Characterization and evaluation of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanoparticles containing 2-ethylhexyl-p-methoxycinnamate, octocrylene, and benzophenone-3 in anti-solar preparations.

Ultraviolet radiation can bring both harm and benefits to human health. Among those harms are erythemas, photosensitivity, photoaging, and the most worrying, skin cancer. Nanoencapsulation of sunscreen agents (SA) by using a biocompatible and biodegradable polymer such as poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) is advantageous as it increases the retention of UV absorbers in the skin, avoids systemic absorption, and consequently, improves water resistance and stability of the preparation. The aim of this work is to develop, characterize, and study the encapsulation of 3 different SA: 2-ethylhexyl-p-methoxycinnamate, benzophenone-3, and octocrylene in PCL nanoparticles (Nps). Nps were prepared by the solvent emulsification and evaporation method. The process yield was calculated, and the Nps were characterized in terms of size, polydispersity index (PI), morphology, zeta potential (ZP), encapsulation efficiency (EE) (%), and sunscreen agent content (SAC). The final formulations were submitted to the hen's egg test-chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM), chorioallantoic membrane-trypan blue staining (CAM-TBS), red blood cell (RBC), Draize tests, in vitro release, in vitro sun protection factor (SPF), UVA protection factor (PF-UVA), and photostability. All the Nps were in the nanometric scale. PI showed monodisperse systems. ZP became more negative as the Np were lyophilized and were added to the formulations. EE varied from 84 to 90%. The SAC went from 44 to 65 microg of sunscreen agents by milligram of Np. The process yield went from 60 to 76%. Nps were predominantly spherical and elliptical forms. The addition of Np diminished the release of the SA. The SPF increased with Np presence and helped to maintain the PF-UVA after irradiation. The HET-CAM assay evaluated the formulation as slightly irritant, CAM-TBS and RBC tests as non irritant, and the Draize test as moderately irritant.

Comparison of the different protocols of the Hen's Egg Test-Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) by evaluating the eye irritation potential of surfactants.

The Hen's Egg Test - Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) is a valid alternative method used to assess the potential for eye irritation from chemicals. This method is the only one that mimics the conjunctivae of the eye and aims to semi-quantitatively evaluate the irritant potential of a chemical on the chorioallantoic membrane surrounding the chicken embryo in egg by observing the irritation effects on the membrane immediately after the pure or diluted chemical is applied. The purpose of this study was to compare the different protocols of the HET-CAM, the French and German protocols, by evaluating the eye irritation potential of surfactants. The comparison led to the optimization of the French protocol, generating an adapted one, to reduce subjectivity in the test evaluation, ensuring more accurate results and greater quality control. The comparison showed that there are no significant differences between the results obtained in the French and German protocols. HET-CAM is known to overestimate the results and to be able to accurately identify non-irritant products and it is a great candidate to be part of a Bottom-up test strategy. It also can be used in a battery of tests to completely replace rabbits.

In vivo and in vitro evaluation of octyl methoxycinnamate liposomes.

UNLABELLED: Solar radiation causes damage to human skin, and photoprotection is the main way to prevent these harmful effects. The development of sunscreen formulations containing nanosystems is of great interest in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries because of the many potential benefits. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an octyl methoxycinnamate (OMC) liposomal nanosystem (liposome/OMC) to obtain a sunscreen formulation with improved safety and efficacy by retaining OMC for longer on the stratum corneum. METHODS: The liposome/OMC nanostructure obtained was tested for enzymatic hydrolysis with lipase from Rhizomucor miehei and biodistribution with liposomes labeled with technetium-99m. The liposome/OMC formulation was then incorporated in a gel formulation and tested for ocular irritation using the hen's egg test-chorio-allantoic membrane (HET-CAM) assay, in vitro and in vivo sun protection factor, in vitro release profile, skin biometrics, and in vivo tape stripping. RESULTS: The liposome/OMC nanosystem was not hydrolyzed from R. miehei by lipase. In the biodistribution assay, the liposome/OMC formulation labeled with technetium-99m had mainly deposited in the skin, while for OMC the main organ was the liver, showing that the liposome had higher affinity for the skin than OMC. The liposome/OMC formulation was classified as nonirritating in the HET-CAM test, indicating good histocompatibility. The formulation containing liposome/OMC had a higher in vivo solar photoprotection factor, but did not show increased water resistance. Inclusion in liposomes was able to slow down the release of OMC from the formulation, with a lower steady-state flux (3.9 ± 0.33 µg/cm(2)/hour) compared with the conventional formulation (6.3 ± 1.21 µg/cm(2)/hour). The stripping method showed increased uptake of OMC in the stratum corneum, giving an amount of 22.64 ± 7.55 µg/cm(2) of OMC, which was higher than the amount found for the conventional formulation (14.57 ± 2.30 µg/cm(2)). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that liposomes are superior carriers for OMC, and confer greater safety and efficacy to sunscreen formulations.

Ensaios da membrana cório-alantoide (HET-CAM e CAM-TBS): alternativas para a avaliação toxicológica de produtos com baixo potencial de irritação ocular / Chorioallantoic membrane assays (HET-CAM and CAM-TBS): alternative tests for performing toxicological evaluation of productswith low potential for ocular irritation

O presente estudo analisou o potencial preditivo de dois modelos que utilizam a membrana cório-alantoidede ovo embrionado de galinha (i.e. o HET-CAM e sua versão modificada, o CAM-TBS, que quantifica os danos à membrana por meio da absorção do corante azul trypan), como estratégia para a implementação de alternativas aos testes in vivo de avaliação de toxicidade ocular. Vinte colírios foram avaliados in vivo por meio do teste de irritação ocular de Draize e por ensaios in vitro utilizando-se testes HET-CAM eCAM-TBS. Todos os colírios foram classificados como não irritantes pelo teste in vivo. No ensaio HETCAM, foram observados 4 resultados falso-positivos, e o teste apresentou especificidade e precisão de 80%. O CAM-TBS demonstrou melhor desempenho, pois a especificidade e a precisão foram de 100%. O ponto de corte adotado (cut-off = 0,9) no HET-CAM é discutido, uma vez que os resultados falso-positivos observados no presente estudo poderiam ter sido contornados caso a categoria “não irritante” englobasse produtos “não irritantes” e “irritantes leves”, à semelhança do critério preconizado para o CAM-TBS (cutoff= 7,0).

Influência do erro de micropipetas na dosagem espectrofotométrica do ensaio de endotoxina bacteriana (LAL cromogênico) aplicável a produtos sujeitos à Vigilância Sanitária / Effect of micropipette inaccuracy on performance of spectrophotometric assay for bacteria endotoxin dosage (chromogenic LAL) employed in products subjected to sanitary surveillance

Segundo a norma ISO 17.025, os instrumentos usados em experimento devem ser calibrados. No caso de micropipetas não há limite máximo de erro definido, sendo difícil estipular até que ponto uma micropipeta pode continuar a ser usada. O objetivo do trabalho foi o de determinar a porcentagem de erro no volume da micropipeta que não interfira nos resultados das diferentes etapas do ensaio toxicológico Lisado de Amebócitos de Limulus (LAL). Os percentuais de erro foram obtidos do levantamento de 44 certificados de micropipetas. Foram utilizados uma pipeta monocanal calibrada, de volume variável e kit LAL Cromogênio QCL-1000 (Lonza). A curva de endotoxina foi construída com as concentrações de 0,1; 0,25; 0,5 e 1 UE/mL. Os percentuais de erro de ±2%, ±4% e±10% foram comparados com a concentração de referência (0,5 UE/mL), e analisados pelo Student t-test (p<0,05). A análise estatística mostrou que, para a endotoxina padrão e para o substrato do LAL, erro acima de 2% interferenos resultados, cuja correção deve ser feita pelo ajuste do volume na pipeta. Nenhum erro testado causou interferência estatisticamente significativa na reação da cor do substrato. Micropipetas com erro superior a ±2% devem ser corrigidas.