Radiation Oncology Ransomware Attack Response Risk Analysis Using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.

PURPOSE: There have been numerous significant ransomware attacks impacting Radiation Oncology in the past 5 years. Research into ransomware attack response in Radiation Oncology has consisted of case reports and descriptive articles and has lacked quantitative studies. The purpose of this work was to identify the significant safety risks to patients being treated with radiation therapy during a ransomware attack scenario, using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multi-institutional and multidisciplinary team conducted a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis by developing process maps and using Risk Priority Number (RPN) scores to quantify the increased likelihood of incidents in a ransomware attack scenario. The situation that was simulated was a ransomware attack that had removed the capability to access the Record and Verify (R&V) system. Five situations were considered: 1) a standard treatment of a patient with and without an R&V, 2) a standard treatment of a patient for the first fraction right after the R&V capabilities are disabled, and 3) 3 situations in which a plan modification was required. RPN scores were compared with and without R&V functionality. RESULTS: The data indicate that RPN scores increased by 71% (range, 38%-96%) when R&V functionality is disabled compared with a nonransomware attack state where R&V functionality is available. The failure modes with the highest RPN in the simulated ransomware attack state included incorrectly identifying patients on treatment, incorrectly identifying where a patient is in their course of treatment, treating the incorrect patient, and incorrectly tracking delivered fractions. CONCLUSIONS: The presented study quantifies the increased risk of incidents when treating in a ransomware attack state, identifies key failure modes that should be prioritized when preparing for a ransomware attack, and provides data that can be used to guide future ransomware resiliency research.

Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy Are at Risk of Financial Toxicity: A Patient-based Prospective Survey Study.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the financial burden experienced by patients receiving radiation therapy. Furthermore, currently, no financial toxicity screening tools have been validated for use in radiation oncology. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Physician surveys were used to gauge provider understanding of treatment costs and their willingness to adopt the use of financial toxicity screening tools. Post-treatment patient surveys were used to investigate the covariates of treatment-induced financial risk. RESULTS: Of the 210 radiation oncologists who completed our survey, 53% reported being "very concerned" with treatment-related costs negatively affecting their patients, and 80% believed that a financial toxicity screening tool would be useful in practice. An analysis of patient surveys using logistic regression found age and cancer site to be the most important variables associated with financial toxicity. Thirty-four patients (22%) experienced financial toxicity related to treatment. The financial toxicities experienced were loss of job (28%), loss of income (24%), difficulty paying their rent or mortgage (20%), difficulty paying for transportation (15%), and difficulty paying for meals (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Financial toxicity is an important measure for patients and providers and is experienced by approximately one quarter of patients. Further studies to improve models to predict financial toxicity and how financial toxicity is related to patient outcomes and quality of life are warranted.

Serum testosterone changes in patients treated with radiation therapy alone for prostate cancer on NRG oncology RTOG 9408.

OBJECTIVES: We reviewed testosterone changes for patients who were treated with radiation therapy (RT) alone on NRG oncology RTOG 9408. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients (T1b-T2b, prostate-specific antigen <20 ng/mL) were randomized between RT alone and RT plus 4 months of androgen ablation. Serum testosterone (ST) levels were investigated at enrollment, RT completion, and the first follow-up 3 months after RT. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare pre- and post-treatment ST levels in patients who were randomized to the RT-alone arm. RESULTS: Of 2028 patients enrolled, 992 patients were randomized to receive RT alone and 917 (92.4%) had baseline ST values available and completed RT. Of these 917 patients, immediate and 3-month post-RT testosterone levels were available for 447 and 373 patients, respectively. Excluding 2 patients who received hormonal therapy off protocol after RT, 447 and 371 patients, respectively, were analyzed. For all patients, the median change in ST values at completion of RT and at 3-month follow-up were -30.0 ng/dL (p5-p95; -270.0 to 162.0; P < .001) and -34.0 ng/dL (p5-p95, -228.0 to 160.0; P < .01), respectively. CONCLUSION: RT for prostate cancer was associated with a median 9.2% decline in ST at completion of RT and a median 9.3% decline 3 months after RT. These changes were statistically significant.

Impact of Her-2 Neu overexpression on outcome of elderly women treated with wide local excision and breast irradiation for early stage breast cancer: an exploratory analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of Her-2 neu status in elderly patients managed with breast conservation strategy for stage I-II breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted an IRB approved retrospective review of 153 women age 70 and older with stage I-II breast cancer, managed with wide local excision and breast radiation between January 1997 and December 2002. The subset of 106 patients had a known Her-2 neu status and was analyzed for primary patient and tumor characteristics. These characteristics were correlated with cause specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and combined nodal and distant failure (NDF). Her-2 neu positivity was confirmed with FISH HercepTestTM. Statistical tests included Cox regression, contingency table and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 55 months and patient's median age was 76. Twenty two percent of patients were Her-2 neu positive and 78% were Her-2 neu negative. Her-2 neu positivity was significantly associated with high histologic grade (P = 0.008), T2 stage (P = 0.001) and positive axillary lymph nodes (P = 0.02) among 73 patients who had surgical assessment of axilla. Overall, only 15 patients (14%) received chemotherapy. There were no recurrences in the breast. Her-2 neu positivity predicted for NDF and CSS on multivariate analysis. Projected 5-year freedom from NDF was 70% for Her-2 neu positive and 97% for Her-2 neu negative patients (P < 0.01, log-rank). CSS was 86% for Her-2 neu positive and 98% for Her-2 neu negative patients (P < 0.01, log-rank). OS was no different between Her-2 neu positive and Her-2 neu negative patients (80% versus 85%, P = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Her-2 neu amplification predicts development of NDF and negatively influences CSS, but not local control or OS in elderly patients treated with breast conservation. Similar to the trend in younger patients, Her-2 neu positivity may be used in the future to consider more aggressive treatment strategies in elderly patients.