Incidence of Nerve Transection in Upper Extremity Gunshot Wounds.

INTRODUCTION: Reported rates of nerve injury after upper extremity (UE) gunshot wound (GSW) range from 15% to 45%. Many surgeons prefer initial observation; however, this may delay diagnosis of neurotmesis and surgical treatment. We aimed to determine the incidence of nerve transection in adults after upper extremity GSWs. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review approved by the institutional review board. Operative records of five orthopedic surgeons between 2014 to 2019 were filtered for ICD-10 and CPT codes cross-referenced to include both UE GSW assault and nerve injuries. Inclusion criteria consisted of age greater than 18 at time of injury, neurologic deficit on presentation, and surgical exploration nerve procedure. Records were reviewed for degree of nerve injury, procedure performed, and complications. Postoperative outcomes included nerve recovery, complications, and reoperation rate. RESULTS: Of the 17 patients that fit the inclusion criteria, the incidence of complete nerve transection was 64.7% and the incidence of a complete or partial nerve transection was 70.6%. The most common location of GSWs was the hand (70.5%). Average time from date of injury to surgery was 26.1 days. There were 14 identifiable nerve injuries-complete transection in 11, partial transection in one, and contusion in two patients. Of patients with nerve transection, 72.7% sustained a fracture. Postoperative complications included stiffness, chronic pain, and wound infection. The re-operation rate was 29.4%. The average postoperative follow-up was 4.4 months. There was longer follow-up among nerve transection patients (5.3 months) compared to neuropraxia patients (2.68 months). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a higher incidence of nerve transection in upper extremity GSW patients than previously reported. Predictors of nerve transection are GSWs to the hand and associated fracture.

Impact of a Social Worker in a Glaucoma Eye Care Service: A Prospective Study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a six-month social worker intervention for participants with a glaucoma-related diagnosis in an urban ophthalmic setting (N = 40). The social worker assessed common barriers to eye care, helping participants with transportation, access to low-vision resources, and supportive counseling. The Distress Thermometer, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and a satisfaction survey were administered to determine the effect of the social worker intervention and participants' overall impressions of the social worker. The most common barrier to eye care was emotional distress (77.5 percent). There was a significant decrease in the number of participants with symptoms of major and moderate depression. Fourteen participants experienced a clinically relevant decrease in depression, 37 participants felt that the social worker's support addressed their issues, and 29 participants thought it helped them in managing their glaucoma. This study provides evidence that a social work intervention may improve care coordination and management of individuals afflicted with vision impairment due to glaucoma and other ocular diseases.

Collagen-chitosan nerve guides for peripheral nerve repair: a histomorphometric study.

Currently a wide variety of polymer materials are being applied to fabricate nerve guide tubes to repair injured peripheral nerves. In this study we have examined whether collagen-chitosan nerve guides promotes nerve repair compared to chitosan nerve guides using histological analysis. Results indicates that the enclosed structure of the nerve guide both promotes and supports axonal sprouting. Collagen-chitosan guides improved axonal maturation measured by a significant increase in axon diameter and axon area. These findings indicate that the collagen-chitosan nerve guides can be applied to repair severed peripheral nerve ends.

Outcomes of Shoulder Arthroplasty Performed for Postinfectious Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes, infection rate, and complications associated with shoulder arthroplasty for sequelae of prior septic arthritis. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 17 patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty for sequelae of septic arthritis. Patients were analyzed for patient-reported outcomes, complications, and reoperations. RESULTS: The 17 patients in this cohort were an average age of 65.4 ± 12.2 years old, were 58.8% male, and had an average body mass index of 27.9 ± 4.1 kg/m2. These patients underwent 14 reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSAs; 11 after antibiotic spacer placement), one anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty after antibiotic spacer placement, and two hemiarthroplasties (both after antibiotic spacer placement). Two patients underwent reoperation (dislocated RSAs). There were four complications (23.5%): two RSA dislocations, one acromial stress fracture, and one atraumatic rotator cuff tear after hemiarthroplasty. There were no cases of postoperative wound complications or infection. At an average of 4.1 ± 1.8 years of follow-up for all 17 of 17 cases, the average visual analogue scale pain score was 4.6 ± 2.3, average Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Score was 59.3 ± 23.7, average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score was 57.6 ± 15.5, and average Simple Shoulder Test was 6.9 ± 2.6 based on "yes" responses. CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder arthroplasty after septic arthritis had inconsistent functional outcomes and high complication rates but no reinfection.

Comparing Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Either Primary or Revision Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcome metrics in patients undergoing primary and revision anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ACDF is associated with significant improvements in HRQOL outcome metrics. However, 2.9% of patients per year will develop symptomatic adjacent segment disease and there is a paucity of literature on HRQOL outcomes after revision ACDF. METHODS: Patients were identified who underwent either a primary or revision ACDF, and who had both preoperative and a minimum of 1-year postoperative HRQOL outcome data. Pre- and postoperative Short Form 12 Physical Component Score (SF12 PCS), Short Form 12 Mental Component Score (SF12 MCS) Visual Analog Scale for neck pain (VAS-Neck), VAS-Arm, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores were compared. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients (299 primary, 61 revision) were identified. Significant improvement in SF12 PCS, NDI, VAS-Neck, and VAS-Arm was seen in both groups; however, only a significant improvement in SF12 MCS was seen in the primary group. When comparing the results of a primary versus a revision surgery, the SF12 PCS score was the only outcome with a significantly different net improvement in the primary group (7.23 ±â€Š9.72) compared to the revision group (2.9 ±â€Š11.07; P = 0.006) despite similar baseline SF12 PCS scores. The improvement in each of the other reported HRQOL outcomes did not significantly vary between surgical groups. CONCLUSION: A revision ACDF for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy leads to a significant improvement in the HRQOL outcome, and with the exception of the SF12 PCS, these results are similar to those of patients undergoing a primary ACDF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.