Aerosol administration of a recombinant adenovirus expressing CFTR to cystic fibrosis patients: a phase I clinical trial.

Ad CFTR, a replication-deficient adenovirus expressing the human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), was administered by aerosolization in a single escalating dose to three pairs (cohorts) of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Buffer only was administered to the nose and lungs 9-14 days before nasal instillation of virus followed the day after by aerosolization of Ad CFTR to the lung. Nasal doses (defined in terms of viral plaque forming units, pfu) were 10(5), 10(7), and 4 x 10(8), whereas aerosolized doses were 10(7), 10(8), 5.4 x 10(8) for each cohort, respectively. No acute toxic effects were observed in the first 4 weeks after virus treatment. Shedding of infectious Ad CFTR was never detected, whereas detection of vector DNA sequences and CFTR expression demonstrated DNA transfer to the nose and airways of patients. No significant deviations in immunological and inflammatory parameters were observed in serum and in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Importantly, for all patients, the serum anti-adenovirus antibody levels did not change significantly from baseline and no antibodies against adenovirus were found in BAL.

[Aerosol administration of a replication defective recombinant adenovirus expressing normal human cDNA-CFTR in the respiratory tractus in patients with cystic fibrosis]. / Administration par aérosol d'un adénovirus recombinant déficient pour la réplication contenant cADN-CFTR humain normal dans le tractus respiratoire de patients atteints de mucoviscidose.

At present it is conceivable to think that gene therapy represents a way to treat or even prevent the respiratory manifestations of cystic fibrosis. Consistent to such a concept, there is sufficient evidence that Ad-CFTR, a recombinant replication-deficient adenovirus expressing the human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator cDNA, can vectorize the expression of a functional CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) to the nasal and airway epithelia. The clinical protocol was designed to assess the safety of single escalating doses of a replication defective adenovirus expressing the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (Ad-CFTR) when administered to the tracheobronchial portion of the airways and whether biological efficacy of CFTR delivery could be demonstrated. Six cystic fibrosis patients received nasal instillation and subsequent aerosol (Optineb, Air Liquide, Paris, France) administration of Ad-CFTR the following day. Doses (pfu) applied to the nose were 10(5) (patients SG and PB), 10(7) (patients FP and EP) and 4 x 10(8) (patients DS and FG), while aerosolised doses were 10(7) (patients SG and PB), 10(8) (patients FP and EP) and 5.4 x 10(8) (patients DS and FG), respectively. No acute toxic effects, no increase in the titer of anti-adenovirus antibodies and no spreading or shedding of Ad-CFTR were detected. In one patient Ad-CFTR DNA was found in the urine and blood two days after aerosolisation. Ad-CFTR DNA was detected in nasal and bronchial brush samples, in BAL, in saliva and tonsils 21, 8, 14 and 4 days post virus administration, respectively. Ad-CFTR mRNA (RT-PCR on bronchial cells) and CFTR protein (immunochemistry on nasal and bronchial cells) were detected up to 14 days following Ad-CFTR administration. These results show that the nebulisation of Ad-CFTR is a possible approach for treating the respiratory manifestation of cystic fibrosis.