RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent decades have seen significant advances in both structural and functional testing of retinal disease. However, the current clinical value of specific testing modalities, as well as future trends, need to be clearly identified in order to highlight areas for further development in routine care and clinical trials. METHODS: We designed a modified two-round Delphi study to obtain the opinion of a multidisciplinary group of 33 international experts involved in the field of retinal disease management/research to determine the level of agreement and consensus regarding the value and performance of specific structural and functional testing methods for retinal disease. On a Likert scale, a median of 1-2 indicated disagreement with the statement, and 5-6 indicated agreement with the statement. An IQR of ≤2 indicated consensus in the responses. Several questions also allowed comments on responses. RESULTS: There was overall agreement that structural testing currently predominates for detection and monitoring. There was moderate agreement that functional testing remains important and will continue to do so in the future because it provides complementary information. Certain respondents considered that properly designed and applied psychophysical tests are as reliable and repeatable as structural observations and that functional changes are the most important in the long run. Respondents considered future care and research to require a combination of structural and functional testing with strong consensus that the relative importance will depend on disease type and stage. CONCLUSION: The study obtained important insights from a group of international experts regarding current and future needs in the management of retinal disease using a mix of quantitative and qualitative approaches. Responses provide a rich range of opinions that will be of interest to researchers seeking to design tests for future patient care and clinical trials.
RESUMEN
Visual acuity (VA) is compared to contrast sensitivity (CS) testing in assessing "real-world" visual performance, and it is recommended that both should be measured routinely in the clinic. The role of nutritional intervention in improving visual performance is reviewed and emphasized. A brief history and illustration of both VA and CS, within the scope of visual performance, is presented. Parameters for effective CS testing in the clinic, and guidelines for interpretation of results, including a new model for understanding the visual impact of changes in CS, are also presented. Relevant research that supports the use of the macular carotenoids lutein, zeaxanthin, and meso-zeaxanthin to enhance visual performance is reviewed with suggested guidelines for supplementation. CS testing is easily performed at a single intermediate target size and is an excellent tool for the accurate assessment of a patient's overall visual experience. Research continues to uncover the strong link between nutrition and visual performance; the macular carotenoids appear to be especially effective in this regard, and their benefits to visual performance now importantly include contrast sensitivity. Clinicians can provide an improved level of care by incorporating into the examination protocol CS testing and, where appropriate, nutritional counseling and intervention.