Ankaferd blood stopper as a new strategy to avoid early complications after transradial procedures: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: We planned a three arm randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new blood stopper, Ankaferd blood stopper (ABS) along with short-time compression, compared to either short-time compression with conventional sterile gauzes (CSG) or with a TR band after transradial (TRA) procedures. METHODS: The Ankaferd blood stopper as a new strategy to avoid early complications. After transradial procedures (ABS transradial) trial is designed in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled fashion and registered with http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02982733). Six hundred and thirty patients were randomized into three arms in a 1:1:1 fashion corresponding to three different strategies of patent hemostasis techniques after diagnostic or interventional catheterization. RESULTS: One (0.49%) patient in the CSG group and one patient (0.48%) in the TR Band group developed RAO at the end of the hemostasis, compared with 0 (0%) in the ABS group. At 30 days follow-up none of the groups had any patients with RAO. As a secondary end-points the difference was not statistically significant regarding hematoma among the three groups (P = 0.70). Bleeding during deflation of the TR Band or removal of the elastic bandage occurred in 55 patients (26.96%) in the CSG group and in 56 (27.31%) patients in the TR Band group compared to 19 patients (9.40%) in the ABS group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Ankaferd blood stopper is a promising device for use in patent hemostasis, with no evidence on RAO at short-term or long term and with reduced risk of re-bleeding at the end of hemostasis.

Comparison of Effects of Low- versus High-Dose Heparin on Access-Site Complications during Transradial Coronary Angiography: A Double-Blind Randomized Study.

OBJECTIVES: Although heparin is highly effective in reducing the rate of radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization, the optimal heparin dose is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different heparin doses during transradial coronary angiography. METHODS: 490 consecutive patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography were prospectively enrolled into this double-blind randomized trial. A total of 202 patients enrolled in the low-dose (LD; 2,500 U of heparin) group and 202 patients enrolled in the high-dose (HD; 5,000 U of heparin) group were included in the final analysis. The primary endpoint of the study was radial artery occlusion. Bleeding and hematomas were the secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: At day 7, radial artery occlusion occurred in 5.9% of the patients in the LD group and in 5.4% of the patients in the HD group (p = 0.83). Bleeding during deflation of the transradial band occurred in 6.4% of the patients in the LD group and in 18.3% of the patients in the HD group; the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Higher-dose heparin was found to be an independent predictor of bleeding (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: A lower dose of heparin (i.e. 2,500 U) decreases bleeding during transradial band deflation without an increase in radial artery occlusion.

Bypass grafting versus percutaneous intervention in multivessel coronary disease: the current state.

Whether stenting or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the best revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel disease has been a heavily debated controversy. The trials comparing the two methods were unfortunately underpowered for mortality. Moreover, results of clinical trials appeared to contradict with each other. Because CABG is unequivocally a more cumbersome method, stenting became commonly preferred in the absence of evidence for mortality difference. Meta-analysis is a powerful tool, especially when several high-quality randomized trials are available on the same issue. In these instances, meta-analyses can overcome the power limitation of the individual trials. Our recent meta-analysis reveals that, as compared to stenting, CABG leads to unequivocal reductions in mortality and myocardial infarctions in patients with multivessel disease. These benefits are seen regardless of whether patients are diabetic or not and also do not depend on whether bare-metal or drug-eluting stents are used.

Echocardiography-guided or "sided" pericardiocentesis.

Echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis is the first choice method for relieving cardiac tamponade, but the exact role of the echocardiography at the moment of the puncture is still controversial. In this report, detailed echocardiographic evaluation was performed in 21 consecutive patients with cardiac tamponade just before the pericardiocentesis. Appropriate needle position was determined according to the probe position using imaginary x, y, and z axes. Pericardiocentesis was performed successfully using this technique without simultaneous echocardiography and no complications were observed. We concluded that bedside echocardiography with detailed evaluation of the puncture site and angle is enough for pericardiocentesis instead of real time guiding.

Carotid artery stenting without embolic protection: A randomized multicenter trial (the CASWEP trial).

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) with a carotid protection device (CPD) has become the standard practice in patients with severe carotid stenosis and high surgical risk. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of CPDs are still controversial issues. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of the CAS without CPD with CAS combined with CPD. METHODS: This is a multicenter randomized prospective study registered with http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02781181). After the exclusion, 279 patients were enrolled (139 patients in the CAS with CPD group and 140 patients in the CAS without CPD group). The primary outcome was a combination of peri-procedural in-hospital transient ischemic attack (TIA), ipsilateral stroke, or death. The secondary outcome was new ischemic brain lesions on post-procedural diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). RESULTS: Two patients died in CAS without CPD group, one patient died in CAS with CPD group. TIA was only seen in patients who underwent CAS under protection (n = 5). The combined primary outcome of TIA, ipsilateral stroke, and death rate was not different between groups (5.7% vs. 2.8%; p = 0.254). New defects were noted on the post-procedural DW-MRI in 28% of patients in the CPD group and 27% of patients in the no CPD group (p = 0.881). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that CAS without CPD is not associated with higher rates of peri-procedural TIA, stroke, and death or new ischemic brain lesions on post-procedural DW-MRI compared to CAS with CPD in selected symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with significant carotid artery stenosis provided that there is no visible thrombus.

Effect of antihypertensive therapy on incident stroke in cohorts with prehypertensive blood pressure levels: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Compared with normotensive individuals, there is a higher incidence of stroke in patients with hypertensive, as well as prehypertensive, blood pressure levels (ie, 120-139/80-89 mm Hg). Although several studies have shown that blood pressure reduction in hypertensive patients reduces the incidence of cardiovascular events, including stroke, it is still unknown whether treatment of prehypertensive blood pressure levels has a similar effect. We sought to determine whether reduction in blood pressure in the prehypertensive range reduces the incidence of stroke by performing a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing an antihypertensive drug against placebo in cohorts with prehypertensive baseline blood pressure levels. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials performed with the 95 different antihypertensive agents available in the market were identified using MEDLINE, returning a total of 2852 results. Exclusion criteria included: average blood pressure of ≥ 140/90 mm Hg at baseline, crossover studies, and lack of a control group receiving placebo. RESULTS: A total of 16 trials involving 70 664 patients were included. Patients randomized to the active treatment arm had a statistically significant 22% reduction in the risk of stroke compared with placebo, with little heterogeneity among the trials (I(2), 18.0%; RR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.71-0.86]; P<0.000001). To prevent 1 stroke, 169 patients had to be treated with a blood-pressure-lowering medication for an average of 4.3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of stroke is significantly reduced with antihypertensive therapy in cohorts with prehypertensive blood pressure levels. These findings can have important clinical implications.

Effect of QRS morphology on clinical event reduction with cardiac resynchronization therapy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in reducing clinical events in systolic heart failure patients with a wide QRS. Previous retrospective studies suggest only patients with QRS prolongation due to a left bundle-branch block (LBBB) benefit from CRT. Our objective was to examine this by performing a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials of CRT. METHODS: Systematic searches of MEDLINE and the Food and Drug Administration official website were conducted for randomized controlled CRT trials. Trials reporting adverse clinical events (eg, all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalizations) according to QRS morphology were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Four randomized trials totaling 5,356 patients met the inclusion criteria. In patients with LBBB at baseline, there was a highly significant reduction in composite adverse clinical events with CRT (RR = 0.64 [95% CI (0.52-0.77)], P = .00001). However no such benefit was observed for patients with non-LBBB conduction abnormalities (RR = 0.97 [95% CI (0.82-1.15)], P = .75). When examined separately, there was no benefit in patients with right-bundle branch block (RR = 0.91 [95% CI (0.69-1.20)], P = .49) or non-specific intraventricular conduction delay (RR = 1.19 [95% CI (0.87-1.63)], P = .28). There was no heterogeneity among the clinical trials with regards to the lack of benefit in non-LBBB patients (I(2) = 0%). When directly compared, the difference in effect of CRT between LBBB versus non-LBBB patients was highly statistically significant (P = .0001 by heterogeneity analysis). CONCLUSIONS: While CRT was very effective in reducing clinical events in patients with LBBB, it did not reduce such events in patients with wide QRS due to other conduction abnormalities.

Risk of cancer with angiotensin-receptor blockers increases with increasing cumulative exposure: Meta-regression analysis of randomized trials.

Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) are a class of drugs approved for the treatment of several common conditions, such as hypertension and heart failure. Recently, regulatory agencies have started to identify possibly carcinogenic nitrosamines and azido compounds in a multitude of formulations of several ARBs, resulting in progressive recalls. Furthermore, data from several randomized controlled trials suggested that there is also a clinically increased risk of cancer and specifically lung cancer with ARBs; whereas other trials suggested no increased risk. The purpose of this analysis was to provide additional insight into the ARB-cancer link by examining whether there is a relationship between degree of cumulative exposure to ARBs and risk of cancer in randomized trials. Trial-level data from ARB Trialists Collaboration including 15 randomized controlled trials was extracted and entered into meta-regression analyses. The two co-primary outcomes were the relationship between cumulative exposure to ARBs and risk of all cancers combined and the relationship between cumulative exposure and risk of lung cancer. A total of 74,021 patients were randomized to an ARB resulting in a total cumulative exposure of 172,389 person-years of exposure to daily high dose (or equivalent). 61,197 patients were randomized to control. There was a highly significant correlation between the degree of cumulative exposure to ARBs and risk of all cancers combined (slope = 0.07 [95% CI 0.03 to 0.11], p<0.001), and also lung cancer (slope = 0.16 [95% CI 0.05 to 0.27], p = 0.003). Accordingly, in trials where the cumulative exposure was greater than 3 years of exposure to daily high dose, there was a statistically significant increase in risk of all cancers combined (I2 = 31.4%, RR 1.11 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.19], p = 0.006). There was a statistically significant increase in risk of lung cancers in trials where the cumulative exposure was greater than 2.5 years (I2 = 0%, RR 1.21 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.44], p = 0.03). In trials with lower cumulative exposure to ARBs, there was no increased risk of all cancers combined or lung cancer. Cumulative exposure-risk relationship with ARBs was independent of background angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment or the type of control (i.e. placebo or non-placebo control). Since this is a trial-level analysis. the effects of patient characteristics such as age and smoking status could not be examined due to lack of patient-level data. In conclusion, this analysis, for the first time, reveals that risk of cancer with ARBs (and specifically lung cancer) increases with increasing cumulative exposure to these drugs. The excess risk of cancer with long-term ARB use has public health implications.

Angiotensin-receptor blockade and risk of cancer: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) are a widely used drug class approved for treatment of hypertension, heart failure, diabetic nephropathy, and, recently, for cardiovascular risk reduction. Experimental studies implicate the renin-angiotensin system, particularly angiotensin II type-1 and type-2 receptors, in the regulation of cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and tumour progression. We assessed whether ARBs affect cancer occurrence with a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of these drugs. METHODS: We searched Medline, Scopus (including Embase), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the US Food and Drug Administration website for studies published before November, 2009, that included any of the seven currently available ARBs. Randomised controlled trials with an ARB given in at least one group, with a follow-up of at least 1 year, and that enrolled at least 100 patients were included. New-cancer data were available for 61,590 patients from five trials. Data on common types of solid organ cancers were available for 68,402 patients from five trials, and data on cancer deaths were available for 93,515 patients from eight trials. FINDINGS: Telmisartan was the study drug in 30,014 (85.7%) patients who received ARBs as part of the trials with new cancer data. Patients randomly assigned to receive ARBs had a significantly increased risk of new cancer occurrence compared with patients in control groups (7.2%vs 6.0%, risk ratio [RR] 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15; p=0.016). When analysis was limited to trials where cancer was a prespecified endpoint, the RR was 1.11 (95% CI 1.04-1.18, p=0.001). Among specific solid organ cancers examined, only new lung-cancer occurrence was significantly higher in patients randomly assigned to receive ARBs than in those assigned to receive control (0.9%vs 0.7%, RR 1.25, 1.05-1.49; p=0.01). No statistically significant difference in cancer deaths was observed (1.8%vs 1.6%, RR 1.07, 0.97-1.18; p=0.183). INTERPRETATION: This meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials suggests that ARBs are associated with a modestly increased risk of new cancer diagnosis. Given the limited data, it is not possible to draw conclusions about the exact risk of cancer associated with each particular drug. These findings warrant further investigation.

Effect of ACAT inhibition on the progression of coronary atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: The enzyme acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) esterifies cholesterol in a variety of tissues. In some animal models, ACAT inhibitors have antiatherosclerotic effects. METHODS: We performed intravascular ultrasonography in 408 patients with angiographically documented coronary disease. All patients received usual care for secondary prevention, including statins, if indicated. Patients were randomly assigned to receive the ACAT inhibitor pactimibe (100 mg per day) or matching placebo. Ultrasonography was repeated after 18 months to measure the progression of atherosclerosis. RESULTS: The primary efficacy variable analyzing the progression of atherosclerosis--the change in percent atheroma volume--was similar in the pactimibe and placebo groups (0.69 percent and 0.59 percent, respectively; P=0.77). However, both secondary efficacy variables assessed by means of intravascular ultrasonography showed unfavorable effects of pactimibe treatment. As compared with baseline values, the normalized total atheroma volume showed significant regression in the placebo group (-5.6 mm3, P=0.001) but not in the pactimibe group (-1.3 mm3, P=0.39; P=0.03 for the comparison between groups). The atheroma volume in the most diseased 10-mm subsegment regressed by 3.2 mm3 in the placebo group, as compared with a decrease of 1.3 mm3 in the pactimibe group (P=0.01). The combined incidence of adverse cardiovascular outcomes was similar in the two groups (P=0.53). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with coronary disease, treatment with an ACAT inhibitor did not improve the primary efficacy variable (percent atheroma volume) and adversely affected two major secondary efficacy measures assessed by intravascular ultrasonography. ACAT inhibition is not an effective strategy for limiting atherosclerosis and may promote atherogenesis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00268515.).

Application of intravascular ultrasound in anti-atherosclerotic drug development.

The background use of a number of established therapies presents a key challenge for the development of novel anti-atherosclerotic agents: how to predict potential efficacy before the completion of long-term trials with endpoints such as mortality. This challenge has stimulated the search to develop intermediate measures of efficacy. Recent advances now allow intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to provide an accurate assessment of atheroma accumulation within the arterial wall. Here we describe how IVUS can be applied to the serial assessment of atheroma burden in response to treatment with a range of anti-atherosclerotic strategies, which has resulted in its emergence as a key technology in the evaluation and approval of novel drugs.

Candidate mechanisms for regression of coronary atherosclerosis with high-dose statins: insight from intravascular ultrasonography trials.

Animal models and serial imaging studies in humans have shown that atherosclerosis is a potentially reversible disease. Several drug classes have been tested to determine whether they can promote reversal of atherosclerosis. Of these, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) have been consistently proven to have anti-atherosclerotic effects in large-scale clinical trials. In this article, we review the lipid- and non-lipid-based mechanisms of statin-induced disease regression using the information provided by the recent intravascular ultrasonography trials. We conclude that, despite several potential mechanisms, reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol appears to be the dominant mechanism responsible for regression of atherosclerosis.

Beta-blockers and progression of coronary atherosclerosis: pooled analysis of 4 intravascular ultrasonography trials.

BACKGROUND: In patients with myocardial infarction, beta-adrenergic blockers reduce recurrent myocardial infarction and total mortality rates. However, whether a direct influence of beta-blockers on coronary atherosclerosis contributes to reduced recurrent myocardial infarction and total mortality rates is not known. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether beta-blocker therapy is associated with reduced atheroma progression in adults with known coronary artery disease. DESIGN: Post hoc, pooled analysis of individual patient data from 4 intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) trials. SETTING: Four IVUS trials conducted in the United States, Europe, and Australia. PATIENTS: 1515 patients with coronary artery disease. INTERVENTION: The original trials used 3 different statins, a calcium-channel blocker, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, or an acyl coenzyme A-cholesterol acyltransferase inhibitor. MEASUREMENTS: Changes in atheroma volume, as determined by IVUS after adjustment for possible confounders by using linear mixed-effects models, were compared in patients who did and did not receive concomitant beta-blocker treatment. RESULTS: Patients who received beta-blockers (n = 1154) were more likely to have histories of myocardial infarction, angina, and hypertension than were patients who did not receive beta-blockers (n = 361). The estimated annual change in atheroma volume was statistically significantly less in patients who received beta-blockers. This was true for univariate and multivariable analyses that controlled for history of myocardial infarction, angina, and hypertension (mean [+/-SE] atheroma volume, -2.4 +/- 0.5 mm3/y in treated patients vs. -0.4 +/- 0.8 mm3/y in untreated patients; P = 0.034). Accordingly, atheroma volume statistically significantly decreased at follow-up IVUS in patients who received beta-blockers (P < 0.001) and did not change in patients who did not receive beta-blockers (P = 0.86). Additional adjustments for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, concomitant medications, and clinical trial did not change the results. LIMITATIONS: Patients were not randomly assigned to beta-blocker therapy, and interventions other than beta-blocker therapy could have influenced the changes in atheroma volume. Whether progression rate of atherosclerosis as detected by IVUS predicts cardiovascular outcomes is unknown. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis demonstrates that beta-blockers can slow progression of coronary atherosclerosis. The findings provide additional support for the current clinical guidelines advocating long-term use of beta-blockers to treat most forms of coronary artery disease.

Determinants of arterial wall remodeling during lipid-lowering therapy: serial intravascular ultrasound observations from the Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering Therapy (REVERSAL) trial.

BACKGROUND: Coronary plaque progression and instability are associated with expansive remodeling of the arterial wall. However, the remodeling response during plaque-stabilizing therapy and its relationship to markers of lipid metabolism and inflammation are incompletely understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: Serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) data from the Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering Therapy (REVERSAL) trial were obtained during 18 months of intensive versus moderate lipid-lowering therapy. In a subgroup of 210 patients, focal coronary lesions with mild luminal narrowing were identified. Lumen area, external elastic membrane (EEM) area, and plaque area were determined at the lesion and proximal reference sites at baseline and during follow-up. The remodeling ratio (RR) was calculated by dividing the lesion EEM area by the reference EEM area. The relationship between the change in remodeling, change in plaque area, lipid profile, and inflammatory markers was examined. At the lesion site, a progression in plaque area (8.9+/-25.7%) and a decrease in the RR (-3.0+/-11.2%) occurred during follow-up. In multivariable analyses, the percentage change in plaque area (P<0.0001), baseline RR (P<0.0001), baseline lesion lumen area (0.019), logarithmic value of the change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (P=0.027), and hypertension at baseline (P=0.014) showed a significant, direct relation with the RR at follow-up. Lesion location in the right coronary artery (P=0.006), percentage change in triglyceride levels (P=0.049), and age (P=0.037) demonstrated a significant, inverse relation with the RR at follow-up. Changes in LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and treatment group demonstrated no significant associations. CONCLUSIONS: Constrictive remodeling of the arterial wall was observed during plaque-stabilizing therapy with statin medications and appears related to their antiinflammatory effects.

Comparison of coronary atherosclerotic volume in patients with glomerular filtration rates < or = 60 versus > 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2): a meta-analysis of intravascular ultrasound studies.

The relation between glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and the extent and progression of coronary atherosclerosis in 989 subjects with coronary artery disease was investigated. Despite being older, more likely to be women, and having a history of hypertension, diabetes, and bypass surgery, total atheroma volume and percent atheroma volume in subjects with a low GFR did not differ from subjects with a GFR >60 ml/kg/min. Similarly, there was no difference in progression rates of total atheroma volume and percent atheroma volume in patients with GFRs lower and higher than 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in response to a high rate of use of established preventive therapies. In conclusion, findings suggest that the increased incidence of clinical events in patients with impaired renal function may result from factors other than atherosclerotic burden.

Statins, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and regression of coronary atherosclerosis.

CONTEXT: Statins reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and slow progression of coronary atherosclerosis. However, no data exist describing the relationship between statin-induced changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and disease progression. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between changes in LDL-C and HDL-C levels and atheroma burden. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Post-hoc analysis combining raw data from 4 prospective randomized trials (performed in the United States, North America, Europe, and Australia between 1999 and 2005), in which 1455 patients with angiographic coronary disease underwent serial intravascular ultrasonography while receiving statin treatment for 18 months or for 24 months. Ultrasound analysis was performed in the same core laboratory for all of the studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relationship between changes in lipoprotein levels and coronary artery atheroma volume. RESULTS: During statin therapy, mean (SD) LDL-C levels were reduced from 124.0 (38.3) mg/dL (3.2 [0.99] mmol/L) to 87.5 (28.8) mg/dL (2.3 [0.75] mmol/L) (a 23.5% decrease; P<.001), and HDL-C levels increased from 42.5 (11.0) mg/dL (1.1 [0.28] mmol/L) to 45.1 (11.4) mg/dL (1.2 [0.29] mmol/L) (a 7.5% increase; P<.001). The ratio of LDL-C to HDL-C was reduced from a mean (SD) of 3.0 (1.1) to 2.1 (0.9) (a 26.7% decrease; P<.001). These changes were accompanied by a mean (SD) increase in percent atheroma volume from 39.7% (9.8%) to 40.1% (9.7%) (a 0.5% [3.9%] increase; P = .001) and a mean (SD) decrease in total atheroma volume of 2.4 (23.6) mm3 (P<.001). In univariate analysis, mean levels and treatment-mediated changes in LDL-C, total cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and ratio of apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein A-I were significantly correlated with the rate of atherosclerotic progression, whereas treatment-mediated changes in HDL-C were inversely correlated with atheroma progression. In multivariate analysis, mean levels of LDL-C (beta coefficient, 0.11 [95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.15]) and increases in HDL-C (beta coefficient, -0.26 [95% confidence interval, -0.41 to -0.10]) remained independent predictors of atheroma regression. Substantial atheroma regression (> or =5% reduction in atheroma volume) was observed in patients with levels of LDL-C less than the mean (87.5 mg/dL) during treatment and percentage increases of HDL-C greater than the mean (7.5%; P<.001). No significant differences were found with regard to clinical events. CONCLUSIONS: Statin therapy is associated with regression of coronary atherosclerosis when LDL-C is substantially reduced and HDL-C is increased by more than 7.5%. These findings suggest that statin benefits are derived from both reductions in atherogenic lipoprotein levels and increases in HDL-C, although it remains to be determined whether the atherosclerotic regression associated with these changes in lipid levels will translate to meaningful reductions in clinical events and improved clinical outcomes.