A review of guidelines for evaluating a minor modification to a validated assay.

Any modification to a validated assay must be evaluated in terms of the impact on the assay's performance characteristics and whether the assay remains fit for the intended purpose. The comparison is referred to as a 'method comparison', 'method comparability', 'method change', or 'comparative validation'. This review presents recommendations and examples of studies found in the current literature as a means of assessing minor modifications. In addition, the authors discuss common statistical approaches used for these comparisons.

Toute modification apportée à un essai validé doit être évaluée afin de mesurer l'impact de cette modification sur les paramètres de performances de l'essai et déterminer si l'aptitude à l'emploi qui lui a été assigné demeure valable suite à la modification en question. Cette comparaison est désignée sous les termes de « comparaison de méthodes d'essai ¼, « comparabilité de méthodes ¼, « changement de méthode d'essai ¼ ou « validation comparative ¼. Les auteurs font part de leurs recommandations et donnent des exemples d'études émanant de la littérature récente concernant l'évaluation de modifications mineures. En outre, ils examinent les approches statistiques couramment utilisées pour ces comparaisons.

Toda modificación que se introduzca en un ensayo validado debe ser objeto de evaluación para determinar la influencia del cambio en las características de funcionamiento del ensayo y saber si este sigue estando adaptado a su función. Para referirse a la comparación, los autores emplean expresiones como 'comparación de métodos', 'comparabilidad de métodos', 'cambio de método' o 'validación comparativa'. Los autores presentan aquí recomendaciones y ejemplos de estudios extraídos de la bibliografía actual como medio de evaluar modificaciones de importancia menor. Además, los autores examinan las lógicas estadísticas comunes utilizadas para estas comparaciones.

Evaluation of a non-invasive, inhalational challenge method for rabies vaccine potency assay.

Veterinary rabies vaccines are essential for safeguarding the public from exposure to rabies virus, as vaccination of domestic animals provides a barrier between humans and wildlife reservoirs. Ensuring rabies vaccines are potent and effective is paramount in preventing human exposure to rabies virus. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) test, a mouse vaccination-challenge assay, is the most widely used and internationally recognized assay for potency testing of inactivated rabies vaccines, and it is currently considered the method of choice. In the NIH test, vaccinated mice are challenged by the intracranial (IC) route. The response to the IC challenge can be variable, which often results in invalid tests. In addition, the IC challenge-exposure raises animal welfare concerns. The objective of this study was to evaluate the intranasal route of challenge as a modification to the NIH test to reduce animal pain and suffering until harmonized requirements for in vitro testing of rabies vaccines are developed. Results confirm the intranasal route is an effective route of rabies challenge in mice. However, a valid challenge requires the use of a more concentrated inoculum, in comparison to the intracranial method.

Rabies vaccine standards: comparison of the 5th and 6th WHO international reference standards to the USDA veterinary reference standard.

Ensuring rabies vaccines are potent and effective is paramount in preventing transmission of this deadly disease and safeguarding public health. Efficacy of human and veterinary vaccines is ensured by evaluating relative potency estimates of the vaccine compared to a rabies reference standard using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) test. Reference vaccines are based on the International Standard for Rabies Vaccine provided by the World Health Organization (WHO). A comparison study was conducted to determine the relative potency of the 5th WHO, 6th WHO, and United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) 08-14 reference standards using the NIH test. Results from the study demonstrate that the 6th WHO reference standard is approximately twice as potent as the 5th WHO reference when reconstituted to contain 1 IU per ml. Based on these results, the Center for Veterinary Biologics (CVB) doubled the reconstitution volume of USDA veterinary reference 08-14 from 13 ml to 26 ml, for an initial use dilution of 0.7 IU per ml for use by veterinary biologics manufacturers in the NIH test. This study emphasizes the importance of reference standard calibration for use in the National Institutes of Health test.

Pathogenicity and molecular characterization of emerging porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in Vietnam in 2007.

In 2007, Vietnam experienced swine disease outbreaks causing clinical signs similar to the 'porcine high fever disease' that occurred in China during 2006. Analysis of diagnostic samples from the disease outbreaks in Vietnam identified porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV-2). Additionally, Escherichia coli and Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus were cultured from lung and spleen, and Streptococcus suis from one spleen sample. Genetic characterization of the Vietnamese PRRSV isolates revealed that this virus belongs to the North American genotype (type 2) with a high nucleotide identity to the recently reported Chinese strains. Amino acid sequence in the nsp2 region revealed 95.7-99.4% identity to Chinese strain HUN4, 68-69% identity to strain VR-2332 and 58-59% identity to strain MN184. A partial deletion in the nsp2 gene was detected; however, this deletion did not appear to enhance the virus pathogenicity in the inoculated pigs. Animal inoculation studies were conducted to determine the pathogenicity of PRRSV and to identify other possible agents present in the original specimens. Pigs inoculated with PRRSV alone and their contacts showed persistent fever, and two of five pigs developed cough, neurological signs and swollen joints. Necropsy examination showed mild to moderate bronchopneumonia, enlarged lymph nodes, fibrinous pericarditis and polyarthritis. PRRSV was re-isolated from blood and tissues of the inoculated and contact pigs. Pigs inoculated with lung and spleen tissue homogenates from sick pigs from Vietnam developed high fever, septicaemia, and died acutely within 72 h, while their contact pigs showed no clinical signs throughout the experiment. Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus was cultured, and PRRSV was re-isolated only from the inoculated pigs. Results suggest that the cause of the swine deaths in Vietnam is a multifactorial syndrome with PRRSV as a major factor.