Modifications in surgical implantation of the Penn State electric total artificial heart.

BACKGROUND: Two modifications of the surgical implantation protocol for the Penn State Total Artificial Heart (ETAH) were evaluated: Phrenic nerve ischemia was prevented by minimizing dissection and traction; and hemostasis was augmented and ETAH cuff anastomoses reinforced by using fibrin glue. METHODS: Thirteen Holstein calves underwent orthotopic surgical implantation of the Penn State ETAH between February 1998 and August 2000. Mean hemodynamic and laboratory chemistry variables from the first postoperative week were compared between calves receiving the original (n = 7) and modified (n = 6) protocol. RESULTS: Calves assigned to the modified protocol displayed an improvement in the Po2/FiO2 ratio compared to original (419.4 +/- 17.5 vs 336.3 +/- 35.4, respectively; p = 0.05). All additional parameters were equivalent between groups. The percent survival of animals receiving the modified protocol at 2, 4, and 12 weeks was higher than that of animals that underwent the original protocol. Original-protocol calf deaths consisting of hemothorax (n = 3), and respiratory failure (n = 1) were prevented in the modified protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that manipulations in surgical protocol may promote increased survival in calves implanted with the Penn State ETAH.

Steady state hemodynamic and energetic characterization of the Penn State/3M Health Care Total Artificial Heart.

Total Artificial Heart (TAH) development at Penn State University and 3M Health Care has progressed from design improvements and manufacturing documentation to in vitro and in vivo testing to characterize the system's hemodynamic response and energetic performance. The TAH system is completely implantable and intended for use as an alternative to transplantation. It includes a dual pusher plate pump and rollerscrew actuator, welded electronics and battery assembly, transcutaneous energy transmission system, telemetry, and a compliance chamber. In vitro testing was conducted on a Penn State mock circulatory loop with glycerol/water solution at body temperature. Tests were performed to characterize the preload and afterload response, left atrial pressure control, and power consumption. A sensitive preload response was demonstrated with left atrial pressure safely maintained at less than 15 mm Hg for flow rates up to 7.5 L/min. Variations in aortic pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance were found to have minimal effects on the preload sensitivity and left atrial pressure control. In vivo testing of the completely implanted system in its final configuration was carried out in two acute studies using implanted temperature sensors mounted on the electronics, motor, and energy transmission coil in contact with adjacent tissue. The mean temperature at the device-tissue interface was less than 4 degrees C above core temperature.

Dynamic in vitro and in vivo performance of a permanent total artificial heart.

In vivo characterization studies were performed to compare the dynamic in vivo performance of the Penn State/3M Health Care electric total artificial heart to existing in vitro data. Fully implanted systems were utilized including the artificial heart, controller, backup batteries, compliance chamber, and transcutaneous energy transmission. Catheters were implanted to measure central venous pressure (CVP), left atrial pressure (LAP), right atrial pressure (RAP), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), and aortic pressure (AoP). Cardiac output (CO) was determined from the implanted controller, and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was calculated. Steady state data were collected for each animal along with data regarding the transient responses to changes in preload and afterload. Preload was manipulated through volume changes. Afterload changes were accomplished through vasoactive agents. Increased preload caused little change in cardiac output because the pump output was nearly maximum at baseline. LAP, AoP, and SVR increased with increasing RAP. Decreased preload caused a reduction in CO, LAP, and SVR. Afterload increase resulted in a slight decrease in flow and an increase in system power and SVR. Afterload reduction was accompanied by a decrease in preload and a concomitant reduction in flow. Overall, the system response was similar to the response observed in vitro.