Timing of peritoneal dialysis catheter removal after pediatric renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: A peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter is in place at the time of kidney transplantation in children receiving PD. Removal of the catheter eliminates the risk of catheter-related infections. However, the patient benefits from leaving the catheter in place if dialysis is necessary posttransplantation. There is currently no consensus on the proper timing of PD catheter removal after kidney transplantation in children. OBJECTIVE: To identify the risks and benefits of an in-dwelling PD catheter after renal transplantation in children. DESIGN: Retrospective single-center study of infectious complications and posttransplantation PD catheter use in 31 renal transplantations in 26 children. RESULTS: Peritoneal dialysis catheters were used postoperatively in 13 of the 31 transplantations. In 12 instances the catheter was needed during the first month after transplantation, and 2 of the patients involved did not have a catheter in place when needed. Six catheter-related infections occurred in 5 patients posttransplantation, with only 1 infection taking place within 1 month after transplantation. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the need for catheter use occurs predominantly during the first month, while infectious complications usually happen later. This strongly suggests that PD catheters should not be removed until approximately 1 month after kidney transplantation.

Low serial serum neopterin does not predict low risk for chronic renal graft rejection.

Research has provided new and potent immunosuppressants which can potentially stop ongoing rejection. Subclinical rejection is a particular problem in the pediatric age group and early identification of children at risk is of the utmost importance. Neopterin has been previously shown to be a non-specific but sensitive marker for immunologic activity. In this study we hypothesized that low serum neopterin in the 1st year after transplantation predicts a low risk of chronic rejection. We retrospectively analyzed serial neopterin data obtained beyond the early postoperative period in 21 children and correlated the peak and average with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) loss during the subsequent years (P = 0.63, NS, r = 0.10). Our results show that serum neopterin did not differ between the majority of children who developed chronic transplant dysfunction and children with stable transplant function beyond the early post-transplant period. Thus serum neopterin failed to delineate a low-risk population who might be spared more invasive diagnostic procedures such as protocol biopsy.

Reduction of delayed renal allograft function using sequential immunosuppression.

Previous data suggested that outcome in small children with cadaveric renal transplantation might be improved with sequential therapy. This protocol combines augmented immunosuppression [by including antibody induction (ATG)] with avoidance of nephrotoxic medication in the immediate postoperative phase (by delayed start of cyclosporin therapy). In this report, we describe effects of this approach in 12 consecutively transplanted small children of less than 5 years of age (mean 3.2 years) who received a cadaveric renal graft at our institution between 1991 and 1998. Up to 1996 triple therapy (prednisolone, azathioprine, cyclosporin) and since 1997 sequential therapy (prednisolone, azathioprine, ATG until serum creatinine <2 mg/dl, then cyclosporin) was used for immunosuppression. Five children had delayed graft function (45.4%), all of whom were treated with triple therapy including cyclosporin from the very beginning, whereas children treated by the sequential protocol gained immediate graft function (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two protocols concerning frequency or severity of rejections (67% vs. 60%, all steroid responsive), difference in the incidence of either bacterial or viral infections, or between the incidence of hypertension. Although not reaching statistical significance, 1-year graft survival rates also increased from 60% for triple therapy to 80% for sequential therapy. In conclusion, our findings confirm previous studies showing that outcome in small children undergoing renal transplantation may be improved by specially tailored treatment protocols such as sequential therapy.

Peritoneal dialysate fluid composition determines heat shock protein expression patterns in human mesothelial cells.

BACKGROUND: Low biocompatibility of peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDF) contributes to mesothelial injury. We investigated whether the heat shock proteins (HSP)-27, HSP-72, and HSP-90 are differentially induced upon exposure of mesothelial cells to PDF and whether this was affected by selective modulation of the physicochemical properties of PDF. METHODS: Human mesothelial cells (Met5A and primary human mesothelial cells) were exposed to acidic lactate and glucose-monomer based PDF (CAPD2 and CAPD3), to control culture media, or to a neutral lactate and glucose-monomer-based PDF with reduced levels of glucose degradation products (BALANCE). Expression of HSP-27, HSP-72, and HSP-90 and cellular distribution of HSP-72 were assessed by Western blotting and immunocytochemistry. RESULTS: Mesothelial cells exhibited strong constitutive expression of HSP-27 and to a lesser extent HSP-72 and HSP-90. Exposure of the cells to CAPD2 and CAPD3 resulted in strong up-regulation of HSP-72. HSP-27 levels were slightly increased, but HSP-90 levels were unchanged upon exposure to CAPD2 or CAPD3. In contrast, exposure of the cells to BALANCE did not affect HSP-27 or HSP-72 expression. The acidic pH and glucose degradation products were found to be principal in mediating increased HSP-72 expression upon exposure to PDF. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of HSP expression represents a novel tool to assess biocompatibility of PDF. Among the HSP investigated, HSP-72 is the most predictive and accurate parameter to assess mesothelial cell injury in the early phase of exposure to PDF.