Development and validation of the mirror image comfort and avoidance scale (MICAS).

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument to measure the experience of viewing one's reflection in the mirror for use in rehabilitation, nursing, psychology, and in research studies designed to improve the mirror-viewing experience for those who have suffered psychological or bodily trauma. A secondary purpose was to explore demographic differences in each subscale of the instrument. METHODS: The developed items went through content expert validation, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and internal consistency reliability testing. RESULTS: Using an exploratory factor analysis (n = 137) and a confirmatory factor analysis (n = 142), we validated a 17-item instrument for two distinct populations: veterans (n = 108) and individuals with upper and lower limb loss (n = 210). The mirror viewing comfort subscale (9 items; α = 0.90) and the mirror avoidance subscale (8 items, α = 0.94) were deemed reliable. Strong, significant correlations between pre-and post-comfort scores (r = 0.81, p < 0.001), as well as pre-and post-avoidance scores (r = 0.94, p < 0.001) provide evidence of test-retest reliability. Demographic differences were noted in the subscales. CONCLUSIONS: This instrument contributes to a greater understanding of the experience of mirror-viewing in clinical practice. In interventional research studies to improve the mirror-viewing experience, this instrument can act as a manipulation check or outcome measure.Implications for rehabilitationIndividuals who suffer actual or perceived body disfigurement due to surgery or trauma may suffer mirror discomfort or mirror trauma when viewing their bodies in a mirror. This reaction is due to a pre-frontal cortex neurological disruption and autonomic nervous system fright/flight or faint. Psychological disorders (e.g., devastation, shame, self-revulsion, decreased body image) may ensue.Falls have occurred due to mirror trauma due to an autonomic nervous system disturbance (faint) and may result in ongoing mirror avoidance. When mirrors are needed for incision visualization, mirror avoidance has led to severe surgical site infections.Although there were many scales available in the literature to measure several aspects of the effects of actual or perceived body disfigurement, there were no scales that measured the mirror-viewing experience.Clinicians and researchers can use the Mirror Comfort and Avoidance Scale (MICAS) to assess mirror comfort and avoidance.

A Study of the Amputee Experience of Viewing Self in the Mirror.

PURPOSE: To describe the trajectory of viewing self in a mirror after an ampu-tation and participants' perceptions of what health care professionals should know about mirrors. DESIGN: Hermeneutic phenomenologyMETHODS: Focus groups were conducted to collect the research data. FINDINGS: The mirror experience had three key moments: decision, seeing, and consent. The trajectory of viewing self in a mirror had four key themes: mirror shock, mirror anguish, recognizing self, and acceptance: a new normal. Participants' recommendations for introducing the mirror after an amputation and using a mirror to avoid skin breakdown and infection, and correct gait and balance are described. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a unique viewpoint into the world of those who have suffered amputation of a limb. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Rehabilitation nurses and other health care professionals are encouraged through these participants to consider the effect and value of mirrors when caring for those who have had an amputation.