Curcumin and enalapril ameliorate renal failure by antagonizing inflammation in 5/6 nephrectomized rats: role of phospholipase and cyclooxygenase.

Previously, we showed that curcumin prevents chronic kidney disease (CKD) development in ⅚ nephrectomized (Nx) rats when given within 1 wk after Nx (Ghosh SS, Massey HD, Krieg R, Fazelbhoy ZA, Ghosh S, Sica DA, Fakhry I, Gehr TW. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 296: F1146-F1157, 2009). To better mimic the scenario for renal disease in humans, we began curcumin and enalapril therapy when proteinuria was already established. We hypothesized that curcumin, by blocking the inflammatory mediators TNF-α and IL-1ß, could also reduce cyclooxygenase (COX) and phospholipase expression in the kidney. Nx animals were divided into untreated Nx, curcumin-treated, and enalapril-treated groups. Curcumin (75 mg/kg) and enalapril (10 mg/kg) were administered for 10 wk. Renal dysfunction in the Nx group, as evidenced by elevated blood urea nitrogen, plasma creatinine, proteinuria, segmental sclerosis, and tubular dilatation, was comparably reduced by curcumin and enalapril, with only enalapril significantly lowering blood pressure. Compared with controls, Nx animals had higher plasma/kidney TNF-α and IL-1ß, which were reduced by curcumin and enalapril treatment. Nx animals had significantly elevated kidney levels of cytosolic PLA(2), calcium-independent intracellular PLA(2), COX 1, and COX 2, which were comparably reduced by curcumin and enalapril. Studies in mesangial cells and macrophages were carried out to establish that the in vivo increase in PLA(2) and COX were mediated by TNF-α and IL-1ß and that curcumin, by antagonizing the cytokines, could significantly reduce both PLA(2) and COX. We conclude that curcumin ameliorates CKD by blocking inflammatory signals even if it is given at a later stage of the disease.

Hemoglobin A1 in renal transplant recipients.

Studies were undertaken to determine levels of hemoglobin A1 in renal and heart transplant recipients. Hemoglobin A1 was measured by separation from Hb A using an affinity-column chromatography system. Significantly elevated levels of Hb A1 were found in all renal transplant patients; diabetic transplant recipients had the highest levels. There was no correlation between serum creatinine and Hb A1 levels in these transplant recipients. The Hb A1 level did correlate with the prior level of glycemia in these patients. Our findings raised the specter of the consequences of disturbed carbohydrate metabolism in these patients as not being different than that observed with other forms of end-stage renal disease management. Finally, in both diabetic and nondiabetic renal transplant recipients, measurement of Hb A1 can serve as a useful adjunct to assess prior glycemia when such information is not available to the clinician.

Novel combinations in the treatment of hypertension.

Not uncommonly the effective treatment of hypertension requires multi-drug therapy. Multi-drug combinations that dominate clinical practice typically include a thiazide-type diuretic together with either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, or an angiotensin-receptor blocker, or a beta-blocker. On the other hand, there are several medication choices that provide incremental blood pressure reduction but all too often go under-appreciated as to their effectiveness. Such drug combinations include within class switching of diuretics, combining a thiazide-type diuretic with a calcium-channel blocker, utilizing 2 calcium-channel blockers from different classes, giving an ACE inhibitor together with an angiotensin-receptor blocker, adding an aldosterone receptor antagonist to any of several other drug classes, as well as adding nitrate therapy to any of several other drug classes. Such novel pharmacologic approaches offer useful options for treatment in the otherwise difficult to control hypertensive patient.

Variability in salt sensitivity classifications in black male versus female adolescents.

Salt sensitivity (changes in blood pressure in response to alterations in salt intake) may be a risk factor for hypertension. In the present study, we examined the prevalence of salt sensitivity based on two different classifications in healthy black male and female adolescents (aged 13 to 16 years). A total of 135 black adolescents participated in a 50 mmol/24 h low sodium diet for 5 days and a 150 mmol/24 h NaCl supplement for 10 days. Dietary compliance was defined as sodium excretion less than or equal to 50 mmol/24 h for the low sodium diet and greater than or equal to 165 mmol/24h for the high NaCl supplement. Salt sensitivity was defined by two classifications: (1) as a decrease in mean blood pressure greater than or equal to 5 mm Hg from baseline to the low sodium diet, and (2) as an increase in mean blood pressure greater than or equal to 5 mm Hg from the low sodium diet to the high NaCl supplement. With classification 1, 14% of boys were identified as salt sensitive compared with 22% of girls. With classification 2, however, 31% of boys were identified as salt sensitive compared with 18% of girls. Analyses based on changes in systolic pressure demonstrated similar findings across sex, although overall classifications based on systolic pressure yielded a greater percentage of salt-sensitive subjects. These sex differences in classification patterns were not due to differences in other important variables, such as changes in sodium excretion, potassium excretion, or Quetelet index. These results suggest that the prevalence of salt sensitivity differs by sex depending on the type of protocol used for the classification of salt sensitivity in a black pediatric population.

Socioeconomic status and blood pressure reactivity in healthy black adolescents.

Adolescents in low-socioeconomic-status environments are more susceptible to illnesses, such as hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. This study examined the influence of both neighborhood- and family-level socioeconomic status (SES) on blood pressure (BP) reactivity in a healthy sample of 76 black adolescents. It was hypothesized that a higher level of parental education and/or income would reduce the elevated BP reactivity associated with living in poorer neighborhoods. Census-derived data were obtained using each participant's address. Neighborhood level of SES was based on percentage of households below the poverty line, female-headed households, owner-occupied housing, percentage vacant housing, and average number of persons per household. Family level of SES was based on self-reported level of parental education and annual family income. Adolescents participated in a competitive video game to establish their BP reactivity scores. As predicted, adolescents who lived in poorer neighborhoods had lower diastolic BPs if their parents were more (versus less) educated (P<0.05; 7+/-8 versus 13+/-6 mm Hg). Adolescents who lived in poorer neighborhoods also had significantly lower diastolic BP reactivity (P<0.05) if their family had a higher (versus lower) annual income (7+/-7 versus 12+/-8 mm Hg). These data are the first to demonstrate the buffering effect of family SES on the negative health consequences of living in low-SES neighborhoods in healthy black adolescents.

Effects of potassium on blood pressure in salt-sensitive and salt-resistant black adolescents.

This study examined the effects of increasing dietary potassium on ambulatory blood pressure nondipping status (<10% decrease in blood pressure from awake to asleep) and cardiovascular reactivity in salt-sensitive and salt-resistant black adolescents. A sample of 58 normotensive (blood pressure, 101/57+/-9/4 mm Hg) black adolescents (aged 13 to 16 years) participated in a 5-day low sodium diet (50 mmol/24 h) followed by a 10-day high sodium diet (150 mmol/24 h NaCl supplement) to determine salt-sensitivity status. Participants showed a significant increase in urinary sodium excretion (24+/-19 to 224+/-65 mmol/24 h) and were identified as salt-sensitive if their mean blood pressure increase was >/=5 mm Hg from the low to high sodium diet. Sixteen salt-sensitive and 42 salt-resistant subjects were then randomly assigned to either a 3-week high potassium diet (80 mmol/24 h) or usual diet control group. Urinary potassium excretion significantly increased in the treatment group (35+/-7 to 57+/-21 mmol/24 h). At baseline, a significantly greater percentage of salt-sensitive (44%) compared with salt-resistant (7%) subjects were nondippers on the basis of diastolic blood pressure classifications (P<0.04). After the dietary intervention, all of the salt-sensitive subjects in the high potassium group achieved dipper status as a result of a drop in nocturnal diastolic blood pressure (daytime, 69 versus 67 mm Hg; nighttime, 69 versus 57 mm Hg). No significant group differences in cardiovascular reactivity were observed. These results suggest that a positive relationship between dietary potassium intake and blood pressure modulation can still exist even when daytime blood pressure is unchanged by a high potassium diet.

Furosemide pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in renal transplantation.

Furosemide was administered intravenously to four patients who had undergone renal transplantation in the past and four creatinine clearance--matched control subjects. Both patients who had undergone renal transplant and control subjects displayed similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behavior, as assessed by drug delivery to the urine and sodium excretion, respectively. Despite similar degrees of natriuresis, patients who had undergone renal transplantation demonstrated a clear defect in urine potassium excretion. This defect in potassium excretion was not related to altered responsiveness of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis because plasma renin activity increased in a normal fashion after furosemide in both control and transplant subjects. Although the plasma aldosterone response to increases in plasma renin activity was sluggish in patients undergoing renal transplantation, normal increases in plasma aldosterone levels were achieved in both groups, suggesting that there may be an intrinsic defect in distal tubular potassium secretion that can be unmasked by furosemide.

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral torsemide in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

Torsemide is a diuretic that acts in the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle. Unlike furosemide, it undergoes substantial hepatic elimination and should not accumulate in patients with renal insufficiency. Therefore the pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral torsemide and its metabolites were investigated in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Two groups of 24 patients stratified by creatinine clearance (30 to 60 ml/min and < 30 ml/min) were studied in two separate randomized dose escalating crossover studies, one using intravenous torsemide and the other using oral torsemide. The pharmacokinetics of both intravenous and oral torsemide were linear over the dosage range studied. Absolute bioavailability was essentially 100%. Renal clearance was greatly diminished and correlated with renal function. Total plasma clearance and half-life were not related to renal function and were found to be similar to those of healthy subjects. The substantial nonrenal clearance of torsemide prevents accumulation in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

The pharmacodynamics of intravenous and oral torsemide in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

The pharmacodynamics of intravenous and oral torsemide were determined in two randomized cross-over clinical trials in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. There was no significant difference in the rate or magnitude of the diuretic response between oral and intravenous administration. As has been shown with other loop diuretics, patients with chronic renal insufficiency have a reduced diuretic response compared with healthy subjects. This diuretic resistance is primarily related to a diminished delivery of drug to the urinary site of action. The response of torsemide at the tubular level is not different from that seen in subjects with normal renal function. Metabolites of torsemide do not appear to contribute to the diuretic response. A dose of 50 to 100 mg dependent on renal function is required to obtain a maximal response. A ceiling dose of approximately 100 mg in patients with chronic renal insufficiency is therefore recommended.

Disposition and safety of omapatrilat in subjects with renal impairment.

BACKGROUND: Omapatrilat, a vasopeptidase inhibitor, preserves natriuretic peptides and inhibits the renin angiotensin aldosterone system by simultaneously inhibiting neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin-converting enzyme. METHODS: Oral omapatrilat, 10 mg/d, was administered for 8 to 9 days to three groups of eight subjects with varying degrees of renal function (CLCR values, normal > or = 80; mild to moderate impairment < 80 to > or = 30; severe impairment < 30 mL/min/1.73 mL2) and to six subjects undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Omapatrilat and its metabolites (phenylmercaptopropionic acid, S-methylomapatrilat, S-methylphenylmercaptopropionic acid, and cyclic S-oxide-omapatrilat) were quantified in plasma by a validated liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method. The model, Cmax or AUC(0-T) = intercept + slope x CLCR, was tested for a possible linear correlation between Cmax (peak plasma concentrations) or AUC(0-T) (area under plasma concentration versus time curve) and CLCR. RESULTS: For omapatrilat and its inactive metabolites, phenylmercaptopropionic acid, S-methylomapatrilat, and S-methylphenylmercaptopropionic acid, the median times to peak plasma concentrations (tmax) were 1.5 to 2, 2 to 3, 2.5 to 3.5, and 7 to 10 hours, respectively, and were independent of renal function. After Cmax attainment, plasma concentrations declined rapidly to about 10% of Cmax values. Cyclic S-oxide-omapatrilat, a potentially active metabolite, was undetectable at all sampling time points. Hemodialysis did not decrease circulating levels of omapatrilat. There was minimal accumulation of omapatrilat and phenylmercaptopropionic acid and moderate accumulation of the S-methylated metabolites. For omapatrilat and S-methylphenylmercaptopropionic acid, neither Cmax nor AUC(0-T) was CLCR dependent. However, AUC(0-T) for phenylmercaptopropionic acid and both the Cmax and AUC(0-T) for S-methylomapatrilat were CLCR dependent. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of omapatrilat, the only clinically relevant active compound studied, was independent of CLCR. For patients with reduced renal function, adjusting initial omapatrilat dose is not suggested. Hemodialysis did not significantly contribute to the clearance of omapatrilat. The long-term pharmacodynamic response to omapatrilat will dictate dose-adjustment needs.

The pharmacokinetics of irbesartan in renal failure and maintenance hemodialysis.

PURPOSE: An open-label, multiple-dose, parallel-group study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan in subjects with varying degrees of renal function. METHODS: Forty subjects were divided into four treatment groups on the basis of 24-hour creatinine clearance (CLCR): normal renal function (> 75 ml/min/1.73 m2), mild to moderate renal impairment (30 to 74 ml/min/1.73 m2), severe renal impairment (< 30 ml/min/1.73 m2), and maintenance hemodialysis. Subjects received 100 mg irbesartan daily for 8 days (or 300 mg daily for 9 days for the hemodialysis group). Serial blood and urine samples were collected for 24 hours after the first and last of eight successive daily doses. In addition, arterial and venous blood samples were collected during two hemodialysis sessions from subjects requiring maintenance hemodialysis. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant linear relationship between CLCR and maximum plasma concentrations, dose-adjusted area under the plasma concentration time curve values on days 1 or 8, or any other pharmacokinetic parameters among the renal function groups studied. There was no indication of drug accumulation with repetitive dosing. In the subjects receiving hemodialysis, arterial-venous concentration differences for irbesartan were negligible, suggesting that this compound is not cleared through hemodialysis. In addition, irbesartan was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Based on pharmacokinetic parameters, no starting dose adjustment is necessary in subjects with mild to severe renal impairment, inclusive of hemodialysis. Subjects with volume depletion may have an exaggerated response to an initial dose of irbesartan and, under such circumstances, volume depletion should be corrected or a lower starting dose of irbesartan should be considered.

Pharmacokinetics of gabapentin in subjects with various degrees of renal function.

The pharmacokinetics of oral gabapentin (400 mg) was studied in normal subjects and in subjects with various degrees of renal function. Sixty subjects participated in this three-center study. None of the subjects were receiving hemodialysis. Plasma and urine samples were collected for up to 264 hours after dosing, and concentrations of gabapentin were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Apparent oral plasma clearance (CL/F) and renal clearance (CLR) of gabapentin decreased and maximum plasma concentration, time to reach maximum concentration, and half-life values increased as renal function diminished. Gabapentin CL/F and CLR were linearly correlated with creatinine clearance. Total urinary recovery of unchanged drug was comparable in all subjects, indicating that the extent of drug absorption was unaffected by renal function. There was no evidence of gabapentin metabolism even in subjects with severe renal impairment. In summary, impaired renal function results in higher plasma gabapentin concentrations, longer elimination half-lives, and reduced CL/F and CLR values. Based on pharmacokinetic considerations, it appears that the dosing regimen of gabapentin in subjects with renal impairment may be adjusted on the basis of creatinine clearance.

Cyclosporine's effect on functional reserve in the renal allograft.

Thirteen renal allograft recipients (6 patients on cyclosporine/7 patients on azathioprine) participated in a short-term oral protein-loading study to determine the effect of cyclosporine on an allograft's functional reserve. The baseline glomerular filtration rate of the two groups were similar (52 +/- 18 ml/min/1.73 m2 for the azathioprine/conventional therapy (CT) group and 47 +/- 12 ml/min/1.73 m2 for the cyclosporine (CsA) group), as were the baseline effective renal plasma flows (218 +/- 78 ml/min/1.73 m2 and 222 +/- 75 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively). At 3 hr following the protein load there was an increase in GFR to 66 +/- 28 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the CT group. The GFR (39 +/- 8 ml/min/1.73 m2) of the CsA group at this time was unchanged. The responses in ERPF were similar. No significant difference was found between the two groups baseline RAA profiles (4.7 +/- 3.3 ng/ml/hr (CT) and 4.7 +/- 1.7 ng/ml/hr [CsA]), or those at the third hour (8.1 +/- 8.3 ng/ml/hr (CT) and 3.5 +/- 1.9 ng/ml/hr [CsA]). The data in this study indicate that CsA alters the renal allograft's response to a protein meal. This difference may be related to an altered vasodilatory response. This altered vascular reactivity may be mediated through renin activation and/or other hemodynamic regulators such as prostaglandins.

Diuretic combinations in refractory oedema states: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships.

Diuretic resistance is encountered in a number of disease states, such as chronic renal failure, nephrotic syndrome, congestive heart failure (CHF) and cirrhosis. Diuretic stratagems which produce sequential nephron segment blockade, and thus a synergistic diuretic response, are frequently necessary and are regularly employed in these conditions. Pharmacokinetic determinants of diuretic response, including dose administered, absolute bioavailability, and tubular transport capacity and transport rate, are reviewed here. Pharmacodynamic factors are perhaps more important to overall response, and often result in modification of the dose-response relationship; these are also reviewed here. Stratagems used to maximise the diuretic response to loop diuretics include correcting abnormal haemodynamic parameters, utilising larger doses or constant intravenous infusions, and using albumin as a vehicle to deliver the loop diuretic to the site of tubular secretion. If these measures fail, then diuretic combinations are useful. Perhaps the most effective is the combination of metolazone (a thiazide-type diuretic) and a loop diuretic. The rationale for and use of various diuretic combinations, with particular emphasis on the metolazone-loop diuretic combination, is reviewed here and applied to the major disease states associated with diuretic resistance.

Pharmacokinetics and blood pressure response of losartan in end-stage renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Losartan is a selective angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist currently employed in the management of essential hypertension. This compound is in common use in populations with renal failure and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of losartan in patients with ESRD in order to establish administration guidelines. METHODS: Patients were administered losartan 100 mg/day for 7 days, and after the seventh and final dose pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for both losartan and its active metabolite E-3174. During the study, the haemodialytic clearances of losartan and E-3174 were measured during a standard 4-hour dialysis session. Neurohumoral and biochemical changes were assessed during losartan administration. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of losartan and E-3174 in haemodialysis patients did not alter to a clinically significant level. Losartan administration was accompanied by a decline in plasma aldosterone level as well as by an increase in plasma renin activity. Losartan administration resulted in a decline in plasma uric acid level, despite the fact that the study participants had no residual renal function. Losartan and E-3174 were not dialysable. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of losartan and E-3174 are minimally altered in ESRD; thus, dosage adjustment is not required in the presence of advanced dialysis-dependent renal failure. In addition, postdialysis supplementation is not required for losartan because of the negligible dialysability of losartan and E-3174.

Comparison of the steady-state pharmacokinetics of fosinopril, lisinopril and enalapril in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

The phosphinyl ester prodrug fosinopril, a new angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, is fully hydrolysed after oral administration to the pharmacologically active diacid, fosinoprilat. This metabolite is cleared by both hepatic and renal routes, while most other ACE inhibitors are cleared exclusively by the kidney. In the present study, after administration of multiple fixed oral doses the accumulation of the active moieties of fosinopril, enalapril and lisinopril was compared in patients with renal insufficiency. 29 patients with creatinine clearances (CLCR) less than 30 ml/min received either fosinopril 10mg (n = 9), enalapril 2.5mg (n = 10) or lisinopril 5mg (n = 10) once daily for 10 days in a nonblind (open-label) parallel study. Pharmacokinetic parameters including area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC), peak serum concentration (Cmax) and time to peak concentration (tmax), as well as renal function, blood pressure, and plasma renin activity (PRA) and aldosterone levels, were determined on the first and last days of the study. The percentage (+/- SEM) increases in AUC from day 1 to day 10 for fosinoprilat, enalaprilat and lisinopril were 26.8 +/- 9.9 (nonsignificant), 76.6 +/- 16.6 (p less than 0.001) and 161.7 +/- 31.8% (p less than 0.001), respectively. These results indicate that there was significantly less accumulation of fosinoprilat, based on accumulation indices, relative to either enalaprilat (p less than 0.05) or lisinopril (p less than 0.001) during the study. The Cmax of fosinopril increased significantly less than that of lisinopril (21.1 vs 123.6%; p less than 0.01). Renal function was not altered in any group, and blood pressure changed modestly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dosage considerations with perindopril for systemic hypertension.

Perindopril erbumine is a once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor that effectively lowers systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Converted from the prodrug ester perindopril, the active diacid perindoprilat is distributed rapidly and extensively, primarily to tissues with high ACE activity. Its ability to lower BP is comparable to or better than that of other antihypertensive agents, both of its own class and other classes, and its trough-peak ratio is consistently between 75% and 100%, translating into 24 hours of true efficacy per dose. First-dose hypotension caused by an initial acute BP depression occurs less frequently with perindopril than with other ACE inhibitors, an advantage in volume-contracted patients and those whose BP is angiotensin II dependent, such as patients with congestive heart failure. A missed-dose study showed that most of the antihypertensive effect of perindopril remains for 24 to 48 hours after dosing, a characteristic that confers protection to patients who miss a dose. Perindopril improves the distensibility and compliance of large and small arteries, which are compromised in hypertension, and can effect vascular remodeling by a mechanism independent of BP lowering. The clinical implications of these effects are being investigated in large trials. Perindopril is well tolerated in the elderly, and combination therapy with a diuretic was shown to yield significant additional BP reduction. Perindoprilat is cleared renally; dosage should be adjusted in patients with renal impairment.

Nocturnal dosing of a novel delivery system of verapamil for systemic hypertension. Verapamil Study Group.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel delivery system of physiologic pattern release (PPR)-verapamil administered nocturnally to patients with stages I and II hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring, we performed a multicenter (17 centers), double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial with placebo and 120, 180, 360, and 540 mg of verapamil in 287 randomized patients. The delivery system has a delay in the release of verapamil for 4 to 6 hours, and then delivers the drug from an osmotic pumping system for approximately 12 hours. Patients were dosed at 10 P.M. The primary end point was change from baseline in trough diastolic BP assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring from 6 to 10 P.M. after 8 weeks of therapy, whereas secondary measures included changes from baseline in peak, early morning (6 to 10 A.M.) systolic and diastolic BP, trough clinic BP, and 24-hour average daytime (8 A.M. to 8 P.M.) and nighttime (8 P.M. to 8 A.M.) BP. The 180, 360, and 540 mg verapamil doses achieved statistically significant reductions in trough (6 to 10 P.M.) diastolic BP (-3.9 +/- 1.0, -7.8 +/- 1.2, and -10.6 +/- 1.1 mm Hg, respectively). Reductions in peak early morning (6 to 10 A.M.) diastolic BP were greater (-4.6 +/- 0.9, -13.3 +/- 1.2, and -19.0 +/- 1.2, for 180, 360, and 540 mg, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Fixed-dose combination antihypertensive drugs. Do they have a role in rational therapy?

Fixed-dose combination antihypertensive therapy has been available for over 25 years. During that time, considerable progress has been made in the development of physiologically appropriate combinations. The inherent advantage of fixed-dose combination therapy resides in its improving compliance because fewer pills are required. Alternatively, fixed-dose combination therapy limits dosage flexibility and dose titration of a single component of the combination to complement ongoing treatment of a concomitant non-hypertensive illness. The most frequently employed fixed-dose combinations include some form of a thiazide diuretic together with either a potassium-sparing diuretic, beta-blocker or an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. Newer combinations using a calcium channel blocker and beta-blocker, or a calcium channel blocker and an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor are either in development or soon to be available. Such developments, if combined with appropriate cost reductions will ultimately increase the popularity of these combination drug administration strategies.

Acute brain death alters left ventricular myocardial gene expression.

OBJECTIVES: The depressed myocardial function observed in brain dead organ donors has been attributed to massive sympathetic discharge and catecholamine cardiotoxicity. Because elevated catecholamines are associated with altered myocardial gene expression, we investigated whether acute brain death from increased intracranial pressure alters the expression of myocardial gene products important in contractility. METHODS: A balloon expansion model was used to increase intracranial pressure in rabbits (n = 22). At timed intervals after brain death, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, electrocardiograms, histologic myocardial injury, and systemic catecholamines were assessed. Messenger RNA levels encoding myofilaments, adrenergic receptors, sarcoplasmic reticulum proteins, transcription factors, and stress-induced programs were measured with blot hybridization of total left ventricular RNA. RESULTS: Increased intracranial pressure induced an immediate pressor response that temporally coincided with diffuse electrocardiographic ST segment changes. Systemic epinephrine and norepinephrine levels concurrently increased (5- to 8-fold within 1 minute), then fell below baseline within 2 hours, and remained depressed at 4 hours. By 1 hour, histologic injury was evident. Four hours after the induction of increased intracranial pressure, levels of messenger RNA-encoding skeletal and cardiac alpha-actins, egr-1, and heat shock protein 70 were significantly increased. Sham-operated animals did not exhibit these changes. CONCLUSIONS: Select changes in myocardial gene expression occur in response to increased intracranial pressure and implicate ventricular remodeling in the myocardial dysfunction associated with acute brain death.