Preferences for Conditional Economic Incentives to Improve Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Adherence: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among Male Sex Workers in Mexico.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective in preventing HIV but requires sustained adherence. Conditional economic incentives (CEIs) can improve medication-taking behaviors, yet preferences for programs that employ CEIs to increase PrEP use among male sex workers (MSWs) have not been investigated. We conducted a discrete choice experiment in Mexico City to elicit stated preferences for a CEI-based PrEP adherence program among MSWs. Respondents expressed their preferences for different program characteristics: incentive amount; incentive format; incentive type; and adherence-verification method. We used a random utility logit model to estimate the relative importance of each attribute and estimated willingness-to-pay. MSWs preferred a higher, fixed incentive, with PrEP adherence measured via hair sampling. MSWs were willing to forego up to 21% of their potential maximum CEI amount to ensure receipt of a fixed payment. MSWs are highly willing to accept a CEI-based intervention for PrEP adherence, if offered along with fixed payments.

RESUMEN: La profilaxis previa a la exposición (PrEP) es muy eficaz para prevenir el VIH, pero requiere una adherencia sostenida. Los incentivos económicos condicionales (IEC) pueden mejorar los comportamientos de toma de medicamentos, sin embargo, no se han investigado las preferencias por los programas que emplean IEC para aumentar el uso de PrEP entre los trabajadores sexuales masculinos (TSM). Realizamos un experimento de elección discreta con TSM en la Ciudad de México para obtener preferencias declaradas para un programa de adherencia a la PrEP basado en IEC. Los participantes expresaron sus preferencias en cuanto a diferentes características: monto del incentivo; formato del incentivo; tipo de incentivo; y método de verificación de la adherencia. Utilizamos un modelo logit de utilidad aleatoria para estimar la importancia relativa de cada atributo y la disposición a pagar estimada (DAP). Los TSM prefirieron un incentivo fijo más alto, con la adherencia a la PrEP medida a través de muestras de cabello. Los TSM estaban dispuestos a renunciar hasta el 21% de su monto máximo potencial de IEC para garantizar la recepción de un pago fijo. Los TSM están muy dispuestos a aceptar una intervención basada en IEC para la adherencia a la PrEP, si se ofrece junto con pagos fijos.

Assessing costs of a hypertension program in primary care: evidence from the HEARTS program in Mexico.

Objective: In 2021, Mexico launched the HEARTS program to improve the prevention and control of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in 20 primary care facilities in the states of Chiapas and Yucatán. This study projects the annual cost of program implementation and discusses budgetary implications for scaling up the program. Methods: We obtained district-level data on treatment protocols, medication costs, and other resources required to prevent and treat CVD. We used the HEARTS Costing Tool to estimate total and per-patient costs. A "partial implementation" scenario calculated the costs of implementing HEARTS if existing pharmacological treatment protocols are left in place. The second scenario, "full implementation," examined costs if programs use HEARTS pharmacological protocol. Results: Respectively in the partial and full implementation scenarios, total annual costs to implement and operate HEARTS were $260 023 ($32.1 per patient/year) and $255 046 ($31.5 per patient/year) in Chiapas, and $1 000 059 ($41.3 per patient/year) and $1 013 835 ($43.3 per patient/year) in Yucatán. In Chiapas, adopting HEARTS standardized treatment protocols resulted in a 9.7 % reduction in annual medication expenditures relative to maintaining status-quo treatment approaches. In Yucatán, adoption was $12 875 more expensive, in part because HEARTS hypertension treatment regimens were more intensive than status quo regimens. Conclusion: HEARTS in the Americas offers a standardized strategy to treating and controlling CVD risk factors. In Mexico, approaches that may lead to improved program affordability include adoption of the recommended HEARTS treatment protocols with preferred medications and task shifting of services from physicians to nurses and other providers.

Lung cancer in Mexico: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study, 1990-2016.

OBJECTIVE: To show lung cancer (LC) mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in Mexico. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the visualization tools at the Global Burden of Disease Study website, we analyzed LC mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) by state, sex, socio- demographic index (SDI), age, and risk factors between 1990 and 2016. RESULTS: Mortality rate decreased from 13.9 to 9.1 per 100 000 between 1990 and 2016. This reduction is greater among men. However, deaths by LC rose from 5 478 to 8 470. DALYs rate also decreased. Northern states with higher SDI face a larger burden from LC but exhibited greater reductions compared with southern, less developed states. The burden of LC is concentrated among older population. Smoking is the main risk factor for LC. CONCLUSIONS: The burden by LC has decreased but is differential between states. LC threatens financially both the health system and individuals, since an important fraction of the population is not protected.

OBJETIVO: Mostrar la mortalidad y los años de vida saluda- bles (Avisas) perdidos por cáncer de pulmón (CP) en México. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Con la herramienta de visualización del estudio de la Carga Global de la Enfermedad, se analizó mortalidad y Avisas por CP según diferentes criterios entre 1990 y 2016. RESULTADOS: La tasa de mortalidad disminuyó de 13.9 a 9.1 por 100 000. Dicha reducción fue mayor entre hombres. Las muertes por CP crecieron de 5 478 a 8 470. La tasa de Avisas se redujo. La carga del CP se concentra en grupos de edad avanzada. Los estados del norte, con mayor nivel sociodemográfico, enfrentan mayor carga, pero presen- taron mayores reducciones comparados con estados menos desarrollados. Fumar es el principal factor de riesgo para CP. CONCLUSIONES: La carga por CP ha disminuido pero es diferencial entre estados. El CP amenaza financieramente el sistema de salud y la población, pues una fracción importante no está protegida.

A spatio-temporal cluster analysis of technical efficiency in the production of outpatient maternal health services and its structural correlates in México.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the formation of spatial clusters of technical efficiency (TE) in the production of outpatient maternal health services in México for the period 2008 to 2015. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal analysis of administrative and structural data related to the 243 Mexican health jurisdictions. We use window data envelopment analysis and spatial and econometric techniques. Structural correlates of each TE cluster obtained were identified estimating a pooled multinomial logit model. RESULTS: We observed an increase in the overall TE, accompanied by a reduction in its standard deviation. Furthermore, we identified positive TE spatial dependence both globally and locally. Multiple regression analysis showed that the maximum-performance TE cluster was composed of health jurisdictions located in the North of México and characterized by social marginalization, a reduced indigenous population, and a low demand for maternal health services. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of TE clusters can provide elements to induce decision makers to innovative in ways of allocating resources and manage their utilization. In México as other low- and middle-income countries, it is key to develop targeting strategies to implement specific health services innovations putting to the population to be served at the front of the strategy. This implies testing new modalities to strengthen primary health services, the empowerment of community participation, the training and allocation of health personnel that could respond adequately to population's demand, and the active involvement of competent state and local authorities in the assessment of the results of these innovations.

Old principles, persisting challenges: Maternal health care market alignment in Mexico in the search for UHC.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the alignment of supply and demand for antenatal care (ANC) in Mexico based on the definition of access provided by Donabedian: the "degree of adjustment" between resources and needs. Alignment was studied in the teenage and adult population of Mexico that lacked conventional social security between 2008 and 2015, a period of expanding financial resources for health and public health insurance coverage. Spatial econometric methods were used to analyze data from the Ministry of Health on the supply and demand for ANC in 2,314 municipalities (94% of all municipalities in Mexico). During this period, the relative weight of ANC demand among adolescents increased 37% while the production of antenatal consultations for adolescent and adult women remained unchanged. Bivariate spatial analyses of correlation between supply and demand for ANC services yielded a minimal spatial correlation, or lack of territorial correspondence, between supply and demand among women in both age groups. Spatial econometric analysis confirmed a non-significant association between supply and demand for ANC services. Our findings suggest the existence of misalignment between supply and demand for these services. This requires a reassessment of the management and delivery of ANC services at the local level in order to increase effective coverage and improve the overall performance of the health system.

Assessing costs of a hypertension program in primary care: evidence from the HEARTS program in Mexico

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. In 2021, Mexico launched the HEARTS program to improve the prevention and control of cardiovascu- lar disease (CVD) risk factors in 20 primary care facilities in the states of Chiapas and Yucatán. This study projects the annual cost of program implementation and discusses budgetary implications for scaling up the program. Methods. We obtained district-level data on treatment protocols, medication costs, and other resources required to prevent and treat CVD. We used the HEARTS Costing Tool to estimate total and per-patient costs. A “partial implementation” scenario calculated the costs of implementing HEARTS if existing pharmacological treatment protocols are left in place. The second scenario, “full implementation,” examined costs if programs use HEARTS pharmacological protocol. Results. Respectively in the partial and full implementation scenarios, total annual costs to implement and operate HEARTS were $260 023 ($32.1 per patient/year) and $255 046 ($31.5 per patient/year) in Chiapas, and $1 000 059 ($41.3 per patient/year) and $1 013 835 ($43.3 per patient/year) in Yucatán. In Chiapas, adopt- ing HEARTS standardized treatment protocols resulted in a 9.7 % reduction in annual medication expenditures relative to maintaining status-quo treatment approaches. In Yucatán, adoption was $12 875 more expensive, in part because HEARTS hypertension treatment regimens were more intensive than status quo regimens. Conclusion. HEARTS in the Americas offers a standardized strategy to treating and controlling CVD risk factors. In Mexico, approaches that may lead to improved program affordability include adoption of the recom- mended HEARTS treatment protocols with preferred medications and task shifting of services from physicians to nurses and other providers.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. En el año 2021, México puso en marcha el programa HEARTS para mejorar la prevención y el con- trol de los factores de riesgo de las enfermedades cardiovasculares en 20 centros de atención primaria en los estados de Chiapas y Yucatán. En este estudio se estima el costo anual de la ejecución del programa y se abordan las implicaciones presupuestarias para su ampliación. Métodos. Se obtuvieron datos a nivel de distrito sobre los protocolos de tratamiento, los costos de los medica- mentos y otros recursos necesarios para prevenir y tratar las enfermedades cardiovasculares. Se empleó la herramienta HEARTS para el cálculo de costos con el fin de estimar los costos totales y por paciente. En una situación de “implementación parcial”, se calcularon los costos de ejecutar HEARTS si se mantienen los pro- tocolos de tratamiento farmacológico existentes. En un segundo escenario de “implementación completa”, se examinaron los costos de los programas que emplean el protocolo farmacológico de HEARTS. Resultados. En los escenarios de implementación parcial y total, respectivamente, los costos anuales totales para implementar y poner en marcha el paquete de medidas HEARTS fueron de US$ 260 023 (US$ 32,1 por paciente al año) y US$ 255 046 (US$ 31,5 por paciente al año) en Chiapas, y US$ 1 000 059 (US$ 41,3 por paciente al año) y US$ 1 013 835 (US$ 43,3 por paciente al año) en Yucatán. En Chiapas, la adopción de los protocolos de tratamiento estandarizados de HEARTS supuso una reducción de 9,7% en los gastos anuales de medicamentos en comparación con el mantenimiento de los enfoques de tratamiento ya establecidos. En Yucatán, la adopción fue US$ 12 875 más cara, en parte porque los esquemas de tratamiento para la hiper- tensión que se proponen en HEARTS fueron más intensivos que los esquemas ya establecidos. Conclusiones. El programa HEARTS en la Región de las Américas ofrece una estrategia estandarizada para tratar y controlar los factores de riesgo de las enfermedades cardiovasculares. En México, los enfoques que pueden conducir a una mayor asequibilidad del programa incluyen la adopción de los protocolos de tratamiento recomendados de HEARTS con medicamentos de preferencia y la distribución de tareas de los servicios para que pasen del personal médico al personal de enfermería y otros prestadores de atención de salud.

[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Em 2021, o México lançou o programa HEARTS para melhorar a prevenção e o controle dos fatores de risco de doenças cardiovasculares (DCV) em 20 unidades básicas de saúde nos estados de Chiapas e Yucatán. Este estudo projeta o custo anual de implementação do programa e discute as implicações orça- mentárias para sua expansão. Métodos. Foram obtidos dados de nível distrital sobre protocolos de tratamento, custos de medicamentos e outros recursos necessários para prevenir e tratar a DCV. A ferramenta de cálculo de custos do HEARTS foi usada para estimar os custos totais e por paciente. Um cenário de “implementação parcial” calculou os cus- tos de implementação do HEARTS se os protocolos de farmacoterapia existentes forem mantidos em vigor. O segundo cenário, “implementação plena”, examinou os custos se os programas utilizassem o protocolo de farmacoterapia do HEARTS. Resultados. Respectivamente nos cenários de implementação parcial e plena, os custos anuais totais para implementar e operar o HEARTS foram de US$ 260 023 (US$ 32,1 por paciente/ano) e US$ 255 046 (US$ 31,5 por paciente/ano) em Chiapas, e $1 000 059 (US$ 41,3 por paciente/ano) e US$ 1 013 835 (US$ 43,30 por paciente/ano) em Yucatán. Em Chiapas, a adoção de protocolos de tratamento padronizados do HEARTS resultou em uma redução de 9,7% nos gastos anuais com medicamentos em relação à manutenção das condutas atuais (status quo). Em Yucatán, a adoção foi US$ 12 875 mais cara, em parte porque os regimes de tratamento de hipertensão do HEARTS eram mais intensivos do que os regimes atuais. Conclusão. A HEARTS nas Américas oferece uma estratégia padronizada para tratar e controlar os fatores de risco de DCV. No México, abordagens que podem levar a uma melhor acessibilidade do programa incluem a adoção dos protocolos de tratamento recomendados do HEARTS com medicamentos preferidos e a realo- cação de tarefas de médicos para enfermeiros e outros profissionais.

Assessing costs of a hypertension program in primary care: evidence from the HEARTS program in Mexico / Evaluación de los costos de un programa de hipertensión en la atención primaria: datos del programa HEARTS en México / Avaliação dos custos de um programa de hipertensão na atenção primária: evidências do programa HEARTS no México

ABSTRACT Objective. In 2021, Mexico launched the HEARTS program to improve the prevention and control of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in 20 primary care facilities in the states of Chiapas and Yucatán. This study projects the annual cost of program implementation and discusses budgetary implications for scaling up the program. Methods. We obtained district-level data on treatment protocols, medication costs, and other resources required to prevent and treat CVD. We used the HEARTS Costing Tool to estimate total and per-patient costs. A "partial implementation" scenario calculated the costs of implementing HEARTS if existing pharmacological treatment protocols are left in place. The second scenario, "full implementation," examined costs if programs use HEARTS pharmacological protocol. Results. Respectively in the partial and full implementation scenarios, total annual costs to implement and operate HEARTS were $260 023 ($32.1 per patient/year) and $255 046 ($31.5 per patient/year) in Chiapas, and $1 000 059 ($41.3 per patient/year) and $1 013 835 ($43.3 per patient/year) in Yucatán. In Chiapas, adopting HEARTS standardized treatment protocols resulted in a 9.7 % reduction in annual medication expenditures relative to maintaining status-quo treatment approaches. In Yucatán, adoption was $12 875 more expensive, in part because HEARTS hypertension treatment regimens were more intensive than status quo regimens. Conclusion. HEARTS in the Americas offers a standardized strategy to treating and controlling CVD risk factors. In Mexico, approaches that may lead to improved program affordability include adoption of the recommended HEARTS treatment protocols with preferred medications and task shifting of services from physicians to nurses and other providers.

RESUMEN Objetivo. En el año 2021, México puso en marcha el programa HEARTS para mejorar la prevención y el control de los factores de riesgo de las enfermedades cardiovasculares en 20 centros de atención primaria en los estados de Chiapas y Yucatán. En este estudio se estima el costo anual de la ejecución del programa y se abordan las implicaciones presupuestarias para su ampliación. Métodos. Se obtuvieron datos a nivel de distrito sobre los protocolos de tratamiento, los costos de los medicamentos y otros recursos necesarios para prevenir y tratar las enfermedades cardiovasculares. Se empleó la herramienta HEARTS para el cálculo de costos con el fin de estimar los costos totales y por paciente. En una situación de "implementación parcial", se calcularon los costos de ejecutar HEARTS si se mantienen los protocolos de tratamiento farmacológico existentes. En un segundo escenario de "implementación completa", se examinaron los costos de los programas que emplean el protocolo farmacológico de HEARTS. Resultados. En los escenarios de implementación parcial y total, respectivamente, los costos anuales totales para implementar y poner en marcha el paquete de medidas HEARTS fueron de US$ 260 023 (US$ 32,1 por paciente al año) y US$ 255 046 (US$ 31,5 por paciente al año) en Chiapas, y US$ 1 000 059 (US$ 41,3 por paciente al año) y US$ 1 013 835 (US$ 43,3 por paciente al año) en Yucatán. En Chiapas, la adopción de los protocolos de tratamiento estandarizados de HEARTS supuso una reducción de 9,7% en los gastos anuales de medicamentos en comparación con el mantenimiento de los enfoques de tratamiento ya establecidos. En Yucatán, la adopción fue US$ 12 875 más cara, en parte porque los esquemas de tratamiento para la hipertensión que se proponen en HEARTS fueron más intensivos que los esquemas ya establecidos. Conclusiones. El programa HEARTS en la Región de las Américas ofrece una estrategia estandarizada para tratar y controlar los factores de riesgo de las enfermedades cardiovasculares. En México, los enfoques que pueden conducir a una mayor asequibilidad del programa incluyen la adopción de los protocolos de tratamiento recomendados de HEARTS con medicamentos de preferencia y la distribución de tareas de los servicios para que pasen del personal médico al personal de enfermería y otros prestadores de atención de salud.

RESUMO Objetivo. Em 2021, o México lançou o programa HEARTS para melhorar a prevenção e o controle dos fatores de risco de doenças cardiovasculares (DCV) em 20 unidades básicas de saúde nos estados de Chiapas e Yucatán. Este estudo projeta o custo anual de implementação do programa e discute as implicações orçamentárias para sua expansão. Métodos. Foram obtidos dados de nível distrital sobre protocolos de tratamento, custos de medicamentos e outros recursos necessários para prevenir e tratar a DCV. A ferramenta de cálculo de custos do HEARTS foi usada para estimar os custos totais e por paciente. Um cenário de "implementação parcial" calculou os custos de implementação do HEARTS se os protocolos de farmacoterapia existentes forem mantidos em vigor. O segundo cenário, "implementação plena", examinou os custos se os programas utilizassem o protocolo de farmacoterapia do HEARTS. Resultados. Respectivamente nos cenários de implementação parcial e plena, os custos anuais totais para implementar e operar o HEARTS foram de US$ 260 023 (US$ 32,1 por paciente/ano) e US$ 255 046 (US$ 31,5 por paciente/ano) em Chiapas, e $1 000 059 (US$ 41,3 por paciente/ano) e US$ 1 013 835 (US$ 43,30 por paciente/ano) em Yucatán. Em Chiapas, a adoção de protocolos de tratamento padronizados do HEARTS resultou em uma redução de 9,7% nos gastos anuais com medicamentos em relação à manutenção das condutas atuais (status quo). Em Yucatán, a adoção foi US$ 12 875 mais cara, em parte porque os regimes de tratamento de hipertensão do HEARTS eram mais intensivos do que os regimes atuais. Conclusão. A HEARTS nas Américas oferece uma estratégia padronizada para tratar e controlar os fatores de risco de DCV. No México, abordagens que podem levar a uma melhor acessibilidade do programa incluem a adoção dos protocolos de tratamento recomendados do HEARTS com medicamentos preferidos e a realocação de tarefas de médicos para enfermeiros e outros profissionais.

Lung cancer in Mexico: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study, 1990-2016 / Cáncer de pulmón en México: hallazgos del estudio de Carga Global de la Enfermedad 1999-2016

Abstract: Objective: To show lung cancer (LC) mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in Mexico. Materials and methods: With the visualization tools at the Global Burden of Disease Study website, we analyzed LC mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) by state, sex, sociodemographic index (SDI), age, and risk factors between 1990 and 2016. Results: Mortality rate decreased from 13.9 to 9.1 per 100 000 between 1990 and 2016. This reduction is greater among men. However, deaths by LC rose from 5 478 to 8 470. DALYs rate also decreased. Northern states with higher SDI face a larger burden from LC but exhibited greater reductions compared with southern, less developed states. The burden of LC is concentrated among older population. Smoking is the main risk factor for LC. Conclusions: The burden by LC has decreased but is differential between states. LC threatens financially both the health system and individuals, since an important fraction of the population is not protected.

Resumen: Objetivo: Mostrar la mortalidad y los años de vida saludables (Avisas) perdidos por cáncer de pulmón (CP) en México. Material y métodos: Con la herramienta de visualización del estudio de la Carga Global de la Enfermedad, se analizó mortalidad y Avisas por CP según diferentes criterios entre 1990 y 2016. Resultados: La tasa de mortalidad disminuyó de 13.9 a 9.1 por 100 000. Dicha reducción fue mayor entre hombres. Las muertes por CP crecieron de 5 478 a 8 470. La tasa de Avisas se redujo. La carga del CP se concentra en grupos de edad avanzada. Los estados del norte, con mayor nivel sociodemográfico, enfrentan mayor carga, pero presentaron mayores reducciones comparados con estados menos desarrollados. Fumar es el principal factor de riesgo para CP. Conclusiones: La carga por CP ha disminuido pero es diferencial entre estados. El CP amenaza financieramente el sistema de salud y la población, pues una fracción importante no está protegida.