Left ventricular mass regression is independent of gradient drop and effective orifice area after aortic valve replacement with a porcine bioprosthesis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The question of whether left ventricular mass (LVM) regression following aortic valve replacement (AVR) is affected by the prosthesis indexed effective orifice area (IEOA) and transprosthetic gradient has not been fully elucidated. Data from a prospective, core-laboratory-reviewed echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study was used to determine if the degree of LVM regression following AVR with two types of porcine bioprosthesis in patients suffering from predominant aortic valve stenosis (AS) was related to the prosthesis IEOA and transprosthetic gradient. METHODS: Over a two-year period, 149 patients enrolled at eight centers received either an Epic or an Epic Supra aortic bioprosthesis (St. Jude Medical, MN, USA). Preoperative valve dysfunction was pure AS in 54 patients (36%) and mixed valve disease (primarily stenosis) in 95 patients (64%). LVM was determined preoperatively and at six months postoperatively, using MRI. The prosthesis IEOA and transprosthetic gradient were calculated at six months by means of echocardiography. RESULTS: Data were available for 111 patients at both enrolment and six months postoperatively. The LVM at enrolment and at follow up was 154.96 +/- 42.50 g and 114.83 +/- 29.20 g, respectively (p < 0.0001). An analysis of data using Spearman rank correlation coefficients and linear regression methods, showed LVM regression to be independent of the mean systolic pressure gradient, peak systolic pressure and prosthesis IEOA at six months (p = 0.53, 0.43, and 0.15, respectively). CONCLUSION: At six months after AVR with a porcine bioprosthesis to treat AS, there was a significant LVM regression that was independent of the prosthesis IEOA and the mean systolic pressure gradient and peak systolic pressure.

Challenges and satisfaction in Cardiothoracic Surgery Residency Programmes: insights from a Europe-wide survey.

OBJECTIVES: The increasing complexity of surgical patients and working time constraints represent challenges for training. In this study, the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Residents' Committee aimed to evaluate satisfaction with current training programmes across Europe. METHODS: We conducted an online survey between October 2018 and April 2019, completed by a total of 219 participants from 24 countries. RESULTS: The average respondent was in the fourth or fifth year of training, mostly on a cardiac surgery pathway. Most trainees follow a 5-6-year programme, with a compulsory final certification exam, but no regular skills evaluation. Only a minority are expected to take the examination by the European Board of Cardiothoracic Surgery. Participants work on average 61.0 ± 13.1 h per week, including 27.1 ± 20.2 on-call. In total, only 19.7% confirmed the implementation of the European Working Time Directive, with 42.0% being unaware that European regulations existed. Having designated time for research was reported by 13.0%, despite 47.0% having a postgraduate degree. On average, respondents rated their satisfaction 7.9 out of 10, although 56.2% of participants were not satisfied with their training opportunities. We found an association between trainee satisfaction and regular skills evaluation, first operator experience and protected research time. CONCLUSIONS: On average, residents are satisfied with their training, despite significant disparities in the quality and structure of cardiothoracic surgery training across Europe. Areas for potential improvement include increasing structured feedback, research time integration and better working hours compliance. The development of European guidelines on training standards may support this.

The surgical option in the management of acute pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVE: Massive or submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) carries a high mortality. Traditionally this condition has been treated with thrombolysis or anticoagulation and support measures. Surgical embolectomy is carried out in situations of hemodynamic instability or contraindication for thrombolysis. We present our results of surgical embolectomy in patients with massive and submassive PE. METHODS: Over a three-year period, we have carried out 20 surgical embolectomies for acute PE. The mean age was 66 years, and there were 11 males. In all cases, the diagnosis had been made by a computerized tomography (CT) pulmonary artery angiography. Nine patients (45%) arrived to the operating theater on inotropes, and two of them (10%) with ventilatory support. All patients underwent a median sternotomy, bicaval cannulation for institution of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and main pulmonary arteriotomy for the removal of the thrombus. RESULTS: The mean bypass time was 45 minutes. Two patients (12%) died after being unable to wean off CPB due to right heart failure. Among the 15 survivors, the median ventilation time in the intensive care unit was 24 hours. Twelve patients (60%) required inotropic support postoperatively for right heart failure. All but one survivor (94%) underwent an insertion of a permanent inferior vena cava filter and were anticoagulated with coumarin. The mean follow-up is 9.8 months and is 100% complete, with a survival of 94.5%. All patients were in the World Health Organization (WHO) functional class I, with no re-admissions for respiratory failure. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute massive or submassive PE, surgical embolectomy offers a valid therapeutic strategy. A right-sided heart failure is the main complication of this condition.

Invasiveness in cardiac surgery: a question of age.

A survey was conducted among 1644 cardiac surgeons on the surgical strategy regarding the invasiveness of the procedure they would prefer as a patient in a number of simple clinical scenarios. A total of 380 (23%) replies were received. Only in the case of aortic valve surgery, a notable preference of minimally invasive strategy was registered, as transcatheter aortic valve implantation was indicated by 49% of the respondents. Regarding the size of the incision for mitral valve surgery, there was a substantial equality between preferences of standard surgery and minimally invasive option (port access: 42%; standard surgery with full sternotomy: 40%). With regard to the use of extracorporeal circulation for coronary surgery, the traditional option received more preferences than the less-invasive one (on-pump CABG: 42%; off-pump CABG: 31%). When respondents' age was taken into account, surgeons aged<50 years preferred mini-thoracotomy (P=0.03) and transcathether approaches (P=0.008) to have their mitral and aortic valve surgeries performed, whereas more senior ones would choose more traditional techniques. In conclusion, the findings of this survey suggest that the surgeon's age may play an important role in the preference for less-invasive techniques.

A European training system in cardiothoracic surgery: is it time?

OBJECTIVE: Training in cardiothoracic surgery across Europe remains diverse and variable despite the ever closer integration of European countries at all levels and in all areas of life. Coupled with the increasing ease of movement across Europe, the need for uniform training programmes has arisen to allow for equivalent accreditation and certification. METHODS: We review the current training paradigms within the specialty across the world and in Europe and also explore the concept of competence. RESULTS: There are diverse training systems across the world and in Europe in particular. Competence-based training is the new model of training; however, competence remains difficult to define and measure. We propose a European Training Programme in Cardiothoracic Surgery that aims to standardize training across the European countries. CONCLUSIONS: The difficulties in unifying training across Europe are numerous, but it is time to implement a European Training System in Cardiothoracic Surgery that will deliver a competence-based curriculum.

Impact of off-pump to on-pump conversion rate on post-operative results in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass.

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: In patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery, does the off-pump to on-pump conversion rate have an impact on post-operative results? Altogether more than 420 papers were found using the reported search, of which 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated and ordered according to the sample size. In the 14 RCTs reviewed, the off-pump to on-pump conversion rate incidence ranged from 0 to 13.3%. The most frequent causes of conversion were haemodynamic instability and intramyocardial-coronary target. A low conversion rate (<2%) was reported by five studies. Three of them did not show any difference in terms of mortality between the OPCAB and on-pump groups, one showed better survival of the OPCAB group at 5 years, and one reported better early survival of the OPCAB group. Three of these trials describe a high OPCAB experience and reported that patients undergoing OPCAB had a shorter post-operative stay and lower morbidity compared with patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Five RCTs showed a high conversion rate (>9%), and among them, one reported lower morbidity of the OPCAB patients, three were not able to show any benefit in terms of morbidity of the OPCAB, and one reported worse survival and patency graft rate of the OPCAB group. Four RCTs reported conversion rates ranging from 3.7 to 7.0%, describing a wide spectrum of results. We conclude that RCTs with a high off-pump to on-pump conversion rate were often associated with a lower experience in OPCAB of the surgeons participating in the trials. These studies were also mostly unable to show any benefit in terms of mortality or morbidity of OPCAB over the on-pump strategy. On the contrary, a low conversion rate is mostly reported by RCTs with a high structured experience in OPCAB. These trials were mostly able to show a benefit, in terms of morbidity and survival, of the OPCAB over the on-pump strategy.

Does the introduction of duty-hour restriction in the United States negatively affect the operative volume of surgical trainees?

Over the last few years, both sides of the North Atlantic have witnessed compulsory duty-hour restrictions for doctors. It has been suggested that the reduction in working hours for surgeons in training may have a negative impact on their exposure to surgical procedures and therefore, on the quality of training. A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: among surgeons enrolled in a training program, does the introduction of duty-hour restrictions have a negative impact on their exposure to surgical procedures and therefore, on the quality of training? In total, more than 74 papers were found using the reported search, of which 15 represented the best evidence to answer the question. All these manuscripts came from the USA. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Studies from different surgical disciplines, such as general, orthopedic, pediatric, cardiothoracic and vascular surgery were included. Among the studies analysed, eight revealed a decrease, five showed no change, and two studies demonstrated an increase in the operative experience of residents following the introduction of the 80-hour limit. The changes appear to have more negatively affected junior residents in favor of more senior ones due to a shift in the surgical workload to the latter. Interestingly, some studies demonstrated better results in the in-training examinations (testing for clinical and basic science knowledge) following the duty-hour restrictions. We conclude that although most of the studies included in this review revealed that the introduction of working-hour restrictions in the USA has produced a decrease in number of cases performed by trainees, some have failed to do so. Changes in the residents' working patterns, such as 'night float' and 'leave early' models, may be useful to preserve exposure to surgical procedures.

Real life cardio-thoracic surgery training in Europe: facing the facts.

The objective of this study was to determine the current status of training in cardio-thoracic surgery in Europe and the residents' perception of the effects of the full implementation of the European Working Time Directive (EWTD) on training. We conducted a web-based survey of trainees registered with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and 79 respondents form the basis for this analysis. A majority of trainees (69.6%) are aware of the implications of the EWTD and 58.7% believe it will have an impact on their training. Most residents (98.7%) work well over the time limitations stated in the Directive and 96.2% are of the opinion that a 48-hour week would be insufficient to meet their learning needs. A large proportion (60.5%) of European trainees are dissatisfied with their training and report low-levels of regular assessment of their progress (37.8%) and of training facilities (27.4%). Only 23.3% of European trainers appear to attend training courses. Striking differences exist among European countries with regards to standards of training. These findings are alarming. Training in cardio-thoracic surgery across the European Union requires urgent attention to unify and improve the standards of training and compensate the potential negative impact of the EWTD.