Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Surg Endosc ; 36(11): 8364-8370, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35534732

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stenting is the management of choice for many benign and malignant oesophageal conditions and in the interest of safety stent insertion has traditionally been performed under fluoroscopic guidance. But this incurs additional expense, time, radiation risk and for the foreseeable future, an increased risk of Covid infection to patients and healthcare personnel. We describe a protocol that obviates the need for fluoroscopic guidance, relying instead on a systematic checklist to ensure safe positioning of the guidewire and the accurate positioning of the stent. The aim of this retrospective study was to review our experience of stent insertion employing a checklist system and compare our outcomes with outcomes using fluoroscopy in the literature. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected dataset of all patients undergoing oesophageal stent insertion between December 2007 and October 2019. The primary end points were patient safety parameters and complications of stent insertion. RESULTS: Total of 163 stents were deployed of which 93 (57%) were in males and the median age was 67.9 years (25-92 years). Partially covered self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) were used in 80% of procedures (130/163). One hundred nineteen stents (73%) were for malignant strictures and 127 (78%) were deployed for strictures in the lower third of the oesophagus. There was no stent misplacement, injury, perforation or death associated with the procedure. Vomiting was the main post-operative complication (14%). Severe odynophagia necessitated stent removal in 3 patients. Stent migration occurred in 17 (10%) procedures with a mean time to stent migration of 6.4 weeks (range 1-20 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Oesophageal stent placement without fluoroscopy is safe provided that a strict checklist is adhered to. The outcomes are comparable to the results of fluoroscopic stent placement in the literature, with considerable saving in time, cost, personnel, and risks of radiation and Covid exposure.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lista de Verificación , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Stents/efectos adversos , Fluoroscopía , Esófago , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía
2.
Surg Endosc ; 29(4): 961-71, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25159628

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of minimally invasive surgery and the use of laparoscopic techniques have significantly improved patient outcomes and have offered a new range of options for the restoration of intestinal continuity. Various reconstruction techniques have been described and various devices employed but none has been established as superior. This study evaluates our experience with, and modifications of, the orally inserted anvil (OrVil™). METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study on 72 consecutive patients who underwent OrVil™-assisted oesophago-gastric or oesophago-jejunal anastomosis between September 2010 and September 2013. We collected data including patient demographics, disease site, type of procedure, location of the anastomosis, involvement of resection margins and peri-operative complications. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included in the study. Patient ages ranged from 45 to 92 years (median ± SD = 69 ± 10 years). Total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis was the most-commonly performed procedure (n = 41; 57 %). R 0 resection was achieved in 67 patients (93 %). There were no Orvil™-related clinical leaks during the study period, and just two patients (2.8 %) demonstrated radiological evidence of leak, both of whom were managed conservatively. There were three in-hospital mortalities during the study period; these were unrelated to the anastomotic technique. CONCLUSION: Despite a steep learning curve, the OrVil™ device is safe and reliable. It also permits the creation of higher trans-hiatal anastomoses without resorting to thoracotomy in high-risk patients with cardia tumours. Certain shortcomings of the device, that had implications for patient safety, were identified and addressed by intra-operative modification during the study period. We commend the use of a prepared OrVil™ device, as a game changer, for upper gastrointestinal reconstruction.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esófago/cirugía , Gastrectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Estómago/cirugía , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Int J Surg ; 55: 124-127, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29807170

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis is a commonly encountered emergency but accurately predicting that subset of patients who will become systemically unwell has proven difficult. Simple haematological prognostic markers, such as red cell distribution width (RDW) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), could identify such patients. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of RDW and NLR measured on admission as predictors of mortality and intensive care (ICU) or high dependency unit (HDU) admission in patients with acute pancreatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patient who presented to our institution with acute pancreatitis between August 2013 and August 2016 were retrospectively identified using the prospectively maintained Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) discharge audit. Data on survival, admission to HDU or ICU, length of stay and haematological parameters including RDW and NLR on presentation to the emergency department were collected. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients with acute pancreatitis were included of which 23 (12%) patients had a RDW above the upper limit of normal (ULN), which was associated with a significantly increased likelihood of admission to ICU or HDU (RR3.5; p = 0.01); 117 (63%) patients had a NLR above 5 on presentation, which also increased the risk of ICU or HDU admission (RR 8.1; p = 0.01). Patients who had both a RDW above the ULN and a raised NLR had an increased risk of inpatient mortality (RR 9.9; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: RDW and NLR can identify patients at increased risk of severe acute pancreatitis on presentation to the Emergency Department.


Asunto(s)
Índices de Eritrocitos , Linfocitos , Neutrófilos , Pancreatitis/sangre , Pancreatitis/mortalidad , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidados Críticos , Femenino , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
4.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne ; 10(1): 133-7, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25960805

RESUMEN

For many years, open gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy was the gold standard treatment for gastric cancer. In recent years, however, laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy with associated D2 lymphadenectomy has gained in popularity. It has a similar oncological outcome to open resection, but has all of the added advantages of a laparoscopic procedure, such as early mobilisation, less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay. This article describes the operative techniques, including key procedure steps, as well as a guide for using the new OrVil device for the laparoscopic creation of the oesophago-jejunal anastomosis. A video of a laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy is presented.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda