RESUMEN
Objective:To explore the clinical features of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor-associated hypophysitis and improve the understanding of the disease.Methods:For the present retrospective case series study, the clinical data of patients with PD-1 inhibitor-associated hypophysitis who were treated at the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University and the 3rd Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2020 to May 2023 were collected for analysis of clinical manifestations and prognosis.Results:Fifteen cases of PD-1 inhibitor-induced hypophysitis were included, with 13 males and 2 females. The mean age of onset was (62.1±7.5) years, and the median time of onset was 6.5 (4.7, 11.6) cycles of PD-1 inhibitor. At diagnosis, 14 patients complained of gastrointestinal symptoms, and 12 patients complained of fatigue. There were 12, 1, 1, 5, and 1 cases of hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hypoglycemia, hypotension, and fever, respectively. Secondary adrenocortical insufficiency occurred in all cases. Moreover, four patients had secondary hypothyroidism, and two patients had secondary hypogonadism. Posterior pituitary hypofunction was not found. Pituitary MRI showed one case each of vacuolar sella turcica, pituitary cystic lesion, pituitary stalk slightly shifted to the left, high metabolism in the sella turcica, and pituitary abnormal signal, while no abnormalities were found in 11 cases. The follow-up time was (47.66±11.93) weeks. At the last follow-up, one patient′s serum levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol returned to normal.Conclusions:Hypophysitis associated with PD-1 inhibitors occurs later, and gastrointestinal symptoms and fatigue are the most common clinical manifestations. PD-1 inhibitor-associated hypophysitis mainly manifests as adrenocortical hypofunction, and some cases manifest as hypothyroidism and hypogonadism. In addition, patients with PD-1 inhibitor-associated hypophysitis show no obvious imaging changes in the pituitary gland.
RESUMEN
Objective:To compare the efficacy of single-agent versus multi-agent adjuvant chemotherapy after radical gastrectomy for elderly patients with stage Ⅲ gastric cancer.Methods:The propensity score matching and retrospective cohort study were conducted. The clinicopatholo-gical data of 456 elderly patients with stage Ⅲ gastric cancer who underwent D 2 radical resection in the Renji Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine from January 2016 to December 2020 were collected. There were 343 males and 113 females, aged 71(range, 65?89)years. Of the 456 patients, 274 cases undergoing single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery were divided into single-agent chemotherapy group, 182 cases undergoing double-agent or triple-agent adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery were divided into multi-agent chemotherapy group. Observa-tion indicators: (1) propensity score matching and comparison of general data of patients between the two groups after matching; (2) adverse events during chemotherapy; (3) follow-up. Propensity score matching was done by the 1∶1 ratio, with the caliper value of 0.05. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was conducted using the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range). Count data were described as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data between groups was conducted using the non-parameter rank sum test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw survival curves and calculate survival rates, and the Log-Rank test was used for survival analysis. Results:(1) Propensity score matching and comparison of general data of patients between the two groups after matching. Of 456 patients, 306 cases were successfully matched, including 153 cases in the single-agent chemotherapy group and 153 cases in the multi-agent chemotherapy group. The elimination of age, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, pathological TNM staging confounding bias ensured comparability between the two groups after propensity score matching. (2) Adverse events during chemotherapy. In terms of hematological adverse events, 6 cases in the single-agent chemotherapy group and 16 cases in the multi-agent chemotherapy group had neutropenia, showing a significant difference in the neutropenia ( χ2=4.90, P<0.05). In terms of non-hematological adverse events, cases with anorexia and nausea were 77 and 50 for the single-agent chemotherapy group, versus 96 and 69 for the multi-agent chemotherapy group, showing significant differences between the two groups ( χ2=4.80, 4.96, P<0.05). (3)Follow-up. All the 306 patients were followed up for 48(range, 8?61)months. The 5-year overall survival rates of the single-agent chemotherapy group and the multi-agent chemotherapy group were 36.08% and 38.31%, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( hazard ratio=0.93, 95% confidence interval as 0.70?1.20, P>0.05). Results of further analysis showed that the 5-year overall survival rates were 32.41% and 39.40% for 97 patients of the single-agent chemotherapy group and 97 patients with double-agent regimen of the multi-agent chemotherapy group, respectively, showing no significant difference between them ( hazard ratio=1.20, 95% confidence interval as 0.82?1.70, P>0.05). The 5-year overall survival rates were 43.15% and 37.11% for 56 patients of the single-agent chemotherapy group and 56 patients with triple-agent regimen of the multi-agent chemotherapy group, respectively, showing no significant difference between them ( hazard ratio=0.81, 95% confidence interval as 0.65?1.00, P>0.05). Conclusions:For adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with stage Ⅲ gastric cancer, there is no significant survival advantage of double-agent or triple-agent chemotherapy over single-agent oral chemotherapy. However, there is a higher incidence of neutropenia, anorexia, ausea.
RESUMEN
Preserving gastric function and improving quality of life (QOL) is the tendency of surgery for early gastric cancer. Function preserving gastrectomy (FPG) is applied to modify the extent of surgery and to achieve better quality of life at the premise of radical resection. Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy is the most favorable approach of FPG with oncological safety, which can improve nutritional status and QOL via preserving pylorus and vagal nerve. Proximal gastrectomy is widely accepted as FPG for early upper 1/3 gastric cancer. However, the most optimal way of anastomosis is not yet solved. Sentinel node navigation is currently the most accurate approach for intraoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis, which stimulates the development of many kinds of FPG procedures for individual treatment. Nevertheless, more efforts should be made to reduce false negative rate of sentinel node biopsy. Herein we discuss the valuation and prospect of FPG.