Loss of intrahepatic HBsAg expression predicts sustained response to peginterferon and is reflected by pronounced serum HBsAg decline.

There is a lack of knowledge regarding the effect of peginterferon (PEG-IFN) on the expression of intrahepatic hepatitis B core and surface antigen (HBcAg and HBsAg) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and its relation with response to therapy. Fifty-two HBeAg-positive and 67 HBeAg-negative CHB patients with paired liver biopsies taken at baseline and after 1 year of PEG-IFN therapy were studied. After PEG-IFN therapy, HBeAg-negative patients showed a significant reduction in both intrahepatic HBcAg (P = 0.04) and HBsAg expression (P < 0.001). In contrast, a reduction in intrahepatic HBcAg expression was not observed in HBeAg-positive patients, while a trend in reduction of intrahepatic HBsAg staining was found (P = 0.09). Post-treatment, 7 (13%) HBeAg-positive and 9 (14%) HBeAg-negative patients had no expression of intrahepatic HBsAg. Patients without any intrahepatic HBsAg expression post-treatment were more likely to achieve a combined response (HBeAg loss with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <2000 IU/mL for HBeAg -positive and HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL and normal alanine aminotransferase for HBeAg-negative CHB): 71% vs 5% for HBeAg-positive (P < 0.001) and 60% vs 16% for HBeAg-negative patients (P = 0.004), respectively. Moreover, a more profound decline of serum HBsAg was observed in patients with absence of intrahepatic HBsAg staining (3.1 vs 0.4 log IU/mL, P < 0.001 and 1.7 vs 0.4 log IU/mL, P = 0.005 for HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative CHB, respectively). In conclusion, PEG-IFN reduces expression of intrahepatic HBsAg. Loss of HBsAg as assessed by immunohistochemistry from the liver predicts a sustained response and is reflected in a pronounced serum HBsAg decline.

Review article: chronic hepatitis B - anti-viral or immunomodulatory therapy?

BACKGROUND: First-line treatment options for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) consist of nucleos(t)ide analogues with a high barrier to resistance (entecavir and tenofovir) or the immunomodulatory agent peginterferon (PEG-IFN). The optimal choice for individual patients remains controversial. AIM: To review treatment options for CHB, with a focus on deciding between prolonged nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy or a finite course of PEG-IFN. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken. RESULTS: Long-lasting, treatment-maintained suppression of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA without resistance is achievable in most patients by entecavir or tenofovir. A sustained off-treatment response is, however, unlikely and long-term therapy must be anticipated. PEG-IFN offers a higher rate of sustained response in a subgroup of patients, but is frequently complicated by side effects. Pre-treatment predictors of response, including HBV genotype, alanine aminotransferase and HBV DNA levels, aid in selecting patients for PEG-IFN therapy. Furthermore, on-treatment markers such as quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen may be applied to identify nonresponders early during the PEG-IFN treatment course, thereby preventing unnecessary treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both nucleos(t)ide analogues and PEG-IFN can be prescribed as first-line treatment options for CHB. However, PEG-IFN should only be considered for patients with a high chance of response based on pre-treatment and on-treatment factors.