Diet and irritable bowel syndrome: an update from a UK consensus meeting.

There has been a renewed interest in the role of dietary therapies to manage irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), with diet high on the agenda for patients. Currently, interest has focussed on the use of traditional dietary advice (TDA), a gluten-free diet (GFD) and the low FODMAP diet (LFD). A consensus meeting was held to assess the role of these dietary therapies in IBS, in Sheffield, United Kingdom.Evidence for TDA is from case control studies and clinical experience. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) have demonstrated the benefit of soluble fibre in IBS. No studies have assessed TDA in comparison to a habitual or sham diet. There have been a number of RCTs demonstrating the efficacy of a GFD at short-term follow-up, with a lack of long-term outcomes. Whilst gluten may lead to symptom generation in IBS, other components of wheat may also play an important role, with recent interest in the role of fructans, wheat germ agglutinins, as well as alpha amylase trypsin inhibitors. There is good evidence for the use of a LFD at short-term follow-up, with emerging evidence demonstrating its efficacy at long-term follow-up. There is overlap between the LFD and GFD with IBS patients self-initiating gluten or wheat reduction as part of their LFD. Currently, there is a lack of evidence to suggest superiority of one diet over another, although TDA is more acceptable to patients.In view of this evidence, our consensus group recommends that dietary therapies for IBS should be offered by dietitians who first assess dietary triggers and then tailor the intervention according to patient choice. Given the lack of dietetic services, novel approaches such as employing group clinics and online webinars may maximise capacity and accessibility for patients. Further research is also required to assess the comparative efficacy of dietary therapies to other management strategies available to manage IBS.

Clinical Characteristics and Management of 50 Patients with Anti-GAD Ataxia: Gluten-Free Diet Has a Major Impact.

The objective of this study is to report the clinical characteristics and treatment of patients with progressive cerebellar ataxia associated with anti-GAD antibodies. We performed a retrospective review of all patients with anti-GAD ataxia managed at the Sheffield Ataxia Centre over the last 25 years. We identified 50 patients (62% females) with anti-GAD ataxia. The prevalence was 2.5% amongst 2000 patients with progressive ataxia of various causes. Mean age at onset was 55 and mean duration 8 years. Gaze-evoked nystagmus was present in 26%, cerebellar dysarthria in 26%, limb ataxia in 44% and gait ataxia in 100%. Nine patients (18%) had severe, 12 (24%) moderate and 29 (58%) mild ataxia. Ninety percent of patients had a history of additional autoimmune diseases. Family history of autoimmune diseases was seen in 52%. Baseline MR spectroscopy of the vermis was abnormal at presentation in 72%. Thirty-five patients (70%) had serological evidence of gluten sensitivity. All 35 went on gluten-free diet (GFD). Eighteen (51%) improved, 13 (37%) stabilised, 3 have started the GFD too recently to draw conclusions and one deteriorated. Mycophenolate was used in 16 patients, 7 (44%) improved, 2 stabilised, 6 have started the medication too recently to draw conclusions and one did not tolerate the drug. There is considerable overlap between anti-GAD ataxia and gluten ataxia. For those patients with both, strict GFD alone can be an effective treatment. Patients with anti-GAD ataxia and no gluten sensitivity respond well to immunosuppression.

Coeliac disease and noncoeliac wheat or gluten sensitivity.

Coeliac disease (CD) and noncoeliac wheat or gluten sensitivity (NCWS/NCGS) are common gluten-related disorders. Both conditions can present with gastrointestinal and extraintestinal manifestations, which can be a challenge for physicians to discern between. Whilst coeliac serology and histological assessment are required for the diagnosis of CD, there are no clear biomarkers for the diagnosis of NCGS. The management of both conditions is with a gluten-free diet (GFD), although the duration, as well as strictness of adherence to a GFD in NCGS, is unclear. Adherence to a GFD in CD can also be challenging, with recent developments of noninvasive assessments, although histological assessment via duodenal biopsies remains the gold standard. The management of refractory coeliac disease remains particularly challenging, often requiring specialist input. Whilst wheat is noted to be a trigger for symptom generation in NCGS, it is unclear which components of wheat are responsible for symptom generation in this group, with further research required to elucidate the pathophysiology.

The role of diet in irritable bowel syndrome: implications for dietary advice.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder that affects approximately 10% of the population. Diet triggers symptoms in the vast majority of individuals with IBS. In view of this, there has been a focus on the role of diet in IBS. The diets currently being headlined for IBS include (i) traditional dietary advice, (ii) the low fermentable oligo-, di-, mono- saccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) diet and (iii) the gluten-free diet (GFD). Although traditional dietary advice is considered as the first-line dietary therapy, its evidence base is variable, with a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the efficacy of this approach, other than for fibre. There are now a growing number of RCTs demonstrating the efficacy of the low FODMAP diet in the short-term, with some emerging data on the long-term 'adapted' low FODMAP diet. There are also several RCTs showing the benefits of a GFD in IBS; however, this concept is hampered with uncertainty as to the mechanism of action. Nevertheless, all of these dietary therapies are viable options for individuals with IBS, with the dietitian and patient engagement at the forefront of achieving success. However, future pragmatic studies are needed to clarify the comparative efficacy and convenience of implementing these various diets into routine life. Moreover, it is imperative to better delineate the concern that restrictive diets - such as the low FODMAP and GFD - may promote nutritional inadequacies, disordered eating behaviours, and lead to detrimental alterations to the gut microbiota.

Persistent mucosal damage and risk of epilepsy in people with celiac disease.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Celiac disease (CD) is associated with an increased risk of developing epilepsy, a risk that persists after CD diagnosis. A significant proportion of patients with CD have persistent villous atrophy (VA) on follow-up biopsy. The objective of this study was to determine whether persistent VA on follow-up biopsy affected long-term epilepsy risk and epilepsy-related hospital emergency admissions. METHODS: This was a nationwide cohort study. We identified all people in Sweden with histological evidence of CD who underwent a follow-up small intestinal biopsy (1969-2008). We compared those with persistent VA with those who showed histological improvement, assessing the development of epilepsy and related emergency hospital admissions (defined according to relevant International Classification of Diseases codes in the Swedish Patient Register). Cox regression analysis was used to assess outcome measures. RESULTS: Villous atrophy was present in 43% of 7590 people with CD who had a follow-up biopsy. The presence of persistent VA was significantly associated with a reduced risk of developing newly-diagnosed epilepsy (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.98). On stratified analysis, this effect was primarily amongst males (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.80). Among the 58 patients with CD with a prior diagnosis of epilepsy, those with persistent VA were less likely to visit an emergency department with epilepsy (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: In a population-based study of individuals with CD, persisting VA on follow-up biopsy was associated with reduced future risk of developing epilepsy but did not influence emergency epilepsy-related hospital admissions. The mechanism as to why persistent VA confers this benefit requires further exploration.

Causes of progressive cerebellar ataxia: prospective evaluation of 1500 patients.

BACKGROUND: Cerebellar ataxias are the result of diverse disease processes that can be genetic or acquired. Establishing a diagnosis requires a methodical approach with expert clinical evaluation and investigations. We describe the causes of ataxia in 1500 patients with cerebellar ataxia. METHODS: All patients were referred to the Sheffield Ataxia Centre, UK, and underwent extensive investigations, including, where appropriate genetic testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Patients were followed up on a 6-monthly basis for reassessment and further investigations if indicated. RESULTS: A total of 1500 patients were assessed over 20 years. Twenty per cent had a family history, the remaining having sporadic ataxia. The commonest cause of sporadic ataxia was gluten ataxia (25%). A genetic cause was identified in 156 (13%) of sporadic cases with other causes being alcohol excess (12%) and cerebellar variant of multiple system atrophy (11%). Using NGS, positive results were obtained in 32% of 146 patients tested. The commonest ataxia identified was EA2. A genetic diagnosis was achieved in 57% of all familial ataxias. The commonest genetic ataxias were Friedreich's ataxia (22%), SCA6 (14%), EA2 (13%), SPG7 (10%) and mitochondrial disease (10%). The diagnostic yield following attendance at the Sheffield Ataxia Centre was 63%. CONCLUSIONS: Immune-mediated ataxias are common. Advances in genetic testing have significantly improved the diagnostic yield of patients suspected of having a genetic ataxia. Making a diagnosis of the cause of ataxia is essential due to potential therapeutic interventions for immune and some genetic ataxias.

Lanreotide in the management of small bowel angioectasias: seven-year data from a tertiary centre.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Haemorrhage from small bowel angioectasias (SBAs) can be debilitating to patients who are very often elderly and have multiple comorbidities. Our aim was to assess the use of lanreotide in addition to endotherapy in patients with SBAs. METHOD: Patients with SBAs on capsule endoscopy (CE) who received lanreotide injections from January 2010 to till the present day at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital in Sheffield were included. Baseline demographics were recorded. Efficacy was evaluated in terms of improvement in mean haemoglobin, transfusion requirements and bleeding episodes. RESULTS: Twelve patients (67% males, mean age 74 SD ± 15.5 years) were included. All patients had multiple comorbidities. Lanreotide was given at a dosage of 60 mg (42%), 90 mg (33%) or 120 mg (25%). It was given at a four-week interval in 75% of patients and at a six-week interval in 17% of patients. One patient (8%) received a single dose. The mean duration of treatment was 19 months SD ± 14.5. Only 17% of patients had their lanreotide stopped due to cholelithiasis. There was a significant improvement in mean haemoglobin: 86.8 versus 98.0 (131-166 g/L, p = .012). The mean number of bleeding episodes (4.18 versus 1.09, p = .010) and packed red cells (323 versus 152, p = .006) received improved. Patients required less DBEs ± APCs after starting lanreotide (19 versus 11 p = .048). CONCLUSION: Lanreotide is a useful adjuvant treatment to therapeutic enteroscopy in patients with refractory obscure gastrointestinal bleeding due to SBAs. It improves haemoglobin levels, reduces transfusion requirements, bleeding episodes and number of DBEs. Overall, it has a good safety profile.

Is it time for one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) in colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is prognostic in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, evaluation by routine haematoxylin and eosin histology (HE) limits nodal examination and is subjective. Missed LNMs from tissue allocation bias (TAB) might under-stage disease, leading to under-treatment. One-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) for CK19 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), a marker of LNM, analyses the whole node. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess recent studies on OSNA versus HE and its implications for CRC staging and treatment. METHODS: Databases including OVID, Medline and Google Scholar were searched for OSNA, LNM and CRC. Study results were pooled using a random-effects model. Summary receiver operator curves (SROC) assessed OSNA's performance in detecting LNM when compared to routine HE histology. RESULTS: Five case-control studies analysing 4080 nodes from 622 patients were included. The summary estimates of pooled results for OSNA were sensitivity 0.90 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-0.93], specificity 0.94 (95% CI 0.93-0.95) and diagnostic odds ratio 179.5 (CI 58.35-552.2, p < 0.0001). The SROC curve indicated a maximum joint sensitivity and specificity of 0.88 and area under the curve of 0.94, p < 0.0001. On average, 5.4% HE-negative nodes were upstaged by OSNA. CONCLUSIONS: OSNA is as good as routine HE. It may avoid TAB and offer a more objective and standardised assay of LNM. However, for upstaging, its usefulness as an adjunct to HE or superiority to HE requires further assessment of the benefits, if any, of adjuvant therapy in patients upstaged by OSNA.

Long-term care for patients with coeliac disease in the UK: a review of the literature and future directions.

Coeliac disease is a common digestive disorder that affects 1% of adults. It is characterised by mucosal damage of the small intestine caused by dietary gluten. The main treatment for coeliac disease is a lifelong gluten-free diet, which can reduce morbidity and mortality and also improve quality of life. Despite the benefits, adhering to this diet is often challenging, with patients often struggling to sustain dietary restriction. Structured follow-up for coeliac disease is recommended in international guidelines for improving adherence and for detecting complications;however, uncertainty exists concerning exactly who should be administering this follow-up care. Here, we undertake a review of the current approaches described in the literature to follow-up patients with coeliac disease, and assess the efficacy of these differing models. We also explore future directions for the care of these patients in the context of the UK National Health Service (a publicly funded healthcare system). Although the focus of this review pertains to follow-up within the UK healthcare system, these problems are recognised to be international, and so the findings of our review are likely to be of interest to all healthcare professionals seeing and managing patients with coeliac disease.

Potential coeliac disease in Type 1 diabetes mellitus: does a positive antibody lead to increased complications?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Coeliac disease (CD) is more common in people with Type 1 diabetes and is associated with poorer glycaemic control, lipid profiles, nephropathy and retinopathy. Potential CD (positive serology but normal duodenal biopsy) is associated with neuropathy but patients with coexisting Type 1 diabetes were excluded. The aim was to determine whether potential CD is associated with increased microvascular complications in patients with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four groups were recruited; 1) patients with Type 1 diabetes and potential CD, 2) patients with Type 1 diabetes and newly identified CD, 3) patients with Type 1 diabetes alone and 4) patients with CD alone. Glycaemic control, quality of life, lipid profile and microvascular complication rates were examined. As many as 76 individuals were included in the study: 22 in group 1, 14 in group 2, 24 in group 3 and 16 in group 4. There were no differences in age, gender, BMI and diabetes duration between the groups. Patients in group 1 had significantly lower total cholesterol compared to group 3 (p = 0.003) but higher than group 2 (p = 0.027). There were no significant differences in HbA1c, HDL cholesterol, cholesterol:HDL ratio, creatinine, quality of life scores or prevalence of neuropathy between individuals in group 1 and the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess the effects of potential CD in patients with Type 1 diabetes. It appears that an enteropathy is required as well as antibody positivity in order to increase the risk of diabetes related complications. This pilot data requires further longitudinal validation.

Long-term coeliac disease influences risk of death in patients with type 1 diabetes.

AIM: The aim of this study was to examine mortality in patients with both type 1 diabetes (T1D) and coeliac disease (CD). METHODS: Between 1969 and 2008, we identified individuals with CD through biopsy reports from all pathology departments (n = 28) in Sweden. T1D was defined as a diagnosis of diabetes recorded in the Swedish National Patient Register between 1964 and 2009 in individuals aged ≤ 30 years. During follow-up, we identified 960 patients with both T1D and CD. For each individual with T1D and CD, we selected up to five subjects with T1D alone (i.e. no CD), matched for sex, age and calendar period of diagnosis, as the reference group (n = 4608). Using a stratified Cox regression analysis with CD as a time-dependent covariate, we estimated the risk of death in patients with both T1D and CD compared with those with T1D alone. RESULTS: Stratifying for time since CD diagnosis, CD was not a risk factor for death in patients with T1D during the first 5 years after CD diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-1.73], but thereafter the HR for mortality increased as a function of follow-up time (5 to < 10 years, HR 1.44, 95% CI 0.74-2.79; 10 to <15 years, HR 1.88, 95% CI 0.81-4.36). Having a CD diagnosis for ≥ 15 years was associated with a 2.80-fold increased risk of death in individuals with T1D (95% CI 1.28-6.12). CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of CD for ≥ 15 years increases the risk of death in patients with T1D.

Quality not quantity for transglutaminase antibody 2: the performance of an endomysial and tissue transglutaminase test in screening coeliac disease remains stable over time.

National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) and European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) guidance for the diagnosis of coeliac disease has been published. However, there is some controversy regarding the advice on the use of stratifying levels of immunoglobulin (IgA) tissue transglutaminase antibody (TG2) test positivity in the absence of test standardization and the vagueness of the indication to test equivocal samples. Using repeat service audit, we demonstrate that a combination of TG2 followed by IgA endomysial antibodies (EMA) is the best strategy for all degrees of mucosal abnormality using our test combination. Reliance upon immunoassay titre is not as effective, and cannot be applied consistently across populations in the absence of assay standardization. Guidelines advocating the use of tests should involve experts in laboratory diagnostics and external quality assurance to ensure that errors of generalization do not occur and that test performance is achievable in routine diagnostic use.

Serological testing for coeliac disease in Type 1 diabetes mellitus: is immunoglobulin A level measurement necessary?

AIMS: Immunoglobulin A (IgA) measurement is advocated when case finding for coeliac disease in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Currently, there is a paucity of contemporary studies assessing IgA deficiency in Type 1 diabetes. This study evaluates the prevalence of IgA deficiency in individuals with Type 1 diabetes, compared with patients with coeliac disease and control subjects. In addition, we evaluate whether routine IgA measurement is justifiable when case finding for coeliac disease in patients with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: All patients were assessed using IgA endomysial antibodies, IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies and total IgA levels. Altogether, 2434 individuals were tested: 1000 patients with Type 1 diabetes, 234 patients with coeliac disease and 1200 population control subjects. Definitive IgA deficiency was defined as total IgA levels < 0.07 g/l. RESULTS: The prevalence of IgA deficiency was significantly more common in patients with Type 1 diabetes (0.9%, n = 9/1000; P = 0.036) and coeliac disease (1.29%, n = 3/234; P = 0.041) when compared with population control subjects (prevalence of 0.17%, 2/1200). No statistical difference between Type 1 diabetes and coeliac disease for IgA deficiency was identified (P = 0.87). Of patients in the group with Type 1 diabetes, 3.3% (33/1000) had coeliac disease, and of those only one patient had IgA deficiency leading to an antibody-negative presentation. Both IgA-deficient individuals within the population control subjects had normal duodenal biopsies and no relevant symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: IgA deficiency is more common in Type 1 diabetes compared with population control subjects. Despite this, very few individuals with Type 1 diabetes and IgA deficiency appear to have villous atrophy on biopsy. These outcomes question the practice of routine IgA measurement when case finding for coeliac disease in patients with Type 1 diabetes.

Comparing virtual with conventional microscopy for the consensus diagnosis of Barrett's neoplasia in the AspECT Barrett's chemoprevention trial pathology audit.

AIMS: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional versus virtual microscopy for the diagnosis of Barrett's neoplasia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-one biopsies from 35 ASPirin Esomeprazole ChemopreventionTrial (AspECT) trial patients were given a Barrett's neoplasia score (1-5) by a panel of five pathologists using conventional microscopy. Thirty-three biopsies positive for neoplasia were digitized and rescored blindly by virtual microscopy. Diagnostic reliability was compared between conventional and virtual microscopy using Fleiss' kappa. There was substantial reliability of diagnostic agreement (κ = 0.712) scoring the 61 biopsies and moderate agreement scoring the subgroup of 33 'positive' biopsies with both conventional microscopy (κ = 0.598) and virtual microscopy (κ = 0.436). Inter-observer diagnostic agreement between two pathologists by virtual microscopy was substantial (κ = 0.76). Comparison of panel consensus neoplasia scores between conventional and virtual microscopy was almost perfect (κ = 0.8769). However, with virtual microscopy there was lowering of the consensus neoplasia score in nine biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic agreement with virtual microscopy compares favourably with conventional microscopy in what is recognized to be a challenging area of diagnostic practice. However, this study highlights possible limitations for this method in the primary diagnostic setting.

What is the use of biopsy and antibodies in coeliac disease diagnosis?

The advent of highly sensitive and specific serological markers has led to some protagonists proposing that coeliac disease can be diagnosed without the need for a biopsy. However, this is an area of controversy. Lack of consensus about diagnostic degrees of histological change, paucity of symptoms, antibody-negative disease and immunodeficiency can make diagnosis difficult even with a biopsy. Conversely, an argument can be put forward for a 'no biopsy' approach based on the large number of patients with typical symptoms and positive serology who experience a diagnostic delay. In addition, endoscopy is not without discomfort. This article discusses the use of antibodies and duodenal biopsy within this context. Finally, we propose a pragmatic diagnostic algorithm for clinicians to use when investigating patients for coeliac disease.

GAD antibody-associated neurological illness and its relationship to gluten sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of gluten sensitivity in patients with stiff-person syndrome (SPS) lead us to investigate the relationship between gluten sensitivity and GAD-antibody-associated diseases. METHODS: We used ELISA assays for anti-GAD and for serological markers of gluten sensitivity. Patients were recruited from clinics based at the Royal Hallamshire hospital, Sheffield, UK. Patients with gluten sensitivity were followed up after the introduction of a gluten-free diet and serological testing was repeated. RESULTS: Six of seven (86%) patients with SPS were positive for anti-GAD, mean titre 109 U/ml; This compared with 9/90 (11%) patients with idiopathic sporadic ataxia, mean titre 32 U/ml, 16/40 (40%) patients with gluten ataxia, mean titre 25 U/ml, and 6/10 patients with type 1 diabetes only, mean titre 8 U/ml. None of 32 patients with celiac disease only, and of 40 patients with genetic ataxia were positive for anti-GAD. The titre of anti-GAD reduced following the introduction of a gluten-free diet in patients with SPS who had serological evidence of gluten sensitivity. The same was observed in patients with gluten ataxia and anti-GAD antibodies. This was also associated with clinical improvement. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest a link between gluten sensitivity and GAD antibody-associated diseases.

Prodromal irritable bowel syndrome may be responsible for delays in diagnosis in patients presenting with unrecognized Crohn's disease and celiac disease, but not ulcerative colitis.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine the prevalence and duration of prodromal periods in patients with celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis). Furthermore, we explored to what extent vague abdominal symptoms consistent with both disorders were attributed to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and if the presence of prodromal IBS (P-IBS) had an impact on prodrome duration. METHODS: In the study, 683 biopsy-proven patients (celiac n = 225, ulcerative colitis n = 228, Crohn's disease n = 230) completed a postal survey including an assessment of prodromal periods and IBS symptoms during both the prodrome and at present (achieved by completion of the ROME II criteria). Results were compared to age/sex-matched controls (n = 348). RESULTS: Crohn's disease patients had the highest prevalence of prodromes (94%) in comparison to ulcerative colitis (48%) and celiac disease (44%). However, Crohn's disease patients have the lowest prevalence of P-IBS (29%) in comparison to ulcerative colitis (38%) and celiac disease (67%). Prodrome duration in patients with P-IBS Crohn's disease was 4 years in comparison to 2 years without (p = 0.018). Prodrome duration in P-IBS celiac disease was 10 years in comparison to 7 years without (p = 0.046). Prodrome duration in patients with ulcerative colitis was not affected by P-IBS (p ≥ 0.05). Age and sex were not confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to make direct comparisons of prodrome periods between celiac disease and IBD. Prodrome duration in celiac disease is significantly longer and more often characterized by P-IBS than IBD. In celiac disease and CD, P-IBS increases prodrome duration. This may represent a failure to understand the overlap between IBS and celiac disease/IBD.