An assessment of career satisfaction among a group of general dental practitioners in Staffordshire.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the level of job satisfaction among general dental practitioners from one area of England, and to assess the association of various personal and work related factors with job satisfaction. DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey. SETTING: General dental practices in South Staffordshire, Wolverhampton and Dudley, England. METHOD: An anonymous questionnaire posted to all 396 registered dentists in the above areas. RESULTS: A 75% response rate was achieved. Data were analysed using non-parametric statistics for any significant differences in the scores for stress, respect, overall professional satisfaction, quality of life and overall job satisfaction according to the different demographic groupings of the dentists (alpha =0.05). Dentists with an area of special interest had higher scores in all categories except quality of life. Overall job satisfaction was higher among private dentists, and those in group practices and in non-rural locations. The highest bi-variate correlation occurred between overall job satisfaction and overall professional satisfaction, delivery of care, income, respect and professional time. CONCLUSIONS: Job satisfaction was judged to be good among this group. Stress was the factor associated with the greatest dissatisfaction. This survey produced similar results to preceding US studies, and suggests ways of improving job satisfaction.

Agreement among dentists' recommendations for restorative treatment.

Differences among dentists in their decisions to recommend treatment have been studied principally at a "macro" level by examinations of variations in dentists' treatment recommendations for individual patients, or for patients aggregated to the practice level. If reasons for these differences are to be understood, however, a "micro" level examination of differences in dentists' decisions to recommend treatment for individual teeth is necessary. Extent of agreement to recommend treatment among dentists was explored for 1187 teeth in 43 patients. Each tooth was examined by a mean of 6.6 general practitioners. A modified reliability index and distributions of raw levels of agreement were used for quantification of agreement rates across an incomplete cross-classification for practitioners and patients. Overall inter-dentist reliability in recommending individual teeth for treatment was moderate, p = 0.62. Among unrestored teeth with no clinically evident caries, as judged by an independent experienced evident caries, as judged by an independent experienced examiner, reliability in treatment recommendations due to caries was fair, p = 0.51. Reliability was lowest for recommendations concerning previously restored teeth, p = 0.43. Among all teeth receiving at least one recommendation for treatment, only 22% received a unanimous recommendation. Over one-half of all instances of lack of agreement resulted from a single dentist's recommendation differing from those of all other dentists examining the tooth. The results suggest that much of the variation in dentists' practice profiles is due to basic differences in decisions to recommend treatment for individual teeth with specific conditions, and that the presence of previous restorations seems to magnify these differences.

Movement of teeth adjacent to posterior bounded edentulous spaces.

Bounded edentulous spaces (BES)-a missing posterior tooth with intact adjacent teeth-are thought to lead to arch collapse resulting from the movement of adjacent teeth. To determine the rate of change in distance between teeth adjacent to a BES, we examined three successive measurable radiographs of 116 untreated posterior BES cases. The distance between the teeth (DBT) adjacent to the space was measured, and change in DBT (delta DBT) between pre-extraction and follow-up radiographs was calculated. We used linear spline regression to construct models for tooth movement and to identify factors associated with delta DBT. The mean delta DBT was < 1 mm during the first year post-extraction, and the DBT continued to decrease at a successively slower rate each following year. Overall and for each tooth type, the greatest rates of decrease in DBT were seen in the zero to two-year period. In a multivariable model, time since extraction and tooth type were significantly associated with delta DBT. These findings suggest that movement of teeth adjacent to a posterior BES after the first two years is usually gradual and minor within the time frame of this study.

An integrated health care model in medical education: interviews with faculty and administrators.

PURPOSE: To broaden the understanding of how medical schools can help students learn an approach to health care that reflects the integration of psychosocial and biomedical factors in health and illness. METHOD: A qualitative research design was used, with data collected through document review and semi-structured interviews conducted in the spring and summer of 1992 with 22 faculty and administrators from 17 U.S. and Canadian medical schools. The interviewees represented the following disciplines: internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, psychiatry, and preventive/behavioral medicine. An analytic framework was developed, within which the constant comparative method was used on a continuous basis during and after data collection. Category development focused on (1) defining the scope and character of an integrated perspective, (2) delineating various ways to incorporate such a perspective in medical education, and (3) identifying barriers to and facilitative factors for incorporating such a perspective in medical education. Validity was assessed by having the interviewees and three other faculty members review the analyses and preliminary results. RESULTS: The interviewees' conceptions of an integrated perspective on health care focused on the theoretical need for a broader scientific model and on the practical need for more inclusive approaches to medical practice. The interviewees described patient-level and community-level approaches as equally important. The ideal curricula envisioned by the interviewees were patient-centered, integrated, developmental, and population-based. In addition to naming many barriers to integration (e.g., negative attitudes of faculty and administrators, diffuse organization of medical schools, ignorance of appropriate curriculum design and implementation), the interviewees identified certain facilitative factors (e.g., strong leaders, faculty development programs, and reform of the faculty reward system). CONCLUSION: The interviewees envisioned an integrated model of health care that suggests that medical curricula should address the development of physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and skills regarding physicians' relationships with both patients and community.

Teaching an integrated approach to health care: lessons from five schools.

Medical education has excelled in bringing a sound biomedical base to the practice of medicine; however, there is now growing interest in helping students and residents learn an integrated approach to health care that addresses the complex interaction of many factors influencing health and illness. The authors' purpose was to learn about how some medical schools teach students a more integrated approach to health care. They used a qualitative, multiple-case-study design and collected data through document review and interviews with faculty, administrators, students, and residents at five U.S. and Canadian medical schools, chosen for their reputed excellence in addressing an integrated approach to care. Visits to the schools were made in the spring of 1993. Data analysis focussed on the institutional factors associated with teaching such an approach and the ways in which the schools help students and residents learn about this approach. The interviewees described the strong presence of an institutional mission or philosophy that is unique to each school but that generally has a service-oriented, patient-centered perspective. They reported that the primary means for learning about an integrated approach was the attention, woven into the curriculum, to four relationships; physician-patient, physician-community, physician-other practitioners, and faculty-student. A broad-based shared mission or philosophy was important in focusing attention on the integration of biomedical and non-biomedical concerns and promoting a perspective that focuses outward toward the community and its people. The pervasive attention to the four relationships suggests that such attention is intimately related to each school's underlying mission or philosophy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

What do we know about how dentists make caries-related treatment decisions?

A conceptual model of dentists' treatment decision-making is discussed. The model suggests that dentists do not use a hypothetico-deductive process for the diagnosis of caries. Rather, caries is identified through a process of pattern recognition that in most instances is inextricably linked to intervention decisions. Individual dentists have inventories of caries scripts that, when matched by a particular clinical presentation, lead to decisions to treat. The scripts comprise salient factors that are dependent on individual dentist's characteristics and biases, and thus vary substantially across dentists. The scripts tend to be complex, highly visual, and difficult to describe. All of these characteristics suggest that efforts to improve dentists' caries-related treatment decisions should acknowledge this knowledge structure and be designed to change the salient factors or interpretations of salient factors within the context of the caries script.

A systematic review of selected caries prevention and management methods.

A systematic review of the periodic scientific literature was undertaken to determine the strength of the evidence for the efficacy of professional caries preventive methods applied to high risk individuals, and the efficacy of professionally applied methods to arrest or reverse non-cavitated carious lesions. An initial search identified 1435 articles, of which 27 were eventually included in the review. Among the 22 studies addressing the prevention of carious lesions in caries-active or high risk individuals, the strength of the evidence was judged to be fair for fluoride varnishes and insufficient for all other methods. Among the seven studies addressing the management of non-cavitated carious lesions, the strength of the evidence for efficacy was judged to be insufficient for all methods. The results do not indicate that the preventive and management methods reviewed are not efficacious; rather, they demonstrate that not enough is known to determine the efficacy of the methods. Suggestions for strengthening the limited evidence base involve the following: i) increasing the number of studies that examine prevention among high risk individuals and non-surgical management of non-cavitated lesions, ii) including a wider variety of subject ages, iii) targeting aspects of the efficacy questions not yet addressed, iv) strengthening research methods employed in the studies, and v) reporting methods and outcomes more completely.

Using crowns to prevent tooth fracture.

Placing crowns to prevent tooth fracture is thought to be a common but infrequently documented treatment procedure. Two studies are described that provide information about dentists' use of crowns to prevent tooth fracture. North Carolina general dentists indicated that 44% of the crowns they placed were for the principal reason of fracture prevention. However, when groups of dentists examined the same patients, there was little agreement about which teeth should be crowned due to risk of fracture. These results suggest that the placing of crowns to prevent fracture merits a careful determination of effectiveness and appropriateness.

Incidence rates for complete cusp fracture.

OBJECTIVES: Although complete cusp fracture is acknowledged to occur frequently, incidence rates have been reported rarely. This study determined incidence rates for complete coronal cusp fracture per person and per tooth type. METHODS: All fractures presenting among enrollees in a dental health maintenance organization using two geographically isolated clinics were noted for 105 days. For a sample of these enrollees, likelihood of attending the clinic in the event of a fracture was assessed through a telephone survey, and the at-risk status of all teeth was determined through a record survey. Incidence rates were calculated for persons, and for individual tooth types for all complete fractures and for non-carious complete fractures. In addition, for posterior teeth the distribution of fractured cusps, and the severity of fractures were examined. RESULTS: Per-person incidence rates for complete coronal fractures for all teeth were 89.0 and 72.7 per 1000 person years, respectively, for all fractures and for non-carious fractures. The rates for all anterior and all posterior teeth were 10.2 and 69.9, respectively, for all non-carious fractures. In mandibular posterior teeth, lingual cusps fractured twice as frequently as facial cusps, while the opposite was true for maxillary premolars. Among maxillary molars, the mesiofacial and distolingual cusps fractured most frequently. The large majority of fractures exposed dentin (95%), while pulpal exposure occurred infrequently (3%). A minority of fractures extended below the gingival crest (24%) or the DEJ (25%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of fracture incidence rates for enumerated persons and teeth at risk and as such helps define the magnitude of the problem for dentists and their patients.

Relationship between epidemiologic coronal caries assessments and practitioners' treatment recommendations in adults.

Caries incidence determinations in adults reflect dentists' treatment decisions as well as epidemiologists' caries assessments because many patients receive treatment between the two assessments that are required to determine incidence. Yet knowledge of the relationship between epidemiologically assessed caries and practitioners' treatment recommendations is poor. In this study, the proportions of practitioners recommending treatment for a tooth, and the reasons for those recommendations, were compared across teeth grouped by their caries status as determined from an epidemiologic assessment. On average, for a tooth deemed carious by epidemiologic assessment, a mean of almost 90% of examining practitioners recommended treatment. Most but not all of these recommendations for treatment of teeth with epidemiologically determined caries were for caries-related reasons. Among teeth classified as sound by epidemiological assessment, the mean proportion of dentists recommending treatment was 11%. For restored, non-carious teeth a mean of 35% of examining dentists recommended treatment. Across all noncarious teeth, 25% of all treatment recommendations were related to caries. The mean patient F increment (number of newly filled surfaces) that would result from treatment recommendations practitioners indicated as being associated with caries was slightly less than one-half of the total F increment. Thus, F increments may substantially overestimate caries incidence.

Case-control study of non-carious cervical lesions.

An exploratory case-control study of non-carious cervical lesions was undertaken to examine the effects of a variety of risk factors. Candidate exposure variables were related to erosion, abrasion, and tooth flexure, the three principal putative causal mechanisms for cervical lesions. Because previous studies have tended to focus on specific causal mechanisms, evidence for a multifactorial etiology is inconclusive. Data describing exposure factors were obtained through clinical examination, dietary and behavioral questionnaires, and analysis of study casts from 264 subjects (137 cases, 127 control). Salivary data were also obtained for a subset of these subjects. Patient and tooth-level logistic regression models were constructed for the full subject group, and the subset with salivary data. For the two patient-level models, only exposures related to brushing entered. For tooth-level models, multiple exposures representing all three causal mechanisms were included in both models. The results suggest that non-carious cervical lesions do have a multifactorial etiology, and that multiple causal mechanisms may operate in the initiation and progression of individual lesions.

Non-carious cervical lesions.

Non-carious cervical lesions are commonly encountered in clinical practice and present in a variety of forms. A knowledge of the aetiology of these lesions is important for preventing further lesions, halting progression of lesions already present, and determining appropriate treatment. The most commonly cited aetiological factors thought to lead to the development of cervical lesions are erosion, abrasion and tooth flexure. Evidence supports a multifactorial aetiology for non-carious cervical lesions. The purpose of this paper is to review the evidence for each of these aetiological factors as it relates to the development of non-carious cervical lesions. Specific features of cervical lesions linked to these factors, including their morphology, location, prevalence and distribution by age and sex will be discussed. Suggestions for future research into the cause and prevention of non-carious cervical lesions will be presented.

A systematic review of the effectiveness of antifungal drugs for the prevention and treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-positive patients.

OBJECTIVE: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials published between 1966 and April 2000 was undertaken to determine the strength of evidence for the effectiveness of antifungal drugs (nystatin, clotrimazole, amphotericin B, fluconazole, ketoconazole, and itraconazole) to prevent and treat oral candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients. STUDY DESIGN: An automated database search identified 366 articles. Six met inclusion and exclusion criteria with respect to prophylaxis; 12 met criteria for treatment of oral candidiasis. RESULTS: The evidence for the prophylactic efficacy of fluconazole is good, although insufficient to draw conclusions about the other antifungals. Evidence for treatment effectiveness is insufficient for amphotericin B but good for nystatin, clotrimazole, fluconazole, ketoconazole, and itraconazole. CONCLUSION: Suggestions for strengthening the evidence base include the following: use of larger, more well-defined groups; control for immunologic status, viral load, history of oral candidiasis, past exposure to antifungals, baseline oral Candida carriage, drug interactions, and antiretroviral therapy; and consistent use of compliance monitors, fungal speciation, and susceptibility testing.

Understanding dentists' restorative treatment decisions.

A critical review of the literature is presented that examines variation in dentists' restorative treatment decisions and the factors associated with this variation. Substantial variation has been documented in dentists' assessment of caries, in dentists' decisions to intervene, and in the selection of treatment recommended to the patient. However, the factors associated with this variation are not well documented. Following discussion of this review, a model is proposed to help guide further studies of dentists' restorative treatment decisions. This explanatory model incorporates the factors identified in the review, as well as others either observed informally or found in the medical literature. The implications of variation in dentists' treatment decisions highlight the importance of a full explication of the process dentists follow in making treatment decisions. Understanding this process, which heretofore has been examined only superficially because it has been regarded as a function of "clinical judgement," is fundamental to determinations of normative treatment needs, to interventions designed to reduce the frequency of inappropriate treatment, and to the development of valid practice parameters.

Cost implications of differences in dentists' restorative treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the effects of variation in both dentists' decisions to treat and choice of treatment on the costs of care. METHODS: Each of 37 patients was examined individually by several practicing dentists (between 3-22, mean = 6.2). For each dentist's recommended treatment for each patient, the total cost of restorative treatment was calculated first using the least expensive treatment possible for each tooth indicated as needing treatment, and second using the costs of specific treatment selected by each dentist RESULTS: Considerable variation was found among dentists in each patients cost of treatment using both methods. The mean of the median cost per patient of the specific treatment selected was three times larger than the cost per patient of basic treatment. Few dentists were found to consistently recommend higher or lower cost treatment plans. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that inconsistencies in both dentists' decisions to intervene and dentists' selection of treatment can have a profound effect on cost. Further, focusing utilization review on "outlier dentists" is likely to be much less productive in containing costs and improving quality than comprehensive attempts to improve consistency across the profession.

Descriptive models of restorative treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVES: This study developed descriptive models of dentists' restorative treatment decisions for individual teeth. Such models could be useful in personnel planning, in assessing the effects of dental treatment programs, and in furthering understanding of dentists' decision-making processes. METHODS: Logistic regression was used to construct models of the probability of individual teeth receiving a recommendation for restorative treatment. Independent variables for the models were data from epidemiologic oral examinations and self-administered questionnaires of subjects who were seeking treatment at a dental school. Data for the dependent variable, the probability of treatment, were collected from multiple dentists' treatment plans of these subjects. Separate models were constructed for molar, premolar, and anterior teeth. An assessment of the models' utilities in a different population consisted of comparing the treatment probabilities estimated by the models with those actually experienced by a community sample of 317 individuals who visited dentists in the 18 months following our examination. RESULTS: Constructed models for molar, premolar, and anterior teeth returned kappa values of 0.60, 0.62, and 0.65, respectively, for the original data set. The models were less accurate in identifying which teeth received treatment among subjects in the community sample, with kappas of 0.10, 0.18, and 0.20, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Models of dentists' restorative treatment decision making based on clinical and nonclinical data can determine the probability of treatment for individual teeth with reasonable accuracy. Hence, the approach holds promise for developing measures of normative treatment need. However, the models are not accurate predictors of dichotomous decisions by individual dentists regarding treatment interventions. Both differences in the subject samples used to develop and assess the models and individual dentist idiosyncrasies may contribute to this inaccuracy.

Variation in dentists' clinical decisions.

OBJECTIVES: The first comprehensive review of the recent literature regarding variation in dentists' clinical treatment decisions is presented. METHODS: Variation among dentists in the clinical decisions they make as well as the methods used for assessing this variation are examined at three levels of aggregation of clinical decisions: the dental practice (or dentist), the patient, and the individual tooth. RESULTS: The extent to which differences in dentists' clinical decisions have been examined is limited. Studies are particularly sparse at the level of the dental practice, where the aggregate of dentists' treatment decisions is reflected. Further, the methods and measures used to assess variation tend to be different across studies, making quantification of variation difficult. Nevertheless, the available information reflects substantial variation in measures such as rates of provision of specific procedures; cost and numbers of procedures recommended for specific patients; and diagnoses, intervention decisions, and treatment selections for individual teeth. CONCLUSIONS: Even when differences in patients are controlled, variation in dentists' clinical decisions is ubiquitous. While its consequences remain undetermined, the variation in basic clinical decisions such as caries diagnosis signals the need to consider the extent to which the appropriateness of care is affected.

Expanding health insurance coverage and the implications for dentistry.

Numerous proposals have been suggested for expanding health insurance coverage to the over 30 million Americans without health insurance. These proposals range from establishing a program of national health insurance modeled after the Canadian system to establishing statewide risk pools. Many of these proposals could have an impact on financial access to dental care for the approximately 120 million people without dental insurance. Dental insurance coverage has been shown to increase access to dental services and improve oral health status. Oral health professionals could facilitate discussions concerning health insurance expansion by informing policymakers about important preventive benefits to be gained by improving access to dental services. Dental public health professionals can serve as a bridge between organized dentistry and health policymakers by providing information to help formulate the priorities and characteristics of a dental health insurance program. This visibility and influence in the health policy arena would be beneficial to dentistry and could ultimately result in greater access to dental services and improved oral health for the uninsured.

Dentist reliability in classifying disease risk and reason for treatment.

OBJECTIVES: The reliability of practicing dentists' classifications of patients' caries risk and periodontal disease risk and reason for treatment for individual teeth were determined. The risk classification protocols had been in use in a group practice for more than a year, and the reason-for-treatment protocol had been introduced six months previously. METHODS: Eight dentists' classifications for caries (n = 66) and periodontal disease risk (n = 66), and six dentists' classifications for reason for treatment (n = 73) were compared to those of a nominal standard examiner. Reliability was expressed as percent agreement and kappa values. RESULTS: Percent agreement was 76 percent, 83 percent, and 74 percent for caries, periodontal disease, and reason for treatment, respectively, with kappa values of 0.56, 0.70, and 0.69. CONCLUSIONS: Dentists can attain reasonable levels of reliability using simple classification protocols with little formal training, although misclassification may be problematic for specific administrative or research-related purposes.

Development of effectiveness of care and use of services measures for dental care plans.

OBJECTIVES: Standardized measures to assess clinical aspects of the performance of managed dental care plans are not available. This project sought to develop and evaluate measures for effectiveness of care and use of services that could be calculated using a plan's administrative data. METHODS: Two panels of stake holders representing dental plans, purchasers, and dental providers participated in a modified Delphi process to refine initial sets of effectiveness of care and use of services measures modeled after HEDIS measures for medical care. The refined measures were then pilot tested in two dental health maintenance organizations. RESULTS: The development process resulted in specification of seven effectiveness of care measures assessing disease activity classification, and prevention and outcomes for caries, periodontal disease, and tooth loss. Six use of services measures focusing on prophylaxes, third molar surgery, preventive, restorative, prosthetic, surgical, and endodontic care also were specified. Pilot testing of the measures indicated reasonable reliability and sensitivity, but also demonstrated the need for supervision or auditing of the process. CONCLUSIONS: These standardized measures for dental care plan performance are available for immediate use. However, because the measures depend on diagnostic information (periodontal probing data and diagnoses associated with restorative treatments) in the administrative data set, their adoption will require changes in most plans' data systems and data collection policies.