Management and outcome of esophageal stenting for spontaneous esophageal perforations.

Treatment of spontaneous esophageal perforation (SEP) consists of different conservative, surgical and endoscopic treatment modalities. In this study, we evaluated the clinical efficacy and the outcome of covered self-expanding stent (CSES) treatment of SEP. All patients with SEP treated by CSES at our institution between 2005 and 2014 were included in this prospective single-center study. The data were collected from a prospective database based on clinical, endoscopic and operative reports. Follow-up data were procured by contacting the patients or their family doctors. The patient data were analyzed concerning course of treatment, leakage sealing rate, complications, and mortality. Patients with iatrogenic or malignant perforations were excluded. In total, 16 patients underwent endoscopic CSES placement for SEP between 2005 and 2014. Sealing of the leakage was immediately successful in 50% (8 patients). A second stent was placed in 5 patients, but did not achieve sealing of the perforation in any case, requiring a switch in treatment to a surgical procedure (n=4) or drainage of the persisting leakage (n=4). In-hospital mortality was 13%. Only delayed treatment was identified as a risk factor for inferior outcome. Patients with successful CSES treatment had a shorter ICU- and hospital stay and had a reduced risk of developing esophageal stenosis (RR: 0.4) or persisting dysphagia despite treatment (RR: 0.33). Endoscopic treatment of SEP is beneficial to the patient if immediately successful, but in our experience, failure rates are higher than described in the literature. Secondary placement of CSES was not successful when initial stent treatment failed, while both surgical intervention and drainage of the perforation showed good results in sealing the leakage.

Covered self-expanding stent treatment for anastomotic leakage: outcomes in esophagogastric and esophagojejunal anastomoses.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage of esophagogastric and esophagojejunal anastomoses is a severe complication after esophagectomy and gastrectomy associated with a high mortality. We conducted this non-randomized observational study to evaluate the outcomes and clinical effectiveness of covered self-expanding stents (CSESs) in treating esophageal anastomotic leakage. METHODS: From 2002 to 2013, consecutive patients with anastomotic leakage after esophagogastrostomy or esophagojejunostomy who received CSESs were analyzed concerning leakage characteristics, leakage sealing rate, success and failure rates of CSES treatment, stent-related complications, and mortality. RESULTS: In 35 patients, anastomotic leakage originating from 5 cervical esophagogastrostomies, 6 thoracic esophagogastrostomies, 12 mediastinal esophagojejunostomies and 12 abdominal esophagojejunostomies were treated with 48 CSESs (16 fully CSES, 32 partially CSES). Of 35 patients, 24 received one stent, 9 received two consecutive stents, and 2 received three consecutive stents. Stent-related complications occurred in 71 % of patients (25/35). The most frequent complications were leakage persistence (44 %) and stent dislocation (19 %). Sealing of the anastomotic leakage was achieved in 24 (69 %) patients after a median (range) stenting time of 19 (1-78) days. Sealing rates differed significantly with 20 % (cervical esophagogastrostomies), 50 % (thoracic esophagogastrostomies), 92 % (mediastinal esophagojejunostomies) and 67 % (abdominal esophagojejunostomies) of patients (p = 0.023). Moreover, clinical success rates differed among these groups (60 vs. 67 vs. 92 vs. 58 %; p = 0.247). Clinical failure of stent treatment was more likely to be recognized in early postoperative leakage (median postoperative day 3 vs. 8; p = 0.098) compared with successful treatment, whereas no difference for clinical success rates was found comparing leakage ≤ 10 versus >10 mm (68 vs. 64 %; p = 0.479). CONCLUSION: CSESs are an effective treatment for anastomotic leakage in patients with esophagogastrostomies and esophagojejunostomies. Best results can be achieved in patients with anastomotic leakages following mediastinal esophagojejunostomy, and in leakages occurring after the very early postoperative phase.

The first teleautomatic low-voltage prosthesis with multiple therapeutic applications: a new version of the German artificial sphincter system.

To date, there are no artificial sphincter prostheses for urinary or fecal incontinence that may be implemented elsewhere instead, for example, in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Conventional systems are conceptually similar but are constructed specifically for distinct applications and are manual in operation. The German Artificial Sphincter System (GASS) II is the evolution of a highly integrative, modular, telemetric sphincter prosthesis with more than one application. Redesigning and integrating multilayer actuators into the pump allows us to reduce the input voltage to -10 to +20 V (V(PP) = 30 V). This provides for a flow rate of 2.23 mL/min and a counterpressure stability of 260 mbar. Furthermore, multiple applications have become feasible due to our standardized connection system, therapy-specific compression units, and application-specific software. These innovations allow us to integrate not only severe fecal and urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and therapy-resistant reflux disease, but also morbid adiposity into the gamut of therapeutic GASS applications.

Two-sided sponge (TSS) treatment: Description of a novel device and technique for endoscopic vacuum treatment (EVT) in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic vacuum treatment (EVT) is increasingly used in the treatment of anastomotic leakages and perforations in the upper gastrointestinal tract. However, sponges often have to be mounted individually on a gastric tube and endoscopic introduction of the latter into an infected extraluminal cavity is challenging. In order to facilitate this procedure in some anatomical situations, we developed the prototype of a new sponge for EVT called a two-side sponge (TSS).

First-line endoscopic treatment with over-the-scope clips significantly improves the primary failure and rebleeding rates in high-risk gastrointestinal bleeding: A single-center experience with 100 cases.

AIM: To evaluate rebleeding, primary failure (PF) and mortality of patients in whom over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) were used as first-line and second-line endoscopic treatment (FLET, SLET) of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB, LGIB). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database identified all patients with UGIB and LGIB in a tertiary endoscopic referral center of the University of Freiburg, Germany, from 04-2012 to 05-2016 (n = 93) who underwent FLET and SLET with OTSCs. The complete Rockall risk scores were calculated from patients with UGIB. The scores were categorized as < or ≥ 7 and were compared with the original Rockall data. Differences between FLET and SLET were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate the factors that influenced rebleeding after OTSC placement. RESULTS: Primary hemostasis and clinical success of bleeding lesions (without rebleeding) was achieved in 88/100 (88%) and 78/100 (78%), respectively. PF was significantly lower when OTSCs were applied as FLET compared to SLET (4.9% vs 23%, P = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, patients who had OTSC placement as SLET had a significantly higher rebleeding risk compared to those who had FLET (OR 5.3; P = 0.008). Patients with Rockall risk scores ≥ 7 had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to those with scores < 7 (35% vs 10%, P = 0.034). No significant differences were observed in patients with scores < or ≥ 7 in rebleeding and rebleeding-associated mortality. CONCLUSION: Our data show for the first time that FLET with OTSC might be the best predictor to successfully prevent rebleeding of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to SLET. The type of treatment determines the success of primary hemostasis or primary failure.

The role of endoscopy in pediatric gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Gastrointestinal bleeding in children and adolescents accounts for up to 20 % of referrals to gastroenterologists. Detailed management guidelines exist for gastrointestinal bleeding in adults, but they do not encompass children and adolescents. The aim of this study was to assess gastrointestinal bleeding in pediatric patients and to determine an investigative management algorithm accounting for the specifics of children and adolescents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pediatric patients with gastrointestinal bleeding admitted to our endoscopy unit from 2001 to 2009 (n = 154) were identified. Retrospective statistical and neural network analysis was used to assess outcome and to determine an investigative management algorithm. RESULTS: The source of bleeding could be identified in 81 % (n = 124/154). Gastrointestinal bleeding was predominantly lower gastrointestinal bleeding (66 %, n = 101); upper gastrointestinal bleeding was much less common (14 %, n = 21). Hematochezia was observed in 94 % of the patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 95 of 101). Hematemesis (67 %, n = 14 of 21) and melena (48 %, n = 10 of 21) were associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The sensitivity and specificity of a neural network to predict lower gastrointestinal bleeding were 98 % and 63.6 %, respectively and to predict upper gastrointestinal bleeding were 75 % and 96 % respectively. The sensitivity and specifity of hematochezia alone to predict lower gastrointestinal bleeding were 94.2 % and 85.7 %, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for hematemesis and melena to predict upper gastrointestinal bleeding were 82.6 % and 94 %, respectively. We then developed an investigative management algorithm based on the presence of hematochezia and hematemesis or melena. CONCLUSIONS: Hematochezia should prompt colonoscopy and hematemesis or melena should prompt esophagogastroduodenoscopy. If no source of bleeding is found, additional procedures are often non-diagnostic.

First successful treatment of a circumferential intramural esophageal dissection with perforation in a patient with eosinophilic esophagitis using a partially covered self-expandable metal stent.

Intramural esophageal dissection (IED) is a rare disease characterized by a partial (PIED) or circumferential (CIED) mucosal rupture. Whereas PIED responds well to nonoperative treatment, complicated courses have been reported necessitating surgery, up to the point of esophagectomy despite complex endoscopic interventions, in CIED. We report the first case of an iatrogenic CIED with perforation in a young patient with underlying eosinophilic esophagitis treated successfully by endoscopy alone, using a partially covered self-expandable metal stent.

Minimally invasive operations for acute necrotizing pancreatitis: comparison of minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy with endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy.

BACKGROUND: A "step-up" approach is currently the treatment of choice for acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy (MINE) and endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy (ETG) and to compare it to open necrosectomy (ONE). METHODS: Patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to our institution from 1998 to 2010 (n = 334) were identified. From these, patients who underwent either ONE, MINE, or ETG were selected for further analysis. Statistical analysis employed 2-sided Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: From 2002 to 2010, 32 patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis were treated by minimally invasive procedures including MINE (n = 14) and ETG (n = 18) or with the classic technique of ONE (n = 30). Time from onset of symptoms to intervention was less for ONE than for MINE or ETG (median, 11 vs 39 vs 54 days; P < .05). The rate of critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock was greatest in ONE (93%) and MINE (71%) compared with ETG (17%; P < .05). Problems after ONE and MINE were ongoing sepsis (ONE 73% vs MINE 29% vs ETG 11%) and bleeding requiring intervention (ONE 26% vs MINE 21% vs ETG 17%). A specific complication of ETG was gastric perforation into the peritoneal cavity during the procedure (28%), requiring immediate open pseudocystogastrostomy. Laparotomy was necessary in 21% after MINE and 28% after ETG owing to specific complications or persistent infected necrosis. Overall mortality was greatest after ONE (ONE 63% vs MINE 21% vs ETG 6%; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Morbidity and mortality remains high in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Operative procedures should be delayed as long as possible to decrease morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive procedures can avoid laparotomy, but also introduce specific complications requiring immediate or secondary open operative treatment. Minimally invasive procedures require unique expertise and therefore should only be performed at specialized centers.