Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender, and age.

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of flexible flatfoot in elementary school children in Taiwan and evaluate the relationship between flatfoot and obesity, gender, and age. A sample of 2,083 children, between 7 and 12 years of age from public elementary schools in northern Taiwan was analyzed. Children were stratified into groups according to age: 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12 years old. Demographic information was obtained, and the presence of flatfoot determined by footprint analysis and grading according to Denis flatfoot staging. A total of 1,222 (59%) children were documented with flatfoot. The incidence percentages of flatfoot were: 67% of males, 49% of females, and 75%, 65%, 57%, and 48% of obese, overweight, normal weight, and underweight children, respectively. A preponderance of flatfoot was observed among 8-year-olds. Multivariate analyses indicated that 8- and 9-year-olds were 1.52 and 0.72 times more likely to have flatfoot than 7-year-olds. Males were twice as likely to have flatfoot as females. Children who were obese or overweight were 2.66 and 1.39 times more likely to have flatfoot than those of average weight. The results of this study indicate that the prevalence of flexible flatfoot is highest among males who are obese and overweight, particularly in the age range of 7 to 8 years.

Comparison of arthroplasty vs. osteosynthesis for displaced femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis compared clinical outcomes of arthroplasty vs. osteosynthesis for displaced femoral neck fractures. METHODS: Meta-analysis was performed on the difference in revision rate and overall mortality between participants undergoing osteosynthesis vs. total hip arthroplasty (THA), osteosynthesis vs. hemiarthroplasty (HA), or THA vs. HA. RESULTS: Pooled direct and indirect results indicated no significant difference in mortality between THA and HA (pooled OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.38; P = 0.556), between THA and osteosynthesis (pooled OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.99; P = 0.553), and between HA and osteosynthesis (pooled OR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.74; P = 0.304). Pooled direct and indirect results indicated no significant difference in revision rates between THA and HA (pooled OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.19; P = 0.874). But, fewer revisions (OR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.34; P = 0.000) were seen in patients treated with THA than osteosynthesis and also in those treated with HA than osteosynthesis (OR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.20; P = 0.000). After excluding studies without showing normal cognition in inclusion criteria, pooled direct and indirect results also indicated no significant difference in mortality between THA, HA, and osteosynthesis. Similarly, there was no significant difference in revision rates between THA and HA, but HA and THA had significantly lower revision rates compared with osteosynthesis. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in overall mortality among osteosynthesis, HA, and THA. However, HA and THA had significantly lower revision rates compared with osteosynthesis. Results of the present study provide support for the use of hip arthroplasty to treat displaced fractures of the femoral neck.