Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 40(1): 2396628, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39217621

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim was to conduct a benchmark pilot study to find the best practice for consultation hours in the field of gynecological endocrinology. Suitable benchmarking participants were found in China, Germany, Greece, and Switzerland. Specifically, the study aimed to find the most time-efficient and beneficial consultation type in gynecological endocrinology focused on menopause and whether a shorter face-to-face consultation correlates with lower patient satisfaction. METHODS: This was an observational study. To analyze the processes of all benchmarking participants three tools were used: a measurement of time needed for the different consultation types, a questionnaire for patients and one for physicians. The primary endpoint was the time measurement of first consultations. Secondary endpoints were the time measurements of follow-up consultations and phone consultations and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The mean overall duration of a first consultation differed from 20.4 min to 39.7 min (p = 0.003), mainly based on differences of the mean time to acquire the patient history, 5.6 to 21.6 min (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients who felt they had enough time to discuss questions ranged from 70% to 100% (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients who felt fully understood by their physician ranged from 62.5% to 92% (p = 0.006). The duration of a first consultation did not correlate with patients feeling well consulted (r=-0.048, p = 0.557). CONCLUSIONS: A concise patient history that concentrates on the most relevant points can reduce the total consultation time. Reducing consultation time can be made without compromising how well patients feel consulted.


Asunto(s)
Endocrinología , Ginecología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Derivación y Consulta , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Benchmarking , Endocrinología/organización & administración , Endocrinología/normas , Ginecología/organización & administración , Ginecología/normas , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 36(6): 513-520, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32064971

RESUMEN

The objective was to assess efficacy and safety of a combined oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG) in an extended-cycle vs. a conventional-cycle regimen. This first European randomized, active controlled, open, prospective, parallel-group trial was conducted in 48 German gynecological centers. 1,314 healthy, sexually active women aged 18-35 years were randomized. With an unadjusted PI of 0.483 (upper 95% CI: 1.237), the extended-cycle regimen fulfilled the contraceptive efficacy of EE/LNG, the requirements of the European Medicines Agency. The mean total number of bleeding days per year was significantly lower in the extended-cycle vs. the conventional-cycle regimen. Analyses of bleeding patterns showed a reduced total number of bleeding/spotting days per year in the extended-cycle vs. the conventional-cycle regimen. Cycle-associated complaints and AE were comparable in both groups. Both regimens were very well accepted. The extended-cycle regimen of EE/LNG was effective and well tolerated resulting in a lower number of bleeding days and a favorable bleeding pattern compared to the conventional-cycle regimen.


Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/administración & dosificación , Etinilestradiol/administración & dosificación , Levonorgestrel/administración & dosificación , Ciclo Menstrual/efectos de los fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Etinilestradiol/efectos adversos , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Levonorgestrel/efectos adversos , Ciclo Menstrual/fisiología , Menstruación/efectos de los fármacos , Menstruación/fisiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
4.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 16(6): 507-517, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37278023

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Around 80% of women suffer menopause-related symptoms that affect their daily activities and quality of life. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has proven to be beneficial in relieving these symptoms. Nevertheless, only 20/30% of symptomatic women seek treatment. This has resulted in neglect of a generation of healthcare professionals' (HCPs) education in menopausal medicine and a reduction in the prescription of MHT in menopausal women for over two decades. AREAS COVERED: The aim of this article was to identify the main barriers that HCPs face for prescribing MHT and menopausal women for using it. Six European experts in menopause agreed on the profiles of women that benefit from MHT and proposed strategies to break down these barriers. EXPERT OPINION: The most important barrier for HCPs was deficient knowledge of the true evidence-based information, with inadequate training regarding the efficacy and safety of personalized MHT and the real benefit/risk ratio in the treatment of symptomatic women. For patients, fear of developing breast cancer was identified as the single most important barrier. Breaking down barriers is possible, by providing appropriate training and education to HCPs and women. This should result in fully informed, evidence based, shared treatment decisions by women and their physicians.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno , Calidad de Vida , Femenino , Humanos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Menopausia , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/efectos adversos , Hormonas
5.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd ; 81(9): 1021-1030, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34565826

RESUMEN

Hormonal contraceptives are an effective and safe method for preventing pregnancy. Progestins used in contraception are either components of combined hormonal contraceptives (tablets, patches or vaginal rings) or are used as a single active ingredient in progestin mono-preparations (the progestin-only pill (POP), implants, intrauterine systems or depot preparations). Progestins are highly effective in long-term contraception when used properly, and have a very good safety profile with very few contraindications. A new oestrogen-free ovulation inhibitor (POP) has recently been authorised in the USA and the EU. This progestin mono-preparation contains 4 mg of drospirenone (DRSP), which has anti-gonadotropic, anti-mineralocorticoidic and anti-androgenic properties. The hormone administration regimen of 24 days followed by a 4-day hormone-free period was chosen to improve bleeding control and to maintain oestradiol concentrations at early follicular-phase levels, preventing oestrogen deficiency. Clinical trials have demonstrated a high contraceptive effectiveness, a very low risk of cardiovascular side effects and a favourable menstrual bleeding pattern. Due to the long half-life of DRSP (30 - 34 hours), the effectiveness of the preparation is maintained even if a woman forgets to take a pill on a single occasion. Studies involving deliberate 24-hour delays in taking a pill have demonstrated that ovulation inhibition is maintained if a single pill is missed. Following a summary of the current status of oestrogen-free contraception, this review article will describe the clinical development programme of the 4 mg DRSP mono-preparation and the resulting data on the effectiveness and safety of this new oestrogen-free oral hormonal contraceptive.

7.
Womens Health (Lond) ; 15: 1745506519864009, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31378196

RESUMEN

Hormone therapy use has undergone dramatic changes over the past 20 years. Widespread use of hormone therapy in the 1980s and 1990s came to an abrupt halt in the early 2000s after initial findings of the Women's Health Initiative trial were published and the study was terminated. Since then, much has been learned about the characteristics of women most likely to benefit from hormone therapy. There is general agreement that women younger than 60 years or who initiate hormone therapy within 10 years of menopause onset gain short-term benefit in terms of symptomatic relief and long-term benefit in terms of protection from chronic diseases that affect postmenopausal women. Despite accumulating evidence in support of hormone therapy for symptomatic menopausal women, the slow response by the medical community has led to a 'large and unnecessary burden of suffering' by women worldwide. Greater efforts are clearly needed to educate physicians and medical students about the pathophysiology of menopause and the role of hormone therapy in supporting women through the transition. This article provides a brief historical perspective of events that led to the backlash against hormone therapy, explores the current position of guideline groups, and provides practical recommendations to guide first-line management of symptomatic menopausal women.


Asunto(s)
Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Guías como Asunto , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/tendencias , Menopausia/efectos de los fármacos , Progestinas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda