Lipoprotein and apolipoprotein levels in angiographically defined coronary atherosclerosis.

Recent studies suggest that apolipoproteins and subfractions of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol may be better predictors of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) than are plasma cholesterol and total HDL cholesterol. To examine this hypothesis, plasma cholesterol and triglyceride, cholesterol of low-density lipoprotein, HDL and its subfractions 2 and 3, apolipoprotein A-I, the apolipoprotein B of low-density lipoprotein, the ratio of apolipoprotein EII to EIII, and ratios of several of these variables were measured in a selected series of 126 patients (83 men and 43 women) who underwent coronary angiography for suspected CAD. Mean values of many of these variables differed significantly between the men with CAD and the men without significant CAD, when controlled for age, use of beta blockers and diuretic drugs. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, the only variable that made a significant independent contribution in predicting CAD in men was the ratio of HDL cholesterol to total plasma cholesterol (p less than 0.0001). The mean of this ratio was 0.17 +/- 0.01 mg/dl in the men with CAD and 0.23 +/- 0.02 mg/dl in the male controls. All men with ratios of less than 0.15 mg/dl had significant CAD, defined as 50% or greater luminal diameter narrowing of 1 or more of the major coronary arteries. No measurement was a significant univariate or multivariate predictor of CAD in the women, but the power to detect such predictors was reduced because of small group sizes. In conclusion, the ratio of HDL cholesterol to plasma cholesterol may be superior to many of the more recently described lipoprotein and apolipoprotein-derived predictors of CAD.

Treatment of acute pancreatitis. Comparison of animal and human studies.

In this review, we compared the outcome of 25 studies of experimentally induced pancreatitis in animals with 13 studies of human acute pancreatitis in which the same therapeutic agents were used (aprotinin, glucagon, 5-fluorouracil, somatostatin, peritoneal lavage). Whereas 81% of the animal studies had a positive outcome (improvement in survival), only 7.7% of the human studies showed a positive outcome on survival. Most animal studies suffered from a protocol in which treatment was not significantly delayed after induction of acute pancreatitis. Of the 12 human studies that showed no effect of treatment on survival, none had sufficient statistical power (1 - beta error) for the investigators to have confidence in the negative outcomes. This was due to the fact that the studies had too few patients or that the event rates in the untreated populations were too low. Only five of the human studies reported the complication rates of acute pancreatitis in patients who did not die of their disease. Treatment (by any agent) did not improve the complication rate in these studies, but only one of the five reports had sufficient statistical power for the investigators to have confidence in these negative results. Large multicenter studies with sufficient numbers of patients with severe pancreatitis (high mortality and complication rates) are needed to evaluate new therapies in this disease.

The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities.

Chorionic villus sampling is a method of prenatal diagnosis in the first trimester of pregnancy in which tissue for genetic study is aspirated from the developing placenta by means of a catheter inserted transcervically under the guidance of ultrasonography. In this seven-center study, we compared the safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling in 2278 women with those of amniocentesis at 16 weeks' gestation in 671 women. Both groups were made up primarily of well-educated private patients; they were recruited in the first trimester of pregnancy and had viable pregnancies verified by ultrasound examination. Cytogenetic diagnoses resulted from 97.8 percent of the chorionic villus sampling procedures and 99.4 percent of the amniocenteses (P less than 0.05); aneuploidy was found in 1.8 and 1.4 percent, respectively, of the cases in which diagnoses were made. Of the women who underwent chorionic villus sampling, 17 (0.8 percent) subsequently had an amniocentesis because the diagnosis was ambiguous. Two of the diagnoses of aneuploidy (one tetraploidy, one trisomy 22) were later proved to be incorrect. On the basis of pediatric examination of the infants subsequently born to the women in the sample, there were no errors in the determination of sex or the identification of the major trisomies (21, 18, and 13). The rate of combined losses due to spontaneous and missed abortions, termination of abnormal pregnancies, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths was 7.2 percent in the group that underwent chorionic villus sampling and 5.7 percent in the group that had amniocentesis. After adjustment for slight differences in gestational and maternal age, the total loss rate for the women in the chorionic villus sampling group exceeded that for the amniocentesis group by only 0.8 percentage points (80 percent confidence interval, -0.6 to 2.2). The rate of loss of chromosomally normal fetuses after chorionic villus sampling was 10.8 percent among women in whom three or four attempts were made to place the transcervical catheter, as compared with 2.9 percent in those in whom only one attempt was necessary (P less than 0.01). There were no serious maternal infections among the women in this study or among an additional 1990 women who underwent chorionic villus sampling (upper 95 percent confidence limit, 0.08 percent). We conclude that chorionic villus sampling is a safe and effective technique for the early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities, but that it probably entails a slightly higher risk of procedure failure and of fetal loss than does amniocentesis.