and SSV scores of 2.2 ± 2.3 and 69.3 ± 22.0, respectively. Of the nine athletes, 3 (33%) reported a successful RTS at a mean of 9 months. Four patients (20.0%) required reoperation at a mean of 27.1 months. The matched analysis demonstrated similar NPRS scores between male and female patients and a trend towards lower SSV scores and rates of RTS. Conclusion: At mid-term follow-up female patients reported pain levels similar to female-specific literature reports, but overall low subjective shoulder function and RTS. Compared to propensity-matched males, females reported similar levels of pain, lower shoulder function, and lower rates of RTS, however, differences did not reach statistical significance. Level of Evidence: IV, retrospective case series.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The murine calvarial model has been widely employed for the in vivo study of particle-induced osteolysis, the most frequent cause of aseptic loosening of total joint replacements. Classically, this model uses an open surgical technique in which polyethylene (PE) particles are directly spread over the calvarium for the induction of osteolysis. We evaluated a minimally invasive modification of the calvarial model by using a direct subcutaneous injection of PE particles. METHODS: Polyethylene (PE) particles were injected subcutaneously over the calvaria of C57BL6J ten-week-old mice ("injection" group) or were implanted after surgical exposure of the calvaria ("open" group) (n = 5/group). For each group, five additional mice received no particles and served as controls. Particle-induced osteolysis was evaluated two weeks after the procedure using high-definition microCT imaging. RESULTS: Polyethylene particle injection over the calvaria resulted in a 40% ± 1.8% decrease in the bone volume fraction (BVF), compared to controls. Using the "open surgical technique", the BVF decreased by 16% ± 3.8% as compared to controls (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Direct subcutaneous injection of PE particles over the murine calvaria produced more profound resorption of bone. Polyethylene particle implantation by injection is less invasive and reliably induces osteolysis to a greater degree than the open technique. This subcutaneous injection method will prove useful for repetitive injections of particles, and the assessment of potential local or systemic therapies.
Asunto(s)
Microesferas , Osteólisis/inducido químicamente , Polietileno/administración & dosificación , Polietileno/efectos adversos , Cráneo/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Osteólisis/patología , Polietileno/farmacología , Cráneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Cráneo/patología , Microtomografía por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Focal cartilage lesions of the knee remain a difficult entity to treat. Current treatment options include arthroscopic debridement, microfracture, autograft or allograft osteochondral transplantation, and cell-based therapies such as autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Osteochondral transplantation techniques restore the normal topography of the condyles and provide mature hyaline cartilage in a single-stage procedure. However, clinical outcomes comparing autograft versus allograft techniques are scarce. PURPOSE: To perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality studies to evaluate the results of osteochondral autograft and allograft transplantation for the treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using various databases. Inclusion criteria were level 1 or 2 original studies, studies with patients reporting knee cartilage injuries and chondral defects, mean follow-up ≥2 years, and studies focusing on osteochondral transplant techniques. Exclusion criteria were studies with nonknee chondral defects, studies reporting clinical outcomes of osteochondral autograft or allograft combined with other procedures, animal studies, cadaveric studies, non-English language studies, case reports, and reviews or editorials. Primary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes and failure rates associated with both techniques, and factors such as lesion size, age, sex, and the number of plugs transplanted were assessed. Metaregression using a mixed-effects model was utilized for meta-analyses. RESULTS: The search resulted in 20 included studies with 364 cases of osteochondral autograft and 272 cases of osteochondral allograft. Mean postoperative survival was 88.2% in the osteochondral autograft cohort as compared with 87.2% in the osteochondral allograft cohort at 5.4 and 5.2 years, respectively (P = .6605). Patient-reported outcomes improved by an average of 65.1% and 81.1% after osteochondral autograft and allograft, respectively (P = .0001). However, meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in patient-reported outcome percentage change between osteochondral autograft and allograft (P = .97) and a coefficient of 0.033 (95% CI, -1.91 to 1.98). Meta-analysis of the relative risk of graft failure after osteochondral autograft versus allograft showed no significant differences (P = .66) and a coefficient of 0.114 (95% CI, -0.46 to 0.69). Furthermore, the regression did not find other predictors (mean age, percentage of female patients, lesion size, number of plugs/grafts used, and treatment location) that may have significantly affected patient-reported outcome percentage change or postoperative failure between osteochondral autograft versus allograft. CONCLUSION: Osteochondral autograft and allograft result in favorable patient-reported outcomes and graft survival rates at medium-term follow-up. While predictors for outcomes such as mean age, percentage of female patients, lesion size, number of plugs/grafts used, and treatment location did not affect the comparison of the 2 cohorts, proper patient selection for either procedure remains paramount to the success and potentially long-term viability of the graft.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante Óseo , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos , Cartílago Articular , Animales , Femenino , Aloinjertos , Autoinjertos , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Cartílago/trasplante , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos/cirugía , Cartílago Articular/cirugía , Cartílago Articular/lesiones , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Trasplante Autólogo , Trasplante HomólogoRESUMEN
Background: Distal biceps repair is a commonly reported procedure in male patients, with reliable outcomes and minimal long-term complications. Information on female patients, however, is limited, and variation in presentation and clinical outcomes is unknown. Questions/Purpose: We sought to report on the presentation, treatment algorithm, and outcomes of a case series of female patients with distal biceps pathology. Methods: A retrospective evaluation was performed from a large, single specialty orthopedic group from 2005 to 2017. Inclusion criteria were surgical treatment of the distal biceps in female patients, with minimum 3 months of follow-up. The primary outcome variable was the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Results: Of 26 patients who met inclusion criteria, 18 (70%) were available for follow-up with patient-reported outcomes. Median age at time of injury was 56.1 years; 46.2% of patients presented with a complete tear of the distal biceps, and the remaining 53.8% presented with a partial tear that failed nonoperative treatment. Six patients had lateral antebrachial cutaneous neuritis in early follow-up, which ultimately resolved. Median MEPS score was 100 (interquartile range: 20). Conclusion: This study represents the largest case series to date describing the presentation, treatment, and outcomes of female patients with distal biceps repair. Women tend to be older than men, have more insidious onset of pain, present with partial tearing, and may benefit from nonoperative treatment. Ultimately, based on this case series we believe distal biceps repair in female patients is a successful operation with minimal complications and high patient satisfaction.