Real-life assessment of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®/ESCULAP) in hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients-a prospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed non-invasively with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in cirrhosis if the characteristic pattern of arterial phase hyperenhancement followed by hypoenhancement is present. Recent studies suggest that diagnosis based on this "hyper-hypo" pattern needs further refinement. This study compares the diagnostic accuracies of standardized CEUS for HCC according to the current guideline definition and following the newly developed CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®, ESCULAP) in a prospective multicenter real-life setting. METHODS: Cirrhotic patients with liver lesions on B-mode ultrasound were recruited prospectively from 04/2018 to 04/2019, and clinical and imaging data were collected. The CEUS standard included an additional examination point after 4-6 min in case of no washout after 3 min. The diagnostic accuracies of CEUS following the guidelines ("hyper-hypo" pattern), based on the examiner's subjective interpretation ("CEUS subjective"), and based on the CEUS algorithms ESCULAP and CEUS LI-RADS® were compared. RESULTS: In total, 470 cirrhotic patients were recruited in 43 centers. The final diagnosis was HCC in 378 cases (80.4%) according to the reference standard (histology 77.4%, MRI 16.4%, CT 6.2%). The "hyper-hypo" pattern yielded 74.3% sensitivity and 63% specificity. "CEUS subjective" showed a higher diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 91.5%; specificity, 67.4%; positive predictive value, 92%; negative predictive value, 66%). Sensitivity was higher for ESCULAP (95%) and "CEUS subjective" (91.5%) versus CEUS LI-RADS® (65.2%; p < 0.001). Specificity was highest for CEUS LI-RADS® (78.6%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CEUS has an excellent diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in cirrhosis. CEUS algorithms may be a helpful refinement of the "hyper-hypo" pattern defined by current HCC guidelines. KEY POINTS: • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has a high diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. • The CEUS algorithm ESCULAP (Erlanger Synopsis for Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Liver lesion Assessment in Patients at risk) showed the highest sensitivity, whereas the CEUS LI-RADS® (Contrast-Enhanced UltraSound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) algorithm yielded the highest specificity. • A standardized CEUS examination procedure with an additional examination point in the late phase, after 4-6 min in lesions with no washout after 3 min, is vital.

LI-RADS-CEUS - Proposal for a Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Populations.

Purpose: To develop a contrast-enhanced ultrasound algorithm (LI-RADS-CEUS = liver imaging reporting and data system with contrast-enhanced ultrasound) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients at risk. Materials and Methods: A CEUS algorithm (LI-RADS-CEUS) was designed analogously to CT- and MRI-based LI-RADS. LI-RADS-CEUS was evaluated retrospectively in 50 patients at risk with confirmed HCC or non-HCC lesions (test group) with subsequent validation in a prospective cohort of 50 patients (validation group). Results were compared to histology, CE-CT and CE-MRI as reference standards. Results: Tumor diagnosis in the test group/validation group (n = 50/50) were 46/41 HCCs, 3/3 intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinomas (ICCs) and 1/6 benign lesions. The diagnostic accuracy of LI-RADS-CEUS for HCC, ICC and non-HCC-non-ICC-lesions was 89 %. For the diagnosis of HCC, the diagnostic accuracy was 93.5 % (43/46 cases) in the test group and 95.1 % (39/41 cases) in the validation group. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 94.3 %, 66.6 %, 94.3 % and 66.6 %, respectively (mean values from both cohorts). Histological findings of HCC were available in 40 versus 23 cases (in total: G1 / G2/G3: 15/35/13). Arterial hyperenhancement was seen in 68/87 (78.2 %) of HCCs. Arterial hyperenhancement with subsequent portal venous or late phase hypoenhancement was seen in 66 % of HCCs. Conclusion: LI-RADS-CEUS offers a CEUS algorithm for standardized assessment and reporting of focal liver lesions in patients at risk for HCC. Arterial hyperenhancement in CEUS is the key feature for the diagnosis of HCC in patients at risk, whereas washout is not a necessary prerequisite.

Determination and prospective validation of cut-off values for the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis for point shear-wave elastography/acoustic radiation force impulse imaging using the ACUSON Sequoia ultrasound system.

OBJECTIVES: Point shear-wave elastography (pSWE) alias acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging is a well-established ultrasound-based technique for the non-invasive assessment of liver tissue stiffness. As cut-off values for liver cirrhosis cannot be transferred from one ultrasound system to another, this study aimed at determining cut-off values for the newly developed Siemens ACUSON Sequoia ultrasound system. METHODS: In a pilot study phase, two independent examiners conducted 10 pSWE measurements in an elasticity phantom and 32 healthy individuals for the determination of inter-examiner agreement. Afterwards, 22 cirrhotic patients and 57 patients with chronic liver disease undergoing liver biopsy underwent pSWE. Patient characteristics and stiffness values were compared for individuals with and without liver cirrhosis. Diagnostic accuracies of cut-off values for the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis were calculated using areas under the receiver operating characteristics analysis and Youden's index. In a subsequent validation study phase, these cut-off values were validated prospectively in 107 cirrhotic and 68 non-cirrhotic patients. RESULTS: Inter-examiner agreement was excellent for measurements in the elasticity phantom (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.998; P  < 0.001), and good for measurements in patients (ICC = 0.844; P  < 0.001). The best cut-off value for the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis was 1.405 m/s with an AUC of 0.872, a sensitivity of 88.2% and a specificity of 88.2% ( P  < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ARFI elastography using the Siemens ACUSON Sequoia showed a good inter-examiner agreement. The optimal cut-off value was lower than the cut-off values described for former generations of ultrasound devices. These preliminary results should be confirmed in larger patient collectives with histology as the reference standard.

Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of Dynamic Vascular Pattern (DVP) in primary liver malignancies - A simple semiquantitative tool for the analysis of contrast enhancement patterns.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a valuable tool in the diagnostic approach of focal liver lesions, but occasionally subjective and observer-dependent. Semiquantitative evaluation of dynamic CEUS (DCEUS) with standardised software programmes such as Dynamic Vascular Pattern (DVP) could help to improve diagnostic accuracy and objectivity in liver tumour assessment. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed at evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of DVP in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DVP images of 52 focal liver lesions [30 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 15 intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinomas (ICCs), 7 focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs)] were analysed by four blinded observers with different levels of CEUS-experience. Diagnostic accuracies for the assessment of dignity and entity were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for detection of malignancy with DVP were 48.4% /67.8% /92.7% and 29.3%, respectively. Total diagnostic accuracies for dignity/entity were 63.9% /38.5% (HCC: 58.3% /25.8%; ICC: 73.3% /50%; FNH: 67.9% /67.9%). Interreader-agreement was moderate (κ= 0.42-0.58). Differential diagnosis between ICC and HCC was most challenging. CONCLUSION: Although developed to improve diagnostic accuracy and objectivity in the assessment of focal liver lesions, DVP alone seems insufficient for differential diagnosis of HCC, ICC and FNH and cannot replace the skills of an experienced observer.