RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Air leak is the major factor that influences the permanence of the chest tube and the in-hospital length of stay (LOS) among patients undergoing lung resections. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of digital chest drain systems, compared with traditional ones, reduced the duration of chest drainage and postoperative in-hospital LOS in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy. METHODS: The study was a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Patients undergoing VATS lobectomy were randomized in 2 groups, receiving a digital drain system or a traditional one and managed accordingly to the protocol. RESULTS: Among 503 patients who fulfilled inclusion criteria and were randomized, 38 dropped out after randomization. Finally, 465 patients were analyzed, of whom 204 used the digital device and 261 the traditional one. In the digital group, there was a significantly shorter median chest tube duration of 3 postoperative days (interquartile range [IQR], 2-4 days) vs 4 postoperative days (IQR, 3-4 days; P = .001) and postoperative in-hospital LOS of 4 days (IQR, 3-6 days) vs 5 days (IQR, 4-6 days; P = .035). Analysis of predictors for increased duration of air leaks showed a relationship with male sex (P = .039), forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentage (P = .004), forced vital capacity percentage (P = .03), and presence of air leaks at the end of surgery (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing VATS lobectomy, the use of a digital drainage system allows an earlier removal of the chest drain compared with the traditional system, leading to a shorter in-hospital LOS.
Asunto(s)
Drenaje , Neumonectomía , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neumonectomía/métodos , Drenaje/métodos , Tubos Torácicos , Tiempo de Internación , Electrónica , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of advanced non-small-cell-lung-cancer (NSCLC) invading mediastinal organs and great vessels is still controversial. The aim of this multicentre study is to analyse oncological outcomes, surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with NSCLC involving heart and great vessels. METHODS: 362 patients treated surgically for locally advanced T4-NCSLC between 1990 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into five subgroups: pulmonary artery(n = 129), left atrium(n = 82), superior vena cava(n = 80), aorta(n = 43), and multiple vascular structures(n = 28). Resection was complete in 327(90%) patients. RESULTS: Overall 90-day mortality was 8.8%, influenced by poly-transfusions, pneumonectomy, bronchopleural fistula and previous cardiovascular disease (4.5HR.p = 0.03, 3.7HR p = 0.01, 14.0HR.p < 0.001 and 3.0HR p < 0.01). One-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 75%, 43%, 33%, respectively and there were significant differences among the five groups(p < 0.001). Survival was significantly affected by induction radiotherapy, nodal status, pTNM-stage and radicality (3.8HR p = 0.03, 2.6HR p = 0.001, 1.6HR p < 0.05 and 1.6HR p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery provided acceptable results in selected patients with T4-NSCLC with major vascular infiltration in expert centres. Nodal-status and radicality influenced the overall-survival and disease-free survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to have a positive effect on long-term results, particularly in N2-patients.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neumonectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vena Cava Superior/patología , Vena Cava Superior/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study reports the results of an international expert consensus process evaluating the assessment of intraoperative air leaks (IAL) and treatment of postoperative prolonged air leaks (PAL) utilizing a Delphi process, with the aim of helping standardization and improving practice. METHODS: A panel of 45 questions was developed and submitted to an international working group of experts in minimally invasive lung cancer surgery. Modified Delphi methodology was used to review responses, including 3 rounds of voting. The consensus was defined a priori as >50% agreement among the experts. Clinical practice standards were graded as recommended or highly recommended if 50-74% or >75% of the experts reached an agreement, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 32 experts from 18 countries completed the questionnaires in all 3 rounds. Respondents agreed that PAL are defined as >5 days and that current risk models are rarely used. The consensus was reached in 33/45 issues (73.3%). IAL were classified as mild (<100 ml/min; 81%), moderate (100-400 ml/min; 71%) and severe (>400 ml/min; 74%). If mild IAL are detected, 68% do not treat; if moderate, consensus was not; if severe, 90% favoured treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This expert consensus working group reached an agreement on the majority of issues regarding the detection and management of IAL and PAL. In the absence of prospective, randomized evidence supporting most of these clinical decisions, this document may serve as a guideline to reduce practice variation.
Asunto(s)
Neumonectomía , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Neumonectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The involvement of mediastinal great vessels is common in advanced stage thymic tumors, which makes their surgical resection challenging. Moreover, the impact of vascular involvement on the oncological prognosis is still unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the surgical and oncological outcomes and the impact of vascular involvement in a population of patients operated for advanced stage thymic tumors. METHODS: A retrospective analysis on four hundred and sixty-five patients undergoing resection for advanced stage (Masaoka III-IV) thymic tumors in a single high-volume center was performed. One hundred forty-four patients met the inclusion criteria and were eligible for the study. Patients were divided in two groups according to the presence or absence of vascular involvement. RESULTS: the two groups did not differ for the baseline characteristics and showed comparable surgical outcomes. Vascular involvement was not associated with worse overall survival but with an increased recurrence rate (p = 0.03). Multivariable analysis demonstrated a higher risk of recurrence in patients without R0 resection (HR 0.11, 0.02-0.54, p = 0.006) and with thymic carcinoma (HR 2.27, 1.22-4.24, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: resection of thymic tumors with vascular involvement can be performed with optimal surgical results in a high volume center. From the oncological point of view, the involvement of the great vessels seems to be associated with a higher recurrence rate without affecting long-term survival.