RESUMEN
H-type tracheo-oesophageal fistula is an uncommon type of tracheo-oesophageal malformation. Acute gastric volvulus is another infrequent pathology in children. They rarely present together.We report the case of a toddler with acute gastric volvulus possibly secondary to an undiagnosed H-type tracheo-oesophageal fistula. The fistula was suspected due to persistent gastric distention observed during volvulus detorsion. This kind of tracheo-oesophageal fistula often presents with subtle symptoms making early diagnosis difficult.Acute gastric volvulus is a life-threatening condition. Gastric distension caused by the passage of air into the stomach through the fistula could be a triggering factor for gastric volvulus.
Asunto(s)
Vólvulo Gástrico , Fístula Traqueoesofágica , Humanos , Vólvulo Gástrico/complicaciones , Vólvulo Gástrico/cirugía , Vólvulo Gástrico/diagnóstico , Vólvulo Gástrico/diagnóstico por imagen , Fístula Traqueoesofágica/diagnóstico , Fístula Traqueoesofágica/cirugía , Fístula Traqueoesofágica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Aguda , Masculino , LactanteRESUMEN
Complications of Hirschsprung's disease's surgery include the general complications of any abdominal surgery, but one of the specific complications is obstruction, which occurs in 10% of children after surgical correction and can be due to a narrowing muscular cuff or a coloanal anastomotic stenosis. We report a case of a 4-month baby, diagnosed as suffering from Hirschsprung's disease, who developed postoperative constipation after transanal endorectal pull-through due to unusual folding of the muscular cuff, which narrowed the colon. A laparoscopic approach was performed. During the surgery, it was observed that the muscular cuff was rolled down, surrounding the neorectum. The anterior rectal cuff was completely divided from the pulled-through colon. After surgery, no intraluminal stenosis was revealed on digital rectal examination. A long and tight rectal muscular cuff could be the reason for postoperative obstructive side effects. The use of laparoscopy has the advantage of confirming the suspected diagnosis and a clear visualisation of the rectal cuff. Key Words: Hirschsprung disease, Intestinal obstruction, Laparoscopy.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung , Obstrucción Intestinal , Laparoscopía , Niño , Constricción Patológica/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/cirugía , Humanos , Lactante , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Surgical intervention in necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is correct when there is intestinal gangrene. This is evident when gangrene produces perforation and pneumoperitoneum, with this being the only universally accepted radiological indication for the surgical intervention of NEC. OBJECTIVE: To perform an analysis on patients with surgically managed NEC, including determining how the decision to intervene is reached, the outcomes, and if patients with perforation had a pneumoperitoneum. METHODS: Retrospective review of neonates with surgical NEC over a period of 10years (2006-2015). An analysis was made of pre-surgical x-ray findings, which were compared with surgical ones, in addition to the morbidity and mortality, depending on the presence (N+) or absence (N-) of pneumoperitoneum. An evaluation was also made of the interobserver concordance with a paediatric radiologist blinded to the clinical reason using the kappa agreement index. RESULTS: A total of 53 neonates were included in the study. Surgical treatment was indicated after observing pneumoperitoneum in 36%. In the remaining neonates, the surgical decision was made after noting a clinical and metabolic deterioration with classical x-ray findings. Intestinal perforation was observed in 39% of the N- neonates. There were no statistical differences between either group on analysing the excised intestinal length, days of intubation, starting of enteral nutrition, and the mortality rate. Comparisons in terms of duration of symptoms and total hospital stay were statistically significant (7 vs. 2 days, P=.008; 127 vs. 79 days, P=.003, respectively), with both being more favourable in the N+ group. These differences remained when the groups were adjusted by birthweight. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical indication has to be done on an ensemble of clinical and radiological evidence, as 39% of the neonates in the N- groups were perforated. In our study, the presence of a pneumoperitoneum did not correlate with a worse prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Enterocolitis Necrotizante/mortalidad , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Morbilidad , Neumoperitoneo/etiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCCIÓN: La intervención quirúrgica en las enterocolitis necrosantes (EN) es precisa cuando existe gangrena intestinal, hecho evidente cuando produce perforación y neumoperitoneo, siendo este la única indicación radiológica aceptada universalmente para la intervención quirúrgica. OBJETIVO: Analizar a los pacientes intervenidos de EN, saber por qué se les intervino, cómo evolucionan y si los pacientes perforados presentan neumoperitoneo. MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo de una cohorte de recién nacidos con EN intervenidos durante un periodo de 10 años (2006-2015). Se analizan los hallazgos radiológicos preoperatorios y se correlacionan con los quirúrgicos y con la morbimortalidad, dependiendo de la presencia de neumoperitoneo (N+) o no (N-). Se evaluó la concordancia interobservador con radiólogo pediátrico enmascarado a la clínica mediante el índice de acuerdo kappa. RESULTADOS: Se analizó a 53 pacientes. El 36% se intervino tras la visualización de neumoperitoneo; en el resto, la indicación fue deterioro clínico y metabólico, junto con hallazgos radiológicos asociados. En el 39% del grupo N- se objetivó perforación. No se encontraron diferencias significativas en ambos grupos con respecto a longitud intestinal resecada, días de intubación, día de inicio de nutrición enteral y mortalidad. La comparación entre duración de síntomas y estancia hospitalaria total en ambos grupos (N-/N+) fue significativa (7 vs. 2 días, p = 0,008; 127 vs. 79 días, p = 0,003 respectivamente), siendo más favorable en el grupo N+. Estas diferencias se mantuvieron al ajustar por peso. CONCLUSIONES: La indicación quirúrgica ha de basarse en un conjunto de datos clínicos y radiológicos, ya que el 39% de los pacientes sin neumoperitoneo presentaron perforación. En nuestro estudio la presencia de neumoperitoneo no se correlaciona con peor pronóstico
INTRODUCTION: Surgical intervention in necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is correct when there is intestinal gangrene. This is evident when gangrene produces perforation and pneumoperitoneum, with this being the only universally accepted radiological indication for the surgical intervention of NEC. OBJECTIVE: To perform an analysis on patients with surgically managed NEC, including determining how the decision to intervene is reached, the outcomes, and if patients with perforation had a pneumoperitoneum. METHODS: Retrospective review of neonates with surgical NEC over a period of 10years (2006-2015). An analysis was made of pre-surgical x-ray findings, which were compared with surgical ones, in addition to the morbidity and mortality, depending on the presence (N+) or absence (N-) of pneumoperitoneum. An evaluation was also made of the interobserver concordance with a paediatric radiologist blinded to the clinical reason using the kappa agreement index. RESULTS: A total of 53 neonates were included in the study. Surgical treatment was indicated after observing pneumoperitoneum in 36%. In the remaining neonates, the surgical decision was made after noting a clinical and metabolic deterioration with classical x-ray findings. Intestinal perforation was observed in 39% of the N- neonates. There were no statistical differences between either group on analysing the excised intestinal length, days of intubation, starting of enteral nutrition, and the mortality rate. Comparisons in terms of duration of symptoms and total hospital stay were statistically significant (7 vs. 2 days, P = .008; 127 vs. 79 days, P = .003, respectively), with both being more favourable in the N+ group. These differences remained when the groups were adjusted by birthweight. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical indication has to be done on an ensemble of clinical and radiological evidence, as 39% of the neonates in the N- groups were perforated. In our study, the presence of a pneumoperitoneum did not correlate with a worse prognosis