Interprofessional transformation of clinical education: The first six years of the Veterans Affairs Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education.

This paper describes the Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education (CoEPCE), a seven-site collaborative project funded by the Office of Academic Affiliations (OAA) within the Veterans Health Administration of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The CoEPCE was established to fulfill OAA's vision of large-scale transformation of the clinical learning environment within VA primary care settings. This was accomplished by funding new Centers within VA facilities to develop models of interprofessional education (IPE) to teach health professions trainees to deliver high quality interprofessional team-based primary care to Veterans. Using reports and data collected and maintained by the National Coordinating Center over the first six years of the project, we describe program inputs, the multicomponent intervention, activities undertaken to develop the intervention, and short-term outcomes. The findings have implications for lessons learned that can be considered by others seeking large-scale transformation of education within the clinical workplace and the development of interprofessional clinical learning environments. Within the VA, the CoEPCE has laid the foundation for IPE and collaborative practice, but much work remains to disseminate this work throughout the national VA system.

Exploring the role complexity and workforce needs of doctoral-prepared nurses.

Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Office of Nursing Services (ONS) is committed to encouraging and sustaining a positive culture that values doctoral-prepared nurses. Responding to needs cited in open-ended responses from the first ever survey of VHA's doctoral-prepared nurse workforce will require: providing and encouraging formal advanced degree achievement recognition; further opportunities for professional development and potential promotion; and support for nurse research activities at the local and national level. ONS recognizes the need for further research and evaluation related to VHA doctoral-prepared nurses to better understand both the outcomes they drive and what drives them.

Medical and pharmacy students shadowing advanced practice nurses to develop interprofessional competencies.

AIM: This article describes a job-shadowing project that partnered second-year medical and third-year pharmacy students with an advanced practice nurse (APN) for a four-hour job- shadowing experience. BACKGROUND: In order to address the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) Expert Panel core competencies of interprofessional communication, teamwork, and roles/responsibilities, this project implemented a job-shadowing experience to increase students' knowledge of APN roles and interprofessional collaborative team practices. METHODS: Forty volunteer medical and pharmacy students were paired together and completed the job-shadowing activity with an APN. Assessment of knowledge was measured by pre- and post-project surveys. RESULTS: Pre- and post-job-shadowing differences demonstrated statistical significance in the interprofessional domains of role awareness, collaboration and communication. These results suggest that an APN job-shadowing experience is effective in developing medical and pharmacy students' competencies in interprofessional collaborative practice. CONCLUSION: Specific recommendations include creating enhanced job-shadowing experiences within the curriculums of medicine, pharmacy, and nursing students, and assessing for evidence of enhanced IPEC competencies as a result of these learning experiences.

Evaluation of Veterans Affairs primary care nurse practitioner residency: Achievement of competencies.

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine has recommended the establishment of residency programs for advanced practice nursing graduates. Currently, the evidence about program effectiveness is limited. PURPOSE: To describe the nurse practitioner (NP) resident outcomes on seven competency domains established by the VA Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education (VA CoEPCE). METHODS: We evaluated mean NP resident competency self-ratings and mean mentor ratings over the 12-month program across NP residency programs at five sites. Highest and lowest rated items and differences between NP resident self-ratings and mentor ratings were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean NP resident self-ratings and mean mentor ratings demonstrated statistically significant improvement in all domains (p < .0001). At 12 months, NP residents were rated by their mentors as able to practice without supervision in all competency domains. At 1 and 12 months, clinical, leadership and quality improvement/population management competencies were the lowest scored domains while patient-centered care, interprofessional team collaboration, shared decision-making and sustained relationships competencies were highest. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide initial evidence for the effectiveness of VA CoEPCE NP residency programs and also highlight areas of needed improvement.

Nurse Practitioner residents' perceptions of competency development during a year-long immersion in Veterans Affairs primary care.

BACKGROUND: Nurse Practitioner (NP) Postgraduate Residency programs are rapidly expanding. Currently, little is known about trainees' self-perceptions during these experiences. PURPOSE: Describe NP residents' perceptions of their strengths, areas for improvement, and goals while participating in the Veterans Affairs Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education NP Residency program. METHODS: NP residents responded to open-ended questions at three time points across their training year. Responses were analyzed using inductive and deductive approaches. FINDINGS: NP residents self-reported strengths in patient-centered care and interprofessional teamwork. They identified clinical skill acquisition as the major area for improvement. Their short- and long-term goals focused on personal and professional growth. DISCUSSION: These results suggest NPs prioritize clinical skill acquisition during a primary care residency. In contrast, leadership and performance improvement skills did not capture their attention. When aggregated at the programmatic level, assessments identified opportunities to improve the NP Residency program curriculum.

The Patient-Centered Medical Home: Preparation of the Workforce, More Questions than Answers.

As American medicine continues to undergo significant transformation, the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is emerging as an interprofessional primary care model designed to deliver the right care for patients, by the right professional, at the right time, in the right setting, for the right cost. A review of local, state, regional and national initiatives to train professionals in delivering care within the PCMH model reveals some successes, but substantial challenges. Workforce policy recommendations designed to improve PCMH effectiveness and efficiency include 1) adoption of an expanded definition of primary care, 2) fundamental redesign of health professions education, 3) payment reform, 4) responsiveness to local needs assessments, and 5) systems improvement to emphasize quality, population health, and health disparities.

Veteran Affairs Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education: transforming nurse practitioner education.

To integrate health care professional learners into patient-centered primary care delivery models, the Department of Veterans Affairs has funded five Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education (CoEPCEs). The main goal of the CoEPCEs is to develop and test innovative structural and curricular models that foster transformation of health care training from profession-specific "silos" to interprofessional, team-based educational and care delivery models in patient-centered primary care settings. CoEPCE implementation emphasizes four core curricular domains: shared decision making, sustained relationships, interprofessional collaboration, and performance improvement. The structural models allow interprofessional learners to have longitudinal learning experiences and sustained and continuous relationships with patients, faculty mentors, and peer learners. This article presents an overview of the innovative curricular models developed at each site, focusing on nurse practitioner (NP) education. Insights on transforming NP education in the practice setting and its impact on traditional NP educational models are offered. Preliminary outcomes and sustainment examples are also provided.

Interprofessional Curriculum Delivery: Experience of a Primary Care Education Program.

Few post-graduate training programs offer a comprehensive curriculum that includes structured clinical experiences to teach interprofessional care. To address this need, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Academic Affiliations funded the Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education (CoEPCE) from 2011-2019 to provide interprofessional curricula for health profession trainees (HPTs), including physician residents, nurse practitioner residents, pharmacy residents, and psychology residents. We examined changes over time in curricular domains, system impacts, and program practices based on HPT survey data and the qualitative evaluation of narrative feedback. An annual survey was administered to participants. Indirect standardized ratios were calculated for interprofessional professional education (IPE) program domains, system impacts, and program practices. Qualitative responses were coded based on curricular domains and key program components. The study cohort included 369 HPTs. Site and profession standardized indirect ratios across all professions indicated improvements in curricular domains, system impacts, and program practices, with significant differences observed for associated health HPTs as compared to other HPTs for performance improvement. Qualitative data indicated that profession was associated with differences in perceptions of the curriculum. Although improvements occurred over time, our findings support the need for the thoughtful consideration of profession-specific identity characteristics when designing interprofessional curricula.

Implementation of an inpatient smoking cessation programme in a Veterans Affairs facility.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To test the transportability and implementation of the Tobacco Tactics intervention using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework, for inpatient units at the Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center. BACKGROUND: Smoking rates are high among veterans. While the Department of Veterans Affairs has standardised outpatient cessation clinics, inpatient cessation services, known to be efficacious, are only sporadically provided. DESIGN: This was a phase 4, pre and postimplementation study of the Tobacco Tactics intervention. METHODS: A unique convenience sample of inpatient veteran smokers was recruited both before (n = 54) and after (n = 50) implementation of the Tobacco Tactics programme. Participants completed baseline and 30-day follow-up surveys along with urine cotinine test kits. In addition, staff completed anonymous surveys during the preintervention period (n = 158) and two months after (n = 81) the Tobacco Tactics training. Bivariate analyses compared preintervention vs. postintervention patient and staff characteristics using Chi-square, Fisher's Exact or Student's t-test. p-values <0·05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Patient-reported receipt of services and satisfaction was 10% higher in the postintervention compared to the preintervention group. Quit rates were 3% higher in the postintervention than in the preintervention group. The mean number of cigarettes smoked per day increased from 13 to 15 in the preintervention group, while the mean number of cigarettes smoked per day decreased from 14 to 9 in the postintervention group. Staff's confidence in their ability to provide cessation services improved greatly posttraining (p = 0·0017) as did self-reported delivery of cessation services (p = 0·0154). CONCLUSIONS: With as little as one-hour training for nurses, the Tobacco Tactics intervention has the potential to be widely disseminated in the Department of Veterans Affairs. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The implementation of inpatient smoking interventions has the potential to improve quit rates and decrease morbidity and mortality in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Strategies for developing faculty confidence and competencies to mentor quality improvement DNP projects.

DNP faculty who mentor students in quality improvement (QI) DNP projects often lack essential knowledge of QI principles. The purpose of this article is to guide DNP programs in developing confident and competent faculty mentors for QI DNP projects, facilitating DNP student success. At a multi-campus practice- and research-intensive university, strategies employed to teach College of Nursing faculty essential knowledge of QI principles comprise structural and process components. Structural supports standardize faculty workload, promote potential for collaborative scholarship, and provide instructional and resource support for faculty mentors. Organizational processes facilitate identification of practice sites and meaningful projects. A College of Nursing and university Institutional Review Board collaboration established policy to guide human subjects protection regarding DNP project activity, streamlining and standardizing the process. Library support mechanisms, access to ongoing faculty QI training and resources, and faculty feedback processes to improve QI faculty development are ongoing and sustained. Peer coaching provides continued support for faculty development. Initial process outcomes indicate that implemented strategies are well-received by faculty. The transition to competency-based education provides opportunities to create tools to measure multiple student quality and safety competencies highlighted in Domain 5 of The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education and inform future directions for faculty development essential to support student success.

A randomized trial comparing the effect of two phone-based interventions on colorectal cancer screening adherence.

BACKGROUND: Early-stage diagnosis of colorectal cancer is associated with high survival rates; screening prevalence, however, remains suboptimal. PURPOSE: This study seeks to test the hypothesis that participants receiving telephone-based tailored education or motivational interviewing had higher colorectal cancer screening completion rates compared to usual care. METHODS: Primary care patients not adherent with colorectal cancer screening and with no personal or family history of cancer (n = 515) were assigned by block randomization to control (n = 169), tailored education (n = 168), or motivational interview (n = 178). The response rate was 70%; attrition was 24%. RESULTS: Highest screening occurred in the tailored education group (23.8%, p < .02); participants had 2.2 times the odds of completing a post-intervention colorectal cancer screening than did the control group (AOR = 2.2, CI = 1.2-4.0). Motivational interviewing was not associated with significant increase in post-intervention screening. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored education showed promise as a feasible strategy to increase colorectal cancer screening.

Doctoral-prepared nurses in the Veterans Health Administration: A cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Doctoral-prepared nurses with diverse skillsets are required to meet nursing care needs in a complex and changing healthcare environment. A better understanding of the roles of doctoral-prepared nurses in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) workforce will help leverage their expertise to meet the needs of Veterans. PURPOSE: Assess the current roles of doctoral-prepared nurses within the VHA. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was used to collect information on doctoral-prepared nurses within the VHA in 2016. Multiple strategies were used to identify doctoral-prepared nurses to recruit for an online survey. Survey invitations were sent electronically to unique individuals identified (N = 2403). RESULTS: Responses were received from 1015 nurses (42.2% response rate), with 929 nurses with a doctoral degree identified. DNP/DNAP degrees were most common (55%), followed by a PhD or DNS (33%). Significant differences were noted between nurses in different doctoral education categories across four main roles: research, clinical, educational, and administration. CONCLUSIONS: This survey generated the first comprehensive list of VHA doctoral-prepared nurses. Findings are being used by the VHA Office of Nursing Services to align degree types, duties of different positions, functional statements, and position expectations. Results support the continued need for collaboration between nurses with PhDs and DNPs to achieve research and clinical goals.

Developing Interprofessional Primary Care Teams: Alumni Evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education Program.

PURPOSE: The Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education (CoEPCE) is an interprofessional graduate training program within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). In this project, we describe career paths of CoEPCE graduates, their perceptions of CoEPCE program value, their overall satisfaction with the training, and suggestions for program improvement to enhance interprofessional education and workforce development. METHODS: The Graduate Participant Survey was developed and administered in 2018 to CoEPCE graduates from 2012 to 2017. Quantitative data from closed-ended questions were analyzed through descriptive and non-parametric statistics to test for significant differences by profession. Qualitative data from the single open-ended question were analyzed using content analysis with inductive and deductive approaches. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 180 graduates. Greater proportions of pharmacists and psychologists than nurse practitioners and physicians were employed in VA, and greater proportions of nurse practitioners and pharmacists than physicians and psychologists were employed in primary care. Although smaller proportions of physicians were currently employed in primary care (P < .0001), a greater proportion completed advanced training programs (P < .0001). Overall, graduates perceived that their CoEPCE training was highly valued by advanced training programs and employers and improved their chances of finding a job. They reported high levels of satisfaction (mean = 4.3 ± 0.9 out of 5 total) with the training program, continued to use skills they learned during training, and believe their CoEPCE experiences made them better health care providers. CONCLUSIONS: Ninety-four percent of the CoEPCE graduates were employed at the VA and/or primary care at the completion of their training, although there were significant differences by profession. Graduates continued to practice interprofessional skills learned during their training and were highly satisfied with the program. Taken together, the findings indicate that continued enhancements to the interprofessional clinical learning environment are warranted.

Interactive, culturally sensitive education on colorectal cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: Increasing colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) can have a substantial positive impact on morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this report is to describe the development and feasibility testing of a computer-based, theory-guided educational program designed to increase CRCS. RESEARCH DESIGN: This mixed-methods study used focus groups and subsequent randomized controlled trial design. SUBJECTS: Participants (N = 199) were randomized to an intervention or control group; 75% were African American; mean age was 57.36 (SD = 6.8); 71% were male. MEASURES: Previously validated measures on knowledge, beliefs, and screening test adherence were used to establish pre- and post-intervention perceptions. Feasibility was measured by response and completion rates, and participants' perceptions of the program. RESULTS: Before feasibility testing, the program was presented to 2 focus groups. Changes were made to the program based on discussion, leading to a visually appealing, easy to understand and navigate, self-paced program. In the RCT pilot test that followed, of the participants in the intervention group, 80% said the education helped them decide to get CRCS; 49% agreed it helped them overcome barriers; 91% agreed it was useful, 68% thought it raised new concerns about cancer, but only 30% said it made them worry about CRC; 95% agreed their doctor's office should continue giving such education, and 99% said they would inform family about the program. CONCLUSIONS: The response rate of 83% demonstrated feasibility of conducting colorectal cancer education in the primary care setting; overall the program was well received; participants averaged 23 minutes to complete it. Participants sought no help from attending data collectors and navigated the revised touch screen program with ease. Computer-based education is feasible in primary care clinics.

Connecting the dots: interprofessional health education and delivery system redesign at the Veterans Health Administration.

Health systems around the United States are embracing new models of primary care using interprofessional team-based approaches in pursuit of better patient outcomes, higher levels of satisfaction among patients and providers, and improved overall value. Less often discussed are the implications of new models of care for health professions education, including education for physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and other professions engaged in primary care. Described here is the interaction between care transformation and redesign of health professions education at the largest integrated delivery system in the United States: the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Challenges and lessons learned are discussed in the context of a demonstration initiative, the VA Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education. Five sites, involving VA medical centers and their academic affiliates in Boise, Cleveland, San Francisco, Seattle, and West Haven, introduced interprofessional primary care curricula for resident physicians and nurse practitioner students beginning in 2011. Implementation struggles largely revolved around the operational logistics and cultural disruption of integrating educational redesign for medicine and nursing and facilitating the interface between educational and clinical activities. To realize new models for interprofessional teaching, faculty, staff, and trainees must understand the histories, traditions, and program requirements across professions and experiment with new approaches to achieving a common goal. Key recommendations for redesign of health professions education revolve around strengthening the union between interprofessional learning, team-based practice, and high-value care.