The Effectiveness of Facial Neuromuscular Retraining on Patients with Facial Nerve Dysfunction: A Mental Health and Quality of Life Analysis.

Background: Facial muscle dysfunction can have drastic psychosocial effects. Objectives: To evaluate the impacts of customized neuromuscular retraining on mental health, quality of life (QoL), facial muscle function, and synkinesis. Methods: Thirty patients with facial nerve dysfunction completed a course of neuromuscular retraining. Patients' mental health, QoL, facial muscle function, and synkinesis were evaluated using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) scale, electronic, clinician-graded facial function scale (eFACE), and Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) at the initial and final visits. Scores were compared before and after treatment. Results: Patients (n = 30) included had a mean age of 59.4 ± 13.4 years (range 32.3-82.8) and were mostly female (22/30, 73.3%). The most common etiology was Iatrogenic facial nerve paralysis (11/20, 36.7%). Most patients had postfacial paralysis synkinesis (15/30, 50%), while 10 had complete flaccid paralysis. The median house-Brackmann score was 2 (range 1-6). The mean duration of facial palsy was 39.5 ± 106.9 (range 1-576 months). The duration of follow-up after the initial treatment session was 5.5 months, including 10 sessions. After neuromuscular retraining median PHQ-9 scores improved from 5 (range 0-25) to 3 (range 0-20) (p = 0.002). Mean FaCE PROM scores increased from 47.7 ± 11.5 to 56.5 ± 8.8 (p = 0.001). The mean eFACE score increased from 55.8 ± 15.1 to 71.7 ± 13.6 (p < 0.001). Median SAQ score was lower at the final visit (34.6 ± 13.4) compared to the initial visit (47.7 ± 17.8; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Customized neuromuscular retraining may improve patient-reported mental health, QoL, and facial muscle function and reduce synkinesis in facial nerve dysfunction.

Comparing in-clinic versus telehealth for vestibular physical therapy.

BACKGROUND: Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is a commonly employed treatment method for disorders of dizziness and imbalance. Access to a clinic for rehabilitation appointments can be challenging for a person experiencing dizziness. Telehealth may offer a comparable alternative to clinic-based VR for some patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of telehealth-based VR compared to traditional clinic-based VR, as measured with the Dizziness Handicapped Inventory (DHI) in a retrospective sample of patients with vestibular conditions. METHODS: This is a retrospective, multi-institutional review from May 2020 to January 2021. Three study groups were analyzed: a telehealth group, a hybrid group, and a clinic based control group. Treatment efficacy was measured using the DHI. A repeated measures ANCOVA was performed to compare changes between the groups and across timepoints. RESULTS: The repeated measures ANCOVA was not significant for the interaction of groups (control, telehealth, and hybrid) by time (pre and post) (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant main effect for time (pre and post) (p < 0.05). Specifically, all groups improved DHI scores from pre to post treatment with mean differences of control: 31.85 points, telehealth: 18.75 points, and hybrid: 21.45 points. CONCLUSION: Findings showed that in-clinic, telehealth, and hybrid groups demonstrated a decrease in DHI scores, indicating self-reported improvements in the impact of dizziness on daily life. Continued research is recommended to explore the efficacy of using telehealth in assessing and treating vestibular conditions.

Outcomes of Soft Versus Bony Canal Wall Reconstruction with Mastoid Obliteration.

OBJECTIVE: To compare recidivism rates, audiometric outcomes, and postoperative complication rates between soft-wall canal wall reconstruction (S-CWR) versus bony-wall CWR (B-CWR) with mastoid obliteration (MO) in patients with cholesteatoma. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary neurotologic referral center. PATIENTS: Ninety patients aged ≥18 years old who underwent CWR with MO, either S-CWR or B-CWR, for cholesteatoma with one surgeon from January 2011 to January 2022. Patients were followed postoperatively for at least 12 months with or without second-look ossiculoplasty. INTERVENTIONS: Tympanomastoidectomy with CWR (soft vs. bony material) and mastoid obliteration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recidivism rates; conversion rate to CWD; pre- versus postoperative pure tone averages, speech reception thresholds, word recognition scores, and air-bone gaps; postoperative complication rates. RESULTS: Middle ear and mastoid cholesteatoma recidivism rates were not significantly different between B-CWR (17.3%) and S-CWR (18.4%, p = 0.71). There was no significant difference in pre- versus postoperative change in ABG (B-CWR, -2.1 dB; S-CWR, +1.6 dB; p = 0.91) nor in the proportion of postoperative ABGs <20 dB (B-CWR, 41.3%; S-CWR, 30.7%; p = 0.42) between B-CWR and S-CWR. Further, there were no significant differences in complication rates between B-CWR and S-CWR other than increased minor TM perforations/retractions in B-CWR (63% vs. 40%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of recidivism rates, audiometric outcomes and postoperative complications between B-CWR with MO versus S-CWR with MO revealed no significant difference. Both approaches are as effective in eradicating cholesteatoma while preserving relatively normal EAC anatomy and hearing. Surgeon preference and technical skill level may guide the surgeon's choice in approach.

Anatomical Study of the Supratentorial Extension for the Retrolabyrinthine Presigmoid Approaches.

BACKGROUND: Supratentorial craniotomy represents the upper part of the combined trans-tentorial or the supra-infratentorial presigmoid approach. In this study, we provide qualitative and quantitative analyses for the supratentorial extension of the presigmoid retrolabyrinthine suprameatal approach (PRSA). METHODS: The infratentorial PRSA followed by the supratentorial extension craniotomy with dividing and removal of the tentorial strip were performed on both sides of 5 injected human cadaver heads (n = 10 sides). Quantitative analysis was performed for the surface area gained (surgical accessibility) by adding the supratentorial craniotomy. Qualitative analysis was performed for the parts of the brainstem, cranial nerves, and vascular structures that became accessible by adding the supratentorial craniotomy. The anatomical obstacles encountered in the added operative corridor were analyzed. RESULTS: The supratentorial extension of PRSA provides an increase in surgical accessibility of 102.65% as compared to the PRSA standalone. The mean surface area of the exposed brainstem is 197.98 (standard deviation: 76.222) and 401.209 (standard deviation: 123.96) for the infratentorial and the combined supra-infratentorial presigmoid approach, respectively. Exposure for parts of III, IV, and V cranial nerves is added after the extension, and the surface area of the outer craniotomy defect has increased by 60.32%. Parts of the basilar, anterior inferior cerebellar, and superior cerebellar arteries are accessible after the supratentorial extension. CONCLUSIONS: The supratentorial extension of PRSA allows access to the supra-trigeminal area of the pons and the lower part of the midbrain. Considering this surgical accessibility and exposure significantly assists in planning such complex approaches while targeting central skull base lesions.