[Outcomes of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in diabetic patients]. / Résultats de la neurostimulation tibiale postérieure transcutanée pour hyperactivité vésicale chez les patients diabétiques.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment with transcutaneous posterior tibial neurostimulation (NTPT) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), but its outcomes in diabetic patients have never been assessed. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of NTPT in diabetic OAB patients and in OAB patients without diabetes. METHODS: A single-center prospective study included all patients treated with NTPT for lower urinary tract storage symptoms between 2012 and 2016. The primary endpoint was symptoms improvement≥50% assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) two months after starting NTPT. Treatment consisted in a daily 20-minute NTPT single-session. The secondary endpoints were lower urinary tract symptoms reported by bladder diary, the Urinary Symptom Profile, the impact on mood and on daily activities. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included, 10 of whom were diabetic. The efficacy rate (EVA>50%) was not significantly different in the diabetic group (70% vs. 44.1%, P=0.17), like the mean EVA efficacy was similar in both groups (4/10 vs. 4/10, P=0.98). OAB USP sub-score diminished significantly in both groups at 2 months (-3 points in the diabetic group; -1.9 points in the non-diabetic group; P=0.03 and P<0.0001, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups, except for the rate of patients who stopped treatment at 6 months, higher in diabetic patients (100% vs. 63.5%, P=0.04). CONCLUSION: The functional outcomes of NTPT appear to be similar in the treatment of OAB in diabetic patients and in non-diabetic patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Routine enema before urodynamics has no impact on the quality of abdominal pressure curves: Results of a prospective controlled study.

AIMS: The presence of stools in the rectum might affect the quality of the abdominal pressure curve during filling cystometry, but, to date, no study has evaluated the impact of bowel preparation before urodynamics. We evaluated the influence of a sodium phosphate enema before urodynamics on the quality of the abdominal pressure curve. METHODS: A prospective, controlled, single-blind study was conducted in a single center from May to June 2013. The patients were divided into 2 consecutive groups: patients seen in outpatient clinics during the first 6 weeks (group A) who underwent urodynamics without bowel preparation and patients seen in outpatient clinics during the second 6 weeks (group B) who had a prescription of sodium phosphate enema before urodynamics. The primary endpoint was the quality of the abdominal pressure curve evaluated independently by three physicians who were blinded to the study group. The following data were also collected: age, gender, the presence of a neurological disorder, complicated nature of urodynamics and bother related to preparation for it, assessed using a Likert scale (0 to 10), and the equipment used. A per protocol analysis and an intent-to-treat analysis were conducted. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients were included: 54 in group A and 85 in group B. One-third of patients had neurological conditions. 14 patients in group B did not perform their scheduled enema. Thus, 68 patients performed an enema before urodynamics and 71 did not. There was no difference between groups A and B regarding the complicated nature of urodynamics (Likert scale: 3.12 vs. 3.18; P=0.91) or bother related to preparation for it (Likert scale: 3.46 vs. 2.97; P=0.43). In the per protocol analysis, the abdominal pressure curve was considered perfectly interpretable (PI) in 69% of patients who did not receive an enema before urodynamics and in 65% of patients who did (P=0.61). The between-group difference was not statistically significant in intent-to-treat analysis (P=0.99). In patients who did not receive an enema before urodynamics, the only factors statistically associated with better quality of abdominal pressure curves were age <60years (P=0.001) and the urodynamic equipment used (Dantec®>Laborie®; P=0.01). CONCLUSION: In this prospective study, routine enema before urodynamics did not improve the quality of the abdominal pressure curve and did not increase the complicated nature of urodynamics or the bother of preparation for it. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Open surgery for haemorrhoids in persons with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Pilot retrospective study on the outcome of open surgery for grade III and IV haemorrhoids in patients with SCI. OBJECTIVE: Haemorrhoids and anal fissures are common in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Grade I to III haemorrhoids are usually managed medically or by surgical ligation. Grade III and IV haemorrhoids are treated with surgical haemorrhoidectomy in the general population, but not in patients with SCI, most probably due to fear of complications. SETTING: Fondation Hopale, Berck-sur Mer, France. METHODS: The surgical database was searched for open haemorrhoidectomies performed between 2007 and 2016. Seventeen patients were included. There were mostly males with complete paraplegia, mean age: 50 years and mean time since injury: 15.9 years. Open haemorrhoidectomy (Milligan and Morgan) was performed for isolated haemorrhoids (n = 4), and combined with Leopold Bellan procedure (posterior anoplasty and internal sphincterotomy) for associated anal fissures (n = 13). Short-term follow-up was performed by the surgeon (post-operative weeks 2 and 6), long-term follow-up by telephone interview (mean 5.7 years, SD 1.9). RESULTS: At 6-weeks post-operative, no significant complications had occurred and all wounds had healed, however 1 patient had recurrence of anal fissure. At long-term follow-up, 75% of patients reported a significant improvement in anorectal symptoms. Recurrences were reported by 5 patients: 3 haemorrhoids (18%) and 2 anal fissures (25%). Anal incontinence occurred in 1 patient who required an anal plug. All patients maintained the same bowel programs as pre-operative. CONCLUSIONS: Open surgery procedures were well tolerated and should be considered in persons with SCI.