Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med ; 30(1): 22, 2020 05 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32415077

RESUMEN

American and European societies' (ATS/ERS) criteria for spirometry are often not met in primary care. Yet, it is unknown if quality is sufficient for daily clinical use. We evaluated quality of spirometry in primary care based on clinical usefulness, meeting ATS/ERS criteria and agreement on diagnosis between general practitioners (GPs) and pulmonologists. GPs included ten consecutive spirometry tests and detailed history questionnaires of patients who underwent spirometry as part of usual care. GPs and two pulmonologists assessed the spirometry tests and questionnaires on clinical usefulness and formulated a diagnosis. In total, 149 participants covering 15 GPs were included. Low agreements were found on diagnosis between GPs and pulmonologists 1 (κ = 0.39) and 2 (κ = 0.44). GPs and pulmonologists rated >88% of the tests as clinically useful, although 13% met ATS/ERS criteria. This real-life study demonstrated that clinical usefulness of routine primary care spirometry tests was high, although agreement on diagnosis was low.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Espirometría/normas , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Neumólogos/normas , Neumólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Espirometría/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Eur Respir J ; 32(4): 945-52, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18550607

RESUMEN

The aim of the present study was to establish the agreement between two recommended definitions of airflow obstruction in symptomatic adults referred for spirometry by their general practitioner, and investigate how rates of airflow obstruction change when pre-bronchodilator instead of post-bronchodilator spirometry is performed. The diagnostic spirometric results of 14,056 adults with respiratory obstruction were analysed. Differences in interpretation between a fixed 0.70 forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1))/forced vital capacity (FVC) cut-off point and a sex- and age-specific lower limit of normal cut-off point for this ratio were investigated. Of the subjects, 53% were female and 69% were current or ex-smokers. The mean post-bronchodilator FEV(1)/FVC was 0.73 in males and 0.78 in females. The sensitivity of the fixed relative to the lower limit of normal cut-off point definition was 97.9%, with a specificity of 91.2%, positive predictive value of 72.0% and negative predictive value of 99.5%. For the subgroup of current or ex-smokers aged > or =50 yrs, these values were 100, 82.0, 69.2 and 100%, respectively. The proportion of false positive diagnoses using the fixed cut-off point increased with age. The positive predictive value of pre-bronchodilator airflow obstruction was 74.7% among current or ex-smokers aged > or =50 yrs. The current clinical guideline-recommended fixed 0.70 forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity cut-off point leads to substantial overdiagnosis of obstruction in middle-aged and elderly patients in primary care. Using pre-bronchodilator spirometry leads to a high rate of false positive interpretations of obstruction in primary care.


Asunto(s)
Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/diagnóstico , Broncodilatadores/farmacología , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Espirometría
3.
Eur Respir J ; 31(1): 84-92, 2008 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17596275

RESUMEN

The present study assessed the impact of computerised spirometry interpretation expert support on the diagnostic achievements of general practitioners (GPs), and on GPs' decision making in diagnosing chronic respiratory disease. A cluster-randomised controlled trial was performed in 78 GPs who each completed 10 standardised paper case descriptions. Intervention consisted of support for GPs' spirometry interpretation either by an expert system (expert support group) or by sham information (control group). Agreement of GPs' diagnoses was compared with an expert panel judgement, which served as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were: additional diagnostic test rates; width of differential diagnosis; certainty of diagnosis; estimated severity of disease; referral rate; and medication or nonmedication changes. Effects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). There were no differences between the expert support and control groups in the agreement between GPs and expert panel diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR (95% CI) 1.08 (0.70-1.66)), asthma (1.13 (0.70-1.80)), and absence of respiratory disease (1.32 (0.61-2.86)). A higher rate of additional diagnostic tests was observed in the expert support group (2.5 (1.17-5.35)). Computerised spirometry expert support had no detectable benefit on general practitioners' diagnostic achievements and the decision-making process when diagnosing chronic respiratory disease.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Sistemas Especialistas , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/métodos , Espirometría/métodos , Diagnóstico por Computador , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Médicos de Familia , Derivación y Consulta , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Programas Informáticos , Espirometría/instrumentación
4.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 152(20): 1157-63, 2008 May 17.
Artículo en Neerlandesa | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18549142

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are differences in prevalence of and health care consumption for asthma and COPD between Dutch people of Turkish, Moroccan and Surinamese origin and indigenous Dutch people. DESIGN: Retrospective. METHOD: Based on data from the 'Second Dutch national study into morbidity and interventions in general practice', we compared the prevalence of asthma and COPD in the different ethnic groups. In addition, we compared the use of various airway medications and the number of general practice contacts between these ethnic groups. RESULTS: We analysed data of 240,067 indigenous Dutch, 2,942 Turkish, 2,416 Moroccan and 3,320 Surinamese subjects. Asthma is more prevalent among Surinamese and seems less prevalent among Moroccans. COPD seems less prevalent among immigrants than among the indigenous Dutch population. Immigrants tend to have less prescriptions of prophylactic maintenance airway medication and they also tend to have less airway-related general practice contacts than indigenous Dutch patients. CONCLUSION: Differences exist in the prevalence of and health care consumption for asthma and COPD between the different ethnic groups in the Netherlands. There seems to be underdiagnosis of COPD in immigrants. Moreover, immigrant asthma and COPD patients are probably undertreated.


Asunto(s)
Asma/etnología , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/etnología , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Emigración e Inmigración , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Minoritarios , Marruecos/etnología , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suriname/etnología , Turquía/etnología
5.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med ; 28(1): 12, 2018 04 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29615628

RESUMEN

COPD exacerbations are commonly quantified as rate per year. However, the total amount of time a patient suffers from exacerbations may be stronger related to his or her disease burden than just counting exacerbation episodes. In this study, we examined the relationship between exacerbation frequency and exacerbation-free time, and their associations with baseline characteristics and health-related quality of life. A total of 166 COPD patients reported symptom changes during 12 months. Symptom-defined exacerbation episodes were correlated to the number of exacerbation-free weeks per year. Analysis of covariance was used to examine the effects of baseline characteristics on annual exacerbation frequency and exacerbation-free weeks, Spearman's rank correlations to examine associations between the two methods to express exacerbations and the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ). The correlation between exacerbation frequency and exacerbation-free weeks was -0.71 (p < 0.001). However, among frequent exacerbators (i.e., ≥3 exacerbations/year, n = 113) the correlation was weak (r = -0.25; p < 0.01). Smokers had less exacerbation-free weeks than non-smokers (ß = -5.709, p < 0.05). More exacerbation-free weeks were related to better CRQ Total (r = 0.22, p < 0.05), Mastery (r = 0.22, p < 0.05), and Fatigue (r = 0.23, p < 0.05) scores, whereas no significant associations were found between exacerbation frequency and CRQ scores. In COPD patients with frequent exacerbations, there is substantial variation in exacerbation-free time. Exacerbation-free time may better reflect the burden of exacerbations in patients with COPD than exacerbation frequency does.


Asunto(s)
Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/fisiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Capacidad Vital/fisiología , Anciano , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
7.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis ; 65(3): 133-40, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17220102

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbations are a characteristic clinical expression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The objective of this study was to investigate the occurrence rate, management, and healthcare costs of exacerbations in patients with COPD in Dutch general practice. METHODS: Baseline data set from the COPD on Primary Care Treatment (COOPT) trial was used. Details on the occurrence and management of exacerbations were collected by systematic medical record review for the 2-year period preceding trial inclusion. RESULTS: The mean age of the 286 study subjects involved was 59.2 (SD 9.6) years, postbronchodilator FEV1 67.1% (SD 16.2) of predicted. Following ERS criteria, subjects suffered from: no (26%); mild (19%); moderate (40%); or severe (15%) airflow obstruction. The overall mean and median annual exacerbation rates were 0.88 (SD 0.79) and 0.5 (IQR 1.0), respectively. Exacerbation rate was not related to severity of airflow obstruction (p=0.628). Mean annual exacerbation costs per subject were 40 Euro, 53 Euro, 61 Euro and 92 Euro for the respective severity subgroups (p=0.012). The increase of costs in the more severe subgroups was mainly attributable to more physician consultations, diagnostic procedures, and prescription of reliever medication (e.g., bronchodilators, cough preparations). CONCLUSIONS: Occurrence of exacerbations did not depend on the severity of airflow obstruction, whereas the healthcare cost associated with exacerbations increased along with the severity of the disease.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/economía , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Antitusígenos/uso terapéutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Tos/tratamiento farmacológico , Recolección de Datos , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/clasificación , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Estaciones del Año
8.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 150(22): 1227-32, 2006 Jun 03.
Artículo en Neerlandesa | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16796173

RESUMEN

The goals of COPD management according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guideline are: prevention of disease progression, relief of symptoms, improvement of exercise tolerance and the quality of life, prevention and treatment of exacerbations and complications, and reduction of mortality and adverse effects. These correspond to the goals formulated in the Dutch 'National transmural agreements on COPD'. Bronchodilators play a key role in the pharmacological treatment and with the availability of tiotropium, a long-acting anticholinergic bronchodilator, it has become important to decide at what moment this is indicated in COPD management. In comparative studies, tiotropium was an effective long-acting bronchodilator that had a favourable effect not only on lung function but also on the other parameters indicated in the GOLD guideline. When maintenance treatment with bronchodilators is needed, one should consider a long-acting bronchodilator. In view of the additive positive effects, tiotropium is the bronchodilator of choice. In case of severe symptoms, a combination of tiotropium with a long-acting beta2-sympathicomimetic agent is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Derivados de Escopolamina/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Bromuro de Tiotropio
10.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 65(6): 1721-5, 1997 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9174466

RESUMEN

Protein-energy malnutrition is thought to be widespread in hospitalized patients. However, the specificity of indexes used to assess malnutrition is uncertain. We therefore assessed the rate of false-positive diagnoses of malnutrition when biochemical-anthropometric indexes were applied to healthy subjects. Nutritional status was assessed in 175 healthy blood donors (aged 44.2 +/- 13.4 y) and in 34 highly fit elderly volunteers (aged 74.7 +/- 3.6 y) participating in the Nijmegen Four Days Walking March. We investigated both the Nutritional Risk Index [(1.489 x albumin) + (41.7 x present/usual weight)] and the Maastricht Index [20.68-(0.24 x albumin, g/L)-(19.21 x serum transthyretin, g/L)-(1.86 x lymphocytes, 10(6)/L)-(0.04 x ideal weight)]. We found previously that 52-64% of nonsurgical hospitalized patients were malnourished according to these indexes. In the present study, 1.9% of the 209 volunteers had apparent malnutrition according to the Nutritional Risk Index and 3.8% according to the Maastricht Index. The prevalence of apparent malnutrition in the elderly volunteers was 5.9% and 20.6%, respectively. The rate of false-positive diagnoses was acceptably low in those aged < 70 y with both the Nutritional Risk Index and the Maastricht Index; therefore, the use of these indexes will not cause a clinically significant increase in the prevalence of malnutrition because patients who are not malnourished are included. The high percentage of spurious malnutrition in the elderly limits the use of the Maastricht Index to subjects aged < 70 y.


Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento/fisiología , Evaluación Nutricional , Trastornos Nutricionales/epidemiología , Trastornos Nutricionales/etiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Antropometría , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Trastornos Nutricionales/fisiopatología , Estado Nutricional , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Albúmina Sérica/análisis , Estadística como Asunto
12.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 143(47): 2354-60, 1999 Nov 20.
Artículo en Neerlandesa | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10590773

RESUMEN

The incidence of malignant mesothelioma, the main consequence of exposure to asbestos, will increase considerably in the Netherlands in the coming decades. In the next 35 year, some 20,000 people will die from malignant mesothelioma. The diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma in practice is based on histological examination in about 80%, on cytological examination in 15% and on other forms of examination, e.g., high resolution computer tomography (HRCT), in 6% of the cases. Using a combination of various noninvasive methods, such as anamnesis, physical and röntgenologic examination, HRCT and spirometry, the diagnosis of asbestosis is made erroneously in 5% of the patients examined. With regard to allowance of financial compensation to patients with pleural mesothelioma and asbestosis, a part is played by the fact that views differ internationally concerning the criteria on which the diagnosis should be based. For mesothelioma cytologic and histologic examination are the most important. For asbestosis, the Health Council considers HRCT as crucial, if necessary supplemented by histological examination, plus a history of exposure to asbestos and pulmonary dysfunction. In mesothelioma cytological and histological examination are the most important.


Asunto(s)
Asbestosis/diagnóstico , Determinación de la Elegibilidad/normas , Mesotelioma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pleurales/diagnóstico , Indemnización para Trabajadores/normas , Asbestosis/complicaciones , Asbestosis/economía , Asbestosis/epidemiología , Salud Global , Humanos , Mesotelioma/complicaciones , Mesotelioma/economía , Mesotelioma/epidemiología , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pleurales/economía , Neoplasias Pleurales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pleurales/etiología , Indemnización para Trabajadores/economía
13.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 143(45): 2246-51, 1999 Nov 06.
Artículo en Neerlandesa | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10578423

RESUMEN

Spirometry is increasingly used in general practice and improves the possibilities regarding mainly the early detection and treatment of obstructive pulmonary diseases. However, spirometry performed in general practice is less reliable than that performed in lung function laboratories and primary care laboratories, so that spirometry performed by the GP personally appears to be less suitable for monitoring purposes. Spirometry is a useful and feasible tool for GP's, providing that test results are adequately integrated within the GP's management of patients with obstructive lung disease. If sufficient attention on quality assurance of spirometry cannot be guaranteed in general practice, lung function laboratories and primary care laboratories may play an important supportive role.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/normas , Enfermedades Pulmonares Obstructivas/diagnóstico , Neumología/normas , Espirometría/normas , Humanos , Países Bajos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
14.
Trials ; 12: 37, 2011 Feb 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21310040

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease, associated with cardiovascular disease. Many patients use (long-acting) bronchodilators, whilst they continue smoking alongside. We hypothesised an interaction between bronchodilators and smoking that enhances smoke exposure, and hence cardiovascular disease. In this paper, we report our study protocol that explores the fundamental interaction, i.e. smoke retention. METHOD: The design consists of a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomised crossover trial, in which 40 COPD patients smoke cigarettes during both undilated and maximal bronchodilated conditions. Our primary outcome is the retention of cigarette smoke, expressed as tar and nicotine weight. The inhaled tar weights are calculated from the correlated extracted nicotine weights in cigarette filters, whereas the exhaled weights are collected on Cambridge filters. We established the inhaled weight calculations by a pilot study, that included paired measurements from several smoking regimes. Our study protocol is approved by the local accredited medical review ethics committee. DISCUSSION: Our study is currently in progress. The pilot study revealed valid equations for inhaled tar and nicotine, with an R2 of 0.82 and 0.74 (p < 0.01), respectively. We developed a method to study pulmonary smoke retentions in COPD patients under the influence of bronchodilation which may affect smoking-related disease. This trial will provide fundamental knowledge about the (cardiovascular) safety of bronchodilators in patients with COPD who persist in their habit of cigarette smoking. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00981851.


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Proyectos de Investigación , Fumar/efectos adversos , Administración por Inhalación , Pruebas Respiratorias , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Exposición por Inhalación , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Países Bajos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/etiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
Med Hypotheses ; 74(2): 277-80, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19800175

RESUMEN

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a highly prevalent disease, characterised by poorly reversible, obstructive airflow limitation. Alongside other comorbidities, COPD is associated with increased morbidity and mortality resulting from cardiovascular disease - mainly heart failure and ischemic heart disease. Both diseases share an important risk factor, namely, smoking. About 50% of COPD patients are active cigarette smokers. Bronchodilation is the cornerstone of pharmaceutical treatment for COPD symptoms, and half of all COPD patients use long-acting bronchodilating agents. Discussion about these agents is currently focusing on the association with overall mortality and morbidity in COPD patients, of cardiovascular origin in particular. Bronchodilation diminishes the hyperinflated state of the lung and facilitates the pulmonary deposition of cigarette smoke by deeper inhalation into the smaller airways. Smaller particles, as in smoke, tend to penetrate and depose more in these small airways. In addition, bronchodilation indeed increases carbon monoxide uptake in the lungs, an important gaseous compound of cigarette smoke. Since the number of cigarettes smoked is positively correlated to mortality from cardiac events, we therefore hypothesise that chronic bronchodilation increases cardiovascular disease and mortality in COPD patients who continue smoking by increasing pulmonary retention of pathogenic smoke constituents. Indeed, a recent meta-analysis is suggestive that long-acting anticholinergics might increase cardiovascular disease if patients exceed a certain number of cigarettes smoked. To demonstrate the fundamental mechanism of this pathogenic interaction we will perform a randomised placebo-controlled cross-over trial to investigate the effect of maximum bronchodilation on the retention of cigarette smoke constituents. In 40 moderate to severe COPD patients we measure the inhaled and exhaled amount of tar and nicotine, as well during maximum bronchodilation as during administration of placebo. The fraction of retention of tar and nicotine is subsequently calculated for both circumstances and analysed for association with bronchodilation. Further observational cohort studies or randomised clinical trials designed to monitor cardiovascular events may well evaluate the interaction. Since many patients are at risk for this possibly hazardous interaction, its relevance to our society and healthcare is potentially great. The implication will be that the urgency to quit smoking is intensified. Besides, chronic bronchodilation - specifically long-acting bronchodilators - needs to be discouraged in smoking COPD patients that refuse to quit.


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Modelos Biológicos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Fumar/epidemiología , Fumar/fisiopatología , Humanos , Incidencia
17.
Fam Pract ; 24(2): 181-8, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17251178

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on inhaled steroid and long-acting beta2-agonist combination products may not be representative for the asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in family practice. OBJECTIVES: To compare in a group of doctor-diagnosed patients with asthma or COPD, the effects of a lower dose of fluticasone in a combination product with salmeterol with conventional treatment (i.e. a higher dose of fluticasone), both supplemented with as-needed use of a short-acting bronchodilator. METHODS: The study was a 12-week multicentre, randomized controlled, double-blind trial. In all, 41 family practices recruited 137 patients diagnosed with asthma and 40 patients diagnosed with COPD. Primary outcome was the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) as percentage of predicted. Morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom-free days, health status [Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)], exacerbations, use of short-acting bronchodilators and adverse events were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: FEV1% predicted increased 2.6% (SD 8.3) in fluticasone/salmeterol- and 0.01% (SD 6.6) in fluticasone-treated patients (overall: P=0.036, asthma: P=0.025 and COPD: P=0.700). PEF increased in favour of fluticasone/salmeterol in asthma patients only (P=0.016). Fluticasone/salmeterol-treated asthma patients had 1.1 more symptom-free days per week (P=0.044); no such effect was observed for COPD (P=0.769). There were no differences in total AQLQ and SGRQ scores, exacerbations, use of reliever puffs or adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: In family practice patients diagnosed with asthma, several treatment goals were better achieved with a lower dose of fluticasone and salmeterol in a combination product than with a higher dose of fluticasone. We found no differences between the two approaches for patients with COPD.


Asunto(s)
Albuterol/análogos & derivados , Androstadienos/administración & dosificación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Albuterol/administración & dosificación , Albuterol/uso terapéutico , Androstadienos/uso terapéutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Femenino , Fluticasona , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Xinafoato de Salmeterol , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
18.
Fam Pract ; 22(6): 604-7, 2005 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16024555

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that severe COPD is associated with depressive symptoms, possibly linked to exacerbations, dyspnea and hospitalisation. However, scarce data are available in primary care where most patients suffer from mild or moderate disease. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to reveal associations of depressive symptoms with demographic and clinical characteristics in mild to moderate COPD. METHODS: Cross-sectional data on lung function measurements, exacerbation frequency, dyspnea, comorbidity, smoking behaviour, body mass index (BMI), age, gender and depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory) of 147 primary care patients were assessed in multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Patients suffered from mild to moderate obstruction (FEV1 63.6% pred, range 45.1% to 82.1%). Female gender (OR 4.8, 95% CI 2.1 to 10.8), BMI > 25 (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.8) and current smoking (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.01 to 5.3) were univariately associated with depressive symptoms, while in a multivariate logistic model only female gender (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.6 to 9.9), BMI > 25 (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.7) and dyspnea (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.9) were independently associated with depressive symptoms. Conclusion. These data suggest that in primary care depressive symptoms in COPD seem to be related with female gender, BMI and dyspnea. In this study, lung function, exacerbation rate, smoking behaviour, age and comorbidity are not independently associated with depressive symptoms in COPD of mild to moderate severity.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Depresión/epidemiología , Disnea , Atención Primaria de Salud , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/psicología , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/clasificación
19.
Thorax ; 58(10): 861-6, 2003 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14514938

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of spirometric tests performed in general practice. METHOD: A repeated within subject comparison of spirometric tests with a "gold standard" (spirometric tests performed in a pulmonary function laboratory) was performed in 388 subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) from 61 general practices and four laboratories. General practitioners and practice assistants undertook a spirometry training programme. Within subject differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity (DeltaFEV1 and DeltaFVC) between laboratory and general practice tests were measured (practice minus laboratory value). The proportion of tests with FEV1 reproducibility <5% or <200 ml served as a quality marker. RESULTS: Mean DeltaFEV1 was 0.069 l (95% CI 0.054 to 0.084) and DeltaFVC 0.081 l (95% CI 0.053 to 0.109) in the first year evaluation, indicating consistently higher values for general practice measurements. Second year results were similar. Laboratory and general practice FEV1 values differed by up to 0.5 l, FVC values by up to 1.0 l. The proportion of non-reproducible tests was 16% for laboratory tests and 18% for general practice tests (p=0.302) in the first year, and 18% for both in the second year evaluation (p=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: Relevant spirometric indices measured by trained general practice staff were marginally but statistically significantly higher than those measured in pulmonary function laboratories. Because of the limited agreement between laboratory and general practice values, use of these measurements interchangeably should probably be avoided. With sufficient training of practice staff the current practice of performing spirometric tests in the primary care setting seems justifiable.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios Transversales , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Espirometría/normas , Capacidad Vital/fisiología
20.
Prim Care Respir J ; 13(1): 48-55, 2004 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16701637

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the probability, and explore determinants of adverse respiratory outcome after discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnosed and treated in general practice. DESIGN: Prospective unblinded ICS withdrawal study. SUBJECTS: 201 ICS treated COPD patients with various degrees of airflow limitation from 45 Dutch general practices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Probability of and time to exacerbation or unremitting worsening of respiratory symptoms after ICS discontinuation. RESULTS: Mean age was 60.6 (S.D. 9.5) years, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) 65.6 (S.D. 15.7) % predicted. Overall probability of adverse respiratory outcome after ICS discontinuation was 0.37 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31, 0.44). Survival analysis showed that age, gender, smoking status and reversibility of airflow limitation were independent predictors of adverse respiratory outcome. For females, the adjusted hazard ratio was 2.14 (95% CI 1.31, 3.50) compared to males. For age, the hazard ratio was 1.05 (95% CI 1.02, 1.08) per year lived. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroids may harm patients with COPD. The probability of an adverse respiratory outcome may be higher in women, elderly patients, smokers and patients with higher bronchodilator reversibility while on inhaled steroid treatment.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda