RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate tools for measuring inpatient gastroenterology (GI) consultation quality on oncologic patients. METHODS: A total of 145 inpatient GI consults were analyzed using electronic health records in this cross-sectional study. Essential Consult Elements on oncologic-hospitalized patients (EE-COH) and Hospitalized Oncologic Patients Enhanced Quality of Consult Assessment Tool (HOPE-QCAT) were used for grading. Interrater reliability was assessed. RESULTS: Both EE-COH and HOPE-QCAT showed near-perfect interrater reliability across most measures in the validation cohort. On application of these measures for quality assessment, basic evaluation by the requesting hospitalist was partially complete in 24.8%, the request for GI consultation was inappropriate in 18.6%, while the rationale for recommended studies from the GI consultant was provided in 55.7% of cases suggesting key areas for quality improvement. CONCLUSION: We developed highly reliable quality measures for inpatient GI consults on oncology patients. The EE-COH and HOPE-QCAT tools can be utilized in future studies of inpatient GI consult quality and to form the basis for interventions to improve communication between consultants and hospitalists. Such tools could be adapted for inpatient quality assessment across other specialties and settings.
Asunto(s)
Gastroenterología , Derivación y Consulta , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Femenino , Gastroenterología/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Internos , Anciano , Neoplasias/terapia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Instituciones Oncológicas/normas , Adulto , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Registros Electrónicos de SaludAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Intestinal parasites, including helminths and protozoa, account for a significant portion of the global health burden. The gastrointestinal (GI) tract not only serves as the stage for these parasitic infections but also as the residence for millions of microbes. As the intricacies of the GI microbial milieu continue to unfold, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the interactions between host, parasite, and resident microbes help dictate parasite survival and, ultimately, disease outcomes. Across both clinical and experimental models, intestinal parasites have been shown to impact microbial composition and diversity. Reciprocally, microbes can directly influence parasitic survival, colonization and expulsion. The gut microbiota can also indirectly impact parasites through the influence and manipulation of the host. Studying this host-parasite-microbiota axis may help bring about novel therapeutic strategies for intestinal parasitic infection as well as conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this review, we explore the relationship between intestinal parasites, with a particular focus on common protozoa and helminths, and the gut microbiota, and how these interactions can influence the host defence and intestinal immune response. We will also explore the impact of this tripartite relationship in a clinical setting and its broader implications for human health.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The City of Hope National Medical Center (COH) is the only stand-alone comprehensive cancer center in Los Angeles, a county that was deemed a COVID-19 pandemic epicenter at the height of the 2020 winter surge. The immunocompromised patient population frequently experienced delays in infection control guidelines from local and government bodies due to minimal data available in comparison to the general population. This required COH to make swift, informed decisions for the best interest of the patient population. AIM: Here, we review the comprehensive COVID-19 infection control response conducted at COH within the context of a high-risk patient population, predominately comprised of patients with hematologic malignancies. METHODS AND RESULTS: This infection control response focused on prevention of COVID-19 transmission on campus, COVID-19 testing, and isolation management. These efforts consisted of COVID-19 screening, limitation of personnel on campus, source control, contact tracing, COVID-19 vaccination, establishment of in-house testing and implementation and management of COVID-19 testing. Between January 2020 and September 2021, COH implemented a robust in-house testing program, completed well over 1000 contact traces, ensured COVID-19 vaccinations were distributed to all eligible staff and patients, and established an algorithm for COVID-19 infection resolution, all without compromising the number of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HCTs) performed, surgical volume, or healthcare-associated standardized infection ratios (SIR). CONCLUSION: Institutional collaboration and attention to infection control was pivotal to minimizing the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Prueba de COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias/prevención & control , Los Angeles/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Control de Infecciones , Neoplasias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cancer patients infected with COVID-19 were shown in a multitude of studies to have poor outcomes on the basis of older age and weak immune systems from cancer as well as chemotherapy. In this study, the CT examinations of 22 confirmed COVID-19 cancer patients were analyzed. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 28 cancer patients, of which 22 patients were COVID positive. The CT scan changes before and after treatment and the extent of structural damage to the lungs after COVID-19 infection was analyzed. Structural damage to a lung was indicated by a change in density measured in Hounsfield units (HUs) and by lung volume reduction. A 3D radiometric analysis was also performed and lung and lesion histograms were compared. RESULTS: A total of 22 cancer patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. A repeat CT scan were performed in 15 patients after they recovered from infection. Most of the study patients were diagnosed with leukemia. A secondary clinical analysis was performed to show the associations of COVID treatment on the study subjects, lab data, and outcome on mortality. It was found that post COVID there was a decrease of >50% in lung volume and a higher density in the form of HUs due to scar tissue formation post infection. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that COVID-19 infection may have further detrimental effects on the lungs of cancer patients, thereby, decreasing their lung volume and increasing their lung density due to scar formation.